Brooklyn Lager | Brooklyn Brewery

Your Rating: None
Want it   Got it 
Brooklyn LagerBrooklyn Lager
BA SCORE
3.72/5
Good
3,749 Ratings
Brooklyn LagerBrooklyn Lager
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Brooklyn Brewery
New York, United States
brooklynbrewery.com

Style: American Amber / Red Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.20%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
In the late 1800’s Brooklyn was one of the largest brewing centers in the country, home to more than 45 breweries. Lager beer in the “Vienna” style was one of the local favorites. Brooklyn Lager is amber-gold in color and displays a firm malt center supported by a refreshing bitterness and floral hop aroma. Caramel malts show in the finish. The aromatic qualities of the beer are enhanced by “dry-hopping”, the centuries-old practice of steeping the beer with fresh hops as it undergoes a long, cold maturation. The result is a wonderfully flavorful beer, smooth, refreshing and very versatile with food. Dry-hopping is largely a British technique, which we’ve used in a Viennese-style beer to create an American original.

Added by UncleJimbo on 02-11-1998

BEER STATS
Ranking:
#29,921
Reviews:
1,261
Ratings:
3,749
pDev:
12.63%
Bros Score:
3.51
 
 
Wants:
128
Gots:
934
Trade:
1
HISTOGRAM
 
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Ratings: 3,749 |  Reviews: 1,261
Photo of chaduvel
3.41/5  rDev -8.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Another good beer in a can tastee. Pours darker than most "pale lagers" that I've had. Not much smell, some malts, a little hops. Has a very nice malty flavor and a hop bite. No fillers or adjuncts in there what so ever. Smooth taste and much better than any macro lager out there. Very nice.

 292 characters

Photo of yen157
3.23/5  rDev -13.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Amber body continually pierced by light carbonation. Fine ad rocky white head topped it all off for a little while before the mass melted into a thin layer of sticky fluff. This is a very easy drinking and uncomplicated beer. Lightly hopped and modest malt, this beer has always reminded me of a good version of Yuengling Lager. Strange metallic flavors build on the finish the more you drink. I hope this is never the first Brooklyn beer that anyone tries. It’s not bad, but when compared to their other brews it is nothing great.

 532 characters

Photo of 86MonteSS
4.26/5  rDev +14.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

I don't know how much the order of beers had determines how tastey they all are, but this was the last I tried tonight and boy was it good. Usually the last beer I have tastes the worst because I fail to adequately cleanse my palate, but tonight was an exception. I'm tasting a remarkable hop content for a lager, almost enough to make it a pale ale. In fact, that would make sense since it has a bold amber coloration. A notably fruity nose makes Brooklyn Lager especially unique. Tastes pretty damn good, will probably buy again. This and that, bla bla bla.

 559 characters

Photo of brewdlyhooked13
4.49/5  rDev +20.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Appearance - pours out with a one-finger head and lots of foam. Amber-orange color with lots of bubbles and some decent lacing on the far side of the glass.

Very nice malt and floral nose, you should be able to tell pretty quickly that this is not your average lager about to be sampled.

Taste - A rather hoppy lager. A quick malty presence is quickly over-ridden by an outstanding but not aggressive hop kick. Not terribly bitter, but solid and tasty, blending beautifully with the carbonation. As the bubbles die down, the sweetness of the malt comes through on the finish. The sweet of the malt and the bitter of the hop resolve in perfect balance at the eleventh hour of the aftertaste. A fine, fine way to round out the flavor profile.

Mouthfeel - pretty heavy for a lager. Slightly oily/resinous, which provides a lot of body to the beer. Solid coating, doing its best to make you remember its name...

Drinkability - A very versatile beer. A light enough style to be a session beer all by itself, but enough character to stand up admirably if paired with food. I suspect the hops would hold their own reasonably well with wings or barbecue.

 1,158 characters

Photo of dmarch
3.63/5  rDev -2.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Clear and golden in color with a thin white head. Aroma is malty with some citrusy hops. Taste starts out sweet like caramel with a zesty lemony finish. Very bitter in the finish which may not please most beer drinking novices. Not the best from brooklyn, but it's a classic in the microbrewing industry.

 304 characters

Photo of SheepNutz
3.85/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

12oz. bottle poured into a sample tasting cup. It pours a classic amber color with one rocky finger of head. There is lots of lacing left on the cup. The smell is a mix of sweet malt and slightly grassy hops. The taste starts with rich malt, and ends with a good dose of hops. Pretty hoppy for a lager. The balance is very nice. The body is a little light, but very smooth. The drinkability is great, and this is good to go for the summer.

 439 characters

Photo of StevieW
3.88/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

12 oz bottle. Clear medium carmel to copper in color. A touch lighter than Samuel Adams Boston Lager, which I think is a fair comparision. Nice fluffy white head. Laced the glass just fine.
Noticable hop presence on the nose, which surprised me. Nice crisp taste, slightly toasted malt, and crisp hop finish. More hops than I ever would have thought from a lager. Very crisp and refreshing. Medium body, nicely carbonated. Taste is less full, less gas filled, and much crisper and more refreshing than a Boston Lager. This could be the perfect grilling beer.

 560 characters

Photo of Wildman
3.65/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This beer poured a copper amber color and formed a nice foamy off white head that left circular lace as it subsided. Some carbonation is also present. One of the darkest lagers I have ever seen. An aroma of malt and hops are present with a touch of caramel. A flavor of malt and caramel. A rather crisp and light finish to it. The coloration and the flavor isn't bad, but I guess this brewer is trying to point to an older way of brewing lagers like Victory's does.

 465 characters

Photo of aaronh
4.01/5  rDev +7.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Sampled at a new place in Washington, Sapphire's, during their first week of operation.

Pours a medium golden color, topped by a solid white head that shows good retention and lacing. The smell is more malty than most, and a little light on overall aroma. Faint hop notes are also evident. The taste is fairly malty for a lager, but it has a substantial hop bite on the finish. I was actually surprised by the overall flavor profile of this beer. The mouthfeel is solid, and the overall package makes for a supremely drinakble beer. I'll revisit it later after my initial impression fades a bit, but I have to get this one in the fridge soon.

 645 characters

Photo of Shiloh
3.08/5  rDev -17.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Maybe this brew is an aquired taste. My initial thoughts on this beer is that of syrup.
Colour of deep golden with a light frothy head. Carbonation is medium active.
Taste starts sweet then switches to a slightly lingering hoppy bitterness.
In the transition tho, I cannot get past a syrupy presence that I find annoying.

 324 characters

Photo of BeerResearcher
4.03/5  rDev +8.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

One of my favorite US Lagers. Pours an amber with orange hue and short-lived off-white head. Nice malty and floral hop aroma. Mostly a trailing lace with some clinging residue. Lightly sweet caramel notes within a nice rounded malt body. Sharp citrusy bitterness and a light metallic edge. A hint of pears appears towards the end of the glass as the flavors meld and balance.

 375 characters

Photo of powoo19
4/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The beer poured nice with a nice golden color and a nice white head that lasted a short time. The smell was a hint of fruit and florallike, very inviting. The taste was very good, crisp and smooth.
It went down nice. The aftertaste was pleasent to the palet. a nice crisp lager.

 280 characters

Photo of PhantomVodoo
4/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Slight brown hue to this golden colored brew. Off-white head that laces. Nice looking beer.
Aroma of floral hops and sweet malts.

Taste is balanced. Nicely hopped with plenty of floral hop notes. Malt backbone has a caramel flavor to it.

Good mouthfeel.
Good drinkability.

Overall, a good lager. If you're in the mood for a lager, give this one a try.

 364 characters

Photo of stirgy
4.15/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This beer poured a very bright and clear amber orange color. Decent frothy white head. Wonderfully inviting and slightly flowery hop aroma. Nice malt presence. The beer is medium bodied and is a great tasting lager. Smooth and mellow and very flavorful. Perfect carbonation. It’s a definite step up from a normal premium lager.

 328 characters

Photo of bditty187
3.71/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Translucent, coppery-bronze hue, a finger’s worth of white head, excellent retention, a few rings of lace. The nose is clean and unassuming… a suggestion of floral. Simple palate; tasty nevertheless… malty with a kiss of creamy-sweetness, some hoppy bitterness, floral notes too. Pleasant palate, rather enjoyable… lovely subtle hops influence. Low carbonation, medium-light mouthfeel, maybe a tad thin but not a problem. Drinkable… session brew material, this would also work well as a crossover beer. This is a tasty Lager… try one.

Thanks Stegmakk for the bottle!

 575 characters

Photo of dwarbi
3.68/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This is a true amber colored beer. Pours an average head that fades quickly, but provides excellent lacing. Smells of flowers and sugar. Good tasting lager. A little sweet, but enough other flavors in there, too. Somewhat thick in the mouth, but more drinkable than your average lager. A great standby beer.

 307 characters

Photo of WVbeergeek
3.5/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Well I bought a sampler without looking at the date and it's best by date is August 2002, however it is against my religion to toss a beer without at least trying it first. Pours a beautiful amber gold with a creamy white foaming head, this beer is forming nice even rings of lace looking quite beautiful in my stemmed Stella Artois glass. Aroma is a bit musky with some mild hops and a very mild hint of malt sweetness, with all things considered mainly the age of this beer not bad at all. The taste is where the age starts to hurt this beer it still has a nice grainy sweetness with some bittering hops thrown in, but overall just a little stale. What did I expect from a lager this old. I remind you that this beer is still a cut above most beers out there, just I will definitely have to resample due to the age of the product. Mouthfeel is still very carbonated with a nice nutty malt thickness to the finish. Overall I bet this beer is really drinkable, but I am going to update this review to find out for sure.

 1,019 characters

Photo of Brent
4.06/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Sparkling crystal bronze color - the carbonation bubbles can easily be observed. Although not overly malty for the style, this lager bordered on ale-like qualities. The hops were interesting - although not overly floral, they did lend a distinct aromatic quality, and the bittering aspect was almost secondary. Overall, a nicely crafted brew.

 342 characters

Photo of Gusler
3.8/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

As I always rail against “Lager/Pilsners”, I must say this is one of the few that I really like and could drink on a regular basis, if available and “Ales” went extinct!

A translucent deep amber to copper color on the pour, a prestigious bright white head, generous lace and a nice clean and crisp nose. Start is loaded with malt, somewhat sweet, the top is moderate in its feel to the palate, with the finish stinging in its acidity, the hops stout in their spiciness, dry aftertaste, a great drinking beer, “I Like It”!

 530 characters

Photo of SchmichaelJ
3.3/5  rDev -11.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This lager had a dark amber appearance, with a nice fluffy head. Very attractive looking beer, complete with a bit of lacing on the glass. The smell was equally impressive, with clove and citrus elements here and there. The taste threw me of a bit, however. An indescribable tangy quality distracted me from the otherwise well-balanced brew. A hint of orange or citrus combined with a yeasty quality that didn't sit well with me. While the taste was definitely something different, I can't say that I enjoyed it immensely. The mouthfeel was rather mediocre, smooth overall, but with a somewhat grainy feel on the tongue. I've had better lagers, even from larger breweries. The Brooklyn Lager wasn't terrible, but it wouldn't be my choice among a variety from the same style.

 774 characters

Photo of AtLagerHeads
3.53/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This beer was a real surprise to me. I wasn't expecting much from the single bottle I bought from a split pack, primarily because of the pricing. Surprise! This is a very good lager, but I believed it is misclassified as a pale lager. This seems much more to me Vienna style. The color is deep amber/copper with a very good goldish tan head that lasts reasonable well. The lacing is also very good. Mucho hops on the head aroma, more malt-like as the head dissipates. Great refreshing taste with more hops than expected. Creamy mouthfeel. Thoroughly enjoyable.

 560 characters

Photo of Naerhu
4.17/5  rDev +12.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Appearance - amber with little head and medium lace
Aroma - fruity nose
Palate - malty medium baody with light/med hops. Light, short aftertaste
Mouth - pleasant medium body
Drinkability - a wonderful lager. I almost do not believe this is a lager. yummy.

 259 characters

Photo of GreatPondBrewer
3.88/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

One of the better micro breweries, Brooklyn has done a fine job with the various tasks they have attempted, but it is always nice to come back to an old stand by such as the Lager. This is so easy to drink. Lager was presented in a 20oz. glass and it was a rich mahogony color with a fine, white head with an interesting, thin, clingy lace. The smell was sharp with lemon and hop aromas. The interesting part about this beer is that it tastes much like a pale ale or bitter, with that distinct hop taste. It was crisp and refreshing though and not nearly as heavy tasting as a pale ale. This is a beer you can always count on and it is pretty easy to find to boot!

 664 characters

Photo of OatmattStout
3.85/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Had a great thick rocky and fluffy head that shrank in a few minutes leaving a merange around the rim of the glass. The color was a deep copper and very clear. Thea smell was full of hops and some maltyness as well. Texture was thinner than I had expected but still had a nice mouthfeel. Tastes reminded me very much of Sam Adams which I have had many time before this lager. Tastes was a mild sweet maltyness upfront followed by complex hop character in the end. Hops left a grapefruit and lingering aftertaste but was not overpowering. Good overall but I think I would stick to SA if I wanted this type of full flavored lager.

 628 characters

Photo of waughbrew
2.54/5  rDev -31.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Not a bad lager, but not a very good one either. I kept thinking that it was like a cheap Sam Adams.

light copper, hop oils form patches of head. Aroma was nice spicy hop. taste was a caramel flavor that did not integrate very well with the rest of the beer. There was a little lemon zest. The one nice surprise was the floral notes in the flavor of the hops. Easy drinking, but why would you buy one when SA boston lager is more easily found and tastes somewhat similar and much better? I suppose this beer is supposed to provide a step-up from tasteless lagers, which it does rather well i guess.

 601 characters

Brooklyn Lager from Brooklyn Brewery
Beer rating: 3.72 out of 5 with 3,749 ratings