Brooklyn Local 2 | Brooklyn Brewery

BA SCORE
90
outstanding
1,415 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score
Send samples
Brooklyn Local 2Brooklyn Local 2
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Brooklyn Brewery
New York, United States
brooklynbrewery.com

Style: Belgian Strong Dark Ale

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 9.00%

Availability: Rotating

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by ClockworkOrange on 02-02-2009

BEER STATS
Ratings:
1,415
Reviews:
549
Avg:
4.03
pDev:
10.67%
 
 
Wants:
106
Gots:
303
For Trade:
8
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 1,415 |  Reviews: 549
Photo of Stoutsman
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of bbadger
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of TubbyDullard
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of jwat
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of wpreynolds
3/5  rDev -25.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of TheBeerAlmanac
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of Fettpopps
3/5  rDev -25.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of jophish17
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of Nichols33
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of thefuneral
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of tastymug
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of rderedin
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of chcfan
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of boondogglefob
3/5  rDev -25.6%

Photo of CMIKEHUNT
3.06/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

After trying local 1 i was eager to try 2.
Did not love it like i liked 1.
Big head with legs. Had lots of smell of bourbon dark fruit and caramel. .dark beer in color. Dark beer in flavor. .
Dos not care for this heavy beer. Was not what i was expecting.
Was a little disappointed. Did not finish the bottle

 310 characters

Photo of dirtylou
3.08/5  rDev -23.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

750ml bottle, brawleys

notes. i've had a day to reflect on how dissapointing this beer was.

appearance: dark cola body, frothy tan head with lively carbonation and foamy retention

smell: dark fruits, booze, wood, dark malts

taste: bitter orange rind, honey, dark malts, booze, woody notes, hoppy, booze soaked dark fruits. split this one and it was really too much.

mouthfeel: really bad - carbonation way over done, spicy boozy finish. basically the opposite of good

drinkability: bad.

 492 characters

Photo of woosterbill
3.09/5  rDev -23.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

750 corked & caged bottle into a Duvel tulip.

A: Dark, opaque black-vermillion body with a lovely 3" head of frothy, creamy tan foam; good retention and light lacing. Great looking beer.

S: Rather dull aroma of bready malt, dark fruits, and spicy yeast. Not bad, but nothing special - especially for such a great style.

T: Starts out with fruity yeast, then the bready malts, then a distinct bit of cherry flavor (nice), and finally a wave of booze. Fairly complex, but overly boozy and not especially tasty.

M: Very smooth and fairly light, with abundant fine effervescence. Quite pleasant.

D: Not so great here. Mediocre taste and overly apparent alcohol make it a bit of a chore to drink a whole 750.

Notes: Much like Local 1, this was a faint imitation of the best Belgians (and, for that matter, top-notch American versions like Three Philosophers and Allagash Quad/Odyssey). Unlike the Local 1, it wasn't all that tasty in its own right. Even though this isn't a bad beer by any stretch, I was pretty disappointed. I'd recommend steering clear of this one in favor of one of the offerings from Rochefort, St. Bernardus, or Chimay, or...you get the idea.

Cheers!

 1,174 characters

Photo of rapidsequence
3.16/5  rDev -21.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

750 ml bottle, $9.39 from my grocery store. Been in my cellar for a year.

Appearance: Pours a dark cherry brown with an off white head. Excellent head retention and some sticky lacing. When held to the light, the beer is a clear garnet color with lots of bubbles. The head and lacing on the second pour is even better, so I'm upping the score. Good looking beer.

Smell: Definitely its a BSDA, but not the best. Some dark fruit and bready yeast, but not too complex. Very spicy and peppery. The "citrus peel," which I assume is curucao is very tart smelling. Unfortunately spice and citrus drown out some of the other nice aromas.

Taste: Up front, a thin example of fruity and yeasty Belgian dark, followed by a ridiculous amount of sour, tart citrus all the way through to the finish. Why, just why? Why add citrus peel to a Belgian dark, and if you must, why this much? Its not terrible, but just wrong.

Mouthfeel: I like the carbonation. It allows it to be foamy and creamy without being too much. It does finish a little too dry/puckering, maybe because its so tart. That makes it seem a little thin though rather than thick and rich.

Drinkability: All in all, its an OK BSDA with too much citrus flavor. Its drinkable and decent, but not for $10 a 750. Much better BSDAs to be had for that, both North American and Belgian.

 1,332 characters

Photo of LMO1190
3.17/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Probably some of the best head retention Ive ever seen in a beer. It nice dark brown with 3 fingers of white head that seem to last forever!!!! the aroma is ok,Brown sugar, malty, spiciness from the Belgium yeast. The taste is about the same. Very dry mouth feel. Overall this is an OK beer. It is nothing grand. I was expecting a lot more, but this just the beer equivalent to table wine. Nothing against the brewery. I have enjoyed there local 1 and Sarachi ace.But I don't think I would go out of way for this one again!

 523 characters

Photo of Hoppington
3.2/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The bottle discretely states: "Ale brewed with honey and citrus peel". Sounds good to me so I bought a bottle.

I have mixed impressions here. It is a decent Abbey influenced beer, but the taste is not evoking either honey or citrus peel. Still, its a good beer - but pretty much a straight belgian style ale...and not particularly distinctive.

The malt notes strike me as a bit muted and the overall mouthfeel is a bit more liquidy than I would expect for this style. Also there is a slight lagerish nose which turns me off a bit.

I'm not going to pan it completely, but I probably won't be drinking this one again unless they refine the recipe a bit. This has potential, but it's just not quite there yet for me. It needs to be more distinctive and exhibit a bit more character. This one seems a bit timid.

 811 characters

Photo of matty
3.2/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Dark brown colored beer with a rapidly fading head.Aroma is dark fruit.Taste is the same dark fruit,alcohol and a bit of hops on the finish.Overall it's ok but this is not something I can see myself buying again in the future.I would probably recommend to try once but as for me one is plenty.

 293 characters

Photo of mhs413
3.22/5  rDev -20.1%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3

A bit too something for me, though I can't quite put my finger on what that something is. Much better with cheese or sausage than on its own.

141 characters

Photo of WalrusJockey
3.22/5  rDev -20.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

750ml bottle into Duvel tulips.

A- very clear and crisp brown on the pour, in the glass it is a darker, reddish color. The head is thick, and the color they call mocha that looks nothing like the coffee of the same name.

S- very sweet with lots of forest-berry aromas, with a choco-vanilla hint, assumedly from the malt.

T- spice and fruit linger behind and alongside the thick malt profile, with the fruit of the nose far removed from where it was expected to be. The dominant flavor is of spices, like a spicy cinnamon loaf, combined with the 9% ABV, the result is very warming. The berries of the nose are sadly underrepresented, and the label's "honey and citrus peel" seem to be more added to sound enticing on the label than to be significant ingredients.

The end result isn't *bad,* in fact it is rather nice, but it is not what the aroma, or the bottle itself, might lead you to expect. For a BSDA I find it to be far too much malt and not nearly enough...flavor besides malt.

M- much thinner than I expected. Not creamy or thick at all. In the glass, it looks quite heavy, and the head is fairly substantial, but in the mouth, the beer is light, and with the heavy amounts of malt and spice present, it winds up feeling lacking in body, though it isn't wattery by any stretch. Honestly, if the mouthfeel had matched the flavor profile in ANY way, this beer would have received a much better score from me.

D- I don't think any 9% is going to be overly drinkable, but I don't especially like this beer, so I would rate it poorly.

Notes- if you want a strong, spiced-unto-spicy beer that won't weigh down your stomach with tons of body, and isn't distracted by fruit flavors, you might like this beer. I don't care for "winter warmer" types, and if I had known that was what this is, I probably would have passed on it. Rated as a BSD it fares even worse.

 1,869 characters

Photo of psyphin
3.23/5  rDev -19.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A - Very dark brown with ruby highlights. Huge slight off white head on top, no lacing.

S - Boozy with typical belgian esters. Dark fruit and malt hidden behind.

T - Heavy malt, fruity with a heavy alcahol heat.

M - Slightly thin with aggresive carbonation.

D - The overwhelming sensation of the alcahol detracted from an otherwise interesting beer. Worth a bottle for sampling, definitely not intended for session drinking.

 428 characters

Photo of MFMB
3.24/5  rDev -19.6%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Hit up Lee's wine and liquor the next day after my Duvel experience on the strip. I was bound and determined to continue my drunken stuper into the following day. I found this little gem and took it back the hotel. Popped the cork, called over a call girl and ordered up some pay per view porn. Woke up the next morning hungover with 137 dollar's in pay per view porn charges on the room. Oh and I think I got a STI that night too but the beer... man the beer is awesome.

 471 characters

Brooklyn Local 2 from Brooklyn Brewery
4.03 out of 5 based on 1,415 ratings.
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.