Oranjeboom Premium Lager | Oranjeboom Bierbrouwerij B. V.

BA SCORE
69
poor
370 Ratings
THE BROS
65
poor
Read the review
Oranjeboom Premium LagerOranjeboom Premium Lager
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Oranjeboom Bierbrouwerij B. V.
Netherlands
interbrew.com

Style: Euro Pale Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by Jason on 08-21-2002

BEER STATS
Ratings:
370
Reviews:
192
Avg:
2.88
pDev:
18.06%
 
 
Wants:
4
Gots:
35
For Trade:
0
View: Beers | Events
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Ratings: 370 |  Reviews: 192
Photo of OMGTheyKilkenny
2.66/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Pint can into a dimpled mug.

A- Pours a clear, golden amber. 1 inch of bubbly head that dissipates very quickly.

S- Not much to talk about. Lagery yeast dominates the aroma with notes of citrus. Nothing special.

T- Very bready. Typical lager malts with average hoppiness. Just a little skunk on the back; think of the Eurotrash equivalent of a Corona.

MF- Crisp and clean. Strong carbonation. Doesn't overstay its welcome.

D- Refreshing, though nothing special to taste. Respectable (read: more expensive) alternative to Budweiser. I picked up a six pack at Trader Joes, which seems to carry nothing but Sierra Nevada and douche beer. Wasn't really in the mood for Sierra Nevada, so I grabbed this one. Hypothesis confirmed.

 729 characters

Photo of Beerandraiderfan
3.32/5  rDev +15.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Gold and copper color pour with lots of clarity, minimal head. Aroma was lively, spritzy, carbonated and clean.

Taste was pretty straightforward, skunky Euro lager thing going on, which I like and was impressed that they still got that profile out of a can, minimal hoppiness to it, not much to chew on malt wise, thin mouthfeel, a hydration beer with some skunk is the concise way of describing it.

Beer was less agreeable the more it warmed. One of the few I'd say drink cold and enjoy the skunk on it.

 507 characters

Photo of Buggies
3/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Not a bad beer. Though, probably not worth the price as an import. It's your typical lawn mowing lager with not not much to offer except that it quenches the thirst.

If your into trying new beers like I do, go get yourself one and check it off on your list of conquered beers. Otherwise, any standard American BMC will do just as well.

 336 characters

Photo of doktorhops
2.62/5  rDev -9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

What is the deal with cheap beers having the word "premium" in their name? It's like making a mediocre beer that your actually proud of. Why do brewers do this? Obviously it would be difficult selling a beer called "Jim's Cheap-ass Lager", but at least they might think about dropping the "premium" from the name and saving it for their best beer... unless of course it is their best beer (in that case, my apologies).

Poured from a 330ml bottle into a tulip pint.

A: Fluffy white head... dissipates to a spider web lacing. The body is a light amber hue... very Lager-ish characteristics here.

S: Cut grass, light honey and a hint of mint (interesting). The aroma suggests a clean, sharp Lager.

T: First thing I noticed was how dull this Lager is... there is nothing exciting here, "yes" it's crisp, "yes" it's clean, "yes" it has a slight dry aftertaste (all typical of Lagers), but that's it: there's no draw card with this beer. Why drink this when you could quite easily settle for one of the other billion boring Lagers out there? Of course this is semantics. In relation to the actual flavour: it's malt grains and light bitterness with that unmistakable hint of honey found in the aroma.

M: The beer I was tasting seemed a bit flat, not sure if this is intentional or just the bottle I was drinking. Also watery, like any other Lager.

D: Easy to drink, but not necessarily a good thing in this case. This beer is so boring I nearly fell asleep while drinking it. A big slice of average pie here.

Food match: Boring food... steamed vegetables and plain white rice. The hint of honey I found might make it go well with dessert, but who drinks beer with desserts?

 1,674 characters

Photo of kojevergas
2.13/5  rDev -26%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Can into Budweiser pint glass (it was all that was around) in low altitude Galway, Ireland. Can acquired in Cork, Ireland. Reviewed live.

A: Pours a two finger head of slight cream and average thickness. Average retention. Meh. Clear dark yellow colour.

Sm: Light scent of malt, barley, and ... maize?

T: Nice unexpected cream over top of barley/maize foundation. The malt is fortunately quite tame, avoiding ruining the flavour. The barley sharpens on the climax, which is unpleasant and unwelcome. It never quite recovers, creating a decidedly nasty finish. Unbalanced and pretty badly built for the style. Bittering hops are present but very background, not even surpassing the generic barley.

Mf: Too much wetness alongside an artificial smoothness/coarseness balance. Pretty crap. Doesn't match the flavours of the body.

Dr: Affordable by Irish standards, but nowhere near a great beer.

 901 characters

Photo of nrbw23
2.68/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A- Pours a very light, clear gold color with a thin white head. Head is gone pretty much in a second and leaves no lacing at all.

S- Pretty pouring smells of grain and corn. Really nothing else. Maybe a touch of lemon.

T- Just like the nose and pretty boring. Pale malts, grain, corn and a touch of citrus. A very light touch of citrus.

M- Light in body and pretty well carbonated.

O- Very crisp and light brew. Just really nothing going on here.

 453 characters

Photo of jazzyjeff13
3/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Purchased at a local petrol station - so it's got to be good, right? A 500ml green glass bottle with a BB of May 2012. Label states an ABV of 4.7%, and features a cool stylised orange tree emblem.

Poured into a Sam Smith's pint glass. A clear golden colour with good carbonation. Forms a small head of white foam that disappears in under a minute. Weak aroma of light malt with a faint solvent note.

Tastes of light malt with a mild bitter finish. Faint grainy character with a hint of stewed leaves that becomes more apparent as it warms. Notes of solvent/alcohol. Mouthfeel is prickly, acidic and slightly dry. Leaves a faint aftertaste of grain and leaves.

A very average beer; certainly not what qualifies as premium in my book. Flavourwise, it's bland and uninteresting. Might be refreshing in hot weather, although I can think of better things to drink. Pass....

 871 characters

Photo of drinkofczars
3.4/5  rDev +18.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A- Old school looking can is pretty cool. Looks like this could be a Rainer type of beer in Holland; cheap but good. Same type of color as an American lager.

S- Not much to smell. Similar to the smell of Stella but not as strong.

T. Crisp and refreshing. Wish it had a little more bite to it. Mellow and easy to drink. I feel most women would like this beer, and most men would say it's ok.

M- Good amount viscosity for a basic lager. Good amount of carbonation, but not overpowering.

O- I probably wouldn't buy this beer again, but would take it over most lagers. This beer is on par with Heineken.

Pretty good beer.

 624 characters

Photo of Knapp85
2.59/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

This beer reminded me a lot of a Grolsh or Heineken. It's got that traditional lager flavor to it where it's a little bitter and aged. The color is plae yellow and not overly exciting. Just about another European Lager. I don't see myself really trying to find this one again any time soon.

 290 characters

Photo of kflorence
3.11/5  rDev +8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A: Pours a golden, copper in color with a good, thick frothy head that dissipates over time. Not much lacing as you drink. Carbonation looks to be low.

S: Smells of sweet malts and grain with some astringency. Corn seems to be the predominant grain aroma.

T: Very simple mix of sweet malts and grain that give it a pleasing, cream corn flavor. It is most definitely not a complex or groundbreaking beer, and it shouldn't be drank with that mentality. It is just plain average.

M: Very light on body, slightly watery, low carbonation. There is a slight creaminess in there, but it's subtle.

D: Overall this is a very light and refreshing lager that is both easy to drink and easy to stomach. Very sessionable, but not overly palatable. At $6 for a six-pack, this is an absolute steal.

 787 characters

Photo of srandycarter
3.65/5  rDev +26.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

A -Pours clear light honey, lots of white head. Some spotty lace.

S - Light hops and european malt. Very Heineken like..

T - Light malt, a little juicy, bittered at end.

M - Light, very light bodied, decent carb, a little over bitter at end for me.

D - Not a hard one to drink for sure.

 290 characters

Photo of rdub
3/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I always have high hopes from German brews. Appearance was golden straw with a light fizzy head. Lots of carbonation.

Smell was skunky, kind of like Heineken.

Taste was just plain average. Quite clean and less funk on taste than aroma. Not too bad just nothing spectacular.

Mouthfeel and drinkability are high due to the thinness and good carbonation.

This was an average brew but still worth a try and kind of fun to have at New Year's since it's not super popular here in Central PA.

 490 characters

Photo of TMoney2591
3.23/5  rDev +12.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Served in a Gale Sayers shaker pint glass.

Sometimes you've gotta wonder at the random beer you can find for real cheap at Trader Joe's. This one pours a clear pale straw topped by a finger of white froth. The nose comprises wheat, corn, dust, and hard water. The taste holds notes of wheat, light orange peel, flowers, light greens, and corn syrup. The body is quite light, with a light carbonation and a watery feel. Overall, a pretty standard beer, nothing to rave for or against.

 484 characters

Photo of MirkoCroCough
3.95/5  rDev +37.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pint can into kolsch glass.

Nice clear golden color with tiny bubbles of carbonation racing to the top. Left a bit of lacing.

Clean Euro lager smell. Earthy and musky.

Good clean flavor. Typical Euro lager malty and biscuity with a mild hop twang.

Good. Nicely carbonated, not seltzery. Smooth clean finish.

Would be easy to session. $8 for a sixer isn't a bad price either. Another Euro lager that trumps your typical American rice and corn beer. Would drink again.

 471 characters

Photo of LumpyGuitar
3.46/5  rDev +20.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Picked this up in a tall can, as it was new to my spot.

Pours a beautiful golden orange with a thin layer of frothy white head. Retention is weak, lacing is minimal.

Smells of biscuit malt and water.

Taste is smooth. Buttery malt dominates, hop is weak.

Mouthfeel is light, carbonation is average.

Drinkability is good. This would actually be tasty in the summer months as its light and you can definately put a few away. I'd say the cloying kicks in about round 4.

 471 characters

Photo of Brenden
3.13/5  rDev +8.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Yes, it's 9 AM. It's breakfast.

This one is what's commonly referred to as a "straw" color, very pale yellow. There's pretty good activity off a soft white head that's a bit taller than I would have expected, which thins to a light coating but leaves reasonable lacing.
What nose there is gives almost exclusively a tart/sour blend of lemon zest and grass, with strong grains and a light dusty/skunky (but not terribly) back. Light notes of corn husk and yeast are also detectable.
That's pretty much the story for the flavor as well. A backbone of grains with an up front and lingering citrusy tart/sour flavor is also extremely grassy and earthy with a bit more doughy and dry cracker malts notes and a touch of green apple. Hops does make an appearance, however light, and are in a lingering finish that goes just a touch sour.
The body is light, crisp but semi-dry rather than the dryness one might expect. Carbonation keeps it spritzy but isn't terribly heavy.
It is what it is and I would take it over a BMC, or at least a BMC light.

 1,040 characters

Photo of morebeergood
3.38/5  rDev +17.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Picked up a single can for $1 at Trader Joe's to try, since I always see this beer here. Poured into a tall pilsener glass. Bright yellow color. Foamy white head with some lacing and decent carbonation. Smelled like an average Euro lager. Taste was better than I expected. There was a bit of malt with some corn flavor, but there were no real offending flavors to turn me off at all. Mouthfeel was crisp enough to please me. Drinkability was fairly good, as this beer was smooth and easy to drink. For a dollar, I wasn't expecting much, but it wasn't too bad. I would drink a can of this beer again if the price was right.

 622 characters

Photo of droomyster
2.7/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from an extra tall can, pours a glowing gold with a short-lived fizzy white head. Aromas similar to those of the self-proclaimed King of Beers fail to impress. Fortunately the taste is nothing like the KoB's, but it's still falls short of being interesting. Faint grains and a light, sugary sweetness dominate the profile, which finishes long and honeylike. Watery body is unappealing. Sadly I bought a six-pack.

 419 characters

Photo of woodychandler
3.65/5  rDev +26.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This review holds dual citizenship as both my entry for NBS (Week 283) and the latest CAN in The CANQuest (TM), which has slowed considerably since broaching the 300 mark. CAN't anybody help me with some new CANs?

From the CAN: "This is the original Oranjeboom Premium Lager of Brewery 'De Oranjeboom', established in Holland in 1671. The striking name, crest, and colour of the 'Oranjeboom', symbolizing the family tree of the Dutch royal family, the princes of Oranje-Nassau, were assigned to the brewery and its premium beer to pay homage to the royal founders of the realm of the Netherlands. Pure natural: Choice Hops, Finest Malts and Grains, Clear Water."; "As a tribute to the House of Orange, the Orange Tree crest, symbolizing the family tree of the Dutch Royal family 'Oranje-Nassau', was introduced and the Oranjeboom brand was born. Oranjeboom is one of Holland's oldest brands. Since we started shipping beer to almost every corner of the world, Oranjeboom has been appreciated for its refreshing, outstanding quality."

My pour created an impressive two fingers' of bone-white head with excellent retention, especially in the face of the broiler oven that is today. Nothing like high heat and humidity to make me want to crack open a CAN of beer! Color was a deep golden-yellow with NE-quality clarity. Nose had the characteristic malty/lager-sweetness that lagers are supposed to have - not the weak, diluted smell of AALs. Sure, my sixer was a little more expensive than a rack of Miller, but that is the trade-off for not using adjuncts. You CAN't have it every which way but loose. Mouthfeel was medium with a pleasant lager sweetness in the mouth. Finish had a faint taste of honey, another characteristic of unadulterated lagers. This was a nice, pleasant lager and one that I would put in my cooler. It's not going to knock your socks off, but it won't require choking it down either (hear me, Minhas?).

 1,926 characters

Photo of OWSLEY069
3/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a clean, pale yellow color with a white head. In the aroma, a dry, sugary, almost orange-ish like lager smell. In the taste, kind of a standard Euro pale lager with a small orange hint. A smooth and light bodied mouthfeel, with a semi dry, small orange like aftertaste. Standard lager, but hints of orange are different.

 326 characters

Photo of StJamesGate
3.18/5  rDev +10.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours the palest straw with giant puffy white foam that clumps and sticks. Nose is light, waxy and cut grass. Mild husk malts, corn sweetness and hay hops. Spritzy finish, soapy linger. Light as can be.

NOTE: This is the medium-strength version, at 3.5% ABV.

I'd like to taste the full strength, as I've good memories of this from Amsterdam. So inoffensive as to be insubstantial, which in the right setting could be an asset. Wouldn't go seeking it, though.

Update: The 5% version is mostly the same notes, only sharper, ironically making a less drinkable beer. Still ahead of most other cheap lager in a can, though.

 621 characters

Photo of Beejay
3.2/5  rDev +11.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Pale to dark straw.. some white head right off the bat, but that fades to a ring fairly quickly.

S: Slight noble hop aroma. Some rice and light malt flavor. Pretty Par for the course.

T: Crisp and clean. Some slight bitterness in the finish, a little more hoppy than the american styles. Decent, but nothing to write home about.

M: Light and crisp, though a little intense on the carbonation.

D: Easy drinking for sure. Though another country's basic lager. So yes it is drinkable, but would I buy it again... no.

 524 characters

Photo of tjsdomer2
2.5/5  rDev -13.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: Pale yellow. Good foam retention for this style. Nice active carbonation. Flattens out quickly.

Smell: Lots of dry grass and strong barley malts.

Taste/Mouthfeel: Fortunately, there is a dry, crisp mouthfeel. I also like the taste a bit. It's not like grass, but actually more like hay. Pretty dry. Unfortunately, the metal taste consumes everything with this beer.

Drinkability: The metallic taste detracts from drinkability.

Overall: Might be an ok beer without the metal.

 490 characters

Photo of MadTown1000
2.89/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This version was brewed by Hofbrauhaus Wolters in Germany, and comes in a pint can.

Pours a golden yellow into an imperial pint stein, with several inches of creamy golden-white foam. Appearance is slightly translucent.

Smell is not too strong. Mostly just grain. Nothing too special. Flavor more or less follows that - there's a little bit of sweetness, some alcohol presence, but all in all it's pretty generic.

It does have some lingering presence in the back of the mouth, so some points for mouthfeel, and it certainly is drinkable - you won't have any problem getting through a pint can.

An acceptable beer, but pretty underwhelming for something with the word "boom" on the can.

 689 characters

Photo of crossovert
2.11/5  rDev -26.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

500ml can, purchased for 6.49 a 6pack at Trader Joe's. It says it is brewed by Hofbraeuhaus Wolters.

It pours a deep gold, more amber/orangeish than most. The head is soapy and white and leaves some spotted lacing.

No problems with skunk here, but it is a mild scented run of the mill smelling Euro pale lager.

It tastes all over the place. Definitely funky for the style. There is some cooked veggie, grain, and mild bitterness. It is too much like an american adjunct lager to be worthy for the style.

This one is cheap, if you need a cheap beer it works.

 561 characters

Oranjeboom Premium Lager from Oranjeboom Bierbrouwerij B. V.
2.88 out of 5 based on 370 ratings.
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.