XXXX Gold | Castlemaine Perkins

BA SCORE
66
poor
84 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score
Send samples
XXXX GoldXXXX Gold
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Castlemaine Perkins
Australia
lion-nathan.co.nz

Style: American Adjunct Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 3.50%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by brewdlyhooked13 on 09-16-2002

BEER STATS
Ratings:
84
Reviews:
29
Avg:
2.39
pDev:
29.71%
 
 
Wants:
4
Gots:
13
For Trade:
0
View: Beers | Events
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 84 |  Reviews: 29
Photo of Sammy
2.35/5  rDev -1.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Yellow with significant white head that soon dissipitates. Neutral aroma. On thin side, bit goes down easy. Not much taste and long metallic and bitter finish. Some corn. Carbonation is OK. Why does our government or any one else decide to bring this in? Proof that New Zealand, the underdog, produces the decent Australian beer.

 329 characters

Photo of kylehay2004
2.93/5  rDev +22.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.75

Photo of spycow
2.5/5  rDev +4.6%

Photo of biboergosum
2.44/5  rDev +2.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

375ml bottle, on an Aussie-themed patio on Whyte Ave, on a nice, bird-watching spring day.

This beer pours a crystal clear medium golden yellow colour, quite reminiscent of watery apple juice, with two fingers of weakly puffy, thinly foamy dirty white head, which leaves some decent fuzzy, tightly honeycombed lace around the glass as things quickly sink away.

It smells of grainy malt - barley and husky corn alike - with a thankfully small dose of weedy, lightly skanky hops. The taste is mildly sweet corn grist and spent barley awn, some stale yeast, and acrid, chemically astringent 'hops'.

The carbonation is generally quite high upfront, before petering out rather quickly, the body a pithy medium-light weight, and pretty plainly smooth. It finishes off-dry, the corn cereal sweetness, and a little skunkiness lingering in yer typical unholy duo.

Nice to try some different offerings from Down Under, but this just seems like more of the same ol', same ol' shite, and sadly, this time with less petrol! Not worthy of the price tag here all the way across the Pacific Ocean, and, I'm guessing, equally so right at home.

 1,131 characters

Photo of dmorgan310
2/5  rDev -16.3%

Photo of WoodBrew
3.28/5  rDev +37.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 5

If there was a Foster's commercial....like the ones they used to have...What's Australian for Michelob Ultra...XXXX Gold Lager!!! The previous people who reviewed this beer did not take into consideration the purpose of the beer. This beer was created for the hard working Australian in northern Queensland where the summers are long, hot, and humid...much like the legs on many a Sheila!!!! This beer looks, smells, and tastes like Mich Ultra. Stop being a snob and enjoy the beer as it was created. You can suck this SESSION down ...FOREVER!!!

 545 characters

Photo of Dicers
2.33/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.25

Photo of stevoj
2.07/5  rDev -13.4%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.25

Draft at Nannup Hotel and Pub. Tastes and smells like wallpaper paste. Clear hold n body with weak head. Bland and not very tasty These pasty lagers sure are popular in the bush.

 178 characters

Photo of biegaman
2.29/5  rDev -4.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

330ml can listed as Castlemanine XXXX Export Gold... and is by all accounts very underwhelming and painfully average...
Pours a brilliantly clear yellow body. Small bubbles drift about. There is a creamy white head that persist the entire tasting. The body is a little flat, with flavours of stale grassy hops and basic (adjuncty) malt bill. The drinkability is about average for a macro lager but I wouldn't by any stretch reccommend it.

 439 characters

Photo of bylerteck
2.25/5  rDev -5.9%

Photo of Viggo
2.53/5  rDev +5.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12 oz can, from the LCBO! Sweet another premium lager!

Pours a clear straw yellow, kind of pissy, big thick white head forms, pretty tight, actually has a nice head on it, good retention and leaves a ton of lace. Smell is familiar, corn, urine, wheat, honey, bread, adjuncts of all kinds, some citrus, bit of a skunkiness. Taste is more of the same, watery adjuncts, some honey and bread, sugars, lemony twang, very weak finish, little bit of sourness. Mouthfeel is light bodied with medium carbonation, pretty low carbonated for the style which makes it slightly more drinkable.

 580 characters

Photo of drummermattie02
2.5/5  rDev +4.6%

Photo of GraduatedCashew
2.5/5  rDev +4.6%

Photo of Griffith
2.5/5  rDev +4.6%

Photo of laituegonflable
1.38/5  rDev -42.3%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

Pours a dirty pale golden colour with slow, slow bead feeding a modest white head that sits listlessly and retains artificially well, with a sheet of lacing around. Looks bland, and you know, mass-produced on a factory line. Not abysmal though.

Smell is that "beer" smell that since childhood I've tried to avoid - sweet corn and grain husks with that soda-stream forced carbonation acerbicness. Touch of POR at the back, but not a lot of hop, just a weird sweet tang overall. Pretty poor.

Taste is bland; yeasty. Touch of sweet corn with rice grain on the front, then becomes bready yeasty on the mid, with an odd lemon/honey tang as a faint mid-palate. Finish is awfully sweet, just adjunct grain with a touch of children's cough medicine. Slight sweetness but otherwise just phenolic and raw. But on top of all that, it's bland as well. I'd be angry with how bad this beer is, if it didn't just suck all the spirit out of me.

No texture at all; no body. Not even carbonation sizzle. I've had tea with more fizz than this.

It's unpleasant enough to be bad and beyond just blandly drinkable. Powerfully mediocre.

 1,117 characters

Photo of patre_tim
3/5  rDev +25.5%

Photo of rastaman
1.1/5  rDev -54%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

even worse than the regular XXXX, this is a midstrenghth brew (3.5% ABV), and it sure as hell tastes like it, very weak, chemically and watery, most beers are better than this, too light for me.

 194 characters

Photo of Agentveba
2.5/5  rDev +4.6%

Photo of Durandal_777
2.25/5  rDev -5.9%

Photo of heygeebee
2.46/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

'XXXX Gold Now On Tap' proclaims my nearest club.

Joy! Celebration! or not....

Sadly this falls into the category of most other mass-produced macros with the sole plus being this is mid-strength so all the usual metallic / macro flavours have a little more reason to be present, ie to give at least some flavour.

Is it 40 deg? Drink it from the Esky.

Is it not 40 deg? Don't drink it...

 390 characters

Photo of pootz
1.88/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

Can from the LCBO

Pours a pale straw colored lager with a flaccid white cap that collases quickly...only light lacing.

Aroma of sweet rice and cardboard

Taste is bland and fizzy with light malts but mostly dextrine sweetness...clean finish, no off tastes just a boring adjunct bland lager with a watery weak character and an annoying dextrin sweet after taste.

It pains me Dogfish head 60 Min. IPA was rejected this summer so we could enjoy bland adjuct lagers like this...with a far too pricey tag for what you get...I won't go back for more...this is the Miller Genuine Draft of OZ.

 596 characters

Photo of soju6
2.03/5  rDev -15.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A: Pours a clear yellow color with a small head that fades to no real lacing.

S: Aroma is sort of musty with some grain and malt sweetness.

T: Tatse of sweet malt and grain. Mild bitterness and a sticky finish.

F: Light body, fairly smooth and pretty bland.

O: Pretty basic lager, bland and boring.

 302 characters

Photo of XsoldoutX
2/5  rDev -16.3%

Photo of Andrewharemza
3.52/5  rDev +47.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

From bottle, Pours golden yellow with a medium head. No nose that I would smell. Watered down hints of hops and malt, but they do work together. Nice summer quencher.

 166 characters

Photo of allergictomacros
3.03/5  rDev +26.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A - Pours a clear straw with a 1 inch head. Pretty solid for a macro.

S - Sweet sort of aroma, a floral/chalky hop and maybe a touch of honey.

T - Bland, macro-ness with a bare touch of citrus in the finish.

M - light and fizzy,

D - Not bad, kinda basic, average, run of the mill macro.

 290 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
XXXX Gold from Castlemaine Perkins
2.39 out of 5 based on 84 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.

    Subscribe