The Abyss | Deschutes Brewery

Your Rating: None

Want it   Got it 
The AbyssThe Abyss
BA SCORE
4.47/5
Outstanding
7,181 Ratings
The AbyssThe Abyss
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Deschutes Brewery
Oregon, United States
deschutesbrewery.com

Style: American Double / Imperial Stout

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 12.20%

Availability: Winter

Notes / Commercial Description:
Aged in bourbon, Oregon oak, and Pinot Noir barrels.

65 IBU

Vintages (production numbers from Deschutes):
2006 - Released December 2006 (approx 90 BBL)
2007 - Released January 2008 (approx 350 BBL)
2008 - Released November 2008 (approx 350 BBL)
2009 - Released November 2009 (approx 600 BBL)
2010 - Released December 2010 (approx 600 BBL)
2011 - Released November 2011 (approx 600 BBL)

Added by BeerAdvocate on 12-24-2006

BEER STATS
Ranking:
#136
Reviews:
1,978
Ratings:
7,181
pDev:
9.4%
Bros Score:
4.13
 
 
Wants:
2,964
Gots:
3,911
Trade:
332
HISTOGRAM
 
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Ratings: 7,181 |  Reviews: 1,978
Photo of cletetron
4.75/5  rDev +6.3%

Photo of MichPaul
4.5/5  rDev +0.7%

Photo of ThirdEyePA
5/5  rDev +11.9%

Photo of bradfordjohnson
3.5/5  rDev -21.7%

Photo of rfreed
4.25/5  rDev -4.9%

Photo of Hopmarc
4.5/5  rDev +0.7%

Photo of Davihaw
4.75/5  rDev +6.3%

Photo of hopswap1
4.75/5  rDev +6.3%

Photo of badboy7113
4.5/5  rDev +0.7%

Photo of searsclone
4.5/5  rDev +0.7%

Photo of FredT
4.5/5  rDev +0.7%

Photo of BrownNut
4.25/5  rDev -4.9%
look: 4.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.25

2011 vintage drunk in December 2012, served starting at 60 degrees F in a tulip.

A - 4.5 - Black, with a thick, textured, lingering, tan head. Only with a Sam Smith's head could it score higher for me.

S - 4.0 - Dark chocolate, a little malty coffee. I thought I got something slightly vinous and then saw on the label that a small percentage of it is aged in wine barrels, so maybe that's it. Possibly some vanilla. Near the end of the glass, after a swirl, a nice, mild, milky coffee note really came out.

T - 4.25 - First impression is wood, more than desirable. Barely noticeable under that is unsweetened chocolate, kind of a powdery version of it, and some coffee. Later, as the head dissipates, the wood notes recede and the other flavors come forward, with the chocolate going a bit sweeter into dark chocolate territory, to make for a better balance. No booze is evident. The label mentions licorice and bourbon barrels but I don't get any of either (I get the wood from the barrels but no bourbon). I wonder if they'd have been more prominent when fresh. No idea what cherry bark, also mentioned on the label, tastes like - presumably wood. I don't taste the vanilla or wine either. Leaves me with a bitter char aftertaste, and later with that plus a sweet chocolate syrup note.

It's interesting how the experience changes from the top of the glass to the bottom, and not just due to changing temperature. Both of the glasses I poured from the bomber, over about 30 minutes, went through the same transition rather than a single transition spread across both glasses as it warmed.

M - 4.5 - North of medium bodied but not as heavy as some of its puddinglike peers. Smooth and creamy. A pleasure.

O - 4.25 - This is a well made and subtle stout with mature flavors. Very well done overall. I'd drink it again for sure but wouldn't chase it via trade again. I'm glad I tried it.

 1,894 characters

Photo of MikeEhrmantraut
4.75/5  rDev +6.3%

Photo of appetiteforparis
4.5/5  rDev +0.7%

Photo of StArnoldFan
4.23/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.25

Photo of fuzzcherry
3.25/5  rDev -27.3%

Photo of acbe
4.73/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 4.75 | smell: 4.75 | taste: 4.75 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.75

Photo of zrab11
4/5  rDev -10.5%

Photo of Hardcore
4.5/5  rDev +0.7%

Photo of dmbsteve
4.2/5  rDev -6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

2012 batch poured from a bomber.
A- Pitch black with a finger of brown head. Slowly dissipates to a layer that sticks around for the ride.
S- With a full glass the roasted malt is dominant, but as the beer goes down the glass the bourbon barrel aroma kicks in strong.
T - taste is extremely complex with elements of roasted coffee, licorice, and chocolate being the predominant flavors. Each sip last for minutes and changes from sweet to bitter as it linger on the back of the tongue.
M - medium to full body. Drying finish. Each sip begs for the next but this beer is to be sipped and savored.
O - intensely flavorful and complex. I am aging another bottle and will compare tasting notes. I'm expecting it to only get better with age.

 736 characters

Photo of PaulUH
5/5  rDev +11.9%

Photo of crnipeter
3.52/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

The infamous 2009 vintage. Cascades murky reddish-brown to give birth to opaque very dark brown-to-black body topped by huge frothy deep-tan head with incredible retention.

Somewhat bland aroma exhibits unrefined sugar qualities,liquorice, bourbon yielding menthol nasal spray sensation, and a hint of bready malt. Tart notes reminiscent of dark fruit (plums and cherries) and red wine fuel my fears the bottle might be infected. I couldn't tell merely by sniffing that tartness comes from brettanomyces action as the dark fruit esters are commonly found in imperial stouts while vinous qualities are typical of well aged examples.

With the first sip comes release - I've got a non-infected bottle. Wild yeast infection is not a state, it's a continuous process so it should be badly reflected in the taste by now. Flavor that lacks the lactic sourness I feared of is dominated by liquorice, dark fruits, bourbon and chocolaty roasted malts adding some coffee-ish notes. Malt role and complexity is lesser than I hoped for, thought. Clean dry finish is followed by unobtrusive alcohol warmth. Flavors have mellowed in the course of aging so nothing really stands out.

Medium to full body is well attenuated, perhaps a bit thinned by aging. The carbonation is not exaggerated as might be deduced from the thick head. The effortlessly drinkable beer has silky texture and is airy and mouthfilling yet not overly so.

Overall, the Abyss is shallower than its advertised depth and considering the hype fails to impress. Not infected, just average.

 1,549 characters

Photo of Holland
4.11/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

A: beautiful right from the get go. Pour dark brown to black with a head that just takes over. It looks like more than half of the glass is foam. Weird things happen to set off the carbonation. Awesome looking!

S: smells like an imperial stout should with toasty good grains, seet malt, coffee and caramel and chocolate.

T: Taste is the same as the smell but also incorporates the barrel flavor. Delicious, but not mind blowing.

M: beautiful full body with heavyish carbonation and a smooth feeling even with the hefty carbonation.

O: tasted a 2010, 2011, and 2012 vertical tonight and was not impressed. This was somewhere between hunahpu's and stone IRS, but I had higher expectations due to the rating. Thought 2011 was the best vintage of the 3, and 2012 was no doubt not ready. In the future I will adhere to their best after dates.

 845 characters

Photo of Iowacraft
5/5  rDev +11.9%

Photo of barbellsNbeers
5/5  rDev +11.9%

The Abyss from Deschutes Brewery
Beer rating: 4.47 out of 5 with 7,181 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.