Red & White | Dogfish Head Craft Brewery

very good
704 Reviews
no score
Send samples
Red & WhiteRed & White

Brewed by:
Dogfish Head Craft Brewery
Delaware, United States

Style: Witbier

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 10.00%

Availability: Rotating

Notes / Commercial Description:
A big, Belgian-style witbier brewed with coriander and orange peel and fermented with pinot noir juice. After fermentation, a fraction of the batch is aged in one of our 10,000-gallon oak tanks.

35 IBU

Added by hopsaplenty on 08-23-2006

For Trade:
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 704 | Ratings: 1,821
Photo of kylehay2004
3.53/5  rDev -9.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Half finger head on a hazy crimson and orange body.

S: light on the nose with orange, strawberry, corriander and a touch of lemon. Good retention and nice lacing.

T: loaded with corriander and peppery zest. Orange is late in the finish. Nice yeast character with well balanced tartness and sweetness.

M: light to medium body and high carbonation.

Overall: this is a nice beer. Not very witbier like but I assume that is the base and the corriander washes it out. Almost like an overpowered saison.

 505 characters

Photo of StonedTrippin
3.7/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

this is a nice complex brew from dfh, but a night after drinking a deconstruction from odell, any other blended wine barrel beer just isnt going to match up. the appearance is cumin powder dullish yellow in color with some haze and an aroused white head a ciouple inches high. the nose is corriander and orange right off the bat, ive smelled this many times before, but then comes the tannins from the vino, tart and grape musty. the flavor is much less provocative than the aroma, and sall the flavors seem to come together into some sort of mixing the fingerpaints together flavor where nothing distinct but alcohol can be tasted. as it warms, an oaky earthen flavor comes out in the finish, but something still seems to be missing. mouthfeel is solid, perfectly carbonated and right on medium bodied. its smooth for the strength, and could match up well with some farmy cheeses. overall not my favorite dogfish brew, but as always i appreciate its originality.

 963 characters

Photo of Knapp85
3.5/5  rDev -10.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This beer poured out as a orange red color with a white fizzy looking head on top. The head fades quickly and doesn't lace the glass too much. The smell of this beer gives off a slightly sour aroma with a subtle sweetness as well. The taste of fermented grape give this beer a big wine like profile, the flavors are a little on the tart side and leaves you with a dry fruity aftertaste. There is also a good amount of yeasty flavors going on in there too. The mouthfeel of the beer is on the lighter side, it's moderately carbonated and maintains a good drinkability. Overall, It's not my favorite DfH brew but I'm happy to have tried it.

 638 characters

Photo of metter98
3.67/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: The beer has a mix of amber and orange hues. It poured with little in the way of a head but has nice lacing patterns. There are noticeable yeast particles floating near the bottom.
S: There are notes of orange peel, grapes and spices in the aroma.
T: The taste is complex and very much the aromas in the nose with more hints of oak and pinot noir grapes.
M: It feels medium-bodied and somewhat thick on the palate.
D: This is a strong beer that needs to be sipped. It has a unique flavor but I only might consider having this again if I'm in the mood for something out of the ordinary.

 588 characters

Photo of BEERchitect
3.56/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

There's simply no end to the alterations that Dogfish Head brewers will place upon traditional styles. To push a Belgian witbier to double its normal strength would have been daring enough for most brewers. But oh-no, how about the induction of pinot noire grapes to amplify the winy character of Belgian ale and then aging the newfound concoction in pinot noire barrels. They've certainly "dogfished" this concoction completely up!

Its first cautious and curious sip comes after a murky orange and peach-stained pour. Layering in with a viscous nestle, the aromas and early taste is of candied fruit, perhaps more of orange and perfume than of grape or wine, all upon a lightly toasted and doughy base.

With the weighty beer pressing deeply into the palate, a notion of orange marmalade wafts over the tongue, carrying with it the orange peels, piths and pulp; along with a lemony, apricot, apple and unmistakable grape tone. Somewhat vegetal with verbena, chive and fresh-cut grass, its bracing acidity ushers in a quick finish.

With the simple syrup sweetness lifting, its pinot character thrives in the late palate, highlighted by vinous alcohol with its own peppery warmth. But closing with a semi-sweet weight, the ale remains much more of a sipping beer than a drinkable one. Mild bitterness and rosy spice gives this high gravity wheat beer a hearty prickle on the tongue as it exits.

 1,395 characters

Photo of brentk56
3.84/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Pours a hazy ruddy color (the liquid looks like white zinfandel) with a lovely head that retains incredibly well and thoroughly laces the glass

Smell: The predominate aroma is a combination of grape and orange peel with an undertone of coriander

Taste: Starts with a fruity orange and pinot noir flavor that becomes increasingly spicy, mid-palate; after the swallow, the woody flavors come to the fore and combine with the fruit to make an intriguing finish

Mouthfeel: Light body with considerable carbonation

Drinkability: Interesting enough, but I'm not sure I would drink this again

 609 characters

Photo of emerge077
3.88/5  rDev -0.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a high clarity amber with a reddish character. Definitely not pink. Nice webs of lace hang on the inside of the glass. Puffy stratus layers of foam and lace intertwine in the second pour. Served at cellar temperature.

Muted aroma of mildy sweet, overripe fruit.

The oak component is the best thing going for this. Earthy, with a little dry tannin, mixed with caramel and the unobtrusive Pino Noir character. It's a nice blend, it seems like a hard one to balance, but they did it.

Sort of limp yet boozy mouthfeel, it lacks the usual higher carbonation of standard Witbiers. This is a genre-defier, but still, some lightness would be nice. Alcohol becomes apparent, but not overbearing. It's drinkable, probably best shared with a friend or two. Higher alcohol, so possibly a cellar candidate.

Witbier is surely a misclassification, as others have noted...

 878 characters

Photo of Phyl21ca
3.85/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottle courtesy of Wickedpete: Poured a deep reddish color ale with a rather large foamy head with good retention and some good lacing notes. Aroma consists of coriander with some notes of wheat and light acidic touch. Taste is a very good mix between some wheat with great notes of coriander and some sweet malt. Great mix between spices and Belgian style malt. Full body with great carbonation and no alcohol. The only negative things that I have too say is that this beer might be slightly too sweet but apart from that great beer from Dogfish.

 547 characters

Photo of Thorpe429
3.2/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Reviewed from notes. On tap at the Dogfish Alehouse in Falls Church.

Pours a light reddish color with a white head. The nose is dominated by red wine with a tad bit of light red fruit and some citrus. The taste is pretty much light red wine, almost just tasting like it has been watered down and carbonated. Feel is a bit sweet. Drinks well enough, but I just didn't get much from this.

 387 characters

Photo of superspak
4.1/5  rDev +5.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

750 ml bottle into signature tulip glass, bottled on 7/9/2013. Pours fairly hazy/cloudy deep orange/amber color with a 1-2 finger dense off white head with good retention, that reduces to a small cap that lingers. Nice spotty soapy lacing clings around the glass, with a moderate amount of streaming carbonation retaining the head. Aromas of big apricot, lemon zest, red grape, orange peel, light banana, coriander, clove, pepper, wheat, honey, caramel, light biscuit, oak, herbal, and yeast earthiness. Damn nice aromas with good balance and complexity of fruity/earthy yeast, spices, and pale malt sweetness; with great strength. Taste of big apricot, lemon zest, red grape, orange peel, light banana, coriander, clove, pepper, wheat, honey, caramel, light biscuit, oak, herbal, and yeast earthiness. Fair amount of earthy yeast spiciness on the finish; with lingering notes of apricot, lemon zest, red grape, orange peel, light banana, coriander, clove, pepper, wheatm honey, caramel, light biscuit, oak, herbal, and yeast earthiness on the finish for a while. Damn nice complexity and robustness of fruity/earthy yeast, spices, and pale malt sweetness; with a great malt/yeast balance and zero cloying sweetness after the finish. Light-medium carbonation and fairly full bodied; with a smooth, fairly creamy, and lightly slick/crisp mouthfeel that is great. Alcohol is well hidden with only a small warming present after the finish. Overall this is an excellent imperial witbier style. All around great complexity and balance of fruity/earthy yeast, spices, and pale malt sweetness; and very smooth to sip on for the big ABV. A very enjoyable offering.

 1,656 characters

Photo of nickfl
4.24/5  rDev +8.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A - One and a half fingers of fluffy, white head on a hazy, reddish-orange body. The head settles down pretty quickly, leaving nice rings of lace on the glass.

S - Fruity yeast notes of acidic tropical fruit, pineapple and guava. Spicy, herbal hop in the background as well as moderately dark malt aromas of toffee and light caramel.

T - Lots of noble hop flavor up front with yeasty fruit and some non specific phenolic notes.. The pineapple flavors meld with toasted malt in the middle. The hops linger to the end where toffee notes and vinous acidity assert themselves for a very dry finish.

M - Moderately high carbonation, a surprisingly thick body, and a dry, acidic finish.

D - Quite quaffable for a 10% abv beer. The aroma characteristics are the best aspect of the beer, and while they are reflected in the flavor the yeast notes are never quite as lively in the mouth as they are in the nose. The hopping rate seems a bit excessive to me, but it may be necessary to balance the syrupy body and heavy malt character.

 1,029 characters

Photo of NeroFiddled
4.37/5  rDev +12.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Bottled in 2009. I've had this in the fridge for about a week. I'd hoped that it would settle to become clear, but I knew that it really wouldn't. It's a cloudy deep-orange marmalade color with a bit of a crimson cast. The massive head's held up very well, and it's left a magnificent sheet of wide-holed lace about the entire glass. Large tulip, by the way.

The nose is sweetish, fruity, and very slightly tart/funky. There's an edge of wood to it. And some orange. And spice. Candy notes and berry-like fruit seem to dominate.

In the mouth it's medium-full in body with a dextrinous edge, and gently bristling on the tongue with a fine-bubbled, just slightly elevated carbonation. Some alcohol gives it a bit of an edge as well, but it's actually nice in that it helps to cut through the malt.

The flavor is very much as the aroma indicates, with orange and fruit and spice and oak & alcohol dryness amidst a candyish malt base. I kind of recalled that there was "wine" in here as well from the first time I had it, but that was years ago. I picked up on it instantly, and then checked the label. Yep. Then it kind of disappeared for a bit and I was tasting more of the malty sweetness and berry-like fruit. But then the more interesting flavors came into focus. I pick the grape juice up mostly in the finish, although I think it's also probably what's giving me the berry-like flavors upfront. It's got a bit of alcohol to it. I can taste it and I can feel it. And it's got some hop bitterness as well. Not a lot, but certainly enough to keep it firm.

It's interesting how the flavors change, and how pronounced they can be at times. Sometimes the spice is just a swirl, and other times it's almost all you can taste. Same thing goes for the orange, and the grape, and the alcohol or oak. And that gives it complexity; which then lends to drinkability. It's not a beer you can drink a lot of, but you'll probably enjoy what you've had, and perhaps want another. Very nicely done, and quite unique.

 2,006 characters

Photo of Kegatron
4.23/5  rDev +8.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a 750 ml bottle, bottled on 2/9/07

Pours an amber orange with a minimal white head that left behind some nice lacing. Big Witbier aroma of yeast & spices & fruits.

Taste is similar to the aroma. Yeast, malt, wheat, spices, fruits (cherry, orange), just a ton of stuff going on. A little too boozy in the finish perhaps? Nice full, almost viscous body.

Wow, yet another fantastic creation from Dogfish! A wonderful marriage of beer & wine that I found to be both quite quaffable & enjoyable.

 513 characters

Photo of TheManiacalOne
3.85/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a 750ml bottle into a DFH tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a light reddish orange color, with a thin off-white head that fades quickly and leaves a thin lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is fruity and sour with oranges, wheat, some coriander and alcohol.

T: The taste starts out with flavors of orange, coriander spice, and grapes. There are light background flavors of wheat and Belgian yeast. There's a mild alcoholic sting but not it's not too strong for a beer with 10.00% ABV. The hops presence is mild and the malt character is on the thin side as you would expect from this type of beer. The after-taste is slightly sour.

M: Smooth and very crisp, medium body, medium carbonation, finish is clean and dry.

D: Tasty, goes down dangerously easily, not too filling, strong kick, decent representation of style while adding a twist to it, this is a pretty good beer but not one that I would want to drink more than one bottle of.

 949 characters

Photo of dbrauneis
3.73/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Pours a hazy golden orange in color with some moderate amounts of visible carbonation. The beer has a two finger tall foamy off-white head that reduces and condenses to a thick layer over the entire surface of the beer. Significant lacing is observed.

S: Moderate aromas of grape along with orange/grapefruit citrus upfront. Additionally there are lighter aromas of spice (coriander), Belgian yeast, wheat, and just a hint of oak.

T: Starts out with some light grape sweetness along with an almost candied orange peel and some wheat. Next comes stronger grapefruit/orange citrus flavors, spice (coriander), and Belgian yeast. Finally the beer finishes oak and some light hints of alcohol.

M: Medium bodied with heavy amounts of carbonation. Smooth and slightly dry in the finish (likely from the introduction of wine).

O: For the most part, the high amount of alcohol is well hidden in this beer - the beer is refreshing and drinkable. While it does taste too strong, I'm thinking that the high ABV does not make this one for session drinking. There is a nice complexity to the flavor.

 1,092 characters

Photo of Rifugium
3.71/5  rDev -4.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

First had: bottle from Joe Canal's, Bellmawr, NJ
This review is from a recent tasting on tap at TJ's, Paoli, PA

Saw this on tap and I thought I'd revisit it since #1 I hadn't had it in quite a while, and #2 I'd yet to have it on tap. Very heady, and it took about 5 minutes to settle to a servable pour. (TJ's tap lines strike again?) Murky orange-red color, the head was tan, ample, and very creamy. Grape and orange peel on the nose, citric acid and bread. First sip was...incredible actually. Maybe it was just because of the frothiness of the head, but it was incredibly smooth and creamy almost like a milkshake. With time, this died down a bit and mellowed to the usual taste and texture exhibited by the beer. Taste follows the nose pretty much, bready, yeasty, vinous, orange peel, wheaty bite. Medium body and some bitterness in the aftertaste. Crisp and tasty, and I liked it slightly better on tap.

 910 characters

Photo of ChainGangGuy
3.06/5  rDev -21.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance: Pours a light, pinkish body (like six steps off from the color of cranberry juice) with a tall, light pink head.

Smell: A wheat-filled aroma with notes of candyish cherry and orange, as well as a few hints of coriander and a dash of cheap chardonnay.

Taste: The type of syrupy sweet fruit flavors of cherry, orange, and grape that you'd expect from a kids juicebox. The combination of spice, alcohol, oakiness, and a regrettable plasticy taste made for a rather caustic finish.

Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied. Medium carbonation. Creamy mouthfeel.

Drinkability: The Black & Blue doesn't taste like Red & White, but they are going for the same vibe all the way through. Unfortunately, I didn't care for either of them.

 735 characters

Photo of BuckeyeNation
3.78/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Blood orange mixed with molten copper. The large, whipped creamy cap is primarily ecru in color, but features a pale rose blush that is almost certainly due to the Pinot noir juice. One doesn't often see this combination of colors in a single beer. The appearance is original, interesting and good. Let's see if the rest of the attributes follow suit.

Of the traditional witbier ingredients, only coriander is noticeable in the nose. Perhaps I'll pick up the orange peel once warming has worked its usual magic (note: I don't). There's also a subtle berry-like grapiness that needed to have been more than subtle to make an impact. It isn't like Dogfish Head to pull its punches... but then I haven't tipped up the glass yet.

Red & White is good beer that doesn't make any serious moves toward being great beer. At least it isn't another boozy, 'too avant garde for its own good' DFH ale. The label description got me ready for something special, with its unquestionably audacious marriage of an Imperial witbier and red grape juice, aged on wine barrels and oak. Unless something changes as the bottom of the bottle nears, the setup is better than the delivery.

First of all, the beer is too sweet. That's the biggest reason why the drinkability score doesn't keep pace with the flavor score. R & W reminds me of a Belgian ale is some undefinable way. Must be the yeast. The flavor profile is reminiscent of sweet red wine mixed with a dash of orange juice and a sprinking of coriander.

I don't get the oakiness at all. In my experience, it's much easier to appreciate woodiness in a dry beer rather than a sweet beer... and this one is tooth-rottingingly sweet. It seems to me that Red & White would work best as a dessert beer, to be shared with an entire tableful of people. Matching it with a blackberry tart would probably be fantastic.

If you like big, syrupy, sticky mouthfeels then DFH has a beer for you. Since I do, I like this one just fine. It works because the number of bubbles is pretty damn close to perfect. A few more would have been okay too. A few less would not have been.

I have mixed feelings about Red & White. On the one hand I applaud Mr. Caglione for thinking outside the box (as always). On the other, the beer is too weighted down by candi sugar to have any hope of being compared with Belgium's best. Sometimes a lighter touch is required.

 2,376 characters

Photo of billab914
3.82/5  rDev -2.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

2009 vintage. Poured from a 750ml bottle into my Allagash glass. It poured amber/orange in color with a modest, off-white head filling the top inch of the glass. The head quickly faded to a thin and spotty layer, where it clung to the edges of the glass to form some nice lacing as I drank it.

The aroma shows a lot of the grape, fruity character to it. I get a crisp, apple or pear like aroma to it as well. The sweeter wheat comes through, along with some of the citrusy coriander and orange peel flavors.

The taste shows more of the grape and tart fruits to it up front. Midway some of the wheat and citrus flavors start to come out. It leads into a malty, sweeter finish with some more spice and tart, crisp fruits coming out. Not much of the oak or barrel character coming out at all.

The mouthfeel is on the heavier side for the style and carbonation is moderate. Drinkability was pretty good, it was a pretty cool beer overall. I liked the grape, fruity flavors it had, and they mixed with the wit beer flavors pretty well. A pretty nice beer overall, and one of the better Dogfish 750's I've had.

 1,110 characters

Photo of mdaschaf
3.85/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass

A: Pours red/orange in color with an off white head that does not last very long. It is slightly cloudy.

S: A very aromatic beer, I can pick up some of the red fruit from the pinot juice and some spices as well. There is a little bit of a yeast component as well.

T: This is a sweet beer, with the pinot being present but not overpowering which I was worried about. It has some wine-like characteristics, some acidity and tartness. They do a good job masking the alcohol in this one.

M/D: The carbonation is great on this one and I found it to be pretty drinkable, as I went back for a second glass and then finished off the bottle as well. Drinking the entire bottle would be tough, but like the black and blue its a great beer to share and was perfect for tonights BBQ.

 816 characters

Photo of mikesgroove
4.05/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

amber with a small head, a little lace that faded into a nice coating with eddys and swirls embedded in the bubbly lace, lingered to the last drop. Smell was sweet, very very sweet. Candy apple, caramle, cherry were all over this and predominated. Slight hop back detected and a tiny bit of alcohol. Did I say sweet!

The taste followed the same route with the huge candy sweetness predominating some other hints of apple, cherries, grapes. Some alcohol, but it is mostly balanced by the rebost flavors. Goes down very smooth, light and crisp. Tingles and warms as it goes. Carbonation is not overally done though. Overall this is a very nice brew, a little too sweet to have more then one or two, but is perfect as a sipper after dinner. the wine notes are subtle and the style i am not sure where they got that from, a sweet, citrusy and floral ale, this works

 862 characters

Photo of Slatetank
3.88/5  rDev -0.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

thanks to tenderbranson69 for sharing this 750ml w/ me.
Poured into a picnic tumbler chilled
A - A hazed garnet with a thin cream head. The color is reminiscent of rooibos tea - a tinge of brown and a shade of plum w/ a head about the thickness of a finger or less.

S - Fruity, vinous, tinges of dried fruit. Cranberry or currant type earthiness. Tart like baked cherry crisp.

M - Thick and full of body. Tart fruit feel followed by a spice and malt texture. Nice effervescent creaminess in the finish.

T - Sweetness and juice taste comes in on a wave of carbonation potent and slightly woody. A flavor of wine that comes across w/ a big beer taste simultaneously and finishes on the beer side. Spices join the thrall of a huge flavored brew. Plenty of fusels and warmth in the last sips.

D - A big ale, but flavorful and unique, it's hard not to keep imbibing this. I found so much flavor layer by layer it was multidimensional and intense for a Wit that is twice the strength it goes down pretty easily. I would certainly want to enjoy this with friends again. I think it would probably go well w/ a glazed pork loin.

2nd taste 2/26/08 cellared for 382 days, decanted into a tumbler cool.

A - A rosy copperish w/ a faint hazy glow and a loose tan head w/ light lace.

S - Boozy, fruity and hints of vinous scents w/ slight yeasty odors

M - Spicy, creamy w/ mild effervescence and warming alcohol. This seems to be smoother than 1 year ago.

T - Sweet dry and toasty w/ vanilla w/ dark berry and sweet candy sugar w/ a spiced fruity citrus essence w/ nice grainy flavors. The flavors seemed to have melded slightly.

D - Very nice, was lighter w/ less alcohol in the flavor upfront and easier on the taste buds too. The flavors of the fruit are still fresh and the overall drink ability was better IMO. a-4 s-4 m - 3.5 t - 4 d - 4.5

 1,841 characters

Photo of womencantsail
3.31/5  rDev -15.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A: The pour is an orange-amber color with a fairly fluffy off-white head on top.

S: The nose features some coriander, which is one of the few things that might tell you that this is a witbier. Maybe a bit of citrus in there along with plenty of fruity sweetness.

T: A bit of fruit and heavy on the sweetness without much of the base witbier coming through. Again, maybe just a hint of coriander and orange peel.

M: The carbonation is maybe a bit on the heavy side with a fairly full body, especially for the style.

D: Definitely a nice idea from DFH, but another one of their beers that did not quite hit the mark (for me, anyway). The 10% abv doesn't really do much for me either, but at least it's fairly well hidden.

 723 characters

Photo of vfgccp
4.37/5  rDev +12.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

A – Cognac orange amber. White head holds up well with nice lace.

S – Big, blackcurrant bouquet paired with a saison-like barnyness and lightness. Hay, green plant stems. Lightly sour.

T – Fruity and complex. The profile opens with dark berries - currants and blackberries - and then arcs into malt, some acidity, and brighter fruit in the form of peach and orange zest. The net effect of the later is reminiscent of marmalade on toast. The middle is tart with a crisp oak character. The backend layers a soft cilantro bitterness on top of the oak, while a boozyness that has been building throughout the profile steps into spotlight to highlight tart grape-skins and sweet raisins. While the booze is big, it’s well integrated and plays an important role in the profile.

M – Warm booze throughout the finish. Medium body is soft on the palate. Net dry finish is lightly fruity.

O – Overall the brew is balanced on the sweet side, has a great complexity, and is surprisingly drinkable for how prominent the alcohol is.

P – Would pair well with herb roasted poultry, pork sausages, sweet bbq pulled pork, and a range of tomato-based pasta dishes from marinara to puttanesca.

 1,193 characters

Photo of Huhzubendah
4/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Feb 2007 vintage purchased fresh. This beer collected dust in my cellar for over three years. I split this with an old friend who has an affinity for Dogfish Head.

A: A fiery orange color with a really terrific head and lace ringlets.

S: Orange peel, citrus, wine, wood, spices (mainly coriander).

T: The smell is better than the taste. The complex aromas aroused great expectations for the taste that fell somewhat short. The beer has a nice taste, but is just too sweet. I was really hoping a few years in the cellar would reduce the sweetness (and perhaps it did?). This tastes like an imperial witbier, which I suppose it is. All of the characteristics of the aroma come forth nicely in the taste. However, the sweetness becomes cloying after a few ounces and begins to overrun the more positive aspects of the beer.

M: Good carb level, even after three years. Finishes sweet. ABV noticeably less present than in a fresh bottle.

D: Tasty and worth trying. I'm not in a hurry to try it again, though I wouldn't turn it down. 375ml was more than enough.

 1,061 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Red & White from Dogfish Head Craft Brewery
3.9 out of 5 based on 1,821 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.