Dismiss Notice
We're celebrating 10 years of BeerAdvocate magazine with $10 print subscriptions for US residents.

Subscribe now!

Curim Gold Celtic Wheat Beer | Carlow Brewing Company

Log in or Sign up to start rating.
BA SCORE
74
okay
94 Reviews
THE BROS
-
no score
Send samples
Curim Gold Celtic Wheat BeerCurim Gold Celtic Wheat Beer
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Carlow Brewing Company
Ireland
carlowbrewing.com

Style: American Pale Wheat Ale

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.30%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by canadianbarman on 08-08-2002

BEER STATS
Reviews:
94
Ratings:
127
Avg:
3.18
pDev:
19.18%
 
 
Wants:
1
Gots:
12
For Trade:
0
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Reviews: 94 | Ratings: 127
Photo of bort11
3.2/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

11.2 oz bottle, poured into a pub glass. Near inch of white head, quick to recede and settle to a grayish tint. Color is a clear golden yellow.

Smell is mild husky grain. Hint of lemon grass. Taste is grainy with a citrus hops. Very mild.

Mouthfeel is light and refreshing. Crisp carbonation. However $8 for a four pack is prohibitive from getting more.

 355 characters

Photo of Tone
2.81/5  rDev -11.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clear golden color. One inch head of a off-white color. Decent retention and slight lacing. Smells of of pale malt, slight lemon aroma, yeast cleanliness, and some small hints of wheat. Fits the style of an American Pale Wheat Ale, if not rather poorly. Mouth feel is smooth and crisp, with an average carbonation level. Tastes of yeast cleanliness up front, then a hint of lemon, the wheat is almost unnoticeable, and a slight hop bitterness is present in the finish. Overall, more like a lager than a pale wheat ale, at least in flavor. Not worth going out of your way for.

 583 characters

Photo of Padron4KM
2.63/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Golden straw with an average size, off white head. small patches of sticky lace left behind.

Wheat is barley perceptable in the aroma. I had to double check the lable to make sure.

Flavor is light wheat, bread and spicy hops.
Finish is light and dry.

 253 characters

Photo of BuckeyeNation
2.86/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Sun-splashed wheat field gold with faded lemon peel borders. The large, polished ivory colored crown is the beer's best feature with respect to appearance. The foam has a considerable amount of character and is starting to leave some lovely looking lace.

There isn't much good to say about the aroma and there isn't much bad either. It's fairly low on power and smells... uh... clean. Just a little untoasted wheatiness and a bit of fruitiness from the hops. Challenger, Mt. Hood and Cascade if you're keeping score.

Curim Gold is an especially grainy version of an Irish pale wheat ale. It's better than pale lagers from the Big 3, but it tastes similar in some respects. Never mind the fact that it's wheat-based and uses ale yeast. When the brewery says 'lightly hopped', they mean it. Any more lightly hopped and it'd be a gruit.

The flavor profile is astoundingly simple: watery grain with a hint of citrus peel. That's it. Carlow Brewing thinks CGCWB has notes of 'peach, banana and plum'. That's laughable, bordering on delusional. As is the 'best by' date of 1-31-10. This stuff will be undrinkable dreck long before then. If you have to drink it, drink it cold.

The mouthfeel is pretty close to watery, but then 4.3% pale wheat ales aren't known for their chewiness. Since the carbonation finds some sort of happy medium, I'll go with an average score.

Curim Gold Celtic Wheat Beer is a decent alternative to almost any American light lager that you'd care to name. However, it's probably more expensive and is much less widely available. Never seen it? You're not missing anything, believe me.

 1,608 characters

Photo of whynot44
3.01/5  rDev -5.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Clear light amber color with a decent white head that doesn't stay around long, although it does manage a bit of lacing.

The aroma is very mild, bread and a trace of dry hay.

The taste is mildly wheat with a carbonic tang and some vague citrus and grassy notes. Strangely, it tastes almost more like a mainline lager than most wheat beer.

Light bodied, very drinkable, fairly crisp and refreshing.

 403 characters

Photo of abcsofbeer
3.25/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a bottle with no drink by date. This one is a clear, golden color that is topped by a 11/2 finger white head. The aroma is lightly hopped and like sweet tea and sugared molasses. I detect some aromas that are similar to a macro brew. Nothing real special here. The taste is also lightly hopped, and, has a good blend of sweetness from the ale fermentation. I also detect a small peppery taste too. The mouthfeel is medium bodied with a fairly dry finish.

 466 characters

Photo of thierrynantes
3.53/5  rDev +11%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Beer bottle (50cl), tasted in 2001.

Apperance : wheat beer golden color, clear, white foam head not persistent
Smell : wheat, hops, coriander ?
Taste and mouthfeel : spicy, no bitterness
Drinkability : a good refreshing beer in the syle American pale wheat beer

 262 characters

Photo of trevorwideman
2.99/5  rDev -6%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

500ml bottle poured into an Erdinger Weiss glass.

Pours a pale yellow with a very slight haze. One finger of head, good retention due to the almost violent carbonation that pierces the brew. Fair amount of wet lace. Aroma is lightly floral with a hint of apple and banana, lots of bready, yeasty aroma, and a light vanilla aroma as well. Light hop spiciness as well. Subtle but enjoyable.

Taste is less remarkable. A bit wheaty with some peppery zest at first, light apple juice sweetness and a floral note. Lemon sourness with a VERY light bitterness in the finish. Watered down and very nearly flavourless. It's so subtle that it comes off as boring. Very watery in the mouth as well, extremely light body. Not much in the way of dryness in the finish, but is is a little sour. Carbonation is a lot lower than expected, contributing to the overall watery impression. Sessionable in spades I'm sure, but it's just too uninteresting to make me want another.

 959 characters

Photo of belgbeerdrinker
2.53/5  rDev -20.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

a: amber color, little carbonation, moderate head settling to thin veil
s: light hoppy & malty aroma
t: malty upfront with sour finish and bearly noticeable wheat presence
m: light body & carbonation, not much going on
d: rather ordinary ale and not a good wheat beer interpretation

 282 characters

Photo of aussielars
2.51/5  rDev -21.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Nice big fluffy and slow-disappearing head. Hazy golden amber in colour. Good effervescence as is typical of this style.

I detect the sweetness of the malt and the tartness that is characteristic of wheat beers.

Mouthfeel is light and not on the same planet as a Schneider, for example.

This beer is very easy to drink. But so is Corona. If I had to pick a wheat beer in which to put a wedge of lemon into, this would be the one.

 433 characters

Photo of brendan13
3.18/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Dark golden orange colour with a large fluffy head that falls away quite quickly.
S - Sweetish wheat malt aroma, vauge spice.
T - Pretty much along the same lines as the smell.
M - Mouthfeel was OK but a little watery. Medium carbonation.
D - Drinkable beer but many tastier wheat beers for the same price or even less.

 327 characters

Photo of JohnfromDublin
3.68/5  rDev +15.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

I have had this many times before both in bottle and on draft. Time for the long overdue review.
This pours a clear amber brew with minimal carbonation and a fairly thin head. Ths smell was of hops and a hint of wet hair!
The taste was much better, not very complex, but a decent lightly hopped ale. Very palatable. Mouthfeel good making this a drinkable beer for a session.

 376 characters

Photo of tjd25
2.87/5  rDev -9.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Quickly fading dense head on a transparent pale orange color body. The smell is of dry straw with some malty (o'fest) notes and hints of pine and honey. The taste isn't really noticeably wheaty. I found more similarities with the dry character of a German pilsner. Some watery caramel notes aren't really enjoyable. Some seltzer water notes bring some freshness and a sweet and lightly fruity character. Also, surprizingly, hints of wood.The mouthfeel is a bit more consistent than the appearance might make you believe, but it's still nothing really interesting. It leaves an aftertaste in the mouth, mostly a harsh yet not overpronounced bitterness. If all this is due to the "celtic" character, I'd rather just have a wheat beer. An ale that tastes like a lager.

 765 characters

Photo of jdhilt
3/5  rDev -5.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours with a one-finger off-white head that fades to a ring leaving some lace. Clear amber color. Medium bodied. Nose is wheat/whiskey. Light-medium carbonation. Starts sweet and crisp finishes fairly smooth without any noticeable yeast - different for a wheat. $1.85 for a 12oz bottle from Hoosick Street Discount Bev. Troy, NY.

 329 characters

Photo of redmosquito
3.58/5  rDev +12.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Nice golden color with a good head. Interesting aroma, yeasty with some oak, and a whiskey like scent. Flavor follows suit with a little sweet wheat flavor with that oak whiskey flavor in the background. The beer finishes quickly without the wheat after taste I’d expect. This is a great summer beer and a good beer overall. Where do they get that whiskey flavor?

 364 characters

Photo of cypressbob
2.9/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

500ml bottle

Pours with a medium hue yellow body, fairly high levels of carbonation, whispy head which retains for a time

Very clear considering its a wheat beer

Smell is limited, but its yeasty and malty, dry, a little fruit but very minimal, reminds me of an extract brewed czech pilsner i made

Taste is dry and full of malt, doesnt go down easily and is a little dull, it really doesnt make u want another, over carbonated

Overall, really disappointing, this is another example of the theory that only the germans can make a good wheat

 553 characters

Photo of chilidog
3.26/5  rDev +2.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I guess, this is one to try if you've had the other two Carlow offerings. It pours a hazy gold with a average head that faded to a thin film. Lace was in spots but through-out the drink. The aroma is citric as is the taste. A slight mello wheat malt along with alittle banana sweetness adds to it. Nothing over-the-top here, just a drinkable wheat beer if only to say you've had all three.

 389 characters

Photo of Winter
2.86/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Pours a deep golden in color with a white short-lived head. Very fruity aroma. Mouthfeel is soft and lighter in body with a touch of crispness as it rolls over your tongue. Fruitiness dominates the palate. Flavors of peaches, pears and bananas on the forefront. Wheat taste is there, but buried behind the overwhelming fruitiness of the beer. Somewhat of a mineral water quality to the finish. Glad I only picked up a single, as this one wasn't that great.

 456 characters

Photo of Billolick
2.45/5  rDev -23%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This stuff is very weak and not worth wasting your time on, there are too many decent/good/great wheats out there!
Light straw, abit cloudy, very minimal yeast/wheat/malt flavor, abit sour, fairly high carbonation. Minimal redeaming qualities, to report on this one.

 267 characters

Photo of GeoffRizzo
3.05/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Hazy, yet dull yelow hue, thin, vanishing head. Wheaty aroma. Off the cuff, crisp wheaty flavorings, a large, overpowering metallic feel, becomes offensive. Rather light bodied, reserved tartiness, sweet/sour palate. Lemony and quite sour, does have a malty backbone, with some biscuity notes in the body. Certainly not an award winner, borderline passing for the style.

 370 characters

Photo of Brent
2.48/5  rDev -22%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Bland and boring. All other description is simply an enlargement on those terms, but here goes: Poured a hazy golden with minimal head. Not much aroma of any kind, perhaps a bit of muted malt. Flavor was slightly tart without any yeast phenols at all. Malt was slightly crackery, fading to a spritzy nothingness at the finish.

 326 characters

Photo of budgood1
2.96/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

after pouring out a bright golden colour with a large rocky head, there was a wee bit o' yeast to work up from the bottom of the bottle from this irish (celtic) wheat. it added a slight haze, such as a hefe should look like. there were heavy rings of lace left on the glass. a rather muted aroma of spice and yeast, with hints of lemony clover and grass. none of the cloves and bananas i drool over. the taste is rather bland and boring...some wheat malt and ghostly spiciness. it's rather refreshing and easily drinkable, but just uninspiring.

 544 characters

Photo of IrishRedRock
2.75/5  rDev -13.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Filtered wheat beer? Surely you jest. Somewhat hazy golden color, but its not hazy due to any yeast or sediment, which is rather disappointing. This obviously takes away from the appearance and aroma. No spicy yeast in the nose, just a bit of light citrus. Bubbly, but zero carbonation is detectable upon sipping this. Wheat flavor is present, as is a sour tangerine-like flavor that is not very pleasant. This brewery does better with their other beers. This one is kind of bland and boring.

 492 characters

Photo of canadianbarman
3.92/5  rDev +23.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

--500 ml brown, wide bottle, freshness date stamped on cap.
--Poured a slightly cloudy, gold straw like in color. Started out with a good head that thinned to a slight head. Some minor lacing.
--Had a sweet, citrus like smell.
This beer had an expected sweeter taste to it. It did have a lightly bitter aftertaste that I wasn't expecting. It was a nice beer that I would drink again.
Thx

 391 characters

Photo of AtLagerHeads
3.03/5  rDev -4.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A hazy yellow body is topped by a decent white head and good lacing. The nose is citrusy with some malt showing through. The lemony flavor is joined by a slight grain flavor but this is small. The feel is light and crisp in the finish. Average drinkability.

 257 characters

Curim Gold Celtic Wheat Beer from Carlow Brewing Company
3.18 out of 5 based on 127 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • Extreme Beer Fest® Cometh

    February 3-4, 2017. Boston, Mass. Limited tickets available. Prepare for epicness.

    Learn More
  • 10 Years of BeerAdvocate Magazine

    We're celebrating 10 years of BA mag with $10 print subscriptions for US residents!

    Subscribe