Wittekerke | De Brabandere

WittekerkeWittekerke
BA SCORE
3.59/5
913 Ratings
WittekerkeWittekerke
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
De Brabandere
Belgium
bavik.be

Style: Witbier

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 03-29-2002

BEER STATS
Ranking:
#37,762
Reviews:
481
Ratings:
913
pDev:
13.93%
Bros Score:
3.57
 
 
Wants:
23
Gots:
80
Trade:
0
HISTOGRAM
 
View: Beers | Events
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Ratings: 913 |  Reviews: 481
Photo of BigBry
3.68/5  rDev +2.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Blue can (11.2oz, 33cl) with light yellow label, from the Make-your-own 6 pack my parents brought back from the States. 'Belgian White Beer' around the shoulder
Pours hazy, opaque yellow with a good size creamy white head. Good looking lace. Typical witbier spice and yeast smells. Light wheat flavor, enough spiciness to give a little boost. Clean and simple taste. Smooth, slightly creamy mouthfeel. Good all around example.

 426 characters

Photo of number1bum
3.63/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Got a can of this from mymrnngjckt. Thanks Kevin.

Pours a very light golden color, lighter than many macro lagers, with a haze to it and about a finger and a half of white head. Actually keeps pretty well and leaves some nice webbing on the sides.

Smell is on the light side but consists of a light, sweet wheat aroma, a bit of spice and some citrus tang.

Taste is also on the light side but like the smell has a nice light sweetness to it, with a bit of wheat and a tangy lemon note. Not much spice at all, and it feels a bit bland at times, but the flavor isn't bad.

Mouthfeel is very light, with a spritzy, clean feel. It's smooth but a tad too watery.

This isn't too bad, but it's a bit too bland. The flavor is quite good and it's very clean, so if it had just a bit more to it I think it'd be a very good wit. Not too bad, and pretty drinkable, but left me wanting something a bit more.

 897 characters

Photo of tone77
3.55/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a brown 11.2oz. bottle. Has a cloudy brown color with a 1/2 inch head and lots of floating yeast. Smell is a bit sweet with some spices. Taste is of citrus and spice, pretty good. Feels creamy in the mouth and goes down easily. Overall this is a quality beer.

 271 characters

Photo of WoogityBoogity
3.46/5  rDev -3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

A - Pale straw body that is cloudy. Tall white head with slow dissipation.

S - Definitely some kind of citrusy wheat & yeast funk going on; some find it favorable, some don't. No hop presence. Lemon and orange esters are predominant. Very low phenol hint.

T - Medium wheat malt flavor, with lemon/orange esters creating a tartness. No unusual phenols to this Wit.

M - Medium to light body that is high in carbonation, creating a great fizz on the tongue.

D - A zangy citrus wheat.

---

Not the best from Bavik, hate it or love it, but it's a really cheap Wit.

 565 characters

Photo of puboflyons
3.62/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

From the 11.2 fl. oz. bottle no. 39701. Sampled on September 26, 2009. It pours straw yellow-white with a thick, puffy white head and extremely cloudy. The aroma has a rich sweetness about it as well as the wheat that I have come to expect from a Belgian Wheat. What I did not expect was how sweet the taste would be. It was almost like drinking sugar. That was a bit off-putting. A background of hops in there too. Something to drink with chips I suppose.

 456 characters

Photo of DanielDanza
4.01/5  rDev +11.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

Poured from a sleek Euro style 11.2 oz bottle into a wheat glass.

The beer is a cloudy yellow, fairly similar in appearance to Hoegaarden, with a small fizzy head with insubstantial lacing, though my pour was far from perfect.

The aroma definitely isn't the strong point on this beer, although it isn't quite off-putting either. Faintly grainy, with some ripe fruit/citric undertones. It smells slightly sour and reminds me slightly of a macro lager, although more appealing due to the fruit notes.

The taste is light, citric, lemony, a bit tart. Basically what you would expect from a Belgian wit, without some of the more overwhelming sweetness and orange flavor one often finds in macro interpretations.

The mouthfeel is delightfully crisp and light but not watery at all. As such, this beer is extremely drinkable and utterly refreshing. I was in the mood for a wit and didn't feel like Hoegaarden, Blue Moon, or Shocktop and I didn't want to fork over the extra cash for Allagash or Bernardus. My hopes were a bit low for this one but I ended up being pleasantly surprised. One of the great warm-weather beers but enjoyable year round.

 1,145 characters

Photo of BarrelO
3.58/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

On-tap at Brasserie Beck. Served in a Wittekerke glass.

A: Hazy orange. Decent head.

S: Typical citrus aromas, but also surprisingly prominent hops. Almost pilsner-esque.

T: Again, typical wit flavors of citrus tartness are countered by pils-like hoppy bitterness. Kind of like Oberon, but not quite as good.

M: Light and spritzy.

D: It's certainly unique. I'd never make it my go-to wit, but it is good and refreshing.

 424 characters

Photo of cdizinno
4/5  rDev +11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Presentation: 11.2 oz bottle, same as pictured, with no freshness date. Poured into a tulip glass.

A: Very cloudy pale yellow with thin white head and moderate lacing.

S: Lemony citric zest and mild spicing.

T&M: Medium bodied with a crisp dry finish. Lots of lemon flavor with a mild malt sweetness and a wheat twang. Chalky yeast, citric peel and other obscure spicing. Finsihes with very mild hop bitterness.

Very good beer.

 433 characters

Photo of augustgarage
3.51/5  rDev -2.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a 330mL bottle into a rocks glass.

Cloudy pear body with chartreuse highlights and a frosting of magnolia forming the head. Very thin head, but retention is good (the same beer poured into a tulip glass on a previous occasion produced a much more satisfactory head, so I won't dock points here). Decent lacing.

Delicate, fairly one-dimensional aroma, with a lager-ish note (pilsner malt?), rice, and lactic sourness masquerading as citrus (sort of a natural air freshener scent).

Sweet and very mild spice on the palate, with a pleasant crisp tartness. Winter fruit (apples, pears) and light wheat notes round things out. Not much yeast flavor. Hints of adjunct, but a nice slightly dry finish.

Fairly thin bodied, not as creamy as I would like for this style, but good carbonation.

Overall, similar but slightly more flavorful and refreshing than macro interpretations of the style. For instance, this compares well to Blue Moon - and makes a great picnic beer if you pick up the canned version.

 1,016 characters

Photo of adamette
3.83/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Live review. Purchased as a 6 pack of 220 ml cans from Heinen's in Willoughby Hills, Ohio last week. The six pack was $9.89. Poured into my Brewery Ommegang Witte glass.

A Opaque yellow meringue-like body under a nice, creamy, thick white head. Head stayed around a bit too. Nice.

S Well, like a witbier and a kind of mass produced one as well without much spice to the nose. Really it kind of reminded me of a lager behind the wheat.

T Really nice, light wheat without a lot of fuss. The spice profile is not high but I really appreciate its simplistic "Here is a Witbier" approach.

M Nice smoothness really helped the whole taste profile as well.

D Very good indeed with manageable ABV and nice, light taste.

Notes: Nice to find in a can.

 746 characters

Photo of Cyberkedi
4.09/5  rDev +13.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

It pours a clear, rather typical wan sunny yellow, but the thick, fluffy, white head adds appeal. Aroma is strong, malty, wheaty and yeasty with just a touch of fruit - mainly banana - and inviting a taste. Flavor is mainly malty with yeasty undertone and a fruity hint. Texture is tingly and lively, what I like in a beer.

This one is worth finding. I had it at the Cafe Intermezzo in Dunwoody, GA.

 400 characters

Photo of bskrtz
4/5  rDev +11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance: cloudy pale lemonade.
Smell: is very subtle citrus juice
Taste: A very smooth and refreshing summer ale. Classic wheat style. Not spicy or partularly citrusy.
Mouthfeel: Ample carbonation, very slight lacy white head. emphasis on smooth
Drinkability: Yes, it is

 276 characters

Photo of atigerlife
3.26/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Pours a lemonade color with a 2-finger fluffy white head that has good lasting power. Good lacing. Lots of floaters.

Aroma is of citrus, light spices and rather musty.

Taste is of lemon, wheat, spices. Really seems to be lacking any defining character. Rather light in the taste.

Mouthfeel is light, lightly cleansing.

Overall, this brew is drinkable but not one I will try again.

 384 characters

Photo of GRPunk
3.78/5  rDev +5.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

I did a side-by-side tasting of the bottled and canned version. I'm pretty sure I've had the bottle before, and know I haven't had it in a can. Scoring is based on the canned version. Both were poured into pilsener glasses.

A- It poured a clean, yellow-gold initially. I was happily surprised when a shake of the can released some yeast sediment that clouded the body nicely. The head was 2-fingers, nice and white and it eventually fell to a full lace. There were great sticky spots all over the glass. (The major difference between the bottle and can was a thicker head with more staying power and stick, and a slightly darker body from the bottled version).

S- My first impression was of wheaty/yeasty qualities with a hint of green apple aroma. Maybe just a bit muted. (The bottled version was a little mustier).

T- Pretty standard for the style. Wheat flavor mixed with some light spice. It's hard to pinpoint, but I'd guess coriander and some possible citrus additions. (The bottled version was a bit more muddled and did not come off as quite so crisp).

M- Good, unfiltered feel. Overall, it was pretty light with moderate-heavy carbonation that leant a little kick. There was a pleasant grainy quality. (The bottle wasn't as carbonated, and came off as a little more viscus).

D- Like many in the style, it's an easy drinker. Light enough to drink a few in a sitting. Also light enough on the spice to be very enjoyable. I could see drinking a bunch in the warm weather. The only knock on the lightness, is that it doesn't "wow" the drinker. I'd enjoy this during the summer months in the future. (Bottle was still good, maybe more substantial/filling).

Overall- Both the bottle and can were good examples of the style. The can seemed a little lighter than the bottle. I can see taking cans to the beach/golf course/tailgate when bottles aren't allowed.

 1,866 characters

Photo of roadhouse
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

11.2 oz. bottle into a Duvel glass

Pours a hazy straw yellow with a one inch white head that falls to a skim rather quickly. Doesn't leave much in the way of lacing.

Aroma is strangely similar to a Czech Pils with a lot of Saaz hop aroma and some breadiness. A slight spiciness as well and some lemony orange citrus.

Taste is really not very good compared to most witbiers. It's got a bit of citrus, and bready malt. The strange Czech pils character is not really fitting for the style. A very light phenolic bite towards the finish, that I usually prefer to be a bit stronger in a wit.

Mouthfeel is medium bodied, pretty good soft texture to it makes it seem nice and creamy, but really, it is slightly low in carbonation.

Not a bad beer, but a pretty poor witbier overall. Wouldn't recommend it when there are much better options.

 837 characters

Photo of spointon
3.57/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I poured this one from an 11.2 skinny brown bottle into my Allagash tulip glass.

A= This ale poured a cloudy pale yellow color with a 3/4" white head and a fair amount of sediment in the glass. The head settled slowly to a thin skim and left very minimal lacing behind.

S= I found a nice aroma profile of lemon-citrus, fresh cut grass, coriander, and a dry funky yeast note. Very pleasant!

T= This was a very fruity and yeasty ale. The sweet malts played well against the fruity notes of lemon, orange, and apple. The wheat gave a nice twang to the front end as well. The coriander and whatever other spices may have gone into this brew were very muted. The yeast was extremely chalky and musty. Finsihed with a slight tartness and more earthy, funky yeast.

MF= Medium bodied with a carbonation level that was too low in my opinion and a mouthfeel that wasn't nearly as crisp as I would have liked it.

D= Not a perfect witbier, but a pretty good one all things considered. I really liked the yeasty character and only wish the carbonation level was more to my liking for this style. All in all a very sessionable beer though.

 1,133 characters

Photo of PreacherBrewer
4.05/5  rDev +12.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Served on tap at Beer Run in Cville.

Appearance - A vibrant Yellow beer shines in my 10oz glass. A very attractive color, and small bubbly carbonation collecting at the surface. A very attractive color...

Smell - Citrus flavors are bouncing everywhere in my nostrils. Orange, Lemon, Lime, etc. Pine Saw comes to mind, in a good way...haha. it's like breathing in a fresh breeze.

Taste - The Lemon, Orange, and Citrus flavors all return in quite an exhilarating fashion. Pineapple shows up with it's good buddy the pear. as the beer warms, yeast is present in a good way. very tantalizing and very refreshing.

Mouthfeel - This witbier sports a handsome mod-heavy mouthfeel, which is different, in a great way. it has a lot of carbonation going on for a wit, which i like the change-up on this note. very crisp, very refreshing.

Drinkability - A very Balanced beer was in my glass, and is now in my tummy. It was refreshing, bold for it's style, and full of wonderful flavor. Although it was a tiny bit watery, it was complex and refreshing enough to keep my full attention. great brew. i'll have another...

 1,111 characters

Photo of u2carew
3.88/5  rDev +8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A) Pours with a two finger head, then settles slightly. Tight, sticky lacing. Straw colored with some haze (hence, wheat beer) and visible carbonation.
S) Citrus orange and lemon. Wheaty.
T) Just a touch of malty sweetness in the front end then a transition to a citrus wheat mid section. Finishes with dry, yet fruity, wheat notes.
M) Just a bit gritty. Light bodied. Crisp. Refreshing.
D) True to form. Refreshing. Has a decent body feel, leaving one as though they did drink a beer and not some light colored concoction. I'd have another.

 542 characters

Photo of NODAK
2.95/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

Aroma is pretty bright and citrusy. Definitely good notes of lemon here.

And the taste?? I'm disappointed. This may be my favorite style of beer and I generally like any beer of this style but something wrong happened here. There's just nothing interesting about it. From the beginning of the sip until the end of the swallow, it's just lemony. The familiar spiciness of this style is very minimal and I had to struggle to even notice it. It's just basically citric. At the very tail end some very faint wheat can be percepted but it isn't near enough to properly balance this beer. I don't mind citrus in beer and I in fact do like that, but something more interesting would be nice.

Drinkability is fairly high because it isn't hard to choke down. That's as far as I'll recommend it though, because there are far better for style.

 835 characters

Photo of ChainGangGuy
3/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance: Tremendously clear, damn near colorless body exhibiting only a faint pale yellow hue. Thin, white head.

Smell: Thin, puny aroma with just the mildest notes of barley, wheat, flowers, and lemons.

Taste: Slight touches of listless barley and wheat with a sweet, floral taste of honeysuckle. Small hint of grain. Lemony qualities and a minimal amount of spice character. Light bitterness. Sweetish back-and-forth of barren malts and tired lemon until the drying, weak finish.

Mouthfeel: Light-bodied. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: A real snoozer. So filtered and meek, it's downright wimpy. I'm all for light and refreshing, but, come on, let's have some (any) flavor too!

 689 characters

Photo of jdubjacket
3.4/5  rDev -5.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Enjoyed at the pool from the 4th of July.

Pale frothy yellow color. Smell is slightly earthy, wheaty, and a hint of banana. Taste is your typical wit, except slightly more watered down than usual - wheat, grassy, hint of banana, as indicated by the nose. Watery mouthfeel. These things are pretty easy to drink however, and make good pool beer.

Overall, a decent beer.

 370 characters

Photo of merryjoulton
3.15/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Smell is of light crisp malt, bread, yeasty, banana, and mysterious hops. it's a little thin smelling and just feels like something is missing. Taste is light and thin although there is a crisp breadiness. mouthfeel is light and drinkability is alright.

 253 characters

Photo of Risser09
2.73/5  rDev -24%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz can poured into a nonic - fridge - best by 12/3/2010

Appearance: A hazy light yellow color with a 2" white, soapy head. Great retention and spotty lace remains. A unique foam for the head is similar to a root beer style head. No visible carbonation activity.

Smell: Pale, wheat malts envelope some lemon and sour yeast aromas. Dandelion blossoms also.

Taste: A very pale flavor gives away some wheat , lemon and white pepper. Slight mineral aftertaste.

Mouthfeel: Very light body, very little carbonation, no apparent alcohol, and not much flavor.

Drinkability: This beer goes down extremely effortlessly because of its lack of body, flavor and any other harsh impediment. I wouldn't revisit.

 704 characters

Photo of BamaBeerBuff
3.86/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: A hazy pale straw yellow color. Very pale color with a creamy, fluffy white head that sticks around for quite a while and retains very well atop the beer. Negligible amounts of lacing.

S: A very unrestrained, raw wheat aroma, some lemony notes, a bit of beligan funkiness that borders on skunkiness. Interesting, but kind of odd and off.

T&M: Clean, complex, and flavorful. A good bit of orange rind and lemon, a light spice note, and a clean finish. The epitome of drinkability. Light bodied with a fine, Belgian-esque carbonation. Fine bubbles that work well. On par for the style.

D: Epitome of drinkability. Light and decently flavorful, but good.

 657 characters

Photo of Gmann
3.28/5  rDev -8.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a very pale straw color with that whitish tinge that wit biers have. Small but tight pure white head that dissipated into a ring, some minimal lacing. The aroma is grainy with lemon and hints of coriander. Grainy on the taste with a wheat malt crisp edge, some lemon and coriander. Pretty bland for a wit. The feel is light with fizzy carbonation; finishes with a grainy sweetness. Drinks real easy, good for drinking in the sun. The bier is just about average in all aspects. No real bold wit flavors, they seem to sit in the background. The grainy flavor seems to be forefront, while making the beer easy to drink, it seems to stray from the style. Perhaps a can is not the best vessel for this beer.

 708 characters

Wittekerke from De Brabandere
Beer rating: 3.59 out of 5 with 913 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.