Curious Brew | Hepworth & Co. (Brewers) Ltd.

12 Reviews
no score
Send samples
Curious BrewCurious Brew

Brewed by:
Hepworth & Co. (Brewers) Ltd.
England, United Kingdom

Style: Euro Pale Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.70%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by wl0307 on 12-09-2005

For Trade:
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Reviews: 12 | Ratings: 32
Reviews by jazzyjeff13:
Photo of jazzyjeff13
3.88/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A 330ml bottle with a BB of April 2013. ABV is stated as 4.7% and the name has changed to simply 'Curious Brew', but I'm pretty certain it's the same beer. Described on the label as a lager re-fermented with Champagne yeast and dry-hopped with Nelson Sauvin.

Poured into a tulip pint glass. A clear golden colour with good carbonation. Yields a huge head of white foam with a creamy texture and decent retention, although it disappears after a few minutes. The aroma is interesting; light malt with distinct overtones of earthy yeast, dry white grapes (like white wine) and hops. Not bad....

Tastes of light, clean malt with a mild hop bitterness. Notes of earthy yeast, light fruit (perhaps white grapes, though it's hard to describe) and subtle stewed hops. Mouthfeel is crisp and dry, with pleasant carbonation and slight astringency. Aftertaste of dry yeast and faint hops.

A quality effort for a lager - clean and tasty with some unusual fruity characteristics that resemble dry white wine. Superior craftmanship is in evidence compared with the industrial swill that typically passes for lager. Worth sampling.

 1,119 characters

More User Reviews:
Photo of biboergosum
3.36/5  rDev -4.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

330ml bottle. England has a 'leading winemaker' - swuh? Who knew?

This beer pours a crystal clear, pale golden straw hue, with one skinny finger of bubbly, fizzy, off-white head, which leaves a few instances of low-lying bonsai tree lace around the glass as it evenly subsides.

It smells of crisp citrus rind, hallow pine resin, bready malt, a suspect musky white grape fruitiness, some softly earthy, leafy hoppiness, and an off-note buttery character that only barely borders on rancid. The taste is sweet grainy pale malt, a prominent pithy yeastiness, some mildly oxidized white wine must, and softly fruity hops.

The bubbles are average, and generally supportive in their bearing, the body medium-light in weight, and a little too cloying from the start to be considered all that smooth. It finishes mostly sweet, the compromised pale malt giving it to a certain extent to the yeast and fruity lingering hops.

A somewhat strange offering from one the venerable lands of beer, where their production methods seem to be only second to Germany in terms of adherence to tradition. The yeasty wine character does perform a number on the underlying pale lager, and not always for the best. Approach with caution.

 1,215 characters

Photo of DJoe
2.8/5  rDev -20.7%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3

Photo of Jerseyislandbeer
2.5/5  rDev -29.2%

Photo of mdagnew
3.25/5  rDev -7.9%

Photo of DoddyDunbar
2.55/5  rDev -27.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

I am not sure if I am tasting the same beer because I was not impressed by this “lager”. It was watery and thin with insufficient body. The use of champagne yeast seemed to leave it with little to complement the, for my taste, overdone hops with too much competition between the three varieties used resulting in a cacophony rather than a marriage. So not enough character from the yeast too much from the competing hops and where was the lager malt character. I probably gave up looking because it was so hard to find under the hops. I know this brewer can produce some really fine beers so, yes, I was disappointed.

 621 characters

Photo of dark3d0
3.84/5  rDev +8.8%

Photo of edtri19
3.75/5  rDev +6.2%

Photo of Florya
3.5/5  rDev -0.8%

Photo of talatham
3.14/5  rDev -11%
look: 4 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

Slightly pale in colour, a very crisp dry taste.
Drank outside the Tower Hotel, London.

87 characters

Photo of Sam-VW
3.35/5  rDev -5.1%

Photo of bark
3.7/5  rDev +4.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The colour is deep yellow; the small foam quickly disappears with a fizzing sound. The liquid is clear.

The smell is dry; it resembles a lot of white wine with flowery notes of grape fruits, white grapes and some elderflowers. There is also a touch of cascade hops.

The taste is dry with earthy notes of white wine (Riesling grapes). The taste is clean with some body and a hint of maturing. The somewhat fruity aftertaste got a moderate bitterness and a long lasting semi sweet note of lime and grapefruit.

The carbonation is strong with lots of refreshing, big bubbles.

 581 characters

Photo of Howlader
3/5  rDev -15%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of Euroglot
3.6/5  rDev +2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Photo of steverx8
3.75/5  rDev +6.2%

Photo of Hoppsbabo
3.5/5  rDev -0.8%

A: Pale lager. Quite big bubbles. Decent lacing.
S: Fudge, which must be the Cascade hops. Vinous and grapey.
T: The finish and mouthfeel are a total flop but the initial flavour is very pleasant: White wine, Saaz hops, some American IPA caramel and white bread. Also a touch lemony.
O: Interesting, but wine-infused beer gets better than this.

 344 characters

Photo of Hanglow
3.37/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Clear gold, small head

Slightly aromatic and a small whiff of nelson hops

light taste of malt, some bready character , some fruity/winey hops. It's dominated by the zingy carbonation though when you swallow. Med dry finish, little bitterness to counteract the equally low sweetness.

A decent take on inoffensive lagers

 322 characters

Photo of BostonJustin
4/5  rDev +13.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Photo of harpus
3.25/5  rDev -7.9%

Photo of lacqueredmouse
3.3/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Tried on-tap at the White Horse Parson's Green in London.

Pours a bright golden colour, brilliantly clear and crystal. Head forms a fine crest of slightly greying white. Lace forms fine and light as the beer goes down. Not bad.

Nose is crisp for the most part, with muted hops, but a light, grainy euro-pils character which isn't unpleasant. Some faint honey and floral characters come through as it warms up. Again, it's fairly decent.

Taste is clean and light from start to finish. Smooth mid-palate leads to something a tad buttery on the back. Crisp carbonation helps punctuate the ending. Hops are again muted but provide just enough balance. Aftertaste has a slight hint of yeast or flour.

Feel is light and sparkling with a fineness to it. Really not bad.

Overall, this is pretty drinkable stuff. Light and fairly crisp. It's not the greatest beer in the world, but it certainly does its job, and it's probably less offensive than some equivalent beers that claim to do the same job.

 995 characters

Photo of rapayn01
3.75/5  rDev +6.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

I was at a party and the host offered me the Curious IPA, but handed me the lager. Thus, I was a little disappointed. However, it is a pretty good lager. Crisp.

 160 characters

Photo of mdfb79
3.4/5  rDev -3.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.25

Keg beer
High carb evident bright yellow one in bright white head

65 characters

Photo of larbush
2.75/5  rDev -22.1%

Photo of flyingpig
3.53/5  rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Clear and light amber colour with a thumb sized, foamy white head on top that stays quite well and leaves some nice lacing on the glass too.

Lively smelling beer with some grapes and floral notes to begin along with a sort of white wine aroma, no doubt thanks to the champagne yeast used in the brewing process. It is quite dry on the nose and pretty light too with a fair helping of flowery hops as well.

Lots of floral flavours coming through and some grapes to start. There is a white wine taste that the smell hinted at and a little citrus thrown in for good measure. I could also detect some lighter malts coming through but not many.

Lively carbonation to begin along with a medium bodied and a rather dry feel to things. The beer was clean on the palate and quite crisp with a touch of bitterness in there. Overall the palate is quite a sweet one but pleasant nonetheless.

This one wasn't a bad beer at all, it was certainly different but pleasant to drink in spite of this. There is a good flowery aroma that settles down a bit in the taste but is still good. I could have done with the beer being slightly more complex perhaps but it was still enjoyable and worth a try if you get a chance.

 1,203 characters

Photo of CwrwAmByth
3.26/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Curious Brew from Hepworth & Co. (Brewers) Ltd.
3.53 out of 5 based on 32 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    No fake news here. Get real beer content delivered to your doorstep every month.