Steenbrugge Blond
Brouwerij Palm NV

Steenbrugge BlondSteenbrugge Blond
Write a Review
Beer Geek Stats: | Print Shelf Talker
Style:
Belgian Blonde Ale
Ranked #57
ABV:
6.5%
Score:
82
Ranked #38,431
Avg:
3.64 | pDev: 13.46%
Reviews:
30
Ratings:
69
From:
Brouwerij Palm NV
 
Belgium
Avail:
Year-round
Wants
  3
Gots
  8
SCORE
82
Good
Steenbrugge BlondSteenbrugge Blond
Notes:
View: Beers
Reviews: 30 | Ratings: 69 | Log in to view all ratings and sort
Reviews by DoubleJ:
Photo of DoubleJ
3.58/5  rDev -1.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

So my Brazilian friend e-mailed me last week saying he had gone to Bierkeller near his hometown and loved a beer called Steenbrugge Blond he drank there. I wasn't sure if this beer was sold in the US, and it turns out it is! Given the few number of reviews so far, it must be new to the US market. Found at Hi-Time in Costa Mesa, CA in the 750 ml format, on to the beer:

More of an orangish gold color than the blonde I was expecting. A big soaopy head sits on top and slowly drops into a creamier texture. Carbonation rushes through the middle of the beer. Its aroma is mild at first sniff. Eventually, you start to dig out some sweet honey and a touch of ground clove. Fairly sweet aroma.

A sweet tasting beer. Quite sugary. Fortunately, it's not overly sweet like a Leffe. Pretty straightforward as far as the flavor goes: a little bit of sugar, a little bit of hop bitterness, a little bit of bubblegum, a little bit of corn sugars(?), ending with a touch of liquid spice towards the end. The carbonation is on the bubbly side in this medium bodied brew. Lingering sweet aftertaste.

Overall, I have to say this is a solid little beer. I've had better and I've had worse. It's worth trying out. A bit steep in terms of cost/benefit ($8.99 for a 750 ml), but it's a lot better than the price my Brazilian friend would pay in Porto Alegre; he would pay R$17.20 (approx. $9)...for a 330 ml bottle.

 1,402 characters

More User Reviews:
Photo of Sigmund
3.65/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

330 ml bottle, courtesy of Cardinal Pub & Bar, Stavanger. ABV is 6.5%. Golden colour, huge white head. The aroma is herbal, citrussy and moderately spicy, nice. The flavour is fairly sweet and fruity, notes of citrus, yeast and some spice. Minimal bitterness.

 259 characters

Photo of Gueuzedude
3.48/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Expires 2012; Sampled July 2009
A solid pour produces an almost four-finger thick, pale tan colored head in my 25cl tulip glass. The beer is a bright, copper gold hue that shows a brilliantly clear, and I mean brilliantly clear, rich gold hue when held up to the light. The aroma smells of sweet honey-like grain, floral hop and fermentation notes, a touch of melon fruit character, some white grape aromas, a nice floral tart pear note, a touch of grassy grain, a light herbal note that adds some counter-balance.

The taste is a bit drier than the aroma might suggest, but does have a light sweetness to it that is accentuated by floral nectar and fruity notes. Flavors of pear, ripe honeydew melon, and a touch of herbal floral nectar notes up front are balanced by a biting bitterness and a peppery carbonic bite in the finish. This beer is pretty light bodied, even the palate presence fades pretty quickly, it does have just enough body to keep from being watery though. The malt contributes a touch of grassy grain, perhaps some cracker-like notes as well as a touch of honey-like malt.

I can certainly be a sucker for these lower gravity Belgian type beers, but this one just doesn't really do it for me. It is lacking that complexity and depth of flavor that the best of the type achieve. Not bad, even worth trying, but not great.

Purchased: Plaza Liquors, Tucson AZ

 1,378 characters

Photo of JohnfromDublin
3.58/5  rDev -1.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

I tasted this 330ml bottle on 25.12.2008, best by 03.07.11.
This is one of the relaunched (or new line) of brews brewed by Palm at Steenhuffel, replacing the former Brugse beers brewed in Bruges.

Appearence was a nice blonde ale with a slight haze with a subsiding off-white head.
The aroma was not that special; mild hop aroma with some background maltiness.

The label says "enriched with Gruut" which means wheat (in Flemish). This made for a nice balance of malt and some hop flavours. The beer gave a nice coating when swirled in the mouth, making for a solid brew. Definitely drinkable without being outstanding.

 619 characters

Photo of Absumaster
3.97/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A clear, dark golden beer with a head that settles into a a thin layer.

Smell is clovey with spicy notes of non definable spices, they appear 'warm' like holiday spices. A good maltiness that is biscuity and a little doughy.

Taste is a continuation of the smell with strong spicy yeastiness which give the beer depth. The beer tastes like a clone of Leffe Blonde, but better balanced and less clovey. The malt is biscuity and has a light caramel twist.

 458 characters

Photo of biegaman
3.47/5  rDev -4.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

Steenbrugge Blond captures the essence of the style perfectly, at least visually. Its familiar pale yellow colour, clean and bright complexion and lasting, rocky head represent the approachability, simplicity and quality that define most Belgian Pale Ales. Served in the typical chalice-shaped glass, it really does look like a drink made for royalty.

The abbey with ties to Steenbrugge claims roots as far back as 1094. Not only that, it was supposedly founded by St. Arnold himself, the patron saint of brewing! But neither of these are mentioned on the label. Instead, apparently the more important selling point was that this is "enriched with Gruut" (though what exactly that is they fail to explain).

From what I can tell, "gruut" refers to a mixture of herbs that are grown (or at least blended) in or around the town of Bruges. There's virtually no evidence of them in the aroma - certainly nothing specific you could put a finger on - though a charming, if delicate potpourri-like fragrance does emerge a little bit with warmth. Granted, it smells pretty standard for the style.

Nevermind herbs, refined white sugar is more appreciable than anything. It coats both the aroma and aftertaste and brings out more of a sweet yellow corn flavour from the malt rather than the grainy, perhaps very lightly honeyed, cereal taste that's more standard. Of course there's a few fruity yeast esters floating around too, but even they're pretty subdued.

Blond Ales catch a bad rap for being bland and boring - Steenbrugge Blond does nothing to dispel that conception. Normally Belgian blondes at least offer a little more spice and character (and with this one the added herbs too!). But seemingly geared towards undiscriminating European lager drinkers, this is pretty well purposeless besides a quick, casual quaff.

 1,822 characters

Photo of TheManiacalOne
3.33/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a caged & corked 750ml bottle into a tulip glass.

A: The beer is a deep gold color, with a large off-white head that fades slowly and leaves a thick but spotty lace on the glass.

S: The aroma contains light caramelized malts, Belgian yeast, honey, some citrus, some spice and a faint touch of hops.

T: The taste starts out with a strong breadiness from a hearty malt character and Belgian yeast. Then some mildly sweet flavors of caramel, honey and some spices come in. The hops presence is very mild and there is a touch of smokiness in the background but there doesn’t seem to be much balance. The after-taste is slightly bready and slightly sweet.

M: Crisp and a little smooth, medium body, medium carbonation, finish is slightly sticky.

O: Not very tasty, goes down ok, not too filling, good kick, decent representation of style, it’s a solid beer but there are better choices within the style.

 919 characters

Photo of Rochefort10nh
3/5  rDev -17.6%

Photo of BlackHaddock
3.32/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Picked up in Brugge during a beer run, 33cl brown bottle, best before 3rd July 2011. Drank on a cold 22nd Dec 2009.

Poured with gusto into a Hoegaarden Grand Cru stemmed tulip glass. A large white head sat on top of an almost clear orange/amber body which had a small cloudy swurl within, the cloud soon dissipated into the rest of the body giving the whole beer a semi-misty look.

Sweet yeast aroma, light toffee and candyfloss sort of fairground smell. All the smells subside as the beer settles away from the bottle, once in the glass and warming it seemed to lose its heavy sweetness (strange because beers normally give off more flavours as they warm).

The taste is far from sweet, sharp, crisp and a shock after the smell. Bitter and citrus fruits sour in the mouth. I found pink grapefruit and lemon peel in the taste.

The body didn't do it for me, lacked a true depth, decent, but not a classic Blonde.

My wife is a huge fan of Palm beers, she didn't get to try this one though, she's at a girls only Christmas party. I'm having the Steenbrugge Dubbel next!

 1,070 characters

Photo of metter98
3.65/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: The beer poured clear golden yellow in color with a two finger high white head that quickly dies leaving lacy patterns of bubbles covering the surface. A light to moderate amount of carbonation is visible from the rising bubbles.
S: The nose is rather spicy with notes of black pepper and cloves. Some hints of light fruits, malts and yeast are also noticeable in the smell.
T: The initial taste has light flavors of biscuity malts with some hints of sweetness and candi sugar. It transitions to a subtle amount of bitterness and spiciness towards the finish. Overall, the flavors aren't that strong or complex but they are well balanced.
M: It feels light- to medium-bodied and clean on the palate with a slight amount of dryness. There is a moderate amount of carbonation.
D: The beer is quite drinkable and would even work well during the summer months.

 859 characters

Photo of mltobin
3.48/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

Photo of EvanWilliams
3.75/5  rDev +3%

Photo of JBogan
3.28/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured into a tulip glass a dark honey color with a large and long lasting pillowy white head. Moderate lacing left behind. A very nice looking beer.

The aroma was mostly sweet and malty, with a slight musty yeast factor as well. A bit of tropical fruit too, but only a hint.

The taste was a balance of the above mentioned aromas, yet it seemed somewhat on the weak side. Slightly dull in this regard.

The mouthfeel was slippery yet far too thin.

Overall this wasn't a very interesting beer. The initial pour looked great, the aroma was good, but after that things kind of went downhill. It really needs a boost in the taste department, and also in the mouthfeel. Probably not a beer I'll be revisiting again.

 713 characters

Photo of StJamesGate
3.45/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours bright pale gold with a fast-fading white head that still leaves some trails of lace. Heavy floral and honey nose. Light melony fruit, a Belgian yeast & phenol hit, no noticeable hops. Thin feel, and dies in the end.

Not much doing here. Good summer drinker, I guess, but the lightness + ABV together are trouble, and not worth it.

 338 characters

Photo of avalon07
3.13/5  rDev -14%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A: Poured from a bottle to a tulip glass. Had a coppery color and a clear texture. There was an inch and a half of foamy, fairly long-lasting head. No lacing at all.

S: A very faint yeasty smell, with some traces of fruit as well.

T: Like the smell, the taste had a lot of yeast, with some fruit (apples, pears), and malt, but not much else. This is a surprisingly one-dimensional flavor.

M: A well-carbonated beer with a smooth finish. Light-bodied.

O: This is not a terrible beer, just a frightfully uninteresting one. Could have been better.

 548 characters

Photo of JAHMUR
3.25/5  rDev -10.7%

Photo of chinchill
3.75/5  rDev +3%

Photo of gfreed
3.83/5  rDev +5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Remarkably clear for a beer with a giant pile of yeast in the bottom of the bottle-- I guess this means I didn't shake the bottle sufficiently before popping the cork. Decent fizz produces a thin and jumpy head; not much aroma. Somewhat light in terms of flavor: not as dense as other Belgians in this style, but this makes it quite drinkable. I could have easily downed the entire big bottle had not my wife been there to intervene. Light body and moderate ABV make this a good warm-weather option.

 499 characters

Photo of spycow
3.5/5  rDev -3.8%

Photo of ATPete
3.92/5  rDev +7.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

corked/caged 750ml

Pours a lucid but deep yellow color, nearly still in appearance with slow and far between rising bubbles of carbonation, a large foamy white head forms after an aggressive pour. An interesting nose of wintergreen, dried citrus fruit, green apple and herbal notes. Sweet and crisp, cookie dough, candy sugar, some spices embrace the tongue into a long finish rich with sweet malt and apple skins. Bright with carbonation in the mouth initially but morphing to a slick, coating after quaff mouthfeel. Its different, but very refreshing. Recommended.

 567 characters

Photo of bmaggot
3.91/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Photo of CHickman
2.83/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Poured into a Duvel tulip glass, this was clear yellow gold in color with bubbles racing up the middle and a foamy 2 finger white head that faded slowly and left decent lacing that slid down the glass fast. The second half of the bottle poured hazy, as expected with all the yeast in the mix.

Smells fruity and sweet, with sour apple, sweet malt, yeast, light citrus hops, light caramel, grass, wet bread or cardboard, musty or earthy tones like hay, mild spices and the classic funk associated with most bottle conditioned Belgians. The aroma gets more sour and funky as the beer warms, with more fruit coming out like a rotting pear and lemon zest, but it remains soft and light.

Tastes sweet and funky, with yeast, sour apple, pear and lemon starting this off with a sourness that almost gives a pucker; then the swallow allows the grains, sweet malt, grass, hay, wet wheat bread, light pepper and other mild spices to come through, with the yeast funky-ness appearing as this fades dry after each sip. Might have detected light citrus hops, tea, grapefruit, and some faint caramel, but this beer didn’t sweeten up like the nose hinted it might and remained sour and on the bitter side. With each sip I kept hoping that it would get better, but it didn’t so I must say that this was disappointing. It had all the makings of a nice blond ale that hides the ABV very well, but it fell short somewhere.

Mouthfeel is creamy and very smooth, with a light body, a light, crisp feel and very mild carbonation that would have helped this go down easy if it only tasted better.

Perhaps I should have let this age, as the expiration date on the bottom of the bottle was 4/28/2012. Oh well, I’ll have to pick up another one to age and hope for better results. At this point I can’t recommend this beer as it was not enjoyable to me and expensive (about $12 with tax) for a 25 oz bottle.

 1,894 characters

Photo of KTCamm
4.43/5  rDev +21.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.5

Poured from champagne bottle into the Duvel glass.

Pours a beautiful light golden soft copper. Transparent. Retains an inch of white foam. Some small bubbles float.

Slight belgian yeast smell, some hop and some malt. Light malty taste, very smooth and flavorful. Really firm carbonation. Small residual hop.

Great beer, supremely drinkable.

 343 characters

Photo of dogfishandi
4/5  rDev +9.9%

Photo of BeerFMAndy
3.35/5  rDev -8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

750 ml bottle split and poured into a Tripel Karmeliet tulip. 6.5% ABV, Best By 25/05/12.

Thanks to bnieman and his Dad for sharing this one with me!

A - Crystal clear golden yellow in color with a low white head. No retention or lace to speak of.

S - Light hops and pale malt come forwards with hints of straw and spicy Belgian esters. Not really unique, the aroma is very average and bland.

T - Pale malt and straw with a sharp tingle and light hoppy finish, the flavor offers more than the aroma, but not much.

M - Very strong carbonation tingle on the tongue and throat, this beer is light-bodied, crisp, and clean.

D - Easy drinkability for this basic blonde. It's not offensive but certainly not great either. I'd call this a BMC of Belgian beer.

 758 characters

Steenbrugge Blond from Brouwerij Palm NV
Beer rating: 82 out of 100 with 69 ratings