Kingfisher Premium Lager | United Breweries - UB Group

Log in or Sign up to start rating.
BA SCORE
66
poor
356 Reviews
THE BROS
75
okay
Read the review
Kingfisher Premium LagerKingfisher Premium Lager
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
United Breweries - UB Group
India

Style: American Pale Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.80%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 03-06-1998

BEER STATS
Reviews:
356
Ratings:
854
Avg:
2.77
pDev:
35.02%
 
 
Wants:
11
Gots:
123
For Trade:
0
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Reviews: 356 | Ratings: 854
Photo of Hunter
2.33/5  rDev -15.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Vigorous pour yields only the thinnest, whispiest of heads. Seetles quick into a thin latyer of white bubbles atop a deep golden brew. Minimal lacing and little carbonation.

Brew has the telltale skunkiness in the aroma of many lagers...is it possible to get away from that? Lemongrass notes and sharp hops underlie this.

Ber is almost sweet when it initially hits the tongue, giving way to a crispness and hoppy bite mid-swallow, finishing in a sharp aftertaste and semi-sweet finish.

Thin mouthfeel and sticky aftertaste complete the experience.

Not the best of lagers. I won't return for a second glass of this. Perhaps the trip from NY to AZ was too much and it would be better closer to the brewery?

 716 characters

Photo of BDTyre
3.05/5  rDev +10.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Brewed in the UK and exported to Canada.

Boring weak gold colour. Hop smell with a grassy overtone, not much skunk in it.

Taste is not bad. Good hops, no malt taste, grassiness and faint copper tinge to it. Refreshing on a hot afternoon; would go nicely with spicy food.

 276 characters

Photo of Billolick
2.21/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

In need of something to review, I picked up a green bottle of this "Indian" brw which is actually brewed in the states. No freshness dating. Pours light clear amber, typical white head and minimal lacing. Not much taste or interest here, mostly adjuncts account for the lack of malt notes. Best that can be said here is that this washed my sandwedge down nicely and cut through the tahini sauce.

 395 characters

Photo of kbub6f
3.25/5  rDev +17.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A small, white, bubbly head sits on the clear, clear gold beer. Just a touch ambery. Sweet corny nose with some sugary sponk. Major corn in the front. A little spicy... maybe even cinnamon. Middle is tangy with major sweet corn sugar. Some nice bitterness in the end with some grainsy crackers. It's not bad. The hops save it in the end from being completely nondescript.

 371 characters

Photo of joecast
3.47/5  rDev +25.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

very pale clear yellow with little head forming from the pour.
big grassy aroma exits from the bottle. once settled int he glass, some maltiness shows in the background.
taste is fairly crisp and light. obvious sweetness with a just below (or over?) par level of bitterness. still fairly well balanced with maybe some flavor hops as well?
pretty decent beer and i cant argue with the statement on the label as it being the best indian lager. its the best ive had!

 466 characters

Photo of CAMRAhardliner
2.62/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a pale gold with a wispy little head and a tiny bit of lace. The aroma is a a pleasant mix of cereal grains and a faint yeast skunkyness. The taste is worse than the smell. Some light maltiness and wet paper come together with an all too faint hoppiness. The moouthfeel is thin and 'pastuerizey'. This is nothing more than an average adjunct lager. Its also not even brewed in India.

 389 characters

Photo of Sammy
1.23/5  rDev -55.6%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

After a sip, had to wash out my mouth. Even after toothpaste, terrible taste remained. Not a good ambassador. Looks like watered down beer, dry, bitter, thin with awful carbonation. Maybe grass and hops, thin. Goodbye beer, hello drain. Useful for inducing nausea.

 264 characters

Photo of necoadam
1.83/5  rDev -33.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

Had this at an Indian cusine place.

Came in a pint glass. Pale yellow color with almost no head whatsoever. Don't like the sign of that.

Smell was quite clean. Some slight hops and malts show up, along with some citrus type aromas, but that would be it. Everything was on the light side.

Taste was ....blah. Grainy to start out with with some sweetness to it as well. Some metallic flavors also showed up which didn't help one bit. It was like sending a bunch of pyro's to a fire instead of sending firefighters.

Mouthfeel was terrible. Thin bodied with almost no carbonation. One of the worst mouthfeels I've had with beer.

Stay out of sight with this one. Truly a terrible beer.

 697 characters

Photo of blitheringidiot
3.17/5  rDev +14.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Screw cap released this lager from a bottle & label touting “Most thrilling chilled” out of a 650 mL pint + 6 oz greener. Rather plain label without any freshness, but since I bought this tall boy straight from the Saratoga, NY brewery, I know better.

Pale golden hue with tiny beading of carbonation bubbles popping up the sides, and a scant coating of tiny white bubbles. Second pour had a puffy snow like coating that dissipated in 30 seconds.

Crisp, fresh twig lager scents that borderline on malt liquor, perhaps from adjuncts, me imagine.

Tangy balanced lightly spicy lager. Lingering sugary sweet malts. Slightly grassy hops balanced finish. Plenty of bready flavor.

Sticky sugary lingering aftertaste to make a medium bodied brew. A bit tacky to be a session, but not a bad brew all around.

Last swigs: Contract brewed by the big 100 barrel Mendocino Brewery in Saratoga Springs, NY. I met the manager Bob Craven himself there. Lagers have never been a favorite style of mine, but this was an interesting offering that kept me guessing. Reminded me of Heineken meets corn adjuncts and darker malts. I’d pass on drinking this all night. The 1pt 6 oz bottle was enough.

Beer is good. Happy beering.

 1,227 characters

Photo of Globetrotter
3.08/5  rDev +11.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Green 33cl bottle with a white, black and red label featuring the Kingfisher bird and the slogan "most thrilling chilled". Thrills, eh? No ingredient or freshness information. This bottle was contract brewed by Shepherd Neame.

Pours a clear pale gold under a 1.5 finger white head that settles quickly to thick film. There's a strong grainy skunk nose, typical of a macro lager. The mouth is very pirckly and light. The taste starts with standard adjunct malt and skunky hops. There's a slightly sweet moment, followed by a fairly substantial metallic hoppy bite. The bite is stronger than most macros would produce, and lasts a bit longer, pushing this beer just slightly, ever so slightly, above average.

 709 characters

Photo of donnebaby
3.22/5  rDev +16.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A light gold color below a decent-sized, yeasty, frothy top. Looks like beer. Smells good, a nice combination of malts with a hop background.

The taste reminded me of hamburgers at first and continued to remind of some sort of cooked meat as I drank it. This was not a totally pleasant experience--nor was it terrible either. A very good hop bitterness that is felt in the mouth and continues through in the aftertaste.

Crisp mouthfeel--and I could imagine drinking several of these. Very smooth-drinking, light yeast malt flavor. That said, really not too much taste.

I agree with the label that is it "Most Thrilling Chilled".

 638 characters

Photo of cypressbob
2.1/5  rDev -24.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

330ml green bottle

Pours very light in hue, thin head with little retention

Smell is of husk, corn comes through very prominantly. Malt sweetness also

Taste is dry, the taste of corn comes through, thin , very thin, little bit of sweetness

Along the lines of the standard euro pale lager

 299 characters

Photo of canadianbarman
3.08/5  rDev +11.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

--green bottle, label says to check neck for freshness date but nothing was there.
--Poured a light golden in color, very thin head and little bubbling.
--a mild skunky smell.

This beer had that clear-bottle-tropical taste to me. Some hops could be found but thats about it, nothing spectacular. It did go down faster than I expected because the bottle was done before I knew it!
Thx

 389 characters

Photo of WesWes
3.38/5  rDev +22%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

The beer pours a pale gold color with a thick frothy white head that fades to lacing. The aroma is decent. It boasts of mainly pale malts and lager yeast, but it comes across as light and refreshing. The taste is a little above average. It is light with a grainy pale malt flavor on top of a dry lager yeast finish that refreshes on the way down. The mouthfeel is good. It is a low bodied beer with good carbonation. This beer drinks easy, but it has nothing to brag about. It does a lot right, but not a lot more than others. Still, this is a decent lager.

 557 characters

Photo of ark57
3.42/5  rDev +23.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I happened upon this beer at the Fancy Food Show in New York City. I have seen it many times in liquor stores, but never thought much of it. Well, I am not one to pass on free samples of beer and this booth was giving away full bottles. Not a bad sample , huh? Needless to say I was very surprised at the taste. It has a noble hop aroma and a taste that was crisp and refreshing. It is better than I thought it would be. Still not something to go out of your for, but for free, it is great.

 490 characters

Photo of arizcards
3.12/5  rDev +12.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Part of a "Beers of the World" package received as a Christmas gift but comically enough this is brewed in New York state. A nearly opaque color that poured a fine head that disapated quickly. There is almost a sweet alcohol smell to this brew. Not a bad taste considering all. A sweet beginning ends up with a decent hop finish. This is an extremely thin beer but a drinkable one.

 381 characters

Photo of BeerResearcher
2.35/5  rDev -15.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

It was bottled in a big brown 16.9oz bottle.
It pours a golden color with a thin, fast fading head. The aroma is mostly of cut grass and corncob with a trace of metallic scent. The light-bodied sweet malt is a bit grainy and lightly herbal. A mildly spicing hop bitterness peeks through, as does a hint of alcohol. Mellow, Smooth & Sweet. OK on a hot day.

 357 characters

Photo of DagFishHead
2.88/5  rDev +4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Brewed in Saratoga Springs NY by the Kingfisher Brewing Company?
Appearance: Optically clear, very pale golden pour. Fizzy white head fades fast leaving little lace.
Smell: Popped the cap and took an instant skunk hit (damn!), but I toughed it out to find a sweet cream malt nose with faint hops in the background.
Taste: Surprisingly sweet malt start, then dryed by a subtle hop bitterness. Dry clean finish.
Mouthfeel: Decent malt fullness for such a pale brew, carbonation level low, but crisp.
Drinkability: Glad I didn't let the skunk drive me away at the get go. Not a beer I would seek out again, but I'd have one if it was offered to me. Boring, but nicer than most all of the macros!

 697 characters

Photo of SixpointJMH
2.29/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

pours a light but healthy golden colour, evocative of heineken or peroni or the like. the smell is just bad...at first. smells of sulfer and skunkiness. thankfully, this cleared out almost entirely after a couple of minutes. the taste here was pretty standard for a pale lager: minimal overall hop/grain taste that was kind of watery. unlike the smell, there was no skunk flavour here. mouthfeel was quite smooth overall but a bit too highly carbonated the smell was what really turned me off here. otherwise, this is a pretty average brew.

 540 characters

Photo of RoyalT
1.71/5  rDev -38.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Appearance – Clear light yellow in color with a white head that foamed up big and laced well.

Smell – Grainy skunk hides the hint of hops in this nose.

Taste – The skunk is complimented by sour fizz, making it difficult to drink AND to smell.

Mouthfeel – The cheap, fizzy carbonation make this thin, light-bodied ale feel horrible in the mouth.

Sinkability – Yes, this is going down the drain.

 410 characters

Photo of beerguy101
1.88/5  rDev -32.1%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A lager lager. Pale gold color, small head. A light bodied lager. Light malts and hops. Light flavor, nearly sort of bland, but well-balanced and nice taste. Mouthfeel is full and round. Finish is clean and smooth. Aftertaste is slightly bitter. An OK lager, but there is a touch of green bottle skunyness.

 306 characters

Photo of TerryW
1.71/5  rDev -38.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Kind of an odd one here I think. It's got what strikes me as a couple of noticeably offputting characteristics.

Looks like a glass of ginger ale once it's poured, maybe slightly more yellow. Crystal clear and a steady parade of small bubbles - bright and cheery if nothing else. Rough white head that disappears almost immediately, no lacing.

It flat out smells soapy. I kid you not. Head down to the laundry room, grab a fistful of laundry soap and inhale. Now whistle back up to your beer and inhale. Laundry soap. Weird.

Not real strong in the taste department either. Some hops and a odd fruity taste like some manner of chewing gum. Bitter hop finish.

Doesn't work for me. The smell of clean laundry is a wonderful thing - but not in your beer.

 761 characters

Photo of Rumrunner
2.39/5  rDev -13.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

12oz. green bottle. Great note on the bottle: "Most thrilling chilled!"

Pours a clear straw color. Nice foamy head at first but it disappears quickly. Not much lacing. The scent is weak fruit hop and a bit of a peat potato scent. Also some skunkiness to the smell.

This beer feels more than it flavors. I felt the crispness, the carbonation and the water more than I tasted much. My taste buds had to strain to get the florals out. The malt balance is not bad but then the aftertaste is taken over again by the feel of the beer and not the flavor.

The mouthfeel is inturuptingly annoying. This is an easy beer to drink therefore I would not turn one down for free if there were not any better beers around that I could pay for.

 736 characters

Photo of lipschitz
3.08/5  rDev +11.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Presentation: 330ml green bottle with the proclamation of “Most Thrilling Chilled” on the label.

Pours faded yellow, crystal clear, with a whiff of head. The aroma is openly floral, with a touch of skunkiness (contemptible green bottles!) Flavour is initially husky, accompanied by some herbal notes and a trace of lemon, with a thin & watery mouthfeel.
Notes:
This is a pleasant enough European style lager. It’s not very bold, but considering the climate of its country of origin – it probably hits the spot quite nicely there. It would probably do quite well alongside a plate of chicken vindaloo, or simply as a companion on a hot summer day.

 676 characters

Photo of hotstuff
3.26/5  rDev +17.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

This beer poured a small white head that contained small-medium sized bubbles.The body was clear and there was no lacing with this beer.This beer's nose was hoppy.There is nothing very special about this beer in my opinion.I found it to have a somewhat of a bitter taste to it and it is a beer that went down rather smoothly.

 325 characters

Kingfisher Premium Lager from United Breweries - UB Group
66 out of 100 based on 356 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • Return of the Belgian Beer Fest

    BeerAdvocate Brings its All-Belgian Fest to Portland, Maine on September 17, 2016. Tickets are on sale now.

    Learn More
  • Get the Mag

    Become a BeerAdvocate magazine print subscriber today.

    Subscribe