Taj Mahal Premium Lager | United Breweries - UB Group

210 Reviews
Read the review
Taj Mahal Premium LagerTaj Mahal Premium Lager

Brewed by:
United Breweries - UB Group

Style: American Adjunct Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.50%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 03-08-2002

For Trade:
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 210 | Ratings: 457
Photo of craftaholic
2.9/5  rDev +11.1%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3

Crisp and light. Confused by the serious amount of negative reviews. It isn't trying to be something groundbreaking and it pairs fantastically with the complex flavors of Indian cuisine

 185 characters

Photo of MeanMotaScootah
3.5/5  rDev +34.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

For the style this is a dead ringer, straight down the middle american lager (brewed in "slowly" according to the bottle - in India.) Pours golden brass, aroma is malty. Flavor is better than a Bud, tastes is as expected crisp, light, relatively dry - not a bad lager if that's your thing.

 291 characters

Photo of TheKingofWichita
1.43/5  rDev -45.2%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.25 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 1.5

Pale straw color with fizzy head and little lacing. Smells of cereal grains and tastes the same. Bubbly mouthfeel that feels just like Coors Light. Not the kind of beer to purchase every day or really any day. Don't waste your time or taste buds.

 246 characters

Photo of mmmbeer89
2.82/5  rDev +8%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.75

It's certainly nothing special but it's probably slightly better than your standard macro brew, the problem is it's more expensive and not that much better.

 156 characters

Photo of logicalparadox
3.23/5  rDev +23.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

No head retention, light pale straw, but crystal clear.

Not much in the way aromatics, just some prickly carbonation and very fine pale malt notes. A whisper of floral, spicy hops might be there... A bit uneventful but clean and nice

Pretty damn mild. Super subtle biscuit and caramel malt flavors with a mild kiss of hop for balance. Slightly sweet in the front, slightly dry, crisp, lingering finish.

Super refreshing and quaffable. That's the main lure for the style I think.

Pretty underwhelming overall, but certainly not bad or deserving of hate.

 556 characters

Photo of Guppy314
2.45/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

From a bottle, pours a pale straw with a thin white head. Very subtle aroma of grains. Tastes are subtle with both malt and hops detectable. But there are also distracting flavors of corn, grass, and rice. Not even much redeeming carbonation.

 247 characters

Photo of EMH73
3.23/5  rDev +23.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

I, like several others do not understand how poorly this beer is rated. IMO Taj is superior to the vast majority of macro lagers out there. It pours a clear, bright yellow with a poorly retained half inch head that left almost no lacing. Smells slightly sweet, bread and malt. Taste is crisp and clean, bready and slightly sweet. Well carbonated and light bodied. Certainly not a great beer but very drinkable. I'll take this over a Bud or Miller any day of the week.

 471 characters

Photo of Dmcdonald33013
4.35/5  rDev +66.7%
look: 4.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

I do not understand all the negative feedback on this beer. I do not rate beer by comparing it to the best avaialble, rather rate it by it it's character, typicity, value and drinkability. As far as lagers go this is better than much of the macro swill out there. I can think of 30 macros I would gladly pass up to have a Taj.

Next time your in a Indian restaurant faced with a choice between a miller shite and a Taj, do your self a huge favor. Drink a Taj.

 462 characters

Photo of rodbeermunch
2.05/5  rDev -21.5%
look: 1.75 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

One of the most straw yellow and clear water beers around. The aroma is barely grainy.

The taste is barely grainy. Highly carbonated, light mouthfeel and body. How do they get away with charging a premium price on something like this. They say it pairs well with spicy food, but you can say that about any beer that doesn't really taste like anything. There's a mild sweetness that makes me think this might have cut the barley with some corn or something in that realm.

 476 characters

Photo of Ozzylizard
3.19/5  rDev +22.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

$ 2.97/22 oz bottle ($ 0.135/oz) at State Line Liquors, Elkton, MD
Bomber at 42 degrees F into SA “perfect pint”
Aroma – smells like a AAL, just a hint of disulfide
Head – large (Five cm, slow gentle pour), white, fizzy/frothy, diminishing to irregular three to six mm ring and thin layer
Lacing poor – some drag but little else
Body – light yellow, clear, effervescent
Flavor – no worse than most AALs, just a hint of (hop?) bitterness; no malt, no alcohol, no diacetyl. As it warms, it becomes sweeter.
Palate – light, watery, lively carbonation

Appearance 3.5, Aroma 3.25, Flavor 3, Palate 3.5, Overall 3.25

 628 characters

Photo of Greasy
3.31/5  rDev +26.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

I'm going to rate this as compared to its counterparts within the adjunct lager style. 650 ml poured into a pilsner glass.

A: Pours a light golden yellow with a soapy white head that fades away after a moment.

S: Aroma gives typical pale lager scents. Sweetness, bread notes, some biscuit.

T: Flavorful. Plenty of sweet malt with some cracker and faint bitterness. Not offensive at all.

M: Feel is thin, but not overly watery. Finishes crisp and refreshing. Exactly as it should.

O: Among adjunct lagers, this beer is above BMC swill and drinks more like a good Euro pale or pilsner (minus the hop bitterness). I'd much rather reach for this to binge drink than a Bud, Miller High Life or PBR.

 700 characters

Photo of stevoj
1.6/5  rDev -38.7%
look: 2.75 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 1.5

Piss poor pale lager from India. Aroma will tell you something is wrong from the start, musty, sour, citrus, cereal. Appearance is as expected for a lager. Taste again is sour, musty, corn, and overall watery mouthfeel. Lingering taste is not pleasant. Thumbs down.

 265 characters

Photo of Czequershuus
2.49/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 2.5

Enjoyed alongside a rather splendid Indian buffet. This beer pours a light golden with a modest head. The aroma has some rather nice grainy, funky notes, but very understated. Flavor is as you would expect for a lager although there is some depth here. The mouthfeel is a bit sticky. As the beer warmed it became increasingly sweet. Overall this is maybe better than the average lager, but not by much. The corn syrups sweetness is just too apparent to enjoy this too much.

 473 characters

Photo of 1000lbgrizzly
2.61/5  rDev 0%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Clear light yellow, coarse head, tons of bubbles rising. Smells of malt and grain. Taste adds some white grape notes and faint caramel. Still super (cereal) grain forward. Over carbonated, but light and refreshing refreshing as heck.
It's a good, easily enjoyed, quaffable brew, devoid of off-putting flavors.

 309 characters

Photo of pat61
3/5  rDev +14.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Had on tap at the Dancing Ganesha. It is bright straw gold under a 1” quickly receding white foam collar. It has a faint butterscotch to movie popcorn butter aroma and not much flavor. It is light bodied, effervescent to fizzy. A fairly insipid, boring beer without a lot of character – typical industrial lager.

 316 characters

Photo of foxyaardvark27
3.48/5  rDev +33.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

Not as bad as people are saying. It's nothing fancy but it beats a lot of other AAL style beers for drink-ability and goes nicely with some Indian food.

 152 characters

Photo of EdTheEdge
1.96/5  rDev -24.9%
look: 2.25 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Shared this with a friend. Poured into a pint glass. This beer has no redeeming qualities. It smells like dirty water, there is very little taste. This beer only manages to look like beer and then only for a short while as the head falls away quickly and there is zero lacing. It degrades into a dark golden liquid. I would not recommend this beer to anyone.

 362 characters

Photo of JMS1512
3.25/5  rDev +24.5%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

It was very, very "eh." I suppose this is what you might expect from a macro-producing brewery in India. It wasn't vile, just ho-hum. I found it appropriate to sip and relax with this while watching golf, not something to examine and contemplate for something like NBS.

 272 characters

Photo of YumaLaowai
4/5  rDev +53.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I thought it was a great 8/10 pre salt and/or lime.... With a 8.7-9.0
Very good.... Smooth with a good malt flavor that gave it a well needed kick...!

 150 characters

Photo of Tilly
3.13/5  rDev +19.9%
look: 4.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3.25

straw color, with a nice two finger white head that disappears in short time to a scim of white foam. Smells like yeast and malt. Taste is not very exciting but not disapointing. Pleasant fresh bread with a very small lemon taste. Mouth feel is clean. Not a bad beer for a lager! I realize now why I'm not a lager fan. I think this would be a great beer on a hot summer day.

 374 characters

Photo of Pegasus
2.75/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Appearance: Medium golden-orange in color, with a small, off-white head, which soon fades to a scattering of foam. Fine-beaded, patchy lacing adorns the glass walls. The carbonation is slight and slow-rising.

Aroma: Somewhat cider-like aroma, with notes of cooked vegetables, and grain. An undertone of earthy and grassy hops notes are present as well.

Taste: Opens rather dry and a bit tannic, the taste could almost be described as dusty. As the taste progresses, some herbal and medicinal hops assert themselves. Faint hints of apple ring are present as well. These dominate the taste, with mildly toasted malt seemingly a mere afterthought. Finishes with a lingering, mild herbal bitterness, a bit of toasted malt, and a faint sweetness.

Mouth feel: Thin, with slight stinging carbonation.

Drinkability/notes: This beer seems to be crafted for an oppressively hot climate. With its light body and low alcoholic content, it might well be a fine "lawnmower"beer, this from someone reviewing in early winter.

Presentation: Packaged in a Euro-style twenty-two ounce (650 ml) brown glass bomber with a pry-off crown, served in a New Belgium Brewing chalice.

 1,162 characters

Photo of iheartmyTHO
3.5/5  rDev +34.1%

I bought of bottle of this to drink at the Indian dinner put on by my neighborhood pool club. It paired well with the food, I'd say.

Overall, the Taj Mahal, reminded me of a tasty version of Budweiser i.e. it has more flavor. The beer was light tasting but also had a bit of hops and malt. It wasn't anything spectacular, but not anything awful either.

 356 characters

Photo of ordybill
3.8/5  rDev +45.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

This Indian Lager is a very good American styled lager beer. I bought it from a "Whole Foods" store in Marietta, GA and it traveled well from the brewery. No hint of skunkiness, a good crisp taste. A non-overpowering aroma and a pretty full body for a lager. I would definitely drink this again. I would compare it with the other well known Indian brew "Kingfisher", Interesting label to boot, not shiny and eclectic like many micro-brews but an old school label that did get me to notice it in the cooler.

 506 characters

Photo of JuicesFlowing
2.09/5  rDev -19.9%
look: 1.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured into a shaker pint glass.

Look: Clear golden body with a white head that disappears immediately. No retention or lacing.

Aroma: Sour corn adjuncts or vegetables, faint sourness.

Taste: Harsh on the palate immediately. Slightly alcoholic opening despite the low ABV, followed by a metallic middle. Adjuncts come into play bringing notes of cabbage or other sour veggies. A tangy, sour finish.

Mouthfeel: Carbonated and thin.

Overall: I rate according to style, and I was not impressed with this one.

 510 characters

Photo of jimmah120
3.09/5  rDev +18.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

22oz bottle, got it for $3 on a whim. bottled in april so it's ~8mo old.

smell is corny grain, some sugar cookie dough. sweet and skunky. poured a little out to check the appearance, it's piss yellow with a bubbly froth that fades to a rim before your eyes.

starts light, clean, bitter, but sweet; ends with a slight metallic tinge and some other off flavors. amazingly, considering the style, there's noticeable hop flavor.

Good, but pricy for what it is.

 459 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Taj Mahal Premium Lager from United Breweries - UB Group
2.61 out of 5 based on 457 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.