Dismiss Notice
Subscribe to BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99! (Limited time offer, US delivery only)

Utica Club | Matt Brewing Company / Saranac Brewery

Your Rating: None

Want it   Got it 
Utica ClubUtica Club
BA SCORE
2.71/5
Poor
157 Ratings
Utica ClubUtica Club
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Matt Brewing Company / Saranac Brewery
New York, United States
saranac.com

Style: American Adjunct Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by IrishRedRock on 09-25-2002

BEER STATS
Ranking:
#44,677
Reviews:
62
Ratings:
157
pDev:
28.41%
Bros Score:
2.46
 
 
Wants:
7
Gots:
34
Trade:
0
HISTOGRAM
 
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 157 |  Reviews: 62
Photo of UCLABrewN84
3.17/5  rDev +17%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3

Photo of StonedTrippin
2.53/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

as low budget pounders and golf course swill goes, I like good ole Utica club. partially due to the fact that I grew up on this, but also because I think its a league better than miller lite, coors or bud light, and especially any of the even more garbage adjunct stuff, ice beers, and the like. soda like bubbles on the pour, very lively, with that pee yellow color working. the nose is generic and light, watery, but not plain per se, its got a sort of freshness in the malt to it, better than its competition. not much hops, but the flavor of the pils malts really does come through nicely, cleanly, and this is a pretty refreshing brew all up, and I do like it for what it is. never going to pick it to buy, but it is the lesser of a great many evils.

 755 characters

Photo of WillieThreebiers
2.75/5  rDev +1.5%

Photo of TheManiacalOne
2.25/5  rDev -17%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Poured from a 12oz can into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a pale yellow color, with a short white head that fades quickly and leaves a thin lace on the glass.

S: The aroma contains light malts, adjuncts and a very faint touch of hops.

T: The taste starts out bready with flavors of adjuncts. Then a mild sweetness comes in from a thin malt character. The hops presence is very faint and there’s a little bit of balance. The after-taste is slightly bready.

M: Crisp and a little smooth, light body, medium-to-high carbonation, finish is clean.

D: Not very flavorful, goes down very easily and not filling at all since there isn’t much to the beer, very mild kick, decent representation of style, there are other inexpensive alternatives that I would choose over this beer.

 791 characters

Photo of oberon
2.03/5  rDev -25.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

How did I find this here in North Carolina?A staple of my father in law in Buffalo back in the day,pours a clear translusant yellow with a decent head,aroma of sweet cooked corn and wet carpet.Taste is pretty sweet and grainy pretty cloying after a few drinks.Not much of a beer here no better than the big domestic macros but now I can offer my father in law a UC.

 365 characters

Photo of ygtbsm94
2.75/5  rDev +1.5%

Photo of woodychandler
3.42/5  rDev +26.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Another day, another AAL in a CAN in support of the ongoing CANQuest (TM). Actually, as the kind fellow who sent me some in a trade pointed out, it is made/headquartered in UtiCA,Ny! Ha.

From the CAN: "XX Pure. Brewed from best quality malt, grains, and choicest hops. Absolutely pure. First beer sold in the United States after prohibition."

My pour initially netted a finger of bone-white head, but as I was transcribing the above, the head hit the road! Wow. Color was a light golden-yellow with NE-quality clarity. Nose was characteristic for the style - slightly lager-sweet overlain with a graininess that does not need to be there. Mouthfeel was medium and the taste was really not all that bad. I have had far worse, believe me! It would be a good lawnmower beer or some other outdoor activity where a simple, refreshing beer might be in order. It had a light lager sweetness and it was not overpowered by the adjuncts nor was it poorly made (and regular readers of my reviews will know who that refers to). Finish was mild, unobtrusive, simple. Cooler worthy, but still not a phenomenal beer, just a better version of a lousy style.

 1,143 characters

Photo of tdm168
1.71/5  rDev -36.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a clear golden yellow with a 1/4" of head and no retention. Smells of grains, lager yeast, and metal. Taste is pure grains and metal. Mouthfeel is very light with moderate carbonation.

Bought this at Whole Foods for $1 for the 12oz. I'll gamble $1 anytime. This is a one and done for me.

 294 characters

Photo of InspectorBob
2.5/5  rDev -7.7%

Photo of GreesyFizeek
2.07/5  rDev -23.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Didn't pour it out, but if I were to guess, this is probably fizzy and yellow looking.

Smells like essentially nothing, a bit of metal and sweet corn.

This essentially just tastes like corn and carbonation, and not much else. Cold, it just tastes kind of crisp and boring, as it warms, it becomes a weird melange of creamed corn, cooked veggies, and metal. Meh.

This has a light bodied and crisp mouthfeel, and a higher level of carbonation.

Not horrible, but not very good at all either.

 493 characters

Photo of tone77
3.15/5  rDev +16.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Thanks to woodychandler for the trade.Poured from a 12 oz. can. Has a rich golden color with a 1/2 inch head. Smell is sweet, some notes of corn. Taste is very mild, light malts, not a whole lot to it. Feels light in the mouth and is very drinkable. Overall this makes for a fairly decent beer.

 294 characters

Photo of plaid75
2.41/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured a light straw hue with a two finger foamy white head. There was decent retention and lacing.

The smell featured a sweet boiled corn with a wisp of flowery hop.

The taste consisted of a sweet corn with some non adjunct graininess. Some hops toward the finish to dry out the corn.

The mouthfeel was thin.

Overall not something I would search out again. It is what it is.

 387 characters

Photo of WesWes
2.88/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The beer pours a pale gold color with a thick frothy white head that slowly fades to lacing. The aroma is average. It has a very basic, grainy pale malt scent with the presence of adjuncts and a dry lager yeast aroma. The taste is less than average. It has a weak and watery pale malt flavor that is grainy and a bit skunky. It goes down with ease, but has little complexity and a horrid aftertaste. The mouthfeel is fine. It is a low bodied beer with adequate carbonation. This is an average adjunct lager. It has little flavor and aroma, but is highly drinkable when served at near freezing temperatures.

 606 characters

Photo of BillRoth
2.5/5  rDev -7.7%

Photo of puboflyons
3.5/5  rDev +29.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

From the 12 fl. oz. can marked 2329-1346. Sampled on September 29, 2009. The pour is a golden yellow with a thin white head that diminishes in under one minute. The aroma is of sweet caramel and malts with a dash of hops. The mouthfeel is smooth like honey and of adequate quality. The flavor also emphasizes the sweet malty ingredient with some muted hops taking up the rear. This was not all that bad for a cheap beer. Gotta love the classics!

 445 characters

Photo of BGsWo22
2.25/5  rDev -17%

Photo of Brad007
2.62/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I've only heard of this beer but have never seen it available until now.

Pours a light golden color with a nice white hue.

Sweet with very little hop character. Hopefully malty.

Mostly sweet. Grainy. Some crispness but not much else is there.

Clean finish.

Cheap and inoffensive. I'm still a Narragansett man though.

 325 characters

Photo of grahuba
3.59/5  rDev +32.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Photo of BAsbill
2.62/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.5

Photo of mynie
2.31/5  rDev -14.8%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.25

12 pack purchased during a very sad visit to Ithaca, NY. The cans are pretty. Too bad I didn't realize this was made by Matt, even though I probably should have deduced as much.

Pours pale yellow and fizzy, absolutely acceptable for the style but still nothing much to look at.

Smells simple and sweet: adjunct corn and barley. Very light, but nothing offputting. But then it warms up, and some unpleasant sour nodes manifest themselves.

Tastes okay up front: a very "full" taste for a macro adjunct, kind of similar to original Coors. That's nice, but then the middle gets a little rough and sour, just off in the same way that Old Milwaukee is a little off. Finishes decently smooth.

Not really complex or well balanced enough to enter into the upper echelons of macro beers. Maybe better than low tier options, like Bud, but still below Coors and High Life, and far behind Schlitz, Grain Belt, and Ballantine XXX. Still, it was okay for the price.

 961 characters

Photo of rderedin
3.5/5  rDev +29.2%
look: 5 | smell: 5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 5 | overall: 2.5

Not really a fan but I can deal with it.

40 characters

Photo of RochefortChris
2.25/5  rDev -17%

Photo of RonaldTheriot
3.08/5  rDev +13.7%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Utica Club has a medium-to-thick white head, a mostly clear, golden appearance, with minimal lacing but very noticeable fine particulate matter suspended throughout. The aroma is of sweet grain and a slight sourdough note. Taste is of those elements, with just the faintest hop bitternes, some paper, and also an unfortunate chalky aspect. Mouthfeel is light to medium, and Utica Club finishes refreshing and pretty crisp.

RJT

 428 characters

Photo of AMCimpi
3.05/5  rDev +12.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of BeerAdvocate
3.7/5  rDev +36.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Review from BeerAdvocate Magazine Issue #44 (Sep 2010):

Fizzy head, decent amount of lace though. Shiny yellow clarity. Dried grass, cooked veggies and a touch of apple skin in the nose. Dry mouthfeel with a bitty, almost fluffy light body. Clean palate, very clean. Grainy with dried grass, bread crust and cooked cereal flavors throughout. Hop bitterness is there to balance; not much flavor to account for. Cooked veggies and a mild mineral or salty hints in the dry finish. Super clean, with enough flavor to certainly rival many of the other Retro Lagers hyped these days.

 579 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Utica Club from Matt Brewing Company / Saranac Brewery
Beer rating: 2.71 out of 5 with 157 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.