Cerveceria Costa Rica (Magic Hat) Suing West Sixth Brewing

Discussion in 'Beer News' started by Nutwood, May 21, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ffOpusx

    ffOpusx Initiate (0) Dec 17, 2011 California
    Trader

    west st logo, looks like pac man swallowing a pellet!
     
  2. BigJim5021

    BigJim5021 Savant (1,227) Sep 2, 2007 Indiana

    Shhhhh. Atari needs money these days. Don't give them any ideas.
     
  3. Tballz420

    Tballz420 Initiate (0) Mar 4, 2003 Minnesota

    After thinking about this for a number of hours, I can see magic hat's point of view. I had never noticed their star in the center of the 9 until now, but the shape of the number and the star are very similar.

    If they are being honest and they tried to work with the small brewery for 6 months or a year or whatever, then yeah, they do have a legal obligation to protect their trademark.

    I'm not going to look it up, but I think there was an article in BA magazine 2 issues ago where the writer postulated that the end of the touchy feely craft era was over, and this might be one of the opening shots.
     
    jamvt likes this.
  4. watermelonman

    watermelonman Initiate (0) Feb 14, 2004 California

    I was going to read the rest of this thread but you have already won, good sir.
     
  5. Janeinma

    Janeinma Initiate (0) May 24, 2009 Massachusetts

    If only there was some huge event coming up where a statement could be made! How strongly do people feel about this, should the Bros tell Magic Hat they aren't welcome at the ACBF,should they be asked not to bring #9?
    Should that be repeated at every beer test through summer. Perhaps a strong showing of repulsion for bullying would convince them that this is a marketing fiasco.
     
    FinbarrSaunders likes this.
  6. DelMontiac

    DelMontiac Initiate (0) Oct 22, 2010 Oklahoma

    Jimi said "Well if a 6 turned out to be 9, I don't mind." Anyway, it ain't like either of them are really taking the world by storm. How very...uhm...modern industrial.
     
    chimneyjim likes this.
  7. VTMoondog

    VTMoondog Initiate (0) Apr 14, 2013 Vermont

    No, it's about integrity, and it's about jobs. Yeah, yeah corporate profit...blah blah, but it comes down to keeping people employed. Too many in this thread have tried to cloud the issue around the beer and it's quality, this has nothing to do with beer. It has to do with property. You don't steal the property of others, or at best confuse people into thnking your product is the product of a competitor. I've thought this over some more since last night, and if MH did try in good faith to hash this out and West 6th didn't budge, then they may well deserve a good old fashioned lawsuit.
    Again, West 6th...you hired an inferior, uncreative, lousy designer/design firm, and they should be fired immediately and forced to go back to art school.
     
    jamvt and Frankinstiener like this.
  8. 5thOhio

    5thOhio Pooh-Bah (1,571) May 13, 2007 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    I never drank Magic Hat beers anyway, except to try a single in a mix six once or twice, which didn't impress me.

    So now I'm going to increase the amount I don't drink! Take that, Magic Hat!
     
  9. rlcoffey

    rlcoffey Savant (1,207) Apr 20, 2004 Kentucky

    Do they have any proof that anyone thinks that?

    I asked a group last night, and the only person who thought the label was confusing was a teetotaler. So he isnt in the target demographic at all.
     
  10. rlcoffey

    rlcoffey Savant (1,207) Apr 20, 2004 Kentucky

    As Magic Hat hasnt been considered "craft" by the Brewers Association for a few years now, Im not sure this qualifies as an opening shot. This is international macrobrewer vs craft. Admittedly a smaller international macrobrewer than ABI or SABMiller or MolsonCoors, but still the same category.
     
  11. rlcoffey

    rlcoffey Savant (1,207) Apr 20, 2004 Kentucky

    West 6th went from 0 bbls brewed in 2011 to 1938 bbls in 2012.

    It isnt the largest debut ever (Finch topped it in 2011, for one example off the top of my head), but its a pretty decent first year. And here in KY, they went from nonexistent to on shelfs everywhere in a hurry.

    It was reasonably stormy.
     
  12. rlcoffey

    rlcoffey Savant (1,207) Apr 20, 2004 Kentucky

    Disagree.

    Im not a fan of the design, but I still dont see how it rips off #9 at all. Its fucking hard to put a 6 on a logo that doesnt look like an upsidedown 9. And I dont think anyone should try that hard to make a "unique" six.

    Honestly*, I think Magic Hat ripped off the University of Alabama logo, which has a 10** instead of 9 in the middle.

    *not really
    **A is 10 in hexadecimal
     
  13. Nutwood

    Nutwood Initiate (0) Jun 30, 2012 Kentucky

    So...
    The W6th design is bad
    and...
    It's derived directly from the #9 design
    therefore...

    Actually I think from a pure design standpoint, the 2 logos are more opposite than similar. Yes, they both incorporate a numeral, a circle, and a star, but these are common design elements. The overall presentation of these elements could not be more different.

    The distinctive and most outstanding element of the #9 design -- is chaos, movement, and fluidity.

    On the other hand, the West 6th logo gives the impression of something chiseled and solid, stable and well defined.
     
    YogiBeer and rlcoffey like this.
  14. Auror

    Auror Pooh-Bah (1,641) Jan 1, 2010 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    Yeah, from my limited understanding after talking to a friend of mine who is a copyright attorney, this is the part most people don't understand. If you don't even attempt to protect your trademark, you then can't do so in the future (at least successfully).
     
    jamvt and kingcrowing like this.
  15. kingcrowing

    kingcrowing Pooh-Bah (1,829) Mar 24, 2009 Vermont
    Pooh-Bah


    You are correct, it's an important precedent for Magic Hat to set.
     
  16. Lordkrystic

    Lordkrystic Initiate (0) Jul 18, 2012 Washington


    So what is their excuse for threatening Georgetown with litigation over Nine Pound Porter? Did some tavern owner have an unoriginal, inferior idea for naming his tavern and he should have it taken away and forced to be a janitor? How the hell does Magic Hat own the rights to a Number?

    They've gone down this road before and are douche canoes for it.
     
  17. BearsOnAcid

    BearsOnAcid Pooh-Bah (2,239) Mar 17, 2009 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    They could be called common elements but to use them all in the same design is quite a coincidence. I've been a graphic designer for 10+ years and never even used a start that looked like that.
     
  18. GregoryVII

    GregoryVII Initiate (0) Jan 30, 2006 Michigan

    Because we look at beer cans upside down?
     
  19. rlcoffey

    rlcoffey Savant (1,207) Apr 20, 2004 Kentucky

    They arent even really the same usage, as the 6 is part of the circle, while the 9 is inside the circle. So only one is a circle around a numeral. The other is a numeral integrated into a circle.

    And why hasnt Magic Hat sued Major League Baseball? The circle around the number is very common usage.
     
  20. mwa423

    mwa423 Initiate (0) Nov 7, 2007 Ohio

    First off, I think it's important to note that the first letter to West Sixth was in September of 2012. It seems like Magic Hat has been willing to negotiate in good faith and West Sixth has decided to start crying about the big mean brewery 9 months later. Doesn't impress me.

    I think a lot of people here seem to be busy with hating on Magic Hat and actually ignoring the real issues at hand. No court or businessperson cares whether West Sixth IPA is great (it happens to be) or whether Magic Hat #9 sucks (also true). Magic Hat has posted what appears to be all of the letters between their lawyers and West Sixth here:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/142860493/Magic-Hat-Brewing-and-West-Sixth-Brewing

    Reading through those letters, it seems like Magic Hat is being as reasonable as they can possibly be and that West Sixth were going to make some changes. I suppose it's possible that sometime between the last letter and now Magic Hat demanded the brewer's firstborn, but everything I'm reading above seems pretty reasonable and relatively amicable (as far as legal matters go). At this point, while I enjoy West Sixth IPA, I think that it's pretty rotten that they decided to just take it to the streets and start screaming "damn the man, save West Sixth" in what appears to be a weak effort to intimidate Magic Hat (hint: It probably isn't and won't work). The big objection raised by Magic Hat are the scenarios (and they included examples) of where just the West 6th logo was used without the words "West Sixth" and that was what they objected to. From Magic Hat's lawyers: "Magic Hat requests that West Sixth agree to use its 6 logo consistantly with the words WEST SIXTH BREWING."


    There's another thing that apparently people here don't realize, to keep a trademark you have to affirmatively defend it. If another beer came out that was a dead rip-off of Magic Hat #9, a possible defense in court could be that Magic Hat let this West Sixth beer infringe on its trademark.

    At this point, I'm not buying any more Magic Hat than I already was (none) but I am going to stop buying West Sixth as well because I firmly believe West Sixth was in the wrong by making this issue public and not settling this matter within Magic Hat's very reasonable requests.
     
    Ericness, Sarlacc83, xFih2 and 4 others like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.