Growler fills in MA?

Discussion in 'New England' started by mike22ne, Oct 11, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mike22ne

    mike22ne Savant (1,085) Aug 5, 2014 Massachusetts

    I just moved from Connecticut to the Boston area, and was disappointed to learn that Massachusetts law prohibits breweries from filling growlers purchased from somewhere else. I love visiting local breweries and picking up fresh beer, but I'm not going to go buy a dozen new growlers just to be able to fill each one at the various breweries in my neighborhood. And now the couple of growlers I do have are useless here.

    I'm not sure about the sales numbers in other states but growlers used to be a good amount of my beer purchases in CT, especially for small breweries that didn't package/distribute much or for taproom-only small batches.

    Is there any effort to change the law? Are MA brewers satisfied with the current situation, missing out on potential sales of growler fills? Do other consumers care about it?
     
    #1 mike22ne, Oct 11, 2018
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2018
  2. cmoney13

    cmoney13 Initiate (0) Sep 9, 2017 Massachusetts

    the law has loosened somewhat and breweries are allowed to fill unmarked growlers. That doesn't help you with your stock of various growlers, though maybe you can chip some paint off. It also doesn't mean that a brewery will fill an unmarked vessel, it just means they're allowed to.

    I don't particularly care as I'm not a huge fan of growlers, but I agree the law is pretty silly, though I'm sure most breweries are happy with it.
     
    mike22ne likes this.
  3. kinopio

    kinopio Savant (1,037) Apr 30, 2009 Massachusetts

    Growlers aren't a big thing here. Night Shift stopped filling them. Some of the new breweries have never done growlers but do sell crowlers(Winter Hill, Remnant, Democracy). I haven't filled a growler in MA in over a year.
     
  4. pbrian

    pbrian Pooh-Bah (2,118) Feb 8, 2001 Connecticut
    Pooh-Bah

    It's weird, but the CT vs MA growler scene is vastly different. Just go to NEBCO on any given afternoon and see how many people are getting growler fills. Almost everyone.
     
    sulldaddy and mike22ne like this.
  5. oldbean

    oldbean Initiate (0) Jun 30, 2005 Massachusetts

    The laws in Massachusetts turn growlers from a sort of elegant, waste-free beer delivery system into trash you can't throw away.

    So, I don't think it's that weird.
     
  6. trsC

    trsC Crusader (466) May 5, 2013 Spain
    Society

    Duct tape.
     
  7. krantul

    krantul Zealot (672) May 18, 2005 Massachusetts

    Looking at our statistics at Medusa since we had cans available for sale in the taproom, they outsell growlers about 2:1, but they are still a pretty substantial sector for us. That said, we have a 20 product line semiautomatic counterpressure growler filler, so it helps us have a lot more variety to go than the 2-4 can options we have at any given time. I can certainly see why a brewery that was filling straight off a tap would gladly retire the format in favor of cans, though.
     
  8. papposilenus

    papposilenus Grand Pooh-Bah (3,232) Jun 21, 2014 New Hampshire
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Because who wants to go out and buy a dozen new growlers?

    I live in the southwest corner of NH, about equidistant from MA and VT. I take my growlers into Vermont EVERY week to get them filled - including my old Tree House, Medusa and Honest Weight growlers.

    (Let's not even talk about why I'm not filling them in New Hampshire).
     
    mike22ne likes this.
  9. oldbean

    oldbean Initiate (0) Jun 30, 2005 Massachusetts

    Because they don't brew beer there?
     
    papposilenus likes this.
  10. papposilenus

    papposilenus Grand Pooh-Bah (3,232) Jun 21, 2014 New Hampshire
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    There's beer here, it's just that most of it isn't especially good. Some of the ones that are good, like Kettlehead and Schilling, are crowler fills. New Hampshire is branded glass only, too. I have a couple of Deciduous growlers and, I think, a Post & Beam but, frankly, I couldn't live here if I weren't less than a half hour from both Massachusetts and Vermont.
     
  11. Manfrombelmonty

    Manfrombelmonty Savant (1,165) Sep 12, 2010 Massachusetts

    I'm not a fan of growlers. A 4pk of tall boys is much easier to share than a bottle gradually losing carb.

    Crowlers, I detest. I'm mostly being charged $12-16 for 32oz. The equivalent of $24-32 a 4pk?

    Feck off. I refused to be gouged like that.
     
  12. mike22ne

    mike22ne Savant (1,085) Aug 5, 2014 Massachusetts

    Oh yes, my growlers have seen many NEBCO beers! Sad to think they might never see a Massachusetts beer...

    It definitely seems like the law drives the culture. It were easy (legal) to use growlers widely I expect way more people would use them here.

    And I've never understood crowlers. They're just two 16oz cans that can't be resealed or reused and require the brewer to buy special equipment. Are they so much better than those 32oz mini growlers? I do have one stainless steel growler that holds its pressure over a week if I'm not going to drink the beer immediately, but usually I plan to drink/share it in the next day or two. So the complaints about freshness/pressure loss seem to be missing the intended purpose.
     
    sulldaddy likes this.
  13. kinopio

    kinopio Savant (1,037) Apr 30, 2009 Massachusetts

    I take growlers into Vermont when I go too, but thats because Hill Farmstead is my favorite brewery and they don't can or bottle everything. Now that they do can some stuff I bring less growlers. But they are the only brewery I'll deal with PITA growlers for. There is enough excellent canned and bottled beer around these days to not have to deal with an inferior beer storage option.

    The MA growler law is dumb but if it leads to breweries focusing on getting their beers into cans then the law has actually been a good thing.
     
  14. Sweatshirt

    Sweatshirt Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2014 New Hampshire

    I like crowlers for the purpose of not being required to buy a growler when it's the only take home option available. I hate crowlers because it seems most places will charge for a crowler, on every transaction, what a growler fill would cost with buying the glass.

    I have disposed of many and now own now olny 2 growlers now. One is a local brewery I fill at often and the other is a MA brewery that I only fill when I am in a state that allows me to use it as is.

    It's terrible for the consumer to have to buy brewery specific glass and it seems to have slowly hurt breweries too with consumers getting sick of it. Maybe NH and MA will get thier shit together on this stupid issue some day.
     
    sulldaddy and meefmoff like this.
  15. gclaw4444

    gclaw4444 Zealot (590) Jul 30, 2015 Massachusetts
    Trader

    I'm a fan of growlers only because it's typically the only way to take home small batch beers at some breweries. If more places had canning/bottling lines and packaged everything then i would gladly get rid of my shelf of unused growlers.
     
  16. pbrian

    pbrian Pooh-Bah (2,118) Feb 8, 2001 Connecticut
    Pooh-Bah

    This is true, one might think that crowlers are awesome because they don't charge for the can, but look at the price, crowlers are $10-$12 around here.
     
  17. LeRose

    LeRose Grand Pooh-Bah (4,423) Nov 24, 2011 Massachusetts
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Is this inaccurate?

    https://www.masslive.com/business-n...beer_lovers_rejoice_rule_change_to_let_m.html

    I rarely purchase a growler, but I seem to remember the "house glass" rule in MA changing a while ago and a debate about it in Beer Talk. Basically I thought MA breweries now have the option.

    If I was running a brewery, I would not want to put my beer into another brewery's branded growler - no way. A non-branded blank - well, there's still risk there as people are generally lazy and to some people "clean" is just as subjective as beer taste. I know I chatted about it at Jack's Abby at their old place and they had some really disgusting horror stories about "clean" growlers. I seem to recall that being discussed and breweries should retain the right to refuse to fill for any reason. Some breweries, like Nightshift, just opted for no growler filling - and there was weeping and gnashing of teeth...
     
  18. papposilenus

    papposilenus Grand Pooh-Bah (3,232) Jun 21, 2014 New Hampshire
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Really it's the same thing if you're bringing back branded glass to be refilled, right? I mean, as far as whether or not the customer did a decent job cleaning it out. There's no place I go to that swaps out the growlers you bring in for new or house-cleaned - although I just recently heard of someplace that does that, I forget who now. Most of them will hold it up, squint down into the bottle, maybe give it a sniff, to a greater or lesser degree depending on who's pulling the taps, but, washing it for you, not so much.
     
  19. LeRose

    LeRose Grand Pooh-Bah (4,423) Nov 24, 2011 Massachusetts
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Yes - clean/dirty doesn't matter what the source of the growler. Either way you are relying on the customer being conscientious as a means of maintaining the integrity of your beer.

    Jack's Abby used to swap them out and do their own cleaning - I don't think they do anymore due to cost and time. I did see first-hand Bog Iron exchange one once - they were refusing to fill it since it was dirty and the customer caused a commotion so they just threw it out and gave him a new one. The thing was filthy with probably the yeast cake from the previous fill in the bottom, lord knows what else that I didn't want to see.

    If it were me, I wouldn't fill somebody's branded growler from another brewery because I am working my ass off to establish my own brand identity. I don't want my beer under somebody else's label, clean or dirty. I would refuse to fill a dirty branded or unbranded growler because it is just a he said/she said pissing match if a customer complains. I think I wouldn't fill 'em, period.

    But if I had a world class brewery I could walk to, as a customer it would be great as the "bottled while I watch" thing.
     
  20. mike22ne

    mike22ne Savant (1,085) Aug 5, 2014 Massachusetts

    Yeah, they are "legally permitted" to fill a growler that is completely blank, though I've never seen one. But breweries can still decide not to do any fills if they don't want to.

    I understand the argument about putting your beer in a container with "somebody else's brand" but it seems pretty weak in practice. If consumers know how growlers work, it's pretty easy to address - I've had brewers simply put a sticker on the cap or tie a tag on the handle. If consumers have grown to expect that growlers can *only* ever have that brewery's beer inside, then yes, people could be confused or the brewery would feel mis-represented.

    And geez, bringing your nasty old dirty growler is just embarrassing. Have some respect for the brewers, and the beer.
     
    LeRose likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.