Racking on top of yeast

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by pants678, Dec 13, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. pants678

    pants678 Maven (1,374) Jan 26, 2009 California
    Trader

    If there's a thread on this let me know, wasn't sure wording for a search.

    I'm gonna bottle a tripel and want to re-use that yeast in the next day or two. Generally I've been told for my 2 gallon batches, starters are cool but generally unnecessary. Any issue with capping that yeast-cake-only carboy for a bit then racking the next wort right on top?
     
  2. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    A couple extra days in the carboy, if kept wet, probably isn't going to make a whole lot of difference.

    But a Tripel is a high gravity/ABV beer. That yeast probably isn't going to be in the best shape for a repitch, IMO. Personally, I'd buy some new yeast.
     
  3. PortLargo

    PortLargo Pooh-Bah (1,831) Oct 19, 2012 Florida
    Pooh-Bah

    Because of my laziness I once waited two days to clean my fermentor (plastic bucket). It had been "lid'ed" but I noticed growth already starting on the krausen ring. Remember, after racking the carboy is full of air.
     
    GormBrewhouse and pants678 like this.
  4. Supergenious

    Supergenious Maven (1,273) May 9, 2011 Michigan

    If you do closed transfers you should be fine. I would be a little worried if exposed to oxygen. Keeping in the refrigerator would help too.
     
    pants678 and PortLargo like this.
  5. pants678

    pants678 Maven (1,374) Jan 26, 2009 California
    Trader

    Coming in at 1.088 may not be traditional tripel gravity, still you'd say new pack is best practice?
     
  6. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    1.088 is even higher than a typical tripel. So, yes.
     
  7. beershrine

    beershrine Pundit (819) May 29, 2004 Idaho

    On the day of transferring brew another batch and put your new wort right into your last primary. Results should be great.
     
    rocdoc1 and pants678 like this.
  8. pants678

    pants678 Maven (1,374) Jan 26, 2009 California
    Trader

    Thank you all for the advice, I chose to go with a new pack of yeast. Except I didn't StarSan the carboy.

    Fuck.
     
  9. rocdoc1

    rocdoc1 Maven (1,265) Jan 13, 2006 New Mexico
    Society

    In the olden days I would often brew a series like this, without ever taking the lid off my fermenter. Brown ale OG 1.050, then stout or porter, around 1.065. Then an Imperial stout OG around 1.100. For pale beers it would be an ESB around 1.050, an IPA around 1.070, then another IPA around 1.080. This was a normal brewing schedule for me. One time I noticed a small patch of mold on the lid of the fermenter where the thermowell was inserted, but it didn't affect the beer. The key was to maintain temperature control the first few days and keep the fermentation temp in the lows 60's, gradually letting it climb. This meant racking the wort onto the yeast at no higher than 60F.
     
  10. GormBrewhouse

    GormBrewhouse Pooh-Bah (2,111) Jun 24, 2015 Vermont
    Pooh-Bah

    When possible, I am brewing and bottling, or racking to secondary the same day. Thus, fresh yeast. Often times I can save a pint of slurry and dump the wort into the fermenter.

    in my experience fermentation starts quick doing this.

    have fun
     
  11. skivtjerry

    skivtjerry Pooh-Bah (1,865) Mar 10, 2006 Vermont
    Pooh-Bah

    Typical Tripel is a great beer name.
     
  12. YourBeerRunner

    YourBeerRunner Aspirant (212) May 3, 2022

    A sipple of a typical trippel can cripple
     
    GormBrewhouse and skivtjerry like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.