Sculpin Cans

Discussion in 'Beer Talk' started by Pelican5, Jan 25, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. evilc

    evilc Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2012 California

    Bottles 7 days old with no nose tasting skunked. Purchased at Old Grove location.
     
  2. SubpoenaDeuces

    SubpoenaDeuces Initiate (0) Feb 3, 2011 California

    How much will 6 packs be? $20?
     
    libbey likes this.
  3. jmmy3

    jmmy3 Initiate (0) Nov 30, 2010 Massachusetts

    Yeah, hopefully not...
     
  4. SeaOfShells

    SeaOfShells Initiate (0) Feb 22, 2011 California

    Don't feed the troll?
     
  5. SubpoenaDeuces

    SubpoenaDeuces Initiate (0) Feb 3, 2011 California

    I am asking a legitimate question. If 6 packs are a staggering $18 a piece that's still only less than $6 a bomber. How cheap does it have to be seriously?
     
    libbey and ehammond1 like this.
  6. SeaOfShells

    SeaOfShells Initiate (0) Feb 22, 2011 California


    My appologies.
     
    fmccormi likes this.
  7. SubpoenaDeuces

    SubpoenaDeuces Initiate (0) Feb 3, 2011 California

    Your sentence is to go on ĂȘtre gourmet and spend ~$180 on a bottle of Struise Five Squared so that you can feel the pain of true loss, the brackish spray of regret and excess.

    Only then will $18 sculpin provide solace to a threadbare heart.
     
  8. jmmy3

    jmmy3 Initiate (0) Nov 30, 2010 Massachusetts

    Never seen a 6 pack here. If all breweries used your twisted logic then there would be no 6 packs under 15 dollars.
     
  9. SubpoenaDeuces

    SubpoenaDeuces Initiate (0) Feb 3, 2011 California

    What is twisted about my logic? here I will set if forward as a setential proof:

    p1 - Sculpin costs $18 for 6 12oz cans
    p2 - Sculpin costs $3 for a 12oz can
    p3 - A bomber is 22 ounces
    p4 - 2 12oz cans is more than a single bomber
    p5 - distributing p2, two Sculpin cans cost $6
    - - -
    c1 - using distributed middle, a bomber would cost less than $6.00

    I have no problem with that price point given the quality of the product received. Whether you feel that Sculpin is worth $6 a bomber is a matter of personal preference which not even my twisted logic can sway.

    Before this gets into Stupac/Pahn territory, I am not making prescriptive statements of what breweries should charge, I am simply stating that at the $6 mark, I would happily pay that much given the comparable alternatives in that realm.
     
  10. tjensen3618

    tjensen3618 Maven (1,391) Mar 23, 2008 California

    I've had bad luck with Sculpin over the last 18 months. I would put the ones I had on the level of something like Full Sail IPA, an ok, but seriously underwhelming beer.
     
    evilc likes this.
  11. SeaOfShells

    SeaOfShells Initiate (0) Feb 22, 2011 California

    I never once questioned the price of Sculpin. In fact, if you look at my previous posts in this very thread, you'll see that I was defending it.
     
    SubpoenaDeuces likes this.
  12. jmmy3

    jmmy3 Initiate (0) Nov 30, 2010 Massachusetts

    It's twisted logic because that's not how a business works. It's not 6 dollars a bomber (here), it's 10-11.

    Most 12 oz. bottles cost around 1.60, in terms of normal 6 pack pricings of around 10 bucks. But if I choose to grab a bomber, I'm not refusing anything just because it's over 3 dollars. Do 3 dollars bombers even exist? If everything was priced by the ounce we would probably be paying 20+ bucks per 6 pack. Different serving types have different price points, and around 8 dollars is what I would consider to be the limit on a bomber for a single IPA.

    I hope cans bring the price down, and they should. I'd pay 12 bucks for 6 pack of cans from time to time, for sure.
     
  13. SubpoenaDeuces

    SubpoenaDeuces Initiate (0) Feb 3, 2011 California

    if a 6 pack is $18, how does 22 ounces of beer become 10 or 11 dollars?

    a 6 pack of beer is 72 ounces, if you divide that by $18.00 you get Sculpin at $.25 cents an ounce, if there are 22 ounces in a bomber, that is a $5.50 purchase for 22 ounces at that price point.

    I dont even math that hard and this makes sense to me.
     
    libbey likes this.
  14. AlcahueteJ

    AlcahueteJ Grand Pooh-Bah (3,242) Dec 4, 2004 Massachusetts
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Should I just start the thread now that Sculpin should be consumed directly from the can?
     
    fmccormi and Pelican5 like this.
  15. incapacitant

    incapacitant Initiate (0) Jan 15, 2011 New York

    People who bitch about buying Ye Olde Sculpin really have no one to blame but themselves:

    "Ballast Point: Uses a best before date. Ex.: BE293/03302. BE = Big Eye, 293 = Batch, 03302 is the best before (Mar. 30, 2012). All of our ales and lagers under 10% ABV have an enjoy by date that is 120 days from the moment it touches our bottling line. Our ales and lagers that are over 10% ABV have an enjoy by date of 1 year." - via Fresh Beer Only database
     
    fmccormi likes this.
  16. Pelican5

    Pelican5 Initiate (0) Feb 4, 2012 California

    But there are no floaties to hide in Sculpin :slight_smile:
     
    pjeagles likes this.
  17. evilc

    evilc Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2012 California

    Pff. I've bought 2 day old bottles @ Old Grove. Same issue.
     
  18. jmmy3

    jmmy3 Initiate (0) Nov 30, 2010 Massachusetts

    Nevermind, I didn't realize I was dealing with an autistic.
     
  19. Pelican5

    Pelican5 Initiate (0) Feb 4, 2012 California

    Ya I dont think its a freshness issue, its the inconsistency in brewing. Ive had great bottles super fresh and not so great bottles super fresh.
     
    evilc likes this.
  20. evilc

    evilc Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2012 California

    Yep - yet people will continue to say "you gotta get it fresh bro" to people who can jog to the brewery.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.