Aged Avery Maharaja

One of my favorites

 

You probably dont know how they were stored, right? I wouldnt pull the trigger on.. any of them, since theyre SO old... but hey, screw it? Try one and report back... it's your duty.

 

I made this mistake a couple years ago. It was right around the time of the release and I saw some bottles at a shop I didnt frequent very often. Turns out they were 2008 or 2009 I can't remember but I drank it anyway and....no I would not recommend it.

 

I've had Maharaja that I purposely aged around 2 years. I thought that it tasted like a really hoppy barleywine. I would buy one, and see if you like it.

 

Depends on the cost?
Is it worth it to YOU?

Cheers!

 

I have a bottle being aged right now. It's been about a year. I am planning to lay it down for another couple more years to see how it turns out.

 

Maharaja is an IPA.

I hope that helps.

 

Just bought 2 bottles at the taproom in boulder last week.

 

Maharaja doesn't age well. The spicy/grassy character of the hops don't fade like the other aromatics, and you're left with a mild version of an American barleywine that tastes like it has vegetables in it.

Unless it's very cheap, or you are really curious, I'd avoid. FWIW I had a bottle from 2009 or 2010 last fall and it didn't taste very good.

 

If you draw the retailers attention to the age perhaps they will cut you a break on this price, in which case it may be a worthwhile gamble.

 

I dont remember the specifics, but last february I found of Maharaja mixed into my cellar that was 2-3 years old. It was drinkable but not good. I'm not sure a beer with that amount of hops can go bad, but i wouldn't drink one over a year old again

 

I did a 2008/2012 tasting of Maharaja. 2008 was definitely one of the more interesting brews I tasted. After a few sips, I got tired of the 2008 and preferred it fresh.

 

I have toyed around with aging ImpIPA's and DIPAs and I actually find them quite pleasant, it is like the difference between young and old Chablis, the structure comes forward revealing all the pleasant malt characteristics that are hidden by the outrageous amount of hops. Instead of all the crazy fresh fruit or pine/weed notes you get rich warm tones, and as the hops break down they leave wonderfully underscored spiciness and hints of dead pine needles or dried pine cones. I found the few I have tried (Maharaja, Devil Dancer, the Oracle) to be actually very nice especially since I usually have popped them open in winter making them very unique winter warmers. I say go for it as a beer stability has more to do with its alcohol and storage than anything else, if anything the hops stabilized its descent (after all that is why the English invented the damn style anyways) into malty goodness.

 

If they are really that old I'd casually bring it up with the worker there and see if I could score a decent discount. If not I'd pass.

 

I really never got to drink the 2012 fresh so will be anxious to try the bottle I have in my fridge vs. 2013.

 

I bought an old bottle once and it was awful but that's just my opinion.....

 

I searched for this thread because I opened a two year old bottle of Maharaja last night and thought it was incredible.

The bottle was well stored the entire time. It actually came in a bottle club with the advice that it is very interesting to try aged. At that point, it was about a year old and I've kept it in cool/cold storage for about another year, until last night when I finally cracked it open...

Oh man it was like a great barleywine with tons of bitterness still lingering. The malt base for that beer is incredible. I loved it.

To answer the OP... I think it's worth trying one of those bottles, depending on the cost. After the great experience I had with the 2011 bottle, I know I would give a 2008 a chance. Hopefully they are still available, since you started this thread back in February!