Aging RR Consecration?

Discussion in 'Cellaring / Aging Beer' started by troughnbrew, Jan 16, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. troughnbrew

    troughnbrew Initiate (21) Feb 28, 2010 Maine

    Any advice on what amount of aging is/is not appropriate for stronger sours? I've been keeping Consecration for about two years (the last 750 ML bottling, whenever that was, probably late 2010). Thanks for your thoughts.
     
  2. evilc

    evilc Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2012 California

    Vinne says 3 years right on the bottle for that beer.
     
  3. stealth

    stealth Defender (606) Dec 16, 2011 Minnesota
    Beer Trader

    Older = better, imho. I've had consecration past the '3 year' limit and it was extraordinary.
     
  4. jtmartino

    jtmartino Initiate (0) Dec 11, 2010 California
    Beer Trader

    That's one beer that keeps getting better and better. So damn underrated around here (Bay Area) with everyone trying to get sours from everywhere else.
     
    cfh64 and afrokaze like this.
  5. starrdogg

    starrdogg Champion (812) Jun 21, 2010 District of Columbia
    Beer Trader

    My personal experience with Consecration is that age doesn't necessarily make it better or worse, just different. I love that beer fresh, so maybe I'm not the best person to ask, but aging it just mellows the flavors a bit. The older bottles I've opened weren't as acidic or tannic as fresh bottles.
     
  6. forgetfu

    forgetfu Initiate (172) Jul 27, 2007 Colorado
    Beer Trader

    I'm definitely a fresh consecration fan. Fresh, it's one of my favorite beers. With age, it's not my thing.
     
    Knownfactor likes this.
  7. drgarage

    drgarage Initiate (0) Aug 19, 2008 California

    Last year, we had a batch 1 750 (it was three years old at that point). Very different from fresh. Really intensely sour, crazy dry, thin body, and the carbonation had faded considerably. Still great, but not necessarily better than fresh. It would be your taste buds deciding which you prefer.
     
    FeDUBBELFIST likes this.
  8. FunkyMacGroovin

    FunkyMacGroovin Initiate (0) Sep 22, 2009 California

    I had a batch 2 a few months ago that tasted pretty damn good.
     
  9. FeDUBBELFIST

    FeDUBBELFIST Meyvn (1,068) Oct 31, 2009 Pennsylvania

    Very well put. This matches my batch 1 experience from spring of 2012...although I wouldn't have called the mouthfeel thin, even though it was *thinner* than it is when fresh.
     
  10. chcfan

    chcfan Devotee (466) Oct 29, 2008 California

    They changed the recipe for batch 4, so the fresh Consecration really is a slightly different beer. Earlier batches were more sour. It's still great, but I prefer B1-B3. We did a B1-B7 vertical this summer and did not have any carbonation issues with earlier batches, either. That sounds like and aberration.
     
    jtmartino likes this.
  11. jtmartino

    jtmartino Initiate (0) Dec 11, 2010 California
    Beer Trader

    Not only were earlier batches more sour, the longer you sit on them the typically more sour/drier they get. I feel that fresh Consecration has a full, rich flavor, but a lot of sweetness that I like to see fade a bit.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.

    Subscribe