My concern isn't so much the length of the review, but with the numeral ratings. BA ratings are supposed to be “to style” and the majority of those, at least for the beers I drink, are written that way. UT ratings are based on how much you liked the beer. Merging UT ratings with BA ratings will severely impact the less mainstream styles, simply because the of the way those beers are rated. For instance: On BA Rodenbach Grand Cru Flanders Red Ale (which I love) has 4,209 ratings a 96 “World-Class” score and a 4.33 average. On UT the same beer has 216,000 ratings with a 3.74 average. The sheer number of “how much do I like it” UT ratings would make the BA “how true is it” ratings meaningless.