I have noticed up to about a year or two ago, there was a lot ot top rated beers they had not had, so maybe the "pool" still really was not that deep. I remember seeing the twitter feed on them finally getting a Founders care package. More(or less) input can definitely skew numbers like these. As stated earlier, there are also A LOT of Bros reviews that were ported in from reviews in the magazine from 2006 or whatever. Maybe we all need to go back and re-assess some of our reviews, said the guy who has no reviews.