Welcome to BeerAdvocate!

Looking to talk, rate or trade beer? Join today by creating your free account.

Dismiss Notice
Curious about recent updates to the site and app? Check the Announcements forum for updates.
Dismiss Notice
Love Belgian Beer?

Join us Sep 17 in Portland, Maine for Return of the Belgian Beer Fest, featuring hundreds of authentic Belgian beers and Belgian-inspired offerings.

Tickets + more: beeradvocate.com/belgian

Comment Triple IPA, possibly a new style?

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by dcraig13, Feb 21, 2013.

  1. dcraig13

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Posts:
    27
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Ohio
    There are a lot of beers labeled as a Triple IPA from the breweries but they are still categorized under the Double IPA category on here, RateBeer, and Untappd. Should Triple IPA be a new style or is it just a way for the breweries to indicate Double IPAs with higher abv?
     
  2. sandiego67

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2008
    Posts:
    999
    Likes Received:
    1,012
    Location:
    California
    Barleywine?
     
  3. Gosox8787

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Posts:
    213
    Likes Received:
    187
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    I believe these Triple IPA's already fit under the category of "Imperial IPAs." BA lists the style as "American Double/Imperial IPA" and that seems to work pretty good.

    A seperate listing would definitely be redundant and confusing.
     
  4. MinorThreat

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Posts:
    215
    Likes Received:
    696
    Location:
    Nebraska
    With most double IPA's pushing the IBU detectability threshold as it is I personally don't know if there is a need for a new category.
     
  5. Ranbot

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Posts:
    2,091
    Likes Received:
    3,518
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Along those lines, wouldn't it be accurate to say a "triple IPA" is just a barleywine with pale malts? If so, then again, there's no reason for a new classification.
     
  6. TheBeerAlmanac

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    Posts:
    837
    Likes Received:
    10,735
    Location:
    Kentucky
    I think we should skip triple and go straight to quintuple.
     
    ABisonEgo, Lantern, YogiBeer and 8 others like this.
  7. lnashsig

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2010
    Posts:
    69
    Likes Received:
    74
    Location:
    Texas
    No. Stop it. Forever.
     
  8. Azrael

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Posts:
    64
    Likes Received:
    75
    The IPA style is going to start looking like Gillette razors.

    "Introducing... sixteen blades!"
     
  9. alex021224

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Posts:
    66
    Likes Received:
    60
    Location:
    Michigan
    Would Founders Devil Dancer fall under this category? 112 IBUs and 12% ABV.
     
  10. otispdriftwood

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,295
    Likes Received:
    5,310
    Location:
    Colorado
    And there are others [Knee Deep Simtra for one] but the answer is no, since there is no category nor should there be.
     
  11. bilboTbaggins

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2013
    Posts:
    60
    Likes Received:
    36
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    I agree, at what point is it just marketing? How hoppy can a beer really get and retain drinkability. I tried the hop dam and it was borderline ridiculous. Whats next, a stout you have to serve with a spoon to get it out of the glass?
     
  12. bilboTbaggins

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2013
    Posts:
    60
    Likes Received:
    36
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    yep, and hop dam
     
  13. MammaGoose

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Posts:
    240
    Likes Received:
    622
    Location:
    Wyoming
    I had a triple IPA at Renegade Brewery in Denver, CO. It was a good beer. Hoppy, strong malt backbone, bold, full body. But I can't say it was anything bigger and bolder than any double or Imperial IPA I've ever had. It was around 9% ABV, I believe. The name seemed kind of gimmicky, I guess. Unless there's something in the brewing process that differentiates a triple versus a double IPA, I generally think it's a marketing shtick. Eventually we'll have an octuple IPA.
     
  14. dcraig13

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Posts:
    27
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Ohio
    I agree. I had Hopocalypse and Hopocalypse Black Label side by side the other night and Hopocalypse Black Label was way more intense both in hop character and abv which started this way of thinking.
     
  15. TheBeerAlmanac

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    Posts:
    837
    Likes Received:
    10,735
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Introducing the centuple IPA!
     
  16. bilboTbaggins

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2013
    Posts:
    60
    Likes Received:
    36
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    sign me up, got my bitter face all set to go
     
  17. bramsdell

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Posts:
    577
    Likes Received:
    859
    Location:
    North Carolina
    I think we should just have IPA and Imperial IPAs. Look at the abv, look at the IBUs, just taste it.

    I had a Sucks next to a Flower Power last night. FP is a 7.5% "IPA" and Sucks is a 7.85% IIPA. The splitting of hairs.
     
    Kinsman, jcb7472 and bcook582 like this.
  18. bcook582

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Posts:
    22
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    California
    Last year during SF beer week they introduced a new style category for judging.......The Triple IPA.......

    http://drinkmemag.com/2013/02/sf-beer-week-weekend-roundup/

    I think its legit, and I enjoy them
    I agree its splitting hairs at that level but once you get up into the 9%-10.5% they start to get different.
     
    dcraig13 likes this.
  19. liamt07

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Posts:
    466
    Likes Received:
    402
    Location:
    Ontario (Canada)
    Double/"Imperial" IPA. There's already a category. A triple IPA is an imperial IPA.
     
  20. RangnaR

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Posts:
    651
    Likes Received:
    655
    Location:
    California
    I'm not sure what barleywines some of you folks are drinking, but I can't quite see how any double or triple IPAs would be classified as barleywines. I would hope people (at least on BA) could tell the difference even in a blind tasting. If anything, the Simtra (one of the self-prolaimed triple IPAs) to me seems to lean a bit toward an imperial red with its malt profile...
     
    Revenant and MrDave like this.
  21. AlcahueteJ

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Posts:
    3,906
    Likes Received:
    5,892
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    IVPA
     
    YogiBeer and Dan114 like this.
  22. steveh

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2003
    Posts:
    7,111
    Likes Received:
    5,791
    Location:
    Illinois
    What do they tag the third "I" to? Inane Imperial India Pale Ale? Idiotic Imperial India Pale Ale? Impossible Imperial India Pale Ale? :rolleyes:
     
    jmw likes this.
  23. RyanGoodman

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Posts:
    36
    Likes Received:
    50
    Location:
    Bolivia
    I understand the debate, but shouldn't the brewers be consulted on this as well? Don't we trust the brewmasters of our favorite beers to know what they would like to classify their beers as? After all, isn't that really the core of making "craft" beer, discovering and inventing new styles, new ways to brew, different ingredients in ways that haven't been thought of before? I'm sure the homebrewers would understand this to a certain degree.
     
    kojevergas and bcook582 like this.
  24. bcook582

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Posts:
    22
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    California
    WELL SAID...........THANK YOU
     
  25. Kinsman

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Posts:
    828
    Likes Received:
    1,599
    Location:
    California
    I've pretty much stopped paying attention to whether something is considered an IPA or DIPA and just look at the ABV. 8% tends to be the dividing line for most, but of course there's plenty of examples like Sucks that are under 8. IBUs are a nice number to look at too but how different will a 55 IBU IPA be versus a 62 IBU DIPA? Your palate won't really know the difference, especially with so many being loaded up with late-addition hops and dry hops that barely contribute to the IBUs.
     
    Gosox8787 likes this.
  26. MasterSki

    MasterSki Site Editor
    Staff Member Subscriber Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2006
    Posts:
    759
    Likes Received:
    852
    Location:
    Ontario (Canada)
    It can be tricky to distinguish some 'triple' IPAs from aggressively hopped American Barleywines. Boneyards sends their Notorious Triple IPA to the Toronado barleywine festival every year.

    Triple IPA is a bit of misnomer, as generally these beers have recipes that contain roughly 2x malt as regular IPAs. Double Crooked Tree would be the textbook example. There are probably only a handful of 'true' Triple IPAs in the literal sense: Super Juice, 120 Minute, So Double It's Triple, etc.

    You could certainly make the case that there are distinct classes of IIPA/DIPA:

    1) The highly attenuated 'West Coast' IIPA (7.5-9.0% ABV, with massive hop aroma and flavor and fairly mild malt presence and restrained bitterness)
    Examples: Pliny the Elder, Double Sunshine, Poor Man's DIPA

    2) The balanced 'East Coast' DIPA (8.0%-10.5% ABV, with aggressive dry-hopping, significant malt character, and bruising bitterness)
    Examples: Abrasive Ale, Hopslam, Maharaja, Dogfish 90 Minute,

    3) The 'Triple' IPA (9.5%+, with massive amounts of dry hops, hop flavor, malt flavor, and possibly alcohol and bitterness)
    Examples: Exponential Hoppiness, Pliny the Younger, Hop Suey, Notorious Triple, Ephraim

    Keep in mind these examples were thought up on the fly, so some may straddle the boundaries a bit. I think one category on BA is sufficient anyway, as there's a pretty wide range of beers in the other categories (is it really fair to lump barrel-aged stouts, coffee stouts, and plain old imperial stouts in the same category?). I've always been a fan of a tag based sorting system that lets you increase granularity if you want rather than introducing umpteen new 'official styles' like White IPA, Black Saison, Belgian Stout, Rice Ale, IPL, etc.
     
    nben60 and Gosox8787 like this.
  27. Beerandraiderfan

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Posts:
    1,359
    Likes Received:
    1,385
    Location:
    Nevada
    axeman9182, Azrael and Gosox8787 like this.
  28. ericj551

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Posts:
    350
    Likes Received:
    130
    Location:
    Alberta (Canada)
    Agreed, there is a blurry line already, I don't think we need to blur if further. If a brewery wants to differentiate itself by calling their beer a triple IPA, I'm fine with that (especially if they have a IPA and an IIPA already, e.g. Blind Pig, PtE and PtY).
     
  29. kdb150

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Posts:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    1,846
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Yes, but simply adding more fermentables and more hops isn't inventing a new style. Nor is it particularly creative. And in my opinion, ought not to be encouraged.
     
  30. scraff

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2003
    Posts:
    296
    Likes Received:
    160
    Location:
    Maryland

    Though it's fine for Belgium to have styles of ale designated Single, Dubbel, Trippel? Why not American IPA's? If you're rounding 2nd, might as well leg it our for 3 bases! Younger, Double Crooked Tree, Devil Dancer, etc are definitely (in my mind anyway) above D-IPA standards. And if you have the separate category, more brewers will brew that style in years to come. So in the end--we as the consumers win big! Well...if you're a hophead anyway. ;) Cheers!
     
  31. Gotti311

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Posts:
    390
    Likes Received:
    193
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    In my opinion, attempts at a Triple IPA have been pretty unsuccessful. The 2 beers that I have consumed that I would consider falling under this category are 120 Minute and Devil Dancer. To me, the bitter and alcohol are just too big and the balance is all out of whack, like trying to balance elephants on a teeter totter. Are brewers trying to one-up each other?
     
  32. ShogoKawada

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Posts:
    1,700
    Likes Received:
    3,013
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
  33. TMoney2591

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Posts:
    571
    Likes Received:
    910
    Location:
    Illinois
    But singles, dubbels, and tripels are pretty damn different from each other, so much so that they easily constitute separate styles. I probably couldn't tell the difference between a "true" triple IPA and a thoroughly unbalanced DIPA (kinda like how it's hard to differentiate highly-hopped pale ales like Daisy Cutter and Zombie Dust from "true" IPAs).

    The way I see it, call the beer whatever you want, so long as I have some idea of what I'm about to drink.
     
  34. Azrael

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Posts:
    64
    Likes Received:
    75
    Can you explain what you mean by "every year"? I thought the fest has been going since the mid-90s, but Boneyard as a brewery is a few years old and the first review for Notorious is in June 2011.

    By "every year" do you mean "last year and this year"?

    Seems more like a way for them to get exposure than anything else.
     
  35. mechamifune

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Posts:
    143
    Likes Received:
    104
    Location:
    North Carolina
    No need for a "triple IPA" designation IMO. As others already stated, "imperial IPA" pretty much covers anywhere you want to go once you get into the higher abv's and ibu's of this style. The only reason to call something a "triple ipa" is marketing (not that that's inherently a bad thing).
     
  36. MasterSki

    MasterSki Site Editor
    Staff Member Subscriber Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2006
    Posts:
    759
    Likes Received:
    852
    Location:
    Ontario (Canada)
    This year and last year. Every year that the beer has been in existence as of February. It fits in with the other beers, IMHO.
     
  37. cavedave

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Posts:
    7,858
    Likes Received:
    43,228
    Location:
    New York
    At every point it is just marketing, they are all hoppy pale ales, the rest is marketing and competition entry categories.
     
  38. Beerandraiderfan

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Posts:
    1,359
    Likes Received:
    1,385
    Location:
    Nevada
  39. Droogins

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Posts:
    147
    Likes Received:
    298
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    That sounds delicious.
     
  40. ShogoKawada

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Posts:
    1,700
    Likes Received:
    3,013
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    [​IMG]
     
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • Return of the Belgian Beer Fest

    BeerAdvocate Brings its All-Belgian Fest to Portland, Maine on September 17, 2016. Tickets are on sale now.

    Learn More
  • Get the Mag

    Become a BeerAdvocate magazine print subscriber today.

    Subscribe