Welcome to BeerAdvocate!

Looking to talk, rate or trade beer? Join today by creating your free account.

Dismiss Notice
Curious about recent updates to the site and app? Check the Announcements forum for updates.
Dismiss Notice
Love Belgian Beer?

Join us Sep 17 in Portland, Maine for Return of the Belgian Beer Fest, featuring hundreds of authentic Belgian beers and Belgian-inspired offerings.

Tickets + more: beeradvocate.com/belgian

U.S. Challenges AB-InBev's Purchase of Grupo Modelo

Discussion in 'Beer News' started by jesskidden, Jan 31, 2013.

  1. johnnybgood1999

    Subscriber

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Posts:
    353
    Likes Received:
    304
    Location:
    Virginia
    Most people that I know drink BMC because of the price and a perception that craft beer is dark and bitter. I've converted a few guys with light, refreshing craft brews. If I give them an American Pale Wheat or a Witbier, they are usually surprised at how smooth and refreshing that beer is. At that point they realize beer can have positive flavors and craft isn't necessarily bitter. After the lighter crafts I'll sneak in a low bitterness brew, like a Williamsburg Coffeehouse Stout or a Chocolate Yeti. Usually they are hooked and shocked that dark, bitter beer can be so good.
     
  2. otispdriftwood

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,296
    Likes Received:
    5,310
    Location:
    Colorado
    They have deep pockets and perhaps the math supports their fight. ROI and all that.
     
  3. JackHorzempa

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2005
    Posts:
    18,787
    Likes Received:
    22,394
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Patrik, There is a ‘regular’ Schlitz beer and a totally separate beer that is labeled as “1960’s formula”. If you go to the Schlitz website there is no longer any mention of the beer labeled “1960’s formula”: www.schlitzgusto.com

    Interestingly in the History & Advertising tab they still list:

    “2007: The ‘Classic 60’s Formula’, the one that made Schlitz the most popular beer in the country in the 1950s and 1960s, is back.

    “2008: The ‘Classic 60’s Formula’ of Schlitz, in traditional brown glass bottles, returns to its birthplace, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.”

    Below is something I posted previously:

    I bought a case of Schlitz 1960’s formula beer last summer and I was pleasantly surprised!

    First off, the case cost less than $20.00 including tax. As I paid for the beer I thought to myself: I can’t remember the last time I paid less than 20 bucks for a case of beer.

    Now, Schlitz 1960’s formula beer is not ‘earth shattering’ but it is indeed more flavorful than a typical BMC beer. They utilize a bit more hops (bittering and flavor/aroma) then present day BMC beers so it has more hop presence. They still use adjuncts in this beer (corn) but at a lower level; they use 30% adjunct in making this beer.

    What they were going for in making this beer is just as the label say: 1960’s formula. This means a bit more hops and less adjuncts then present day beers. I thought this was a very tasty and pleasant beer given that it is an American Adjunct Lager.

    Cheers!
     
    Crusader likes this.
  4. familydog

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Posts:
    16
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    So let me understand this. On one hand, we have government regulating the beer industry to ensure AB-Inbev majority market share. On the other hand, government wants to prevent an acquisition to ensure beer industry competition. The irony just baffles me.

    Maybe the "Justice" Department ought to spearhead a task force aimed to eliminate all favorable legislation for any brewery.
     
  5. chefkevlar

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Posts:
    814
    Likes Received:
    629
    Location:
    South Carolina
    That's not a just a rep that's the owner! That was an awesome string of tweets though. He's one person who isn't shy about speaking his mind that's for sure.
     
    RobertColianni likes this.
  6. BEERMILER12

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Posts:
    1,056
    Likes Received:
    20,004
    Location:
    Maine
    19etz55 likes this.
  7. 19etz55

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Posts:
    1,587
    Likes Received:
    2,404
    Location:
    New Jersey
  8. BEERMILER12

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Posts:
    1,056
    Likes Received:
    20,004
    Location:
    Maine
    It's definitely nice to see Goliath fail from time to time... although I guess it's bound to happen when all they can do is buy out David and still completely suck in the eyes of craft drinkers pretty much everywhere.
     
  9. 19etz55

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Posts:
    1,587
    Likes Received:
    2,404
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Hopefully more people like us will join and fight the GOOD fight. There's always hope even if it is micro sized.
     
    BEERMILER12 likes this.
  10. tolar111

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Posts:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    18,956
    Location:
    New York
  11. Mebuzzard

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Posts:
    2,412
    Likes Received:
    1,634
    Location:
    Colorado
    I wonder if AB was still 'Merican would the DOJ intervene.... :cool:
     
  12. Crusader

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Posts:
    1,404
    Likes Received:
    4,238
    Location:
    Sweden
    Seems like the entire landscape that brought forth the 3 tier system has changed, from a highly competitive market with several major players post-prohibition to the near duopoly of today with one clear dominant player which wants to become even more dominant. Add to that distributor consolidation and the 3 tier system looks like less and less of a hindrance for ABInbev, they're achieving ecnomies of scale in all three tiers: brewing, distributor and retail with the clout that comes from offering the most popular brands in bulk at good prices for the distributor and retailer, and in the end the consumer. This whilst also incrementally increasing prices for the consumer who is getting less and less of a deal as the years go by, with price increases above simply inflation, since the competitive forces which used to force the brewers to show restraint in pricing is no more. AB-Inbev communicates their intent to raise prices and MillerCoors follows suit.

    Then again it's difficult to achieve a stable equillibrium where several major players are more or less equally successful and able to compete against one another in a way which doesn't end up with one of them on top, or with several of them going out of business with the end result being the same. The most realistic best case scenario is perhaps one where the craft breweries continue to do well despite the best efforts of ABInbev and MillerCoors, and despite the market dynamics above, where they continue to win more market share and grow in value sales and become a formidable opponent to the big brewers.
     
  13. bigflatsbeerman

    Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2005
    Posts:
    156
    Likes Received:
    74
    Location:
    New York
    I just watched CBS news video on this. The anchor at the end of the story said "it could mean increased prices for everybody at home". I would propose a slight change to, "it could mean increased quality for everybody at home".
    This just points to the perception of beer as a commodity with no differentiation.
     
  14. jesskidden

    Subscriber

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Posts:
    7,774
    Likes Received:
    17,994
    Location:
    New Jersey
    What does "it" refer to in the quote above- the ABI-Modelo purchase or the DoJ lawsuit to stop it? The Department of Justice believes the purchase will allow AB-InBev to raise prices with less resistance from other brewers if they can control the supply and importer's cost of Corona and the other Mexican brands.

    How could "quality" be affected if Modelo is or is not purchased by AB-InBev?
     
    UncleJimbo likes this.
  15. tozerm

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Posts:
    321
    Likes Received:
    301
    Location:
    Washington
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/01/budweiser-corona-deal_n_2599341.html

    "“We must slow the volume trend of High End Segment and cannot let the industry transform,” AB InBev said in internal strategy documents obtained by the Justice Department, referring to the threat posed by imports and craft beers."

    That pretty much says it all right there.... cannot let the industry transform.
     
    Holmes698 and ehammond1 like this.
  16. MaltMilkshake

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Posts:
    255
    Likes Received:
    157
    Location:
    California
  17. scootny

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2007
    Posts:
    35
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    New York
    Hopefully this is all the Justice Department needs to stop the Modelo acquisition.
     
  18. WassailWilly

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    Posts:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    908
    Location:
    New York
    They better be scared I just wish I could convince everyone to drink good beer...
     
  19. PorterLambic

    Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    Posts:
    94
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    Florida
    Hey, they gotta protect their swill and should be allowed to do whatever they want. (where is that sarcasm icon?)
    Honestly, they are talking out both sides of their asses or did they not notice their own attempts to penetrate the high end beer segment with tweaked versions of the same old dreck they've been shilling for decades?
    It's like the auto companies complaining about the inclusion of light trucks in the fuel avg. ratings because they don't want to make fuel-efficient trucks. Maybe AB-InBev should start advertising something other than Bud & Bud Light.
     
  20. RashyGrillCook

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2011
    Posts:
    191
    Likes Received:
    322
    Location:
    Florida
    In terms of putting a stop to the acquisition, having that in writing on their internal documents is a million times more effective then petty hearsay. Reminds me of the quote "Say it and forget it. Write it and regret it."
     
    mfnmbvp, JulianB, kneary13 and 5 others like this.
  21. UCLABrewN84

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    Posts:
    7,936
    Likes Received:
    7,933
    Location:
    California
    High End Segment Advocate.
     
    jcb7472, Sarlacc83, JulianB and 33 others like this.
  22. Boilerfood

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2012
    Posts:
    278
    Likes Received:
    223
    Location:
    Indiana
    Can we get shirts with this printed on it?
     
  23. cavedave

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Posts:
    7,871
    Likes Received:
    43,427
    Location:
    New York
    Haha, as if there is a for profit industry that doesn't hope its competitors do poorly. This is news?

    It would be news if an internal memo said, "We really hope our competitors succeed, and we hope they are successful in causing our profits to go down drastically." That would be news. Some folks need to get a grip on what being in business actually means.
     
    beertunes, ceazaleo, Danielbt and 8 others like this.
  24. taez555

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Posts:
    43
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    They're a business trying to maximize their profit, what else are they gonna do?

    That being said, this is basically the reason I refuse to drink BMC products. People always say you should give beer a shot regardless of the brewer, but I call that bullshit on that. I refuse to drink their beer due to their business practice of actively trying to squash ALL competition, not to mention trick people into buying mediocre "craft" beer released under bogus names that hide the fact their brewed by them.

    But yeah... not really news.
     
    jcb7472, Naterobsnyk4, cjoc83 and 3 others like this.
  25. cavedave

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Posts:
    7,871
    Likes Received:
    43,427
    Location:
    New York
    I am with you, sort of. You lost me after the first sentence.

    ABI's flagship beers suck, so I son't drink them. I love BCBS and BCBCS and I can get them more easily now. If that is because of folks like you who understand that business is business, and still don't buy from companies like ABInBev, well, all I can say is thank you.
     
    JoeyBeerBelly and atoulouk like this.
  26. Lutter

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Posts:
    5,321
    Likes Received:
    5,425
    Location:
    Texas
    Was this an old email or something? Because it would seem to me that the purchase and inflow of cash into Goose Island over the past 2 years has only furthered their nightmare of "not let[ting] the industry transform."

    It sounds like they changed their tune (around late 2010/early 2011), agreed that change was happening, and rolled with it by entering the "High End Segment" with stuff like the Goose Island purchase and "premium" (I use big quotes there) offshoots of their main brands like Budweiser Black Crown, Bud Light Platinum, and Beck's Sapphire.
     
    steveh likes this.
  27. arfenhouse

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Posts:
    122
    Likes Received:
    152
    Location:
    California
    Buy more craft, not like I needed to say really say that.
     
    ddegennaro likes this.
  28. jesskidden

    Subscriber

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Posts:
    7,774
    Likes Received:
    17,994
    Location:
    New Jersey
    That article is a mess. He uses the volume market share of craft beer ("about 5%" - actually it's 5.7% according to the Brewers Association) and then the dollar market share of AB-InBev -"39%". (Craft's dollar share is 9.1% and AB-I's volume share is 46.9%. All figures are 2011's - 2012's not out yet for the most part.)

    He claims that 38 states ban self-distribution - the Brewers Association says it's allowed in 34 states and in D.C. And then he quotes a brewery owner in Ontario, Canada about the difficulty of distribution! Needless to say, the 50 US states' individual distributions laws are quite a bit different than Ontario's.

    For a more factual explanation of the DoJ's case against the AB-I/Modelo deal, see the actual DoJ complaint-

    The United States of America... brings this civil action under the antitrust laws of the United States to enjoin the proposed acquisition by Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV of the remainder of Grupo Modelo S.A.B. de C.V.

    In which it is explained that:
    The DoJ believes that AB-I's prices are kept low because Modelo/Crown higher-priced imported beers don't always go up in price when AB and/or MC raise their prices in lower segments - thus narrowing the gap between premium - above-premium - high-end segments. Also note that the two leading import brewers, Heineken (which includes Newcastle and now the Mexican brands of FEMSA- Tecate, Sol, Carta Blanca, Indio and Dos Equis, etc ) and Modelo/Crown alone have more dollar share of the US market - 13% - than all 2000+ "craft brewers" combined.
     
    Ranbot, beergurujr, afksports and 3 others like this.
  29. TheBeerAlmanac

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    Posts:
    837
    Likes Received:
    10,735
    Location:
    Kentucky
    What exactly do you do, anyway? I feel like if ever there was a job title of beer ninja, you might be it.
     
  30. mborden

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Posts:
    196
    Likes Received:
    699
    Location:
    New York
    "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt."
     
    Gunboat82 likes this.
  31. Hanzo

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Posts:
    4,795
    Likes Received:
    13,125
    Location:
    Virginia
    In other news Microsoft wants to find a way to stop people from buying Apple products.
     
  32. TheBeerAlmanac

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    Posts:
    837
    Likes Received:
    10,735
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Normally I'd just hit the "like" button and move on, but we're not necessarily talking about competing products like laptops or operating systems. Craft brewers have realized there's room to commingle as each respective brewery offers a desired product in its own right in the mind of their consumers. AB sees it as a winner take all competition, that it's their beer or no beer, which is horrible for the end consumer, us, who wants variety and quality. In the end it's still business and everyone's trying to make a buck, but MS vs. APPL is company vs. company and that's healthy competition that breeds quality. AB vs. craft beer is company vs. industry and that doesn't breed a better product, it stifles growth and oppresses the evolution of the industry.

    Sorry, didn't mean to get so serious, I think I need a beer. What time is it?
     
  33. Hanzo

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Posts:
    4,795
    Likes Received:
    13,125
    Location:
    Virginia
    I agree with what you are saying, I was just pointing out that as a big business, of course AB wants to knock out their competiton, we don't need an article to know that.
     
    JulianB and TheBeerAlmanac like this.
  34. MN_Beerticker

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Posts:
    349
    Likes Received:
    638
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Well fellow David Advocates get out your slings. Let's help increase market share.
     
  35. MostlyNorwegian

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Posts:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    2,121
    Location:
    Illinois
    Corporate beer still sucks.
     
    MilkManX and creepinjeeper like this.
  36. mschofield

    Subscriber

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2002
    Posts:
    434
    Likes Received:
    321
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    I think it is important, sure the assumption was BMC was trying to keep craft down and they'd do sneaky things to do it ("pay for play", fake craft brands etc..) but to go and write it down to me means they're not thinking "we need to do this" they're thinking "we have the right to do this"
     
  37. gwdavis

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Posts:
    48
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Georgia
    I wish, but god knows the entire BMC crowd is constantly having favors done for it compliments of government regulation. The evil empire strikes again.
     
  38. MammaGoose

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Posts:
    240
    Likes Received:
    622
    Location:
    Wyoming
    I'd say that's a fairly obvious statement coming from A-B. Of course they want as many people used to buying their beer as possible. And for the better part of the century, Ameridan adjunct lagers were pretty much the only option of beer. If your product is sold to the vast majorty of beer drinkers, nearly the total population of beer drinkers, really...for a century...then ANY change in the market would be disconcerting. The craft beer world boomed pretty quickly. It was a niche that was easy to ignore for a few decades and then within the last decade or so, it got huge. So of course the BMC companies don't want it to keep progressing. I don't think we need "inside info" to assume that; it's obvious economics.

    I do find it interesting that they specifically say they cannot let the industry transform, but the BMC companies themselves are transforming. THEY are the ones changing their products/advertising a little bit and trying to ride the craft beer wave.
     
    cavedave likes this.
  39. frazbri

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Posts:
    825
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Location:
    Ohio
    Legality comes down to the details.
     
  40. cavedave

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Posts:
    7,871
    Likes Received:
    43,427
    Location:
    New York
    Big business is favored by govt.? Wow, that is almost as big news as OP.
     
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • Return of the Belgian Beer Fest

    BeerAdvocate Brings its All-Belgian Fest to Portland, Maine on September 17, 2016. Tickets are on sale now.

    Learn More
  • Get the Mag

    Become a BeerAdvocate magazine print subscriber today.

    Subscribe