Welcome to BeerAdvocate!

Looking to talk, rate or trade beer? Join today by creating your free account.

Dismiss Notice
Curious about recent updates to the site and app? Check the Announcements forum for updates.
Dismiss Notice
Love Belgian Beer?

Join us Sep 17 in Portland, Maine for Return of the Belgian Beer Fest, featuring hundreds of authentic Belgian beers and Belgian-inspired offerings.

Tickets + more: beeradvocate.com/belgian

Comment Your Most Controversial Review

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by TastyAdventure, Jan 26, 2013.

  1. TastyAdventure

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2012
    Posts:
    386
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    Kentucky
    What is your one review of a beer that is way off the mark of others' opinions on this site? What beer, when going to its page to review, were you floored by when you saw the incredibly high or low overall score after tasting yourself?


    Mine is Founders Breakfast Stout. Feel free to bash me for my opinion on it, but I'm more interested in hearing your own Controversial reviews on your beer.

    Here's mine:

    Founders Breakfast Stout. Bottle. 8.3%

    3.19/5 rDev -29.3%
    look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

    I was ready for this one. As famous as it is, I tried to manage my expectations and not hold the bar too high. I believe I did so, but was still very disappointed.

    Although it's not my favorite style, I have had a number of stouts, including Old Rasputin, which is in my 10 favorite beers.

    Poured this from a bottle into a pint glass.

    Here we go, the controversial opinion begins:

    A - brown one-and-half finger head, solid black. Looks like a stout.

    S - stale coffee. maybe a coffee flavored pastry.

    T - Day-old strong coffee, but not quite as bitter as coffee. A bit one-noted on the taste to be honest. I searched and searched for other flavors. Absolutely no chocolate flavor like the bottle says, a mild breadiness that might be reminiscent of a bland oatmeal and coffee breakfast. You wouldn't know there's any alcohol in here.

    M - Low carbonation, too low. Feels like coffee. Leaves a stickyness on the lips and back of throat like oatmeal does.

    Overall - Disappointment. This beer is very one-noted. Coffee, that's mainly all I taste.

    Serving type: bottle
     
    Kyrojack and dt_gbpackersfan like this.
  2. RobertColianni

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Posts:
    909
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Your taste buds suck. Breakfast Stout is chocolate heavy. It's not even dry cocoa, it's creamy dutching chocolate with a vanilla and coffee bean finish.
     
    Overlord and cavedave like this.
  3. kevanb

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Posts:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    4,233
    Location:
    Illinois
    Surly Sÿx

    2.4/5 rDev -38%
    look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2
     
  4. BigCheese

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2009
    Posts:
    800
    Likes Received:
    669
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    10 fidy is the worst RIS I've had, its not bad per se, but ive liked every other big stout I've had more. many like it. Its a good thing its a free country and we can buy what we want.
     
  5. tewaris

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Posts:
    763
    Likes Received:
    897
    Location:
    Minnesota
    No one pays, or should pay, any attention to any of my reviews for them to be "controversial". I am an anonymous person on the internet.
     
    Pahn, Kyrojack, franklinn and 7 others like this.
  6. Rutager

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Posts:
    431
    Likes Received:
    702
    Location:
    British Columbia (Canada)
    Your comment sucks. Taste is subjective.
     
  7. RobertColianni

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Posts:
    909
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    That's an excuse for people with poor sense of taste/scent.
     
    TheBeerDad and Alexmc2 like this.
  8. Rutager

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Posts:
    431
    Likes Received:
    702
    Location:
    British Columbia (Canada)
    Wrong. It's a fact.
     
  9. texasdrugaddict

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    Posts:
    634
    Likes Received:
    3,261
    Location:
    New Mexico
    I haven't done alot of reviews here but I find Ten Fidy overrated and that tends to disagree with alot of people. I think its ok but not worth the price. I had a 12 and a 10 and didn't think its was any better with age on it. I think Rasputin is better for the money. But Ten is not a bad beer by any means just not a great as people tend to think it is.


    Edit: I didn't read the thread or I would have just quote Big Cheese and said "This"
     
    russpowell likes this.
  10. Chaney

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2006
    Posts:
    256
    Likes Received:
    578
    Location:
    District of Columbia
    I had a couple of upset people contact me on here recently from a community that housed a brand spanking new brewery that they were rallying behind because I wrote: "This stout was as thin as Richard Simmons at a Bikram yoga retreat." Needless to say, I didn't make any friends on here from that small Midwestern town.
     
  11. TastyAdventure

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2012
    Posts:
    386
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    Kentucky
    if that's your attitude then why even bother posting on here? or there? or reading this?
     
  12. DaveAnderson

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Posts:
    857
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    Location:
    Minnesota
  13. kdb150

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Posts:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    1,846
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Palate Wrecker. Simply the most unbalanced, unpleasant, and downright undrinkable beer I've had in a very long time. Do people realize that drinking a supremely bitter beer doesn't make them tough?
     
  14. Shagator

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Posts:
    482
    Likes Received:
    1,151
    Location:
    Kentucky
    my biggest one would have to be with two hearted. The first time I tried it I thought it was the worst thing I ever tasted. At the time I was a Miller fan and hot had my eyes opened. I have tried two hearted on several occasions since, i am still not a big fan. It could be because I am more of a double.imperial fan or its because I hold a grudge against a beer that is probably really good
     
  15. Shagator

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Posts:
    482
    Likes Received:
    1,151
    Location:
    Kentucky
  16. Grohnke

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Posts:
    772
    Likes Received:
    437
    Location:
    Illinois
    Oh this thread will last long.
     
  17. CommanderOfAwesome

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Posts:
    760
    Likes Received:
    924
    Location:
    California
    Mine is Hop Crisis by 2st amendment. Terrible beer.
     
    Beerontwowheels likes this.
  18. Grohnke

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Posts:
    772
    Likes Received:
    437
    Location:
    Illinois
    My biggest deviation is -21% for Maui's Coconut porter. Beer was just not good. Lovely nose, terrible palate. Would like to try it again, as I there's always a possibility it was a bad can/ batch/old/etc
     
  19. RobertColianni

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Posts:
    909
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I disagree completely. The only thing subjective about taste is preference. While one may not be a fan of a certain flavor or may prefer more or less extremes of that flavor, there is no denying recipe or potency of an ingredient as perfected by the creator. Dutching chocolate is the overwhelming frontrunner within this beer, and while coffee follows, it follows for a reason; it is not dominant. Vanilla is an ingredient within the Dutching process. He's wrong for saying dry, stale coffee is the only contained flavor and I guarantee he will not own up to not being able to taste milk chocolate when consuming it.
     
    xanok likes this.
  20. BedetheVenerable

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2008
    Posts:
    818
    Likes Received:
    472
    Location:
    Missouri
    In terms of ones that don't make sense to me (i.e. my highest rating per rDev is O'Douls which, in my opinion, doesn't taste any worse than most macro-lagers so, for what it is, is pretty decent) is the Lagavulin cask JW Lees Vintage. I thought that stuff. Was. VILE. Which is funny, as I love single-malt Scotch and English barleywines...just didn't quite work for me.
     
  21. dfhhead25

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2011
    Posts:
    23
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Hopslam for me. This one literally has to be less than 6 weeks old for me to enjoy at all. After that I feel that it's supremely unbalanced and the honey starts to meld with the malt making it overly sweet.
     
  22. DanK4

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Posts:
    194
    Likes Received:
    116
    Location:
    Maine
    Why is this a thread... too bad you didn't like FBS. I love the stuff- bought a case actually. I understand your point, but seriously man- LNBA trolls are out.
     
    Justin_Neff and RobertColianni like this.
  23. Brandywine

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Posts:
    99
    Likes Received:
    65
    Location:
    Washington
    Rude.
     
  24. Brandywine

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Posts:
    99
    Likes Received:
    65
    Location:
    Washington
    120 Minute IPA by DFH: 5/5 rDev +25.3%
    People can hate. People can say it's not an IPA but I disagree. It's extreme but balanced. There's a huge malt body countered by a total hop assault. Love it.
     
    Resuin, waddellc2, Mgm54 and 4 others like this.
  25. hopsputin

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2012
    Posts:
    2,143
    Likes Received:
    7,499
    Location:
    New Jersey
    I feel your pain. Please send all your FBS to me for proper disposal.

    thank you
     
  26. russpowell

    Subscriber Beer Trader

    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Posts:
    9,700
    Likes Received:
    31,570
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    I used to like 10 better, but Old Raspy is still best bang for the buck imp stout IMO for the $ by far. Maybe Narwhal will evolve & give them a run for their money???
     
    TastyAdventure likes this.
  27. TheSixthRing

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Posts:
    448
    Likes Received:
    560
    Location:
    California
    Probably Rogue Voodoo Maple Bacon. I gave it an outstanding review. With as much flak as that beer gets in the forums, it's gotta be. I knew it was gonna be smokey coming into it. I drank it at slightly less than room temperature. I salivated over the aroma. The mouthfeel was thinner than anticipated, but the flavor made up for that. I loved every drop.

    The Memphis Mafia inspired Rogue Voodoo is a completely different story.
     
    madtrixter787 and Rutager like this.
  28. feloniousmonk

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Posts:
    309
    Likes Received:
    335
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Let's see, I gave Sapporro a 1.1, which makes a rDev of -61.1%...and I guess I liked the Polish Zingi Ginger Beer, which I gave a 3.9, with a rDev of +77.3%.
    But I can assure you there was no controversy. In fact, just about no one seems to care.
     
  29. Rollzroyce21

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2009
    Posts:
    1,694
    Likes Received:
    1,506
    Location:
    California
    You may very well be confusing the difference between "taste" and "preference."
    Taste = objective
    Preference = subjective
    The word "taste" gets tossed around so much that there's some "preference" denoted within the term. So the two definitions get muddled. When BA's mention that phrase, "taste is subjective," it can only mean that they're implying personal preference.

    RobertColianni was pointing to objective tasting aspects of FBS, and he was suggesting the OP had missed or confused those taste characteristics. He probably shouldn't have started off by saying his tastebuds sucked. Perhaps the OP's FBS was older where the chocolate had faded. In any case the word taste, without the personal preference aspect of it, is absolutely objective.
     
  30. RobertColianni

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Posts:
    909
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Pleased to meet you!
     
    Rollzroyce21 likes this.
  31. antlerwrestler19

    Beer Trader

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    Posts:
    433
    Likes Received:
    252
    Location:
    Nebraska
    You are arguing against the genetic makeup of a singular human being. Are you trying to say that your taste buds and/or sensory receptors are the same as everyone else's on Earth and some are just better than others? I'm a firm believer in "training" your taste buds and sensory awareness but it isn't something that can be forced. Your impression of a beer could be ENTIRELY different from mine and every other human on this planet. He tastes what he tastes, he is not wrong about what he thinks about the beer, you, however, are wrong about what you think HE should think about the beer. So he didn't like it, nor did he get the certain nuances that you do from it, big fucking deal! More for your sophisticated tastebuds to enjoy!
     
  32. tewaris

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Posts:
    763
    Likes Received:
    897
    Location:
    Minnesota
    If you believe that your review could be controversial, you're giving yourself too much credit. Reviewing/rating has its place, yes; but it gets significant only when it's cumulative.
     
  33. ZiggyPop

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Posts:
    8
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Alberta (Canada)
    I wouldn't say I've had any controversial reviews since I don't do real reviews on here, just "Hads", but Erdinger heff weisen is one. I was surprised to see that it got an average rating on the beer advocate reviews, since it is my personal favorite beer. D'oh well.
     
    kojevergas likes this.
  34. UCLABrewN84

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    Posts:
    7,936
    Likes Received:
    7,933
    Location:
    California
  35. jmgrub

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Posts:
    643
    Likes Received:
    1,151
    Location:
    California
    I don't review, but if I did, my most controversial reviews would be about Old Rasputin and regular Bigfoot, because I would write mean things about them and fanboyz would hate.
     
    kojevergas likes this.
  36. Thehuntmaster

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Posts:
    686
    Likes Received:
    2,963
    Location:
    South Africa
    I must admit, FBS also disappointed me - I felt it was a little thin and needed more bulk in the flavour. It seemed to be a 'light' imperial stout.

    My most controversial reviews would likely include Triple Bock (+24.1%), Tactical Nuclear Penguin (+22.8%), Mikkeller Black (+18.9%), Consecration (-15.2%) and Schlafly Pumpkin (-9.5%)
     
  37. fx20736

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Posts:
    944
    Likes Received:
    3,219
    Location:
    New York
    Victory Prima Pils - 46.9%. I actually had someone BM me to threaten me because he did not like my review.
     
    buffs9 likes this.
  38. gtermi

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Posts:
    1,318
    Likes Received:
    2,132
    Location:
    Texas
    PBR.... Why the hell do people like this???
     
    devlishdamsel likes this.
  39. DaveAnderson

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Posts:
    857
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I care, Al.
     
  40. sunkistxsudafed

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2010
    Posts:
    376
    Likes Received:
    130
    Location:
    New Mexico
    Widmer Marrionberry Hibiscus Gose -45%. the most rancid foul vinegar i've ever tasted.
     
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • Return of the Belgian Beer Fest

    BeerAdvocate Brings its All-Belgian Fest to Portland, Maine on September 17, 2016. Tickets are on sale now.

    Learn More
  • Get the Mag

    Become a BeerAdvocate magazine print subscriber today.

    Subscribe