Lost Abbey's Current Approach to Bottle Carbonation Quality Control

Discussion in 'Pacific' started by GhettoFabulous, Mar 12, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. GhettoFabulous

    GhettoFabulous Initiate (0) May 29, 2010 California

    I recently asked Lost Abbey if they knew whether or not one of their forthcoming releases was properly carbed and was both impressed and puzzled by their reply:

    "We now have in our Quality Laboratory an Anton-Paar Carbo QC that allows us to determine when bottles, whether corked or capped, are at the carbonation level that is in specification for each style of beer"

    I was impressed because they answered my question in a public forum and were not at all defensive in response to the query.

    I was puzzled for two reasons, and suspect that some of you super-knowledgeable beer nerds can answer the second:

    1) They didn't actually say whether or not the beer was properly carbed - just that they have a system in place to check if it is properly carbed. This sounded like a PR type of answer that would be employed when a 100% factual response might not be in the best interest of their company.

    2) Why would you need a fancy expensive QC system to tell you if your beers are carbed? Aren't bottle conditioned beers processed with an estimate as to when they will be properly carbed? Can't you just pop a bottle open as that time line nears to see if they are carbing up properly? If they don't carb properly can't you just wait for them to carb up, popping open a bottle now and then to check on the process? Having a fancy system that monitors this kind of thing reminds me of the desalinization plant in "Top Secret" that Val Kilmer decides is a great way to produce a bunch of salt.

    Aren't their past issues related to carbonation QC due to not putting the correct amounts of bottle conditioning ingredients in their beers (as opposed to simply not waiting long enough for them to carb up before putting them up for sale)? If the problem was related to determining when the carbonation level was proper, it seems like they could have just highered someone to crack the beer open every week or so to check on it.

    The only reason I'm suspicious is because they posted a photo of the beer a few weeks ago and it looked pretty flat (not to mention their notorious history when it comes to carbonation).
     
    gjahn123 likes this.
  2. Xul

    Xul Pooh-Bah (2,139) May 18, 2008 California
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    It is a PR answer, what that means is up for anyone to decipher. Between the fact that Tomme has frequently stated that he prefers to 'slightly' undercarb barleywines in the bottle, and the fact that they've had issues getting their barleywines to carbonate, I know how I would interpret that, but your mileage may vary.

    Yes and no. If you bottle condition with the original yeast, it's an inexact science and can take varying amounts of time depending upon the health of the yeast (which is a function of how high the alcohol is and how long it's been sitting). If they re-pitch a new yeast for bottle conditioning (which would seem like an obvious choice on a 15% BA barleywine), it would theoretically carb up fairly quickly (a matter of a few weeks).

    Well, this system (which I just Googled and spent five minutes reading about, so I'm hardly an expert) would seem to give far more granular data than just popping a bottle. It can determine _exactly_ how much CO2 is in solution so they could monitor if it's carbonating correctly, slowly, or not at all.

    Without knowing how much it costs, I couldn't tell you if it's the best solution to their problems, but if you're fully committed to bottle conditioning rather than force carbonating, something like this would seem to be a useful tool.

    Without being privy to how they bottle conditioned, it would be hard to say what the exact problem is. Roughly (ie, paraphrased for brevity), the needs for bottle conditioning:
    1) How much residual CO2 is in solution...as a beer sits in barrels, this will tend towards 0.
    2) The health of the yeast and whether you're going to re-pitch.
    3) What quantity of fermentables you need to reach your desired level of CO2.

    If you screw up any of those three factors, you risk not attaining proper carbonation. Without knowing whether they pitch new yeast, how much sugar they add, what kind of sugar it is, etc., it's difficult to say why they end up with flat beers. Hell, it could even be a packaging issue related to corking. I would sort of doubt that, since you would think there would be a bunch of flat Red Barn and Judgment Day floating around if it was their packaging line, but it's still a variable to consider.

    That would imply that it will eventually carbonate - under some circumstances (dead yeast or insufficient new fermentables), you'd be paying someone to drink flat beer until the supply was exhausted. Considering the fact that Brandy AS '08 and various other beers basically never carbonated to acceptable levels, I don't think it's strictly a timeline issue.

    If that's the only reason you're suspicious, you're not a very skeptical person. Sede Vacante sounds like a delicious beer, but none got kegged, they've had infection issues with their brandy barrels (apparently including the most recent Deliverance), and carbonation is a question mark. Considering they have less than 100 cases but the limit per person is a case, it would seem like they want to make sure it sells out quickly. By no means do I hope it's infected or flat, but the only way I'd buy it is if it was on tap, or far cheaper than what they're asking.
     
    Callmecoon likes this.
  3. funkel81

    funkel81 Initiate (0) Jan 23, 2011 Colorado

    i read limit 2 bottles @ 35 each. i'm passing on this one
     
  4. mrkrispy

    mrkrispy Initiate (0) Apr 5, 2006 California

    Haha i saw the "are the bottles carbed" question on Facebook and laughed at both the cajones to ask and the fact they replied.
    Nice job
     
  5. MacNCheese

    MacNCheese Initiate (0) Dec 10, 2011 California

    There was an article awhile back they had sent some of their barrel aged beers off to the lab to have the ABV accurately measured. They came back much higher than what they estimated....they were picking up significant alcohol in the barrel...to the 14%ish range. At that level yeast has a hard time consuming fresh bottling sugar to carbonate and that may have been the issue.

    This doesn't explain everything, but is a clue for their flat-esque barrel aged beers.
     
  6. cocoapuph

    cocoapuph Pundit (793) Mar 4, 2011 California

    They changed it to a case now. Wonder if anyone's gonna take the dive.
     
  7. pmarlowe

    pmarlowe Pooh-Bah (2,005) Nov 27, 2010 Virginia
    Pooh-Bah

    From a 2 bottle limit to a case limit? Geez.

    Someone at the front of the line should open up a bottle in the tasting room and then report back on how well it's carbonated to everyone else in line.
     
    drbenzo and vurt like this.
  8. evilc

    evilc Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2012 California

    Wonder how many people are gonna wales bro the release and buy a case of shitty flat/infected/not good beer before they taste it.
     
  9. Pecan

    Pecan Initiate (0) Dec 20, 2012 Arizona

    I'm wondering if the switch to a case means another Churchill's style shitshow or the chance at some beer without living in a parking lot for several cycles of the sun.
     
  10. evilc

    evilc Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2012 California

    Switch to a case would mean very easy to trade for - don't wait in line.
     
  11. ehammond1

    ehammond1 Initiate (0) Jul 4, 2008

    Do you think I could maybe score a Hunahpu with one of these?
     
  12. evilc

    evilc Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2012 California

    I was thinking some Hopslam. 2 bottles.
     
    ehammond1 likes this.
  13. ehammond1

    ehammond1 Initiate (0) Jul 4, 2008

    All set on Hopslam. I already traded my CFH for 3 of 'em! Score!
     
    2beerdogs and Callmecoon like this.
  14. evilc

    evilc Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2012 California

    You totally made out in ounces - I hope you added on your end.
     
    Callmecoon and ehammond1 like this.
  15. abecall98

    abecall98 Savant (1,234) Aug 11, 2007 California
    Trader

    Not sure man. I keep getting told that there was ONLY 13,000 bottles available, not the 14,000 bottles we had first suspected. It's going to change everything.
     
  16. evilc

    evilc Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2012 California

    13k bottles = ultra rare. 14k = rare.
     
    kmatlack and PaulStoneAnchor like this.
  17. bigdaddypolite

    bigdaddypolite Maven (1,303) Mar 2, 2007 Minnesota
    Trader

    Wait, I thought that 13k = Near Mint, and 14k = Very Fine/Near Mint...?

    Dammit, I'm probably just getting my collectibles terminology all mixed up again... Hobbies are hard.
     
    2beerdogs likes this.
  18. CAbeerCAbeerCA

    CAbeerCAbeerCA Initiate (0) Mar 3, 2011 Maryland

    ISO - actually.
     
  19. tjensen3618

    tjensen3618 Maven (1,391) Mar 23, 2008 California

    Ask them to use their Anton-Paar Carbo QC & find out how many Volumes of CO2 are in this beer.
     
  20. Oisin

    Oisin Initiate (0) Oct 14, 2005 California

    Got a flat bottle of Old Viscosity last week.

    Carbonation problems are still present. Yet I continue to roll the dice.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.