Posting Trade Offers in ISO:FT

Discussion in 'Trade Talk' started by dvelcich, Apr 8, 2012.

?

Why are you posting your trade offers in the ISO:FT forum?

  1. I'm new and didn't know it wasn't done that way before when we could post in that forum.

    6.3%
  2. I'm too lazy to start a private conversation. I mean, it's TWO more clicks. Exhausting.

    6.3%
  3. It's easier for me to get the beers being offered if others see what I'm willing to give.

    37.5%
  4. I think all offers should be public. Freedom of Information Act, man.

    12.5%
  5. Other. If you choose this, please explain.

    43.8%
Multiple votes are allowed.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RandomName7

    RandomName7 Initiate (0) Feb 22, 2012 Washington

    I don't care if people reply to my trade posts, but I understand that a lot of people do, which is why I think people should be free to lock their threads if they want to.

    I never really understood why people get so upset about replies in trade posts though, the only time it's going to be truly detrimental to a thread is when the initial offer is unrealistic anyway.
     
  2. vbiliyar

    vbiliyar Initiate (0) Jan 13, 2008 Wisconsin

    It looks like Hanzo's point was ignored, so I'm quoting it:

    in direct disagreement with:

    Before I posted my first trade thread, I looked around to try to find confirmed trade posts with the bottles involved and was largely unsuccessful. While posting in this forum as a trade value thread did help me, it would be far clearer knowing the value of bottles if we could simply see the results of successful trades. Instead, these happen via private message, leaving new traders to rely on the word of others.
     
  3. cbeer88

    cbeer88 Initiate (0) Sep 5, 2007 Massachusetts

    I didn't ignore it, Hanzo's point just isn't really valid. As I pointed out, 90% of the offers made inside the ISO/FT's are basically a joke. It's basically new traders who don't understand how to use the system and have no idea what things trade for. If you're using those to try to figure out what things trade for, you're going to be even worse off than flying blind.

    There's no easy way to determine trade values, even for vets. The more you do it the more you learn the ropes, but it's a constantly moving target. Really, it's almost all about bottle count and wants/gots ratios for all but a small handful of beers. The best thing you can do is scan the FT/ISO's for a beer, and see what people are asking, and what people are offering, for the beer. Throw out the top and bottom 25%, and the most accurate value likely lies somewhere in that remaining area.

    Also, if you can't figure it out, it's super easy to just throw up a post in the general trading forum "what is beer X trading for these days?", and you'll get your answer.
     
    Gosox8787 and Pahn like this.
  4. Pahn

    Pahn Initiate (0) Dec 2, 2009 New York

    another tip for determining trade value is this process:

    1) you have beer X, you want to trade it.

    2) you embark on Thinking Session regarding what beer you'd like to get in return. brainstorm a few beers.

    3) you post an FT: beer X, ISO: the beers you came up with during (2).

    4) the trade either occurs or it doesn't. if the latter, go back to (2) and try again, or forget it.
     
  5. Levitation

    Levitation Initiate (0) Aug 7, 2009 California

    you've been here since 2008 - is this question sincere?
     
    paulys55 and MarkIntihar like this.
  6. Pahn

    Pahn Initiate (0) Dec 2, 2009 New York

    i also want to elaborate a bit on why steps (1) thru (4) make so much sense.

    stumbling upon some beer at the store and then trading it for the Highly Sought After Beers You Only Read about is not going to happen.

    if you have something that commands a giant price in the trading market, chances are you paid a giant price to get it.

    when wondering what something is worth, ask yourself: "how much effort did it take for me to get this beer?" "how much effort would it take for someone else to do the same?" etc etc.

    you don't need to worry about missing that lottery-win with your beer. also, if you don't know what you're doing in the first place, you'd be safer hanging on to that hot shot beer anyway (get your feet wet first).

    ---

    edit: re: replies as offers, i prefer post only, but as long as people act like adults it doesn't really matter. "i want others to see what i'm offering so they don't offer something else," sounds like a dick move, but how so? if your offer is really that intimidating, isn't it just as likely to close down the trade in private (by being accepted)?
     
    Beerontwowheels and pschul4 like this.
  7. vbiliyar

    vbiliyar Initiate (0) Jan 13, 2008 Wisconsin

    I guess I'm making a slightly tangential point that if posting real offers and having agreed-upon trades confirmed in threads were to become "the new trend," it would be a good resource to those users who wanted to use hard evidence to valuate their beers.

    I'm not saying that posting a trade value thread is not useful, but if you ask someone what something is worth, he might give an answer that reflects what he wants the value to be rather than the "actual value" (by which I mean the most the market will bear). Clearly we don't want all trades to be that cutthroat (and from all the "generous BA" threads they definitely aren't), but until someone trades enough to become a part of a community, it's hard to leave something on the table.

    Edit: In response to my being here since 2008, I was never in a position to trade beers until recently, so I never looked at the trade forums.
     
  8. CruisaC

    CruisaC Initiate (0) Sep 3, 2010 Ohio

    The problem with the whole conversation being on display is that the process is almost never as simple as
    "hey, I'll give you Y and Z for X"
    "ok, sounds good. Here's my shipping info"

    There's often a bit of tweaking and negotiation that goes on that is frankly no one else's business.
    Now, maybe it would cut dwn on the almost constant lowballing that goes on, but that's a different topic.
    Again, reasons to stick with trading partners; of course, if you're new to the game, you don't have trading partners yet.
     
    cbeer88 likes this.
  9. dvelcich

    dvelcich Zealot (646) Feb 6, 2008 Illinois
    Trader

    Interesting results so far. I didn't want to influence the outcome by posting early on, but I figure we've gotten the gist of the people's feelings, so here're my thoughts on the options I gave:

    The first is a legitimate excuse a new member of the forum could give, but interestingly enough, no one has admitted to ignorance so far.

    The second is the one I thought would get the most votes. I was sort of using it as a suggestion to the Bros to make it easier to reply in private as cbeer and stupac eluded to, but it seems only a couple people sarcastically voted for that option.

    The third has gotten the most votes so far, which surprises me. I kind of intended that one as a bash on those out there who try to muscle their way into making a trade like they're winning an auction. If you're posting what you have just so others can see it and be intimidated, you're doing it wrong.

    The fourth is another legitimate reason in my mind. If you're posting in someone's trade thread because you believe there should be full disclosure, I can't knock you for that. I can also see how this could be useful to new traders, but it totally leads to an auction style trade. Now if the OP posted what he accepted for his offer after all was said and done through the privacy of a conversation, that might be even more beneficial, but then you're setting a precedent for what a beer trades for, which could ruin someone else's trade down the road, so I'm torn on that one.

    As for some of the others, cbeer nailed a totally reasonable option, maybe there are new users who don't know how to start a private conversation. Hopefully now they do.

    To the penguin, I also think offers should be private, but I don't think posting should be banned. It's informative and helps keep people a little more honest.

    To vbiliyar, I agree that some of the "bashing" is warranted and just a true evaluation of the fairness of a trade, but I disagree that any type of bidding war should be tolerated. We are supposed to be a community that tries to help one another, not a classified ad where people go to make a profit. I can tell that's not you, but there seem to be a lot more opportunists popping up nowadays, and I respect the Bros doing their best to keep things friendly around here.

    And finally, if you're not posting your offers in someone else's trade thread, I would say you're doing it right. Keep up the good work. :wink:
     
  10. cbeer88

    cbeer88 Initiate (0) Sep 5, 2007 Massachusetts

    I hear what you are saying, but if all trades moved to public discussions, then it would create all of the issues I laid out above, and that would significantly outweigh the benefit of public valuation disclosures.

    Also, as pointed out, it's rarely that simple. There's usually a good bit of back and forth, sometimes with 2 or 3 people at the same time. Then the vast majority of deals that I've done end up being multi-bottle, as straight up 1-for-1's lead to very expensive shipping costs per bottle.

    The best perspective for a new trader is to just not worry too much about squeezing every ounce of value out of your beers. So what if you leave an ethereal 30% of value on the table? Just trade the beer you've got for the beer you want. Whether noob or vet, you "win some" and you "lose some" in most deals in terms of pure trading value, but it all equals out in the end.
     
  11. cosmicevan

    cosmicevan Initiate (0) Dec 13, 2009 New York
    Trader

    because you can't reply to posts in iso/ft...oh wait...

    ...must be a thread volume thing? if you post in ISO/FT, your post is on page 2 within a few hours, whereas it takes days to get buried in this forum.


    note, i do not do this practice, but if i were craftier i could see folks considering this.
     
  12. dvelcich

    dvelcich Zealot (646) Feb 6, 2008 Illinois
    Trader

    If you did that though, I'm sure it would get deleted in about the same time.

    Edit: I think you may have misunderstood as well. I'm asking why someone would reply to someone else's thread that was already started in the proper forum with a trade offer instead of starting a private conversation. We can reply to posts now in ISO:FT, and it gets bumped to the top like it used to.
     
  13. woodchopper

    woodchopper Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2010 Illinois

    Its hard to trust someone you don't know. And while some people out there will be very generous other will try to screw you but I agree transparency helps see what's getting traded and also let's some people know that what they though was worth wooden hell isn't worth that one!

    It helps to build a good relationship with ba's regionally and it's a win win seems to work well for my group of traders and we can rest a sure that special bottle sent will be rewarded with a special bottle from them. It always seems to work out in the end!
     
  14. BigTomZ

    BigTomZ Initiate (0) Apr 14, 2009 Virginia

    This is why trade offers and negotiations in the ISO thread in public view is a really bad idea.

    1. There will always be some traders who hold or want one of the beers involved that will inevitably be upset at a low or high offer. They could try to interfere either via posting in the thread or sending private messages. It has happened before.

    2. I might cut someone a break on rarity value because they hooked me up in a past trade or because I noticed someone chasing after the beer for a long while and feel like helping them. Some people are just friendlier with some BAs than they are with others. Hence someone might trade the same beer at different values.

    3. If someone sees you work out a trade at a low value, they will consider you a mark to be taken advantage of. Your mailbox will be flooded with lowball offers every time you post an ISO.

    4. There is some back and forth negotiation on most trades. Traders may expand a trade, determine a ship date, exchange addresses, discuss other beers and trades, etc. This would keep topping the thread over and over, pushing new trades down the board fast and make it harder to browse the trade forum.

    5. Some douche could try to step in and offer a bit more when they see the final trade parameters. We already have the occasional douchey trader back out of a trade when they see they can get more. We would definitely see more of that.

    6. We have the Trading General Help forum to get feedback on the trade value or certain beers. The bros put it here for a reason, and it does help people who use it.

    7. You can look at the ISO threads involving beers you want and just message the traders involved to ask what they ended up doing. I realize #6 and 7 aren't the spoon fed instant information people want these days, but you can find out everything you need.
     
    Holland, cbeer88 and Pahn like this.
  15. weaksauce

    weaksauce Zealot (675) Sep 2, 2010 Ohio

    What about when posts list King Henry but the OP only responds to inquiries for that beer with offers other less desirable things? Subsequent requests for that beer are also never acknowledged except for similar responses containing average stuff. This seems to happen to me a lot now, and my offers are usually pretty good... Is bait and switch a form of ISO:grimacing:ffers? This came is what I had in mind when I selected the other option.

    edit: gotta love how the new emoticons work
     
  16. madawhy

    madawhy Initiate (0) Sep 30, 2011 New York

    Really, this whole thing can be avoided. If you do not like replies or offers in your ISO:FT, simply state you do not want any. Every trade post I have made since replies were allowed, I said politely at the end, to please make all comments and offers in private conversation. Never got any replies yet, though I can probably expect some sarcastic ones(which I love) after making this post...
     
  17. vbiliyar

    vbiliyar Initiate (0) Jan 13, 2008 Wisconsin

    I definitely see the points you guys are making. I think I'm just trying to impose a hard set of standards onto an environment where there isn't really one.
     
  18. sliverX

    sliverX Maven (1,459) Oct 5, 2007 South Georgia & South Sandwich Islands

    Either make it post only which I loved, I could see every ISO in order from the last time I checked. Or at the very least give an option to sort by first post, which would give chronological order yet leave commenting for pertinent info / asshatery.
     
  19. MarkIntihar

    MarkIntihar Initiate (0) Mar 17, 2010 Michigan

    You can choose to sort it chronologically. However, you have to choose it each time you enter the ISO:FT forum, which is a bit tedious.
     
    sliverX likes this.
  20. sliverX

    sliverX Maven (1,459) Oct 5, 2007 South Georgia & South Sandwich Islands

    Good to know its been a while since I've browsed but with that option I may venture over.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.