Fresh Squeezed IPA Recipe Questions

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by duffcalifornia, Jul 29, 2013.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. duffcalifornia

    duffcalifornia Initiate (0) Dec 30, 2010 Wisconsin

    Hey all, I need to tap into minds brighter than my own. I recently wrote to Deschutes to get a line on their Fresh Squeezed IPA recipe. I got something back, but it seems like something is missing, and I'd like some guidance. The recipe is as follows:

    Malt:
    85% Pale
    10% Crystal 75
    5% Munich

    Mash:
    160F for 15 minutes
    5 minute mash off

    Boil:
    1st addition: Nuggets
    2nd addition: Citra & Mosaic
    3rd addition: Citra & Mosaic
    Knock out gravity: 16.5P

    Ferment with your favorite ale strain at 65F

    Targets:
    6.4 abv
    65 IBU
     
  2. koopa

    koopa Initiate (0) Apr 20, 2008 New Jersey

    I've never had the beer before, but strictly from a recipe standpoint It looks fairly complete to me. It's missing the boil times for the hop additions of course. My best guess from a modern day homebrewers brewers standpoint would be something along the lines of 90 (or 60), 15, and 0 for the hop additions.

    P.S. 15 minute mash makes little to no sense.
     
  3. drgarage

    drgarage Initiate (0) Aug 19, 2008 California

    The high mash temperature and high proportion of crystal certainly explains why this beer was too sweet an sticky for my tastes.
     
  4. duffcalifornia

    duffcalifornia Initiate (0) Dec 30, 2010 Wisconsin


    That's the part that's confusing me.
     
  5. koopa

    koopa Initiate (0) Apr 20, 2008 New Jersey

    Well a higher mash temperature will lead to faster conversion (15 minutes seems extreme, but so does mashing at 160F), but it also leaves the resulting wort less fermentable.
     
  6. udubdawg

    udubdawg Initiate (0) Dec 11, 2006 Kansas

    Sounds about right. Go ahead and give it 30 or whatever minutes if you like but as koopa says a mash this warm will convert fast. 1.019 on FG from 1.068 sounds like it's higher than some of us like, but then again, what is Sucks' final gravity, 1.025?

    Know your system - if you know you cannot make a moderately unfermentable wort with these parameters in 15 minutes, adjust. Seems like they gave you quite a lot.

    cheers--
    --Michael
     
    Eriktheipaman likes this.
  7. AlCaponeJunior

    AlCaponeJunior Grand Pooh-Bah (3,452) May 21, 2010 Texas
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Knowing my system pretty well, I'd mash longer than 15 minutes. I usually just do an hour on everything, but might do a shorter mash if I really wanted to up the non-fermentables. Also my system produces quite full-bodied beers even at 150, which is why my instinct says I'd mash a little lower. This isn't hard science tho, it's my instincts and educated guesswork.

    I don't mind the higher amount of crystal in hoppy beers, but along with a very high and short mash, that does seem like it would be pretty sweet. I haven't had the beer tho, if you like the beer you might want to just follow their directions if your system wouldn't call for any changes.

    And yeah - lagunitas sucks, exception that proves the rule about exceptions. :rolling_eyes: I love that beer. Still needs Primus to do a commercial for it tho. Y'know, because Primus Sucks. :sunglasses:
     
  8. barfdiggs

    barfdiggs Initiate (0) Mar 22, 2011 California


    Stone has a similar mash time in some of their clone recipes. The reason for it is the time it takes to empty their tun. After a 15 minute mash, it still takes 40-60 minutes to empty the tun, during which conversion is still occuring.
     
  9. sergeantstogie

    sergeantstogie Initiate (0) Nov 16, 2010 Washington

    No dry hops?
     
    barfdiggs likes this.
  10. bgjohnston

    bgjohnston Initiate (0) Jan 14, 2009 Connecticut

    I am sure they didn't lie about it. The recipe just needs to be adapted to your home brewing equipment. Stone also whirpools the wort for nearly an hour at high temperatures before chilling, similar to a home brewer performing a hop stand at the end of the boil.
     
  11. barfdiggs

    barfdiggs Initiate (0) Mar 22, 2011 California

    Weird. Put me under the group of people that believes dry hopping is essential for a good west coast IPA.
     
    koopa likes this.
  12. sergeantstogie

    sergeantstogie Initiate (0) Nov 16, 2010 Washington

    Yeah having had it a few weeks ago, I gotta think it was dry hopped.
    Edit: A google search shows a couple references to it being dry hopped but I can't read blogs here. beervana is one.
     
  13. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Lots of good discussion here. I have had Fresh Squeezed and it is indeed a balanced IPA: tons of malt backbone along with hops. My thoughts:

    If you want to replicate the heavy malt backbone than a higher mash temperature makes sense to me. If you want to mash at 160°F then you probably can get away with a shorter mash timeframe but I personally would still mash for 60 minutes in my homebrewery.

    In terms of a hop schedule I would add the Nuggets at the beginning of boil, the 2nd addition with 15 minutes of boil remaining and the 3rd addition at the end of boil (with a hop stand).

    If you want to deviate from the Deschutes implied hopping schedule you could include a 4th addition of dry hopping. I think that would be good too.

    Cheers!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.