Left Hand Brewing seeks to trademark "Nitro"

Discussion in 'Beer News' started by McRyan, Mar 19, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jefffalcone

    jefffalcone Initiate (0) Nov 9, 2013 Massachusetts

    There is very little chance that this will be successful and it's terrible publicity. Dumb move IMHO
     
  2. marquis

    marquis Pooh-Bah (2,313) Nov 20, 2005 England
    Pooh-Bah

    Or Bass which has used the name "Pale Ale" since 1777 :slight_smile:
    I would have thought that to register a trademark there should have to be some sort of originality.Fuller's originated the term ESB yet many other brewers use it.
     
    LambicPentameter likes this.
  3. WelshBrewer

    WelshBrewer Initiate (0) Mar 17, 2013 Oregon

    Or "Nightro" ?
     
    JuliusPepperwood likes this.
  4. Rekrule

    Rekrule Initiate (0) Nov 11, 2011 Massachusetts

    Danny Lee Clark will not be happy about this.

    Hopefully someone gets this reference.
     
  5. fleurdelou

    fleurdelou Initiate (0) Nov 11, 2013 Kentucky

    Nitro beers are awful anyhow...let them have it.
     
  6. atomic

    atomic Pundit (945) Sep 22, 2009 Illinois

  7. bpalfrey10

    bpalfrey10 Initiate (0) Jan 15, 2010 New York

    As a trademark lawyer that works with breweries, I'm surprised that the application made it to the publication stage without an Office Action rejecting the application as merely descriptive, i.e., you can't register trademarks for terms that merely describe the associated goods or services. A mark is considered merely descriptive if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of the specified goods or services (TMEP). NITRO is short for nitrogen which is a feature of the goods, i.e., beer, in question.
     
    willbm3 and fleurdelou like this.
  8. -N8

    -N8 Initiate (0) Feb 7, 2014 Germany

    Who's going to trademark, "Hops?"
     
  9. willbm3

    willbm3 Initiate (0) Feb 19, 2010 Massachusetts

    This threw me as well. The word "Nitro" is pretty plainly descriptive. It would be like pursuing a trademark for "Light."
     
  10. willbm3

    willbm3 Initiate (0) Feb 19, 2010 Massachusetts

    Surprised it took this long for someone to explain this. Trademarks are words; no originality or inventiveness needed
     
  11. dpkpr

    dpkpr Initiate (0) Apr 19, 2008 Texas

    I haven't read the entire thread, so apologies if others have made this point -- since Nitro is not only the trademarked name of their beer but also a term commonly used to describe a method of delivery, it would be akin to naming a beer 'Canned' or 'Bottled' or 'Draft' or 'Bomber' or you get the point...and then trademarking that and seeking to stop others from using that word in their name. Seems like a stretch, but I guess that's how lawyers get paid.
     
  12. dpkpr

    dpkpr Initiate (0) Apr 19, 2008 Texas

    Miller actually did attempt to lock down "light" in the 1970s. The Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 1977 ruled, “We hold that, because ‘light’ is a generic or common descriptive word when applied to beer, neither that word nor its phonetic equivalent may be appropriated as a trademark for beer.”

    http://www.metnews.com/articles/2005/reminiscing092905.htm
     
  13. willbm3

    willbm3 Initiate (0) Feb 19, 2010 Massachusetts

    And I have a suspicion that the same will happen with "Nitro." Taken as a whole, Milk Stout Nitro is probably a different story, but "Nitro" alone seems like too much. It never hurts to apply though...
     
    dpkpr likes this.
  14. Joenajera

    Joenajera Initiate (0) Apr 26, 2013 California

  15. bpalfrey10

    bpalfrey10 Initiate (0) Jan 15, 2010 New York

    Interestingly, Oskar Blues filed a trademark application for G'Knightro on March 5th. Doesn't look descriptive to me given the purposeful misspelling of "nitro" and the G'.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.