Water Report or lack thereof

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by jlordi12, May 6, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jlordi12

    jlordi12 Pooh-Bah (1,856) Jun 8, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    My town doesn't offer any kind of water report that has any good information. They do a CCR Report (Consumer Confidence) but none of the info relates to brewing. There is a company in town that does the kind of testing I am looking for. My question is that if I pay to get the water tested how beneficiial is this information to me a month from now? year? two years? etc . Is this something I have to pay for regularly for it to be accurate or is it a case where I can pretty much make pretty good assumptions based on the initial results? If the latter, I'll probably pass on doing the testing and build my water from the ground up. No pun intended.

    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. MLucky

    MLucky Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2010 California

    The answers to your questions depend on the town's water source. Depending on whether you get surface or groundwater, and depending upon your region, you may or may not have fluctuations from season to season and year to year. Generally speaking, those fluctuations tend to be small enough so that they won't affect your brewing, and you could safely make assumptions based on your water report for some time to come.

    All that said, I use RO water with (generally minor) additions of salts. The city water where I live tastes terrible, so I'm already used to hauling home 5 gallons jugs of RO from the supermarket. I use software to calculate gypsum and CaCl additions, adjust the pH (usually via acid malt) and badda bing, badda boom: brewing water.
     
  3. jlordi12

    jlordi12 Pooh-Bah (1,856) Jun 8, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    Thanks for the response. The water in town tastes fine, which is why I've been using it. I just have no idea what is in it. I'll try to gather some info on the source of the water, I should probably have that info available.
     
  4. jlordi12

    jlordi12 Pooh-Bah (1,856) Jun 8, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    According to the CCR report the water is obtained entirely from underground sources within the town's borders. Does this mean my water is more or less likely to fluctuate ? They also go on to say it would be classified as "soft".
     
  5. AlCaponeJunior

    AlCaponeJunior Grand Pooh-Bah (3,452) May 21, 2010 Texas
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Some towns (most, apparently) will add chloramine during part of the year in addition to chlorine. Chloramine doesn't boil off and makes the beer taste like band-aids. Half a campden tablet for five gallons should prevent this from being a problem. When chloramine is present, the beer definitely tastes like band-aids, Luckily I discovered this on mr beer so it wasn't a huge tragedy.

    That being said, I would hazard some wild speculation and say to just give it a try before you mess with your water, and see how it comes out. But if you can get advice from an experienced brewer in the area, that would help. Or there's a place you can send a water sample to if needed. Someone on here will know what that site is. My water is just fine so I don't bother (but I do add the campden).

    Edit: since you're already using it, there's an ol' saying that applies: if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
     
    jlordi12 likes this.
  6. JohnSnowNW

    JohnSnowNW Initiate (0) Feb 6, 2013 Minnesota

    The town, most likely, tests the water for all the minerals you need for brewing. Have you tried contacting them to get that information? That is, have you asked them for the data not released in their annual reports?

    I did, and asked for 2 years worth of data broken down by month. They were quite accommodating.
     
    jlordi12 likes this.
  7. jlordi12

    jlordi12 Pooh-Bah (1,856) Jun 8, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    That's pretty sweet. I reached out to the town and they mentioned the place in town that would be able to perform the tests. Perhaps they outsource the testing? Idk. They didn't have any info readily available when I asked.
     
  8. jlordi12

    jlordi12 Pooh-Bah (1,856) Jun 8, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    Good point . It ain't broke, but it could probably be better, too. I think I'd just like to know because water was the next angle is my brewing I wanted to start exploring.
     
  9. MLucky

    MLucky Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2010 California

    My understanding is that groundwater sources fluctuate less that surface water sources. I would say that if you've got naturally soft water, from an underground source, it would probably make sense to have it tested, and then adjust sparingly as needed for specific styles.

    I agree with others that your city almost undoubtedly has this info. But it might be difficult getting hold of the right person who would know about it and who would understand that as a public employee s/he is more or less required to give such information when members of the public ask.
     
    jlordi12 likes this.
  10. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    The trick is to get the phone number of the engineer if you can.

    I have yet to hear of any municipality that is required to give this info to the public. Though I believe most are required (by law) to report on the safety related ions/compounds. I suppose you could try a request under your state's FOIA (or equivalent act), though I don't know how many state's FOIA's apply to local government. The federal FOIA does not.

    Or just pony up $26 (or whatever it costs nowadays) and send a sample to Ward Lab.
     
  11. MLucky

    MLucky Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2010 California

    Really? You've heard of California, haven't you? In California, at least, public employees are required by state law to respond to requests for information about the work they do. With a few exceptions for things like personnel records, *everything* public employees do with public money is a matter of public record. The results of tests performed on the public water supply would definitely be public information here, and I'd be surprised if it was different in other states.

    Now, that said, the reason I wrote above that they are "more or less required" is that the legal penalties for not releasing public information are notoriously difficult to enforce, and if some guy doesn't want to be bothered, there isn't that much you can do about it short of suing. Newspapers do it all the time, but I doubt if most home brewers would bother. So you're definitely better off trying to find a sympathetic ear at the public works department than you are with a formal written request.
     
  12. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Hadn't heard of this. Is it part of CA's state FOIA (or FOIA-like) law?
     
  13. hopfenunmaltz

    hopfenunmaltz Pooh-Bah (2,647) Jun 8, 2005 Michigan
    Pooh-Bah

    The brewing ions are in the EPA secondary standards, and not required. My local water supplier said they did not test for them, and could not provide, even though I got 5 or 6 pages of harmful chemicals in the primary report.

    I sent a water sample to award labs and that data was not share with the utility, as it was mine.
     
  14. jmich24

    jmich24 Initiate (0) Jan 28, 2010 Michigan

    What numbers did you get from your test and where in Michigan are you located? I was not able to get my local report, but was able to get other nearby cities numbers and took an average for my own. Any additional data would interest me.

    TIA
     
  15. MLucky

    MLucky Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2010 California

  16. jlordi12

    jlordi12 Pooh-Bah (1,856) Jun 8, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    https://producers.wardlab.com/BrewersKitOrder.aspx

    Is the beer test worth the extra coin over the w-6 option? Seems like pretty much the same
     
  17. Mag00n

    Mag00n Initiate (0) Nov 21, 2008 New York

  18. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I sprung for the more expensive one (though it wasn't called 'beer test' at the time). But W-6 has all the brewing ion, alkalinity, and pH stuff you should need for brewing purposes.
     
  19. hopfenunmaltz

    hopfenunmaltz Pooh-Bah (2,647) Jun 8, 2005 Michigan
    Pooh-Bah

    I am in SE Michigan in an area of glacial gravel deposits, and the village water system comes off of wells. Don't use mine for your profile, as the local soil/geology will determine your profile.

    In ppm
    Ca=113, Mg=33, Na=58, Cl=132, SO4=48, HCO3=364.
    Total harness=423 as CaCO3
    Alkalinity=364 as CaCO3
    TDS=630

    So the solution for a water like this is to use RO water for brewing. The TDS for the RO water was 12 ppm.

    Edit - the cities that use Great Lakes water have good brewing water. Some cities use lime softening of source water similar to mine, and produce water good for brewing.

    Edit 2 - so what were those data like, or the average?
     
    #19 hopfenunmaltz, May 7, 2014
    Last edited: May 7, 2014
  20. hopfenunmaltz

    hopfenunmaltz Pooh-Bah (2,647) Jun 8, 2005 Michigan
    Pooh-Bah

    Page 4 of the second report has most of what you want. You have hard water, but the Ca level of 53 is good for most styles of beer.
    The alkalinity is not good at 165 ppm. You could reduce that with acid or acidulated malt. Another way to reduce the alkalinity is to dilute with RO water.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.