Firestone walker beer fest

Discussion in 'Pacific' started by mudbug, Feb 22, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BdubleEdubleRUN

    BdubleEdubleRUN Initiate (0) Jul 28, 2009 California

    Hulk smash table to beer chug on the way to a nice dinner.
     
    ehammond1 likes this.
  2. nanobrew

    nanobrew Initiate (0) Dec 31, 2008 California

    I will hopefully be going next year and I can bring my cornhole set also
     
    BdubleEdubleRUN likes this.
  3. moosington

    moosington Zealot (543) Mar 29, 2009 California

    The barrel character just seems to lend well to the gnarly sweetness inherent to DL. Not that it erases the sweetness, just gives it a little more complexity and somewhere for it to "hide."
     
  4. domtronzero

    domtronzero Initiate (0) Aug 18, 2007 California

    The best part about BA Dark Lord is that it doesn't taste like Dark Lord.
     
    kristalynn, drgarage and tyrsis like this.
  5. Levitation

    Levitation Initiate (0) Aug 7, 2009 California

    shhh.
     
    BdubleEdubleRUN likes this.
  6. Epical8

    Epical8 Initiate (0) Dec 30, 2010 California

    Amazing Fest and Adelaide Inn is the place to be.
     
    ehammond1 likes this.
  7. kpacedo

    kpacedo Initiate (0) Nov 24, 2009 California

    Sounds like it was great. I didn't go but hit FW on Sunday, don't know if I have sand In my vagina, but $25 growler fills of Wookey seemed excessive to me. I really enjoy that beer, but I seem to recall pliny fills for like $10 less for a (significantly) superior brew. Cmon FW....
     
  8. BdubleEdubleRUN

    BdubleEdubleRUN Initiate (0) Jul 28, 2009 California

    You should have went next door to the restaurant and got yourself a $100 on premise bottle of FW13. wtf?
     
  9. Retsinis

    Retsinis Pooh-Bah (1,622) Sep 25, 2009 Arizona
    Pooh-Bah

    Wow, yeah that makes no sense. I purchased a bottle off the shelf this past Labor day at a store across from the Buelton tap room, it was $32, which was already a markup near double since release, but given the vintage, I didn't mind at all (was stored well too, tasted best in a vertical a few months later) but $100!? that's just excessive, especially since it's from the brewery that made it.
     
    BdubleEdubleRUN likes this.
  10. kpacedo

    kpacedo Initiate (0) Nov 24, 2009 California

    I didn't want to be a total Debbie downer. Wasn't the vintage black xantus up there too?
     
  11. BdubleEdubleRUN

    BdubleEdubleRUN Initiate (0) Jul 28, 2009 California

    I believe it was. All the prices on the bottle list were pretty shocking to me at first. I'm sure they priced it that way based off being located in a wine-centric area and people not blinking an eye at $100 for a bottle of vintage wine, only problem is we are talking about beer.
     
    ehammond1 likes this.
  12. ehammond1

    ehammond1 Initiate (0) Jul 4, 2008

    This really was shocking. San Diego pubs sell the same bottle for on-site consumption @$35-40.
     
  13. ParchedNeedBeer

    ParchedNeedBeer Initiate (0) Feb 21, 2011 California

    Maybe they just marked it up for the weekend knowing BA's from all over the country were showing up. Especially beer related business people that could probably write it off as a business expense, where 100 bucks is nothing but a drop in the bucket.
     
  14. ehammond1

    ehammond1 Initiate (0) Jul 4, 2008

    Not cool. And, I doubt it.
     
    Beerandraiderfan likes this.
  15. Rau71

    Rau71 Initiate (0) Dec 12, 2011 California

    They have had that price on that beer since it opened. I am not sure why they set it so high, maybe over valued their own vintages, or just because they didn't keep many, not sure. But it wasn't a weekend mark up. As for the growler fills, sadly beer prices aren't based off of taste or flavor, but ingredients. Pliny the Elder is a great beer, but it is no where the most expensive to make or sell.
     
    ehammond1 likes this.
  16. kpacedo

    kpacedo Initiate (0) Nov 24, 2009 California

    ^

    Sure, I'm certain its not the most expensive beer to make. I'm only pointing out the price point discrepancy and chose pliny since the cost to produce pliny and Wookey to me seem very comparable.
     
  17. Rau71

    Rau71 Initiate (0) Dec 12, 2011 California

    Not even close. Pliny is a DIPA. It probably has a basic malt profile, and a ton of hops. Wookey Jack is a Black Rye IPA. The Malts alone could make up the price difference, and it has a noticeable hop flavor, which to stick out over the dark malts and rye makes it pretty hoppy itself.
     
  18. MichaelGV

    MichaelGV Initiate (0) Apr 2, 2008 California

    This was an awesome event. Well organized, with excellent beers (Dark Lord with vanilla beans, Eclipse Elijah Craig 18 years, to name a few), a wide selection of top-notch breweries and a lot of good food that was included in the price. Kudos to Firestone Walker.
     
    ehammond1 likes this.
  19. kpacedo

    kpacedo Initiate (0) Nov 24, 2009 California


    Not even close? I beg to differ: Both brews are roughly same ABV (8 & 8.5 %, respectively) so the grain bill won't be too drastically different. Wookey is made with extra specialty grain, which is used sparingly (what, 15% grain bill MAX?) I would argue that Pliny requires significantly more hops to brew, which will be the most expensive component during brewing. When I brewed a Pliny clone, I was fucking shocked at how much I was paying in hops.

    I guess what I am trying to say, is that in this example of two beers, the growler fill cost is not commensurate with cost of brewing the beer. BTW- I really like the Wookey.
     
  20. thome50

    thome50 Initiate (0) Dec 10, 2006 California

    A better comparison would be growler fills of Double Jack with are also $25. At least they only charge $5 for the glass but that is still a really expensive pour compared to other breweries. I still pay the price when I go back up that way as it is an amazing beer.
     
    Rau71 likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.