Cantillon Lou Pepe Age Debate

Discussion in 'Beer Talk' started by tendermorsel, Jun 22, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tendermorsel

    tendermorsel Initiate (0) Oct 22, 2006 Massachusetts

    So a local pub had a keg of Lou Pepe Kriek 2009 and last night and a buddy of mine and sour fan and I were debating on the actual age of the beer.

    I thought that this lambic for the base of this Kriek was brewed in 2009 and then aged with cherries and bottled/kegged in late 2011. This would mean the actually beer was 8 months (ish) old

    My buddy insisted that this was not the case that the 2009 dating refers to when it was bottled/kegged and infact the beer was 3+ years old.

    Any thoughs on this?

    Nothing like some Lambic talk on a slow day at work!
     
  2. stupac2

    stupac2 Pooh-Bah (2,031) Feb 22, 2011 California
    Pooh-Bah

    One of my LP's has a 2008 sticker and says "Bottled April 2011" on the back. So I think you're right. I'm also curious why you didn't just check that.
     
  3. pmoney

    pmoney Initiate (0) Apr 15, 2011 Illinois

    The OP had it on draft, not out of the bottle.
     
  4. Rempo

    Rempo Initiate (0) Jan 18, 2010 Indiana

    How are you functional?

    (I would ask the pub)
     
    LambicKing likes this.
  5. tendermorsel

    tendermorsel Initiate (0) Oct 22, 2006 Massachusetts

    Well I bought a 2009 bottle at the brewery that was freshly bottled in Sept 2011. So I would assume that what you are saying would be correct for the bottles. Don't know about the kegs. My buddy works for the distributor and he was so insistant too. Just getting others thoughts. I could always e-mail Yves too:slight_smile:
     
  6. stupac2

    stupac2 Pooh-Bah (2,031) Feb 22, 2011 California
    Pooh-Bah

    Derp.
     
    Mavajo and hopsbreath like this.
  7. tendermorsel

    tendermorsel Initiate (0) Oct 22, 2006 Massachusetts

    Only had one glass... at 13$ a pour I went with a few other weird belgian stuff that was on.

    I am also conviced that Cantillon loses a TON when it is kegged. It was nowhere near as good as some of the recent LP Kriek bottles I have had recently. Very muted with the Cherry flavors. It was good but not great.
     
  8. stupac2

    stupac2 Pooh-Bah (2,031) Feb 22, 2011 California
    Pooh-Bah

    Weird, I've never noticed that.
     
  9. ShawDeuce22

    ShawDeuce22 Crusader (457) Mar 17, 2009 Massachusetts

    I wish I made it out to Deep Ellum last night

    ...nothing further :slight_frown:
     
  10. tendermorsel

    tendermorsel Initiate (0) Oct 22, 2006 Massachusetts


    I read somewhere that Cantillon only kegs beer to satisfy the American market. I think that was in Tim Webb's book?? Any fruited keged Cantillon I have tried stateside has not really impressed me much. That being said some of the draft stuff at Moder Lambic was damn good and exploding with fruit flavors. I would assume that they are getting the stuff insanely fresh however.

    I also have come to the realization how much I love the fruit flavors in the Cantillon fruited lambics. So good. Some people freak out on this site about drinking IPA as fresh as possible and I have realized for me the same is true with the fruited stuff. They lose depth of fruit flavor with age in the bottle and when kegged IMHO.
     
    LambicKing and Verecund like this.
  11. stupac2

    stupac2 Pooh-Bah (2,031) Feb 22, 2011 California
    Pooh-Bah

    Funny when you said "Cantillon only kegs to satisfy the American market" I immediately thought "there's plenty at Moeder..." Anyway, as I said I've had a bunch of Cantillon on tap and never really noticed a dropoff, but it's not like I've done a side-by-side. I'm not sure why kegs would be worse than bottles, since bottles are probably older than kegs, since kegs don't need to condition, and they could actually be fruitier. It depends, I suppose.

    Really, I noticed the increased fruitiness with stuff in Belgium. I brought back a fresh Kriek to do side-by-side with a 2011, and the differences were pretty remarkable. That one's a bit weird since it gets so sour, and the really fresh stuff wasn't very sour at all. So unless the kegs were sitting around for a really long time, I just doubt that they're all that different in fruitiness (I'm sure that they're less funky/sour since they're not conditioned, but that might make them seem more fruity).
     
  12. davey101

    davey101 Pooh-Bah (2,360) Apr 14, 2009 Connecticut
    Pooh-Bah

    This thread is making me thirsty...
     
    smithdc33 likes this.
  13. tendermorsel

    tendermorsel Initiate (0) Oct 22, 2006 Massachusetts

    Good stuff... Lambic talk!!!
    I have noticed that too with the fruited bottles I have brought back too. In fact... I have noticed that with many Belgian beers. Orval, Westmalle, DeKonnick, Rodenbach ect, all taste different and better overthere. I don't think it is mental either. Freshness and how the bottles are maintained definately matters with all beer and fruited lambics are no exception.
     
  14. Soonami

    Soonami Initiate (0) Jul 16, 2008 Pennsylvania

    I talked to Jean Van Roy at Monk's in Philly on Tuesday and he confirmed that the 2009 LP Kriek I had was brewed in 2009. Fruit from the 2011 harvest (summer) was added to the beer and then it was bottled later in 2011, before they started brewing for the next season.

    I also noticed that kegged versions of the beer seem to have not the vitality of the bottled beers. I'm not sure if it's because the bottled versions are exposed to more oxygen and have a little more acidic bite. There's definitely less carbonation in the kegged versions than in bottles. Maybe the beer ages faster in bottles or if there's more yeast growth in a bottle that is often kept warmer than kegs are. In the end, it might be perception, but I'm not the only one that things that kegged versions are different after talking to others at the Monk's event
     
    jedwards and tendermorsel like this.
  15. BeerMaverick

    BeerMaverick Zealot (718) Dec 14, 2010 Connecticut

    I had a bottle of the 2009 at a local bar and the sticker on the bottle said 2009, but once we popped the cork, the cork said 2011, so we figured that meant 2 years of aging.
     
  16. Soonami

    Soonami Initiate (0) Jul 16, 2008 Pennsylvania

    2009 is the year the base beer was brewed the cork date is when it was bottled
     
  17. BearsOnAcid

    BearsOnAcid Pooh-Bah (2,239) Mar 17, 2009 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    They're doing a terrible job at satisfying us :wink:

    As for the dating I would say the '09 refers to the sticker date that is on the Lou Pepes. So bottled in 2011. I would also say this since I bet it is more likely Max would put on a more recent vintage last night. I don't think I've ever seen 3+ year old Cantillon drafts at Deep Ellum. At least not in recent years.

    And with kegs vs. bottles, never done side-by-sides and vintages can vary so it's hard to really say. Draft gueuze seems better than bottles to me. St. Lamvinus too. Hop aroma is a little more forward with Champions in bottle. Fou Foune, Lou Pepe Kriek and Framboise, Rose, Kriek, and Iris all seem sort of the same to me. The Lou Pepes may have a little more punch to it on draft than bottle. I've never been a big fan of LP though.
     
  18. BearsOnAcid

    BearsOnAcid Pooh-Bah (2,239) Mar 17, 2009 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    You did a 2012 kriek next to a 2011? Haven't had any newer batches in a while but I think around 2009/2008 the kriek started getting more fruit forward and less sour. Also, noticed a decline in sourness all through most Cantillons. Could've been because of the rumor that belgians complain that Cantillon is too sour. Anyways, after having gotten into Cantillon when the kriek smelled like a livestock farm the difference with fresh batches was like night and day. They were much easier to stomach and less of a novelty.

    Then again, there is a strong argument that Shelton and/or distributors have left pallets of Cantillon out in extreme heat during the summer so I'm sure they can change a lot during transportation. I have no clue what they were supposed to taste like back then.
     
  19. stupac2

    stupac2 Pooh-Bah (2,031) Feb 22, 2011 California
    Pooh-Bah

    Yeah, it was '12 next to '11. And I haven't had much older kriek, but I hear it becomes sour, which isn't surprising, because even with a year on it it's pretty damn sour.

    And who knows what Shelton does with it. I hope it's better than that.
     
  20. Zimbo

    Zimbo Pooh-Bah (2,305) Aug 7, 2010 Scotland
    Pooh-Bah

    Has anyone told marquis about this thread?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.