Belgian table dubbel recipe critique

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by blacklabelbrewer, Jul 5, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. blacklabelbrewer

    blacklabelbrewer Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2011 California

    i was listening to the beersmith podcast with Stan Hieronymus and i was inspired to brew a table dubbel with the westmalle yeast strain. Near the end Stan gave a basic layout for a recipe but does not specify percentages or exact amount of the grain used, so kind of winged it. Open to suggestions, and i might exchange the belgian chocolate for some special B for some raisin flavor but I am not set on that decision. Thanks for your help.

    Belgian Table Dubbel:
    3.5 oz Belgian chocolate
    4 oz Dark munich
    3.5 LB Belgian pils
    3.5 LB Belgian pale
    13 or 14 oz of sugar
    0.75 oz Hallertau pellets @ 60 mins
    0.5 oz Hallertau pellets @ 20 mins

    Mash low at 148F for 60 mins
    ferment at 60F and let naturally ramp up 70s

    i assume a 90min boil because of the DMS issues with pilsner malt, right?
     
  2. JimmyTango

    JimmyTango Initiate (0) Aug 1, 2011 California

    I would switch the chocolate for Special B as I don't really like the combo of belgian yeast and roasted grains, especially in a beer that will be as dry as I 'spect yours will given the malt bill and mash temps. Also, if you are going to use sugar, why not use some dark candi suryp for more belgian flare?

    For the record, I havent brewed anything like this before, so my suggestions are just kinda' "from the hip."

    I have used the Westmalle yeast though, and I think it would be great for this style.
     
  3. PangaeaBeerFood

    PangaeaBeerFood Initiate (0) Nov 30, 2008 New York

    It depends on how traditional you want the beer to be. Here is the description from BJCP:

    "Belgian yeast strains prone to production of higher alcohols, esters, and phenolics are commonly used. Water can be soft to hard. Impression of complex grain bill, although traditional versions are typically Belgian Pils malt with caramelized sugar syrup or other unrefined sugars providing much of the character. Homebrewers may use Belgian Pils or pale base malt, Munich-type malts for maltiness, Special B for raisin flavors, CaraVienne or CaraMunich for dried fruit flavors, other specialty grains for character. Dark caramelized sugar syrup or sugars for color and rum-raisin flavors. Noble-type, English-type or Styrian Goldings hops commonly used. No spices are traditionally used, although restrained use is allowable."

    Dark roasted grains like chocolate malt aren't really Belgian appropriate, and might give off too much coffee flavor in a small beer. I also think 13-14 oz. of simple sugar in a table beer is a bit much and will dry it out too much. I'd go for something more like this:

    3.5 lbs. Belgian Pils
    3.5 lbs. Belgian Pale or Munich
    4 oz. Belgian Aromatic or Special Roast or Some Other Toasted Grain
    4 oz. Special B or another dark Crystal Malt
    8 oz. of Dark Belgian Candi Sugar
     
    JimmyTango likes this.
  4. blacklabelbrewer

    blacklabelbrewer Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2011 California

    I was trying to keep the cost of the batch down if possible. Do you think the beer would come out too off style or lacking the dark rummyness from the candi syrup/sugar if I were to go without it? I hear that belgian candi/sugar can be costly for the good stuff, Stan says the yeast see sucrose as sucrose and table sugar works just fine in necessary if I'm not mistaken. I want to keep my recipe somewhat simple so I can have a subtle but interesting platform for the westmalle strain to shine. I do like special B instead out the chocolate so I will be going with that.
     
  5. PangaeaBeerFood

    PangaeaBeerFood Initiate (0) Nov 30, 2008 New York

    When it comes to clear candi sugar, I totally agree, sugar is sugar. The thing about dark candi sugar is that it is caramelized, which definitely adds a different, richer flavor. If you have a candy thermometer you could always caramelize the table sugar, which is free. Or, you could try brown sugar. It'll add a bit more richness than caramelized sugar will, but it's in the same ballpark flavorwise.
     
  6. southdenverhoo

    southdenverhoo Pooh-Bah (1,567) Aug 13, 2004 Colorado
    Pooh-Bah

    pardon my ignorance, but what's a "table dubbel"? I thought I knew what a table beer was and I thought I knew what a dubbel was but if there's such a thing as a table dubbel I must have had it wrong. I thought a table beer was of lower strength than a dubbel, brewed for the monks' own consumption at table, and in fact was sometimes referred to as a "singel"; that is, that it was definitionally of lower strength than a dubbel. Like, say, this one: http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/6/14

    or, say, for a darker version, like you're doing, this:
    http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/313/13690

    I tried googling "table dubbel" and it seemed like what I got were a bunch of refdrences to "dubbel" that happened to have the word "table" in close proximity....and this thread.

    Can you straighten me out? alcohol %, IBU, color range, and a word or two about the characteristics?
     
  7. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Next you'll say there's no such thing as a Black IPA. :astonished:
     
    tronester and blacklabelbrewer like this.
  8. blacklabelbrewer

    blacklabelbrewer Initiate (0) Jan 27, 2011 California

    I like the idea of using the brown sugar. I really appreciate all of the input from everyone else, don't know what I would do without you fellow BAs. Cheers!
     
    PangaeaBeerFood likes this.
  9. PangaeaBeerFood

    PangaeaBeerFood Initiate (0) Nov 30, 2008 New York

    I think you're way overthinking this, broseph. It isn't a style. He just wants the general flavor profile of a Dubbel in a semi-sessionable strength. You could call it an Abbey Single, I suppose, but that denotes that it's a Pale beer, which this is not. Don't get too caught up on the overcategorization of it all. Sometimes beer is just beer, and it's delicious.
     
  10. yinzer

    yinzer Initiate (0) Nov 24, 2006 Pennsylvania

    One could only wish.
     
    FeDUBBELFIST likes this.
  11. southdenverhoo

    southdenverhoo Pooh-Bah (1,567) Aug 13, 2004 Colorado
    Pooh-Bah

    Actually I don't get hung up on styles; I was curious because I brew some sessionable beers like the OP was discussing and I just call 'em "belgian pales" or "belgian browns" depending on how dark they come out (Usually "belgian amber" is more accurrate). Or "Farmhouse" if I throw some brett in there!

    Was just wondering if there was a new style encompassing what I am already doing....trust me, "overthinking" does not describe my brewing in any way, though "underthinking" (as in discovering at the beginning of the sparge that you forgot to screw the bazooka into the mashtun before mashing in) certainly does...
     
    PangaeaBeerFood likes this.
  12. PangaeaBeerFood

    PangaeaBeerFood Initiate (0) Nov 30, 2008 New York

    Maybe we could call it a Dubbel Divided by 2.
     
  13. JimmyTango

    JimmyTango Initiate (0) Aug 1, 2011 California

    ^ Half Dubbel
     
  14. PangaeaBeerFood

    PangaeaBeerFood Initiate (0) Nov 30, 2008 New York

    Maybe we can call it a 1.4142135 Squared.
     
  15. DmanGTR

    DmanGTR Initiate (0) Feb 19, 2008 New York
    Trader

    I would just do Belgian pils malt + dark candy as your fermentables. Maybe something like 8 lb pils + 1 lb dark candy sugar. Sometimes simpler is better.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.