Coagulation of protein and albumin -- how to ensure clean hot break

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by herrburgess, Apr 25, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bergbrew

    bergbrew Initiate (0) Jan 12, 2004 Minnesota

    It's around somewhere. I'll take a look tomorrow if I get a chance.

    Looking at Amazon, I'm more upset about not knowing where that book is. $149 these days!
     
    herrburgess likes this.
  2. herrburgess

    herrburgess Grand Pooh-Bah (3,077) Nov 4, 2009 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    Been reading the Narziss article. The quote is:

    "More recent [malt] varieties show high protein modification...so that during mashing the breakdown processes occurring at 45-55C can be limited, and higher mashing temperatures of 59-62C can be selected. The "two-mash" mashing methods...however, require very uniform cytolysis of the malt but also a sufficient portion of FAN...in order to avoid difficulties later during beer filtration.... Excessive protein rests are not advisable, in order to avoid the beer becoming too bland or insipid and the foam being of poor quality." (emphasis mine)

    The article then goes on to provide a number of figures/graphs showing 15-20 min protein rests at 50C.

    The part about FAN is beyond my knowledge; any help here in understanding what is meant is appreciated.

    Also, why do the graphs show these 50C rests when he says they are not advisable? Is it because they are short, and not "excessive" at just 15-20 min?
     
  3. herrburgess

    herrburgess Grand Pooh-Bah (3,077) Nov 4, 2009 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    I have never experienced the foam not forming on the top either; rather I am talking primarily about the coagulation of proteins in the wort during the initial stages of the boil -- after the foam has subsided -- that look like egg-drop soup.

    In other words, not this:
    [​IMG]

    ...but this:
    [​IMG]
     
  4. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I almost posted a similar message. Glad you have pictures. Some people equate the initial foaming with hot break. It's not. Even extract batches will have that, and extract doesn't have the proteins to form a substantial hot break, because it has been remove by the process of making the extract.
     
    herrburgess likes this.
  5. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I know what hot break is and I obtain it as my wort comes to boil. You may refer to it as “egg drop soup” if you like; I simply call it hot break.

    Cheers!
     
  6. herrburgess

    herrburgess Grand Pooh-Bah (3,077) Nov 4, 2009 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    Just thought there might be some confusion. I have had to guard against boil-over with the initial foaming, but never with the coagulated protein strings I have referred to as looking like egg-drop soup.
     
  7. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    So are you saying that the foam that threatens to boil over is the true hot break or not? I believe @herrburgess is saying not, and I agree with him.
     
  8. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I will take a photograph next batch.

    Cheers!
     
  9. herrburgess

    herrburgess Grand Pooh-Bah (3,077) Nov 4, 2009 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    Does it look more like picture 1, picture 2, or a combination?
     
  10. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Below is some verbiage from the online book How to Brew. I am pretty sure that I have read this section before but that was a very, very long time ago. I took note that John Palmer also uses the description of “Egg Drop Soup”.



    7.2 The "Hot Break"


    [​IMG]


    A foam will start to rise and form a smooth surface. This is good. If the foam suddenly billows over the side, this is a boil-over (Bad). If it looks like it is going to boil over, either lower the heat or spray the surface with water from a spray bottle. The foam is caused by proteins in the wort that coagulate due to the rolling action of the boil. The wort will continue to foam until the protein clumps get heavy enough to sink back into the pot. You will see particles floating around in the wort. It may look like Egg Drop Soup. This is called the Hot break and may take 5-20 minutes to occur, depending on the amount of protein in your extract. Often the first hop addition triggers a great deal of foaming, especially if hop pellets are used. I recommend waiting until the Hot break occurs before doing your first Hop addition and timing the hour. The extra boiling time won't hurt.
     
  11. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Sure, but extract also foams up, and it doesn't contain significant amounts of the proteins that make hot break. When I boil DME for starters (usually Muntons, but other brands too), it foams like crazy, but then the foam subsides and there is no "egg drop soup," i.e. clumps/flakes/globs of coagulated proteins left. This is not surprising, because the hot break has already happened during the boil that processed the extract.

    My point is that you can get significant foaming without getting significant hot break.
     
  12. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I obtain hot break when I bring my wort up to boil.

    Maybe others don't; I really don't know.

    Cheers!
     
  13. bergbrew

    bergbrew Initiate (0) Jan 12, 2004 Minnesota

    He's saying that the cell wall polysaccharides need to be uniformly broken down, the main concern being beta glucan. In addition, if there is adequate FAN, you can skip the protein rest. As I indicated before, proteolysis is almost completely taken care of in malting. However, a lower temp rest will create more FAN.

    If either one of those two is lacking, a lower rest is recommended. That being said, in my experience this isn't the case with modern malts. Keep in mind that article was written 20+ years ago. Malt has changed since then. A lot.
     
  14. herrburgess

    herrburgess Grand Pooh-Bah (3,077) Nov 4, 2009 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    Just following up on this as I got some info in another thread from a pro brewer that worked at a very highly regarded German brewery (http://www.beeradvocate.com/communi...e-bought-and-drunk.55872/page-62#post-3745596).

    I definitely plan to take his advice on getting my wort analyzed by a lab at some point. But I thought his next suggestion was very interesting:

    Protein haze is usually caused by having too much High Molecular Weight Protein (more than 240 mg/L) in your wort. Here are some tips (don't try all at once):
    • First: send off a sample to get analyzed. You can't be sure that this is the issue if you don't know the numbers.
    • Carboxypeptidase rest at 55 C for 20 min (will chew the ends off some of those long Proteins)
    • more intense boil (shouldn't need to be boiling off more than 10% though)
    • drop your pH (protein solubility decreases as pH does)
    • lager long and cold
    • Or, you could do what most "craft" brewers do: dump fining agents into your brite tank. (which I don't know much about, but see as fully unnecessary when the beer is made well in the first place)
    I am very much leaning toward a short rest at 55C for my next batch to try and tackle this protein haze. Will probably experiment on the 5-gal system before doing it on the 1 BBL setup. Will also report back any findings....
     
    ChrisMyhre likes this.
  15. GreenKrusty101

    GreenKrusty101 Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2008 Nevada

    http://www.weyermann.de/usa/gelbe_Seiten_usa.asp?snr=1&idkat=1297&umenue=yes&idmenue=269&sprache=10

    the ph is listed as 3.4-3.6 so I am assuming there is a calculator out there that will work with the % used. BrewCipher? : )
     
    #75 GreenKrusty101, Jun 11, 2015
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2015
  16. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

  17. GreenKrusty101

    GreenKrusty101 Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2008 Nevada

    See ninja edit : )
     
  18. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Thanks. It could be useful, if it stated the conditions, i.e. how much malt in how much (presumably distilled) water. BrewCipher (and MpH, whose water models BrewCipher uses), assumes a 3% lactic acid strength by weight. People can (and I think have) debate(d) whether 3% is the right value, but if it's not, it's probably because of variation between acid malt batches, which is the main reason I tend to recommend that people use bottled lactic acid rather than acidulated malt.
     
    herrburgess and ChrisMyhre like this.
  19. bergbrew

    bergbrew Initiate (0) Jan 12, 2004 Minnesota

    All good advice. But as with everything in brewing there are tradeoffs. Fixing one problem often results in another. So you really need to look at the entire process to pinpoint what will work best.
     
    herrburgess likes this.
  20. herrburgess

    herrburgess Grand Pooh-Bah (3,077) Nov 4, 2009 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    Yea, getting a lab analysis is priority #1.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.