"Best of Styles" Lists

Talk Discussion in 'BeerAdvocate Talk' started by Thorpe429, Mar 7, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Thorpe429

    Thorpe429 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,705) Aug 18, 2008 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah

    Now that the server upgrades are complete, would it be possible to revisit the "top beers" lists for each style so that they include 100 beers where applicable? This would be awesome for styles that have loads of beers, e.g. American IPA with 2729 entries, and would fit with the geographic lists, which are already at 100.
     
    craytonic, drabmuh and mdfb79 like this.
  2. FosterJM

    FosterJM Initiate (0) Nov 16, 2009 California

    Sounds like it would be a good fit. Hopefully they have the time and energy to code some stuff up.

    Cheers!
     
  3. Thorpe429

    Thorpe429 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,705) Aug 18, 2008 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah

    I know nothing about coding. I'm hoping that if the server space exists, this is simple and just involves changing a "50" to a "100." I'm sure it's not that easy, but given my lack of computer knowledge, I can dream.
     
  4. FosterJM

    FosterJM Initiate (0) Nov 16, 2009 California

    Depending on the script Todd is using it very well could be saying ListMaxNumber=100 but then again I dont know what he is using so hard to tell. I am sure its pretty easy if he had the time. Not sure what is on his plate either.

    Cheers!
     
    Thorpe429 likes this.
  5. drabmuh

    drabmuh Initiate (0) Feb 7, 2004 Maryland

    Taking ticking to new heights. I approve this message.
     
  6. Thorpe429

    Thorpe429 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,705) Aug 18, 2008 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah

    I want more saisons and IPAs to seek out! Sorting by rAvg and looking for ones with enough reviews that are available in bottles and/or growlers is tough work.
     
    drabmuh likes this.
  7. Todd

    Todd Founder (13,518) Aug 23, 1996 Finland
    STAFF Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah

    Not all styles have 50, let alone 100, that could be considered for the lists ... which is why it's the way it is now.

    Thanks for the suggestion, but we have no intentions of changing things at this time.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.