Barrel Aged Beer in Cans?

Discussion in 'Beer Talk' started by honkey, Nov 1, 2017.

Tags:
?

Would you rather buy barrel aged beers in cans or bottles?

  1. Cans

    43 vote(s)
    16.7%
  2. Bottles

    85 vote(s)
    33.1%
  3. No Preference

    79 vote(s)
    30.7%
  4. Whichever one is best for the quality of the beer is what I want

    61 vote(s)
    23.7%
Multiple votes are allowed.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brent212

    Brent212 Pundit (914) Jan 13, 2014 California
    Trader

    I like cans because they stack and travel better.
     
  2. Beer_Economicus

    Beer_Economicus Pooh-Bah (2,698) Apr 8, 2017 Ohio
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    After reading through so much of this thread, I 100% read this as "although not a BPA aged beer..."
     
    rgordon and cavedave like this.
  3. jzeilinger

    jzeilinger Grand High Pooh-Bah (8,847) Dec 4, 2004 Pennsylvania
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Voted "no preference". Canning technology has come a long ways over the years and I like the idea of a big beer from the pop top.
     
  4. KindaFondaGoozah

    KindaFondaGoozah Initiate (0) Jan 1, 2013 Wisconsin

    I carry my prejudices long and deep. Michael Jackson's DK books back in the mid 90s led me down the path to import and craft (and then the divisions were still pretty clear). Glass could be an elevated medium while mass market was trending toward cans. For me, craft meant glass, and that continues to this day. Once feelings are involved, reason and facts cease to apply. I have had a hard time wrapping my mind around cans, but it has not stopped my purchasing. BBA Ten Fidy was excellent. While I am hidebound, I also can accept new revelations. I will be happy to be proven wrong. One last feelz though... Bottles are pretty, while cans are mere vessels.
     
    FonyBones and Beer_Economicus like this.
  5. imfatsowhat88

    imfatsowhat88 Initiate (0) Jul 21, 2017 California

    Barrel Aged Ten Fidy... Nuff Said
     
  6. rgordon

    rgordon Pooh-Bah (2,701) Apr 26, 2012 North Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    Thanks for the laugh. I can see how you read it that way. Yeah, I sort of doubled up on the aged bit!
     
    Beer_Economicus likes this.
  7. The_Snow_Bird

    The_Snow_Bird Grand Pooh-Bah (3,557) May 7, 2015 Michigan
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Preference to the bottle
     
    VABA and DISKORD like this.
  8. RandyRanderson

    RandyRanderson Initiate (0) Jun 24, 2014 Pennsylvania

    Whatever the brewery thinks is best for their beer. Like the OP, if they have a better canning line, use cans. If they have a better bottling line, use bottles.

    In general I guess I prefer cans, mainly because they fit in the fridge easier. The only time I specifically look for bottled beer is if I need more homebrew bottles.
     
    PapaGoose03 likes this.
  9. JohnnyChicago

    JohnnyChicago Initiate (0) Sep 3, 2010 Illinois

    Really good points. Old vs. new canning lines and bowl vs. inline fillers can mean the difference between remarkably stable beer or garbage in a month beer. Generally, it seems you can get lower TPOs in budget bottling lines vs. canning lines, and the differences disappear on large, sophisticated systems. Because of the economy of scale associated with can purchases, it seems like small breweries would benefit more from going glass. But it’s certainly easier for small breweries to do cans successfully than ever before!
     
  10. SCW

    SCW Initiate (0) Jul 25, 2004 New York

    What if you can get an entire 4-pack or 6-pack for the same price as a bomber, but the liquid is just as good, if not better? A whole dynamic range of flavors? This is the type of innovation we need....

    what about a 6-pack of 8.4 oz cans then? better to have a fresh can every time you want a taste than have to open a whole bottle....you can get six cans for the price of a single bomber, you get 50 ounces instead of 25 ounces, and for about the same price....

    and if you think about it, every time you open a can it costs you about $3-4 instead of costing you $25

    @frozyn @cavedave @scream

    yup, important that is a porter and not a stout!

    You nailed it. People often cellar beers that should be consumed right away, and also consume beers right away that should actually be cellared. BA beers are often going to taste the best right after packaging, especially if they have ingredients like coffee in them, which degrades quickly with oxidation. However non barrel-aged stouts and porters and barleywines will often get better over time (to a certain point), provided they were packaged in a clean environment.

    You say that 750mL is optimal for looks, but cans can look pretty as well - if not BETTER than a 750mL bottle. They just have not been given enough love yet for BA beers. We're going to help out with that.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Lingenbrau

    Lingenbrau Grand Pooh-Bah (4,853) Apr 9, 2011 Oregon
    Pooh-Bah

    Agreed. If only I could get those...
     
  12. drtth

    drtth Initiate (0) Nov 25, 2007 Pennsylvania
    In Memoriam

    After thinking about this and checking a few of my notes, I'd probably be fine with that size cans for sipping beers (beers that come in between about 8-10% e.g., your Xbeans porters) since most of the times when I split the 12 oz high ABV bottles into two servings it's a week night and I have things to take care of the next day so I don't want any foggy feeling. Given my metabolism, above about 10% I expect I'd still prefer splitting the 12 oz bottle into two servings.
     
    #132 drtth, Nov 4, 2017
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2017
  13. Wiffler27

    Wiffler27 Pooh-Bah (2,092) Aug 16, 2009 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    to cellar, bottles
    -only because i've heard the beer can absorb some of what is in the can (BPA, etc)

    in general i don't care

    cans take up less space in my fridge
     
  14. donspublic

    donspublic Grand Pooh-Bah (3,552) Aug 4, 2014 Texas
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    @honkey if it is good they will buy it in whatever format you put it in. I have BA beers in cans and bottles and I actually have no preferences. Good luck with it and wish I could get my hands on it when you are finished :slight_smile:.
     
  15. Thecalmdrinker

    Thecalmdrinker Zealot (659) Jun 27, 2015 Montana

    It doesn't really matter to me, but I guess I voted for cans. lol
     
  16. dennis3951

    dennis3951 Initiate (0) Mar 6, 2008 New Jersey

    I would buy the lower price, regardless of which was lower.
     
  17. Beer_Economicus

    Beer_Economicus Pooh-Bah (2,698) Apr 8, 2017 Ohio
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Alright, I guess I will be the brave soul.

    I voted bottles.

    Everything does taste different (to me) depending on the format. This goes back to even having soda in can vs plastic bottle vs glass bottle vs fountain. I never enjoyed the can taste as much as bottles. -And personally, glass bottles have always tasted best (weather we are talking made with real sugar or HFCS). (This is 100% still true today for me.)

    I have yet to have a canned stout that I enjoy as much as a bottled stout. Until that day comes, I will believe 100% that cans are changing the flavor.

    Someone will inevitably bring up BA Ten Fidy in response: It's good no doubt, but I don't think it is as good as other BA stouts I have had in bottles. I have yet to get that WOW! factor either from a canned stout.

    I have not had an opportunity to try the same exact beer from each vessel like with soda.

    Hard to attribute this uniform difference across over more than 20 years across multiple styles to anything but a taste difference. With Soda, Also most people I have ever discussed this with agree there is a noticeable taste difference. -So, it is not clear to me why this would NOT exist here - because it is beer does not make sense to me.
     
  18. Lone_Freighter

    Lone_Freighter Initiate (0) Jun 4, 2017 Vermont

    Didn't vote yet, but I have to admit that this was probably one of the best barrel aged impy stouts I've had from the can, also have to admit that bourbon barrel aged Ten Fidy was pretty legit too.
     
    VABA likes this.
  19. JuliusPepperwood

    JuliusPepperwood Initiate (0) Jul 21, 2013 North Carolina

    Cans are better for beer, so why wouldn't cans be better for barrel aged beers and cellaring beers?

    -More resistant to oxidation than bottle caps
    -100% UV protection
    -BPA is a non-issue (can would need to be heated to leech BPA)
    -Easier to store, stack, and take up less space in cellar
    -More volume options: 8oz, 12oz, 16oz, 19oz

    I've had some bad results from aging bottles like Founders Imperial stout that got heavily oxidized after a year and Bigfoot that got a little skunky. I have had good results with aging Ten Fidy cans though. That being said I found the sweet spot for me is aging 3-6 months. Any longer and I typically start to get some off flavors.
     
    TBonz and sharpski like this.
  20. puboflyons

    puboflyons Grand Pooh-Bah (4,299) Jul 26, 2008 New Hampshire
    Pooh-Bah

    I checked no preference. I am more interested in the quality of what's in the package rather than how it is packaged.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.