Dogfish Head Unveils Mixed Media

Discussion in 'Beer Releases' started by Bitterbill, Apr 20, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. deleted_user_995920

    deleted_user_995920 Initiate (0) Jun 4, 2015

    I fully understand your conundrum, Obviously the 1516 beer purity act does not mean anything to most people today. Today there is even alcohol water! I kid you not. Bartles and Jaymes was a malt based beverage with some wine added. Arrogance aside ,a wine beer spritzer is not beer in my opinion. I tried DFH Midas touch and it was OK. If you enjoy it is all that really matters anyway. Cheers>>
     
  2. surfcaster

    surfcaster Initiate (0) Apr 20, 2013 North Carolina
    Trader

    Absolutely love a Midas.

    Will give it a shot.

    Even if not your thing— DFH beers are well made. Always worth a shot.
     
  3. THANAT0PSIS

    THANAT0PSIS Pooh-Bah (2,275) Aug 3, 2010 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

    I mean, look at how creatively stifled Germany was for a very, very long time because of the Reinheitsgebot (and I'm one of the biggest lovers of German brewing history and culture on the site).

    I have seen the alcoholic tonic water you're talking about, and no one is arguing that it is beer. Similarly, no one thinks Bartles and Jaymes is beer. They're flavored malt beverages, which, on a very technical level, all beer with any sort of added flavor is, I guess.

    I don't get why you feel the need to demean Mixed Media as a spritzer, when it is clearly not that. It's a beer/wine hybrid. This type of attitude just makes you look stuffy. very "get off my lawn." Do you view the Bruery Wineification as a spritzer? What about Cantillon St. Lamvinus? Are gruits beer? My point is that when you start drawing lines it gets pretty messy pretty quickly.

    As to why I exclude Bartles and Jaymes et al from being called beers, I unfortunately don't have a good answer, since I believe they legally are beers. It appears that the TTB actually regulates "malt beverages" more strictly than "beers," per this ruling from 2008. What to make of this, I don't know. How to actually draw the line, I don't know, but I think there's no doubt that Mixed Media is a beer both in the legal sense and the colloquial sense.
     
    meefmoff and drtth like this.
  4. alucard6679

    alucard6679 Savant (1,009) Jul 29, 2012 Arizona

    Late harvest viognier is an interesting choice, I like the sound of it. I'll try it if I see it, why the hell not?
     
  5. drtth

    drtth Initiate (0) Nov 25, 2007 Pennsylvania
    In Memoriam

    It was first added to the DFH line up in 1999 and has been a year round flagship offering for most of the years since then.

    That would suggest it sells quite well.

    It used saffron in addition to hops so it could hit the minimum hopping required by law for it to be called a beer.
     
    THANAT0PSIS likes this.
  6. drtth

    drtth Initiate (0) Nov 25, 2007 Pennsylvania
    In Memoriam

    The original RHG only applied to beers brewed in what is now Bavaria and was pretty much ignored throughout the rest of what is now Germany until the later 1800s.

    The rest of the world has pretty much always ignored the RHG.
     
    meefmoff, THANAT0PSIS and FBarber like this.
  7. THANAT0PSIS

    THANAT0PSIS Pooh-Bah (2,275) Aug 3, 2010 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

    Especially Belgium and the US, which many consider two of the greatest beer nations in the world.
     
    Squire and drtth like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.