Super Bowl Squares

Discussion in 'Beer It Forward' started by Damian74, Jan 20, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. egrace84

    egrace84 Initiate (0) Mar 25, 2012 Illinois

    In, thanks
     
    Damian74 likes this.
  2. RayOhioFelton

    RayOhioFelton Initiate (0) May 24, 2011 Ohio

    In, thanks for organizing!!!
     
    Damian74 likes this.
  3. richkrull

    richkrull Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2010 Wisconsin

    In!!!
     
    Damian74 likes this.
  4. sdhomebrewer

    sdhomebrewer Initiate (0) Jul 14, 2009 California

    In, thanks!
     
    Damian74 likes this.
  5. chriltz

    chriltz Initiate (0) Mar 21, 2010 Illinois

    In!
     
    Damian74 likes this.
  6. heatwaves

    heatwaves Initiate (0) Oct 17, 2009 California

    In!
     
    Damian74 likes this.
  7. FatsBelvadere

    FatsBelvadere Initiate (0) Feb 1, 2013 Texas

    IN - Beer Mail Sent
     
    Damian74 likes this.
  8. concealed

    concealed Initiate (0) May 7, 2009 Georgia

    BM SEnt, definitely in
     
    Damian74 likes this.
  9. jshusc

    jshusc Pooh-Bah (1,654) Aug 16, 2013 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    BM sent...as long as I made the cut, I'm in.
     
    Damian74 likes this.
  10. landrewg

    landrewg Zealot (694) Nov 11, 2008 Michigan
    Trader

    In, please. I promise I won't cause trouble.
     
  11. ThatCracker

    ThatCracker Initiate (0) Nov 20, 2012 Virginia

    If it's a tie score at the end of the 4th there would be OT....
     
  12. Damian74

    Damian74 Initiate (0) Dec 7, 2012 South Carolina

    Haha thank you!
     
  13. Damian74

    Damian74 Initiate (0) Dec 7, 2012 South Carolina

    Yes sir so I'm thinking it's 4 corners, but I put in final score no ot. So should be qters1-3 and final score unless OT it's fourth qt. Good thing is a Super Bowl never went OT I believe.
     
  14. Auslander

    Auslander Initiate (0) Sep 12, 2008 Ohio
    Trader

    If anyone is on the fence about joining this LIF. I won the 3rd quarter in this LIF two years ago. BAs are an awesome group. 24 generous BAs crushed my wants list, broke my porch and filled up my beer fridge & cellar. 24 boxes x 44 ounces is 1056 ounces of beer. I received almost 2000 ounces of beer! That is nearly 7 cases of awesome beer! I received everything from incredible local brews to brewery only releases from across the country that I never dreamed I'd get to taste.

    Sign up now folks. You can't win if you don't play.
     
  15. Blowofftube

    Blowofftube Initiate (0) Dec 26, 2012 Michigan

    This is my year, I'll take 99 squares please.
     
    ThatCracker likes this.
  16. ThatCracker

    ThatCracker Initiate (0) Nov 20, 2012 Virginia

    I would rather win this then the office pool of $$
     
    PerHops, STG228, landrewg and 4 others like this.
  17. GreenMonster12

    GreenMonster12 Initiate (0) May 19, 2013 Maryland

    In. Thanks for organizing
     
    Damian74 likes this.
  18. Damian74

    Damian74 Initiate (0) Dec 7, 2012 South Carolina

    Just quick question, would like some feedback please. The people that have two squares(88oz), should I split that into two seperated entries?

    I will pick senders out of a hat put on YouTube then post here. Just debating right now if I should split up people sending 88oz. Example your 44 oz goes in the hat twice so say one 44oz goes to winner 4 in Arizona and say your other 44oz got drawn by winner 1 in NJ. Just thought people with two boxes should you could be shipping two different targets. It's easier for to keep track.

    Any thoughts?
     
  19. concealed

    concealed Initiate (0) May 7, 2009 Georgia

    As a two-squarer, I would think that it would be best to send 88oz to a single target.
     
    ThatCracker likes this.
  20. Damian74

    Damian74 Initiate (0) Dec 7, 2012 South Carolina

    Only thing about it is when I pick senders out of a hat I gotta keep track who sent 88 who sent 44oz, not saying it's impossible just easier having everyone having the same quantity going into hat.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.