Why do some beer styles seem redundant?

Discussion in 'Beer Talk' started by Das_Reh, Nov 13, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JLaw55

    JLaw55 Pooh-Bah (2,417) Jul 10, 2014 Missouri
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Man, hit the nail on the head there. Couldn't agree more.
     
    MrDave likes this.
  2. Andrew041180

    Andrew041180 Initiate (0) Mar 15, 2013 Massachusetts

    It's a lot more impressive to be able to say that you have consumed a representative from all 100+ BA style categories than if there were only like 20 categories. Frankly, I've never had a problem with excessive categorization though. I think it suits my personality.
     
  3. Brew33

    Brew33 Initiate (0) Oct 24, 2007 Ohio

    Try Duvel and Tripel Karmeliet and tell me Tripels and BSPAs taste the same.....

    Try Chimay Red next to Chimay Blue and tell me they taste the same.....
     
  4. MrDave

    MrDave Initiate (0) Jan 23, 2013 California

    Also, why I never wanted to work in a record store. "Wait, are you looking for their drone stuff or their postrock stuff? You might want to check under alternative...or ambient...or experimental."
     
    FatBoyGotSwagger likes this.
  5. Ranbot

    Ranbot Pooh-Bah (2,463) Nov 27, 2006 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    There's a lot to this. One of the ways brewers market their beers is classifying it to conform [or not conform] with trends in the market. For example plethora of IPA sub-categories lately (e.g. white, red, black, session, rye, belgian, etc.) could have been included within existing styles, but brewers are trying to link their hop-forward beers to the larger IPA popularity trend in the market. I'm not complaining... brewers can name the beers however they see fit and in many cases it does give the consumer a better idea of what to expect, but we run into problems when try to over-classify beers with create strict rules and expectations. Personally, I view many of the "new" styles more like descriptive adjectives for the beer and avoid worrying about them being separate and distinct classifications. Beer exists on a continuum, much like a rainbow.
     
  6. Das_Reh

    Das_Reh Initiate (0) Mar 25, 2013 Florida

    I've had both, and they are vastly different. TK is the only beer I've ever given a perfect 5/5.

    All I'm saying, is couldn't a BSPA basically be classified as a hopped-up tripel?
     
  7. TongoRad

    TongoRad Grand Pooh-Bah (3,884) Jun 3, 2004 New Jersey
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    A lot of it comes from the need to have more rigidly defined guidelines for competitions, but other than that you can look at things however you like.
     
    surfcaster likes this.
  8. yemenmocha

    yemenmocha Grand Pooh-Bah (4,116) Jun 18, 2002 Arizona
    Pooh-Bah

    Actually, I wish there were more style classifications. There's too few, IMO.
     
  9. busternuggz

    busternuggz Initiate (0) Mar 9, 2008 California

    Belgian style classifications are often labels put on them by non-Belgians, or so I've read. They don't really sweat categories in Belgium. But dubbels will tend to be lighter in alcohol and body than quads.

    I'm pretty sure American strong ales are a catch all category created for beer judging in competitions. There's not a lot of restrictions to it other than "lots of alcohol". Barleywines have a typical range of ABV, color, and bitterness that define them.

    I get your point OP, but the answer is that there are different qualities (even if they are sometimes very small) that differentiate beer styles besides how they taste. The difference might even be as slight as where the beer is made.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.