Did Prohibition Help Big Beer?

Discussion in 'Beer Talk' started by JohnnyChicago, Jun 12, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JohnnyChicago

    JohnnyChicago Initiate (0) Sep 3, 2010 Illinois

    Maybe an out-there idea, but has this crossed anyone's mind before?

    During the Temperance movement, the big breweries actively pushed for prohibition thinking that it would only target liquor, while beer and wine, which were seen as having heath tonic qualities would be left alone. This was a purposeful move by the big guys to put their liquor competitors out of business and take over the tavern market. Unfortunately it backfired when prohibition outlawed beer as well and killed the beer industry.
    ...or did it?

    Prohibition shut down the thousands of breweries across the country and the vacuum left in its appeal allowed for the big guys to muscle in and own the U.S. beer market unopposed for half a century...until the rise of craft beer.

    Would it be ridiculous to suggest that perhaps the largest breweries pushed for total prohibition on purpose? After all, this allowed them to steamroll their competitors more effectively than may have been possible otherwise. The biggest guys just went into hibernation, lived off their savings, produced other products, near beer, or 'medicinal' beer and lied in wait while the federal government wiped out their competition.

    Alright, tin foil hat removed.
     
  2. bluehende

    bluehende Initiate (0) Dec 10, 2010 Delaware

    I am sure it had to help as the small guys had found other things to do and never restarted. I cannot imagine any company thinking that strategically that they would hurt their business for that long with no promise of a windfall later. I think modern transportation and distribution systems hurt them much more in the long run.
     
  3. keenan41

    keenan41 Initiate (0) Jun 20, 2005 New York
    Trader

    I don't think they planned it that way, but it definitely helped them. The larger, established breweries were able to stay open by making other products like soda, .5% beer and other crap while moving stuff out the back. The smaller spots had no other options and folded. I think at the time of Prohibition, breweries were at the same number nationally as they are now. Crazy to think about.
     
  4. Norica

    Norica Zealot (660) Feb 2, 2006 Massachusetts
    Trader

    When prohibition hit the big breweries of today didn't have anything close to the market share that they now have. There were also numerous big breweries as compared to the 3 or 4 today that make up the majority of the market. Follow JessKidden for some awesome history/statistics on this matter.
     
  5. maltmaster420

    maltmaster420 Initiate (0) Aug 17, 2005 Oregon

    Nope. Not at all. According to this site, there were 756 breweries up and running again by 1934. It was a steady string of buyouts, closures, and consolidation after that which brought us to the "big 3" we have now.

    Year - Breweries:
    1934 - 756 breweries in operation
    1950 - 407 breweries in operation
    1949-1958 - 185 breweries close down or sell out
    1961 - 230 breweries in operation. Only 140 are independently run.
    1983 - 51 brewing concerns are operating a total of 80 breweries. This is the low water mark for breweries in the 20th century. The top six breweries (Anheuser-Busch, Miller, Heileman, Stroh, Coors, and Pabst) control 92% of U. S. beer production.

    http://www.beerhistory.com/library/holdings/chronology.shtml
     
  6. Strangestbrewer

    Strangestbrewer Crusader (477) Oct 17, 2014 Oregon

    It wasn't some conspiracy but it definitely helped in the formation of the big three. Though combining to become mega corporations was also the style of the time.
     
  7. JohnnyChicago

    JohnnyChicago Initiate (0) Sep 3, 2010 Illinois

    It would have been a hell of a gamble, but the payout was huge! Maybe the top 5-10 powers got together, drafted a 10 year plan, then used the political muscle to force the appeal. Crazier things have happened in business and politics.

    Actually, I believe the brewer's guilds actively were. At least at first. A huge percentage of taxes were coming from beer and the brewers thought they were untouchable, so they pushed for Prohibition, hoping it would wipe out distillers. Then in 1913, the 16th Amendment was passed and the collection of income tax reduced the governments reliance on the beer industry.
     
  8. The_FishermanJay

    The_FishermanJay Pundit (936) May 16, 2010 Florida
    Trader

    I would suggest that the interstate highway system was another significant issue since interstates effectively put "local" and/or "regional" out of business, pretty much regardless of the industry. "Hey, I recognize those Golden Arches/Bob's Big Boy from back home!" "Hey, I know this AB product from back home!" (And yeah: Most people think that way. The phenomenon -- along with a cost-friendly price point -- is why nearly every Cracker Barrel restaurant parking lot is usually jam-packed.) I think some of the dates @maltmaster420 mentions track the development of the interstate system.
     
    BBThunderbolt and JohnnyChicago like this.
  9. jesskidden

    jesskidden Grand Pooh-Bah (3,145) Aug 10, 2005 New Jersey
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Sure, the number of breweries decreased, but the average barrelage of the existing breweries increased (from 2.3k to 47k bbl/yr in 1914) as did total beer production - black doted line in the graph below - which grew faster than the population.
    [​IMG]

    The number of US breweries really says very little about the overall industry, whether it was in the 1870s when the total briefly topped the 4 thousand mark but the average barrelage was 2,300 bbl., or today when the figure is again approaching 4,000 but two brewing companies alone account for nearly 90% of the total US production.

    The same pre-Pro "Big 3" national brewers - AB, Schlitz and Pabst - held that position initially in the first decade after Repeal. By the late 30s, they had about 9% of the US market. Of the Top 10 US breweries during the '30s, only AB still exists as an actual brewing company.

    Pabst as an independent company ended in the '80s when they were bought and eventually combined with the other S&P breweries (Falstaff, General, Pearl) and stopped brewing all together in 2002 when they closed the last of the breweries in San Antonio (ex-Pearl) and Allentown, PA (a brewery they ran only briefly after buying it during the Stroh fire sale of 1999).
     
    #9 jesskidden, Jun 12, 2015
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2015
    BBThunderbolt, OldManMetal and Norica like this.
  10. TurkeyFeathers

    TurkeyFeathers Initiate (0) Jun 22, 2014 New York

    Labatts Prohibition series definately didn't help things in the craft beer market. Blech :rolling_eyes:
     
    PorterPro125 likes this.
  11. yemenmocha

    yemenmocha Grand Pooh-Bah (4,116) Jun 18, 2002 Arizona
    Pooh-Bah

    It wasn't a conspiracy but I think it undoubtedly helped them.

    They also managed to hook people who don't like the taste of beer by giving them Adjunct Lagers, and even worse... Light beers. All of those are basically reduced flavor beers and it isn't surprising that the general public likes these just as it isn't surprising that the general public likes near-flavorless cheese like Velveeta or American. Or Wonder Bread. Or... on and on.
     
    BBThunderbolt likes this.
  12. Scott17Taylor

    Scott17Taylor Initiate (0) Oct 28, 2013 Iowa
    Trader

    I think mass advertising help the big guys much more than prohibition. Prohibition definitely helped the big guys, but they didn't truly dominate the market like they do today for quite a while after prohibitin ended.
     
  13. bergbrew

    bergbrew Initiate (0) Jan 12, 2004 Minnesota

    That happened way before prohibition. And they didn't "hook" anyone. They made what people wanted.
     
    marquis, drtth and TongoRad like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.