Micro or Macro?

Discussion in 'Beer Talk' started by ChristopherWilliams, Nov 4, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ChristopherWilliams

    ChristopherWilliams Initiate (0) Nov 4, 2015

    Micro or Macro? Do you feel strongly against one or the other? Can you enjoy both equally or do you believe you have to choose?

    Personally, I enjoy both since some micro stuff cannot be found all year, so macro does a good enough job of holding me over.

    Let's hear what everyone has to say.

    Cheers to all beer drinkers!
     
    Shroud0fdoom likes this.
  2. ericwo

    ericwo Zealot (624) Aug 21, 2008 Pennsylvania
    Trader

    While I am firmly in the micro (craft) camp, I do believe that every beer has its place, even macros.
     
  3. tillmac62

    tillmac62 Pooh-Bah (2,859) Oct 2, 2013 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    Good beer is good beer.
     
  4. Domingo

    Domingo Grand Pooh-Bah (4,252) Apr 23, 2005 Colorado
    Pooh-Bah

    Totally depends. There are great small breweries that I support, but there are plenty of small breweries cranking out substandard beer, too.
    While I think light lagers are generally garbage, there are plenty of solid breweries that have massive corporate ownership. Of the 6 breweries in Munich, 4 of them are owned by multinational conglomerates. There are Belgian breweries with similar situations. In my own back yard, we have AC Golden and Blue Moon.
    Big doesn't necessarily mean bad and small doesn't necessarily mean good.
     
  5. Shroud0fdoom

    Shroud0fdoom Initiate (0) Oct 31, 2013 Maryland

    I drink both, no shits given.
     
  6. ravenwork

    ravenwork Initiate (0) Mar 16, 2015 Pennsylvania

    I do prefer craft (micro) beer, without a doubt, more flavor, more variety. However, I can admit to enjoying some of the big beers (macro) out there. That being said, I am very much against what appears to be happening in the USA. Soon we will have just one corporation producing and marketing the vast majority of beer in our Nation. This seems very UN-American to me, and since it is a foreign corporation that is doubly so. I am hoping this means continued opportunity for the growth of craft brewing.
     
  7. NCMonte

    NCMonte Initiate (0) Jan 28, 2014 North Carolina

    Tomato, toemato.
     
    wesbray likes this.
  8. WertMaker

    WertMaker Initiate (0) Jan 17, 2009 Oregon

    Agreed... I just hope it isn't the government running it. It will be bankrupt in a year with no availability and QC will be just a catch phrase.
     
  9. drtth

    drtth Initiate (0) Nov 25, 2007 Pennsylvania
    In Memoriam

    There's a lot of food for thought in this earlier thread:

    http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/no-love-for-american-adjunct-lagers.313784/
     
  10. jlsims04

    jlsims04 Initiate (0) Jul 14, 2013 Illinois

    Ill drink both. Obviously prefer craft but all have time and place.
     
    CvilleHopOnTours likes this.
  11. Hop-Droppen-Roll

    Hop-Droppen-Roll Initiate (0) Nov 5, 2013 Minnesota

    When stakeholders finally 86 Brito, I'll feel better about all this.
     
  12. DaverCS

    DaverCS Savant (1,212) Dec 9, 2014 Arizona

    As others have stated, good beer should be the only category we care about. There are TONS of micro breweries that put out crappy beer. With Macro beers, the consistency is there. It may not be as good as the majority of the micro craft beers, but it definitely has it's place.
     
    CvilleHopOnTours likes this.
  13. mnredsoxfan69

    mnredsoxfan69 Initiate (0) Dec 27, 2013 Minnesota

    Micro is no longer used as a term for craft beers since a lot of the bigger craft brewers would no longer be classified as "micro-" meaning 50,000 BBL per year, maximum output. Sierra Nevada, Sam Adams, Summit and Schell's all brew in the hundreds of thousands of barrels per year; although, they do have one of the qualifier's in that they all begin with "S".
     
    Hop-Droppen-Roll likes this.
  14. Lucular

    Lucular Grand Pooh-Bah (4,367) Jun 20, 2014 Maryland
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Macros are beer? :wink:
     
  15. twb0392

    twb0392 Initiate (0) Aug 1, 2014 Wisconsin

    Micro, for sure; but too many mico drinkers are dickholes.
     
  16. CvilleHopOnTours

    CvilleHopOnTours Initiate (0) Nov 4, 2015 Virginia

    Micro means you're contributing to a small business desperately trying to earn a profit so that they can continue to drink beer while doing a job they love. I associate micro with the band that plays in local restaurants. They say want to make it big, but really, they love playing in front of people and want to earn enough to survive.
    Music is music, and beer is beer. But if you want to support local, drink local.

    As long as its not a light beer. AKA water with a slight beer flavoring.
     
    Inspired likes this.
  17. KingEdward

    KingEdward Initiate (0) Jan 6, 2010 North Carolina

    Most of the macrobreweries would prefer the microbreweries fail and disappear...inbev for example so (lots of ugly words)....
     
    CvilleHopOnTours likes this.
  18. Foyle

    Foyle Maven (1,481) Sep 29, 2007 North Carolina

    I drink must anything and enjoy it, with these caveats: I almost never have a light beer (and only if free), and I avoid flavored/gimic beers (whether macro or micro) -- I will buy a maximum of one to say that I tried it, but I have yet to try one that I would buy a second time. I buy and drink more macro than micro both because I enjoy them and because my beer budget would not support a sufficient quantity of beer if I bought only micro.
     
  19. Urk1127

    Urk1127 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,790) Jul 2, 2014 New Jersey
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I drink both because i cant keep consecutively drinking IPAs during football season, it wrecks my tastes and i get completely wasted, fast. So i still drink Rolling Rock, MGD, Ballantine, PBR and Coors Banquet.
     
    Foyle likes this.
  20. jesskidden

    jesskidden Grand Pooh-Bah (3,145) Aug 10, 2005 New Jersey
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    The Brewers Association defines "microbrewery" as "A brewery that produces less than 15,000 barrels..." and it's been that way for, at least, a couple of decades (the exact same wording is used in the 1996-1997 North American Brewers Resource Directory from the Institute for Brewing Studies (one of the two forerunners of the current Brewers Association).

    In the '80s, the "limit" was usually around 10,000 bbl. (essentially, "smaller than Anchor" the then long time smallest brewery in the US) and then bumped up to 12k bbl. for a short time (IIRC).
     
    Urk1127 likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.