(I)PAs - Overrated, or Mislabeled?

Discussion in 'Beer Talk' started by Hop-Droppen-Roll, Nov 17, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hop-Droppen-Roll

    Hop-Droppen-Roll Initiate (0) Nov 5, 2013 Minnesota

    I recently finished up a handful of bottle of Pseudo Sue that a friend gifted me. My understanding is that this beer is on par with Zombie Dust, and both are basically considered IPAs that are labeled as American Pale Ales - so I started thinking, are people rating 'to style'? If so, are these beers mislabeled? If not, should their scores be so high? For example, if I was to review Pseudo Sue as an American Pale Ale, I almost feel that I'd be obligated to knock some points for it being a poor representation of the style, killer brew though it may be. The professional reviewer might think, gosh, as enjoyable as this beer is, it's too hoppy/bitter/what-have-you for a pale ale - that's something that should be present in an IPA, which this beer is (supposedly) not.

    This is just one of the reasons I really don't bother reviewing anymore. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.
     
  2. jmdrpi

    jmdrpi Grand High Pooh-Bah (8,989) Dec 11, 2008 Pennsylvania
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    I haven't had either beer.

    But my thought is that isn't an upper limit on hop aroma or flavor in a pale ale. But too much hop bitterness, then it's mis-labeled and should be labeled as an IPA.
     
    Givemebeer likes this.
  3. BradenMK

    BradenMK Pundit (897) Sep 24, 2012 Alaska

    I... disagree. There's certainly a difference in the taste and the mouthfeel of those beers than probably every beer I've had that has been listed here as an IPA. You could add Daisy Cutter to your list. They stretch the definition, sure, but still, there is enough about them that is different, mostly in the malt bill, that separates them, for me, from IPAs "proper."

    For me, you could put the exact same hops, in the same amounts, at the same times, into, say, a 5.2% abv "Pale Ale," as you do a 7% abv "IPA," with a somewhat expanded malt bill, and the hops can shine more in the latter (if handled right). But to other persons' palates, well, I'm sure they are looking for different qualities out of the hops than I am, ones that maybe aren't accentuated by the extra sugars and/or proteins from additional malt(s).

    Certainly, however, beers such as the recent Boulevard/Cigar City collab Tropical Pale Ale and Lagunitas' Born Yesterday, whose malt bills probably stand toe to toe with any beer labelled as an "IPA," do feel, to me, like they should probably just be considered, and marketed as, IPAs. My two cents.
     
    Hop-Droppen-Roll likes this.
  4. vabeerguy

    vabeerguy Grand Pooh-Bah (5,245) Sep 21, 2015 Virginia
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    I am nowhere near an expert on this beer style (or any beer style for that matter) but I tend to think the same-- that extent of bitterness separates an APA from an IPA. But somehow I would like to believe there is more to it.
     
  5. jmdrpi

    jmdrpi Grand High Pooh-Bah (8,989) Dec 11, 2008 Pennsylvania
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    Well, usually ABV % as well.
     
  6. Hop-Droppen-Roll

    Hop-Droppen-Roll Initiate (0) Nov 5, 2013 Minnesota

    So then my question is, if these beers are labeled and marketed as Pale Ales, should this failure to stick within style guidelines be figured into their scoring?
     
  7. zid

    zid Grand Pooh-Bah (3,132) Feb 15, 2010 New York
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Keep in mind that IPAs are pale ales. Unless the brewer states otherwise (I do not know the specifics of the beers you are referencing and can't comment in that regard), it's unfair to assume what kind of pale ale they were aiming for (if any).
     
  8. maximum12

    maximum12 Grand Pooh-Bah (4,686) Jan 21, 2008 Minnesota
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    No.

    Modern beer has twisted "categories" and "style guidelines" into pretzels. A lot of the stuff coming out now blurs, if not tramples, the lines between traditional styles.

    And I think that's awesome. If you want to get all BJCP on reviews, feel free, it doesn't matter to me. But I'll drink what I enjoy & score it accordingly, regardless of stiff & outdated notions of "style".
     
    JohnnyMc, GetMeAnIPA, ericwo and 6 others like this.
  9. raynmoon

    raynmoon Initiate (0) Aug 13, 2011 Colorado

    It's because have an idea of what a style tastes like/ should taste like and brewers are making extremely hoppy versions of them (which are not representative of the style) and people are impressed.

    "wow this is so good for a pale ale." Well then maybe it is not a true pale ale.
     
    PatrickCT and Hop-Droppen-Roll like this.
  10. Hop-Droppen-Roll

    Hop-Droppen-Roll Initiate (0) Nov 5, 2013 Minnesota

    Interesting point. I do believe that Pseudo Sue is labeled simply 'Pale Ale' and not 'American Pale Ale'.


    Cool, I like this perspective. I should point out that I don't agree or disagree, I'm just curious, which is why I started this thread.

    I would say on a personal note that I didn't feel Pseudo Sue fit neat-and-tidy into either category, it was just a very hoppy beer that was decidedly Pale, so maybe I'm answering my own question...
     
  11. Hop-Droppen-Roll

    Hop-Droppen-Roll Initiate (0) Nov 5, 2013 Minnesota

    This is the other side of the coin I was looking for.
     
    PatrickCT likes this.
  12. PatrickCT

    PatrickCT Grand Pooh-Bah (3,776) Feb 18, 2015 Connecticut

    I would have to imagine that the Pale Ale/IPA line is simply a marketing issue with brewers now. As @zid pointed out, they are one and the same. II think another beer style should be looked at besides pale ales and IPAs to show that people are, in fact, not rating to style. La Fin Du Monde is one of the best tripels and one of the best beers in the world. Yet it is a 4.3?
     
  13. MikeySea

    MikeySea Pooh-Bah (2,165) Sep 17, 2015 Arizona
    Pooh-Bah

    Zombie Dust and Pseudo Sue, those are a couple of great pale ales. Wink, wink.
     
  14. BradenMK

    BradenMK Pundit (897) Sep 24, 2012 Alaska

    Well...

    Pale Ale is an extremely broad category. American Pale Ale is just one subcategory within that style guideline and it, itself, is very broad.

    Not... exactly. An IPA is, technically, a Pale Ale. It's an India Pale Ale. But a Pale Ale is not necessarily, nor should it be, an IPA. It's like squares and rectangles, or any other question of categorical separation going from less to more specific. B might be an A, but A might not be a B.

    Personally, beers such as Boulevard/Cigar City Tropical Pale Ale are very stylistically different from Sierra Nevada Pale Ale, or, yes, even Zombie Dust. While Zombie Dust may be very hoppy, even very bitter, it still feels a lot more like SNPA than it does something like Uinta IPA or even Lagunitas Born Yesterday.

    I don't mean to speak for the rest of the beer reviewing community, but when I review beers like Tropical Pale Ale or Born Yesterday, I review them as IPAs rather than APAs, regardless of what the text on the bottle says, because of the stylistic similarities that must exist during the brewing process to create such a beer. Those similarities aren't as simple as adding more and different hops at different stages of the boil (or after boil) that seem, to me, to separate beers like SNPA, Stone Go To, and 3F Zombie Dust. Those similarities, to me, feel like they are enough to constitute a whole new style definition.

    But, to others, they may not.
     
    #14 BradenMK, Nov 17, 2015
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2015
    THANAT0PSIS and Roguer like this.
  15. peteboiler

    peteboiler Zealot (690) Dec 16, 2010 Florida

    I have always been curious myself. When I want a good Pale Ale, I may go for the Sierra Nevada. When I want a good IPA, I go to Stone IPA. I have had the zombie dust and the born yesterday, and although 'labeled' as pale ale's, my palate tells me they are IPA's. Again, I don't care what they are called, but it is a curious question.
     
    DaverCS likes this.
  16. DaverCS

    DaverCS Savant (1,212) Dec 9, 2014 Arizona

    So then what's the difference between a session IPA and a pale ale? :confused:

    Terms are stupid. If it taste good, I drink it!:wink:
     
    Bearshawks85, Ranbot and MikeySea like this.
  17. MikeySea

    MikeySea Pooh-Bah (2,165) Sep 17, 2015 Arizona
    Pooh-Bah

     
    DaverCS likes this.
  18. PatrickCT

    PatrickCT Grand Pooh-Bah (3,776) Feb 18, 2015 Connecticut

    Fair enough. And, admittedly, I don't know enough about the specifics that separate the "A might not be a B" part. I suppose my statement was referring specifically to American brewed pale ales and IPAs and my own confusion with the muddying of the two styles. Dale's Pale Ale as an example.
     
  19. bleakies

    bleakies Maven (1,355) Apr 11, 2011 Massachusetts

    Flux, babe. Flux.

    How closely does your current favorite IPA resemble your favorite IPA of ten years ago?
     
  20. BradenMK

    BradenMK Pundit (897) Sep 24, 2012 Alaska

    None my friend, none. Marketing buzz words, nothing more. A session IPA is a hoppy pale ale that sounds cooler than "hoppy pale ale," as determined by marketing, sociological/psychological/economical "experts" in the field.
     
    DaverCS likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.