Saisons: A Need for a New Distinction?

Discussion in 'Beer Talk' started by JackRWatkins, May 25, 2017.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JackRWatkins

    JackRWatkins Maven (1,472) Nov 3, 2014 Georgia
    Trader

    Let me start off by saying, I am a huge fan of the saison style, it is easily one of my favorite beer styles. And one of the great strengths of the saison style is it's malleability as a style. However, I personally find the waters to be a bit muddy these days, and before you tell me that I'm an idiot, or that I'm wrong, let me explain to you why: In this, the season of renewed interest in the sour beer, a style like the saison (one that undoubtedly has some quite funky roots) has countless iterations in the market that feel more like wild ales than they do saisons. At this point I feel it necessary to pause for a minute to address an issue that many of you reading this have just summoned up in your minds in order to dismiss the point I'm moving towards, yes I know that the historic saison was not much of a style at all, the history, blah, blah, blah, but the times have changed, and while there are certainly (as mentioned before) many distinct iterations of the style out there to this day, saison means a certain (and slightly more specific) thing to a large portion of the craft consuming population. With this being said, might it be time to create a specific stylistic distinction between the brett leaning saisons (fantome beers, saison brett, crooked stave saisons, etc.) and those that are more traditional (in the contemporary sense) (hennepin, foret, tank 7, dupont, blackberry farm, etc.)? I say this as a consumer, seeking to be able to tell, by the bottle what I am purchasing beforehand, granted, I always look these things up generally anyway, but would it not be useful to know there was funk simply by the style listed on the label? Many of the saison/farmhouse ales do mention this in some form but there is hardly a standard. Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting any mandatory thing, just a way of further clarifying the nomenclature we use. Thoughts?
     
  2. THANAT0PSIS

    THANAT0PSIS Pooh-Bah (2,275) Aug 3, 2010 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

    I'm all for more styles. The more descriptive the better. That's a minority opinion on here, though, especially given how well-received the "Which styles should be retired?" thread is currently. I just think more information and description helps me hone in on what I should be paying attention to.

    As an addendum, I don't think certain things being passed of as saisons these days are actually that. If they stray from simply tart into full-blown sour, that's no longer a saison to my palate. BJCP guidelines allow for "moderate" sourness. Saisons from De Garde (who I admire), some Crooked Stave, and Jolly Pumpkin are much more wild ale than saison for my money.
     
  3. JackRWatkins

    JackRWatkins Maven (1,472) Nov 3, 2014 Georgia
    Trader

    I agree with said addendum, the crooked stave level of sourness to me is much more than moderate sourness, on the point of removing certain, styles, I'm not necessarily against that so long as they are removed for the purpose of clarification or removing redundancy (ex. american imperial stouts vs. russian imperial stouts)
     
    THANAT0PSIS likes this.
  4. Urk1127

    Urk1127 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,790) Jul 2, 2014 New Jersey
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Sorry but too long. Didn't read all of it but just off the title, I'm unsure if it'll happen. I feel it should be up to three Belgians and French to do i .
     
    Brolo75 likes this.
  5. JackRWatkins

    JackRWatkins Maven (1,472) Nov 3, 2014 Georgia
    Trader

    Like I said before, not about some kind of mandate, just a general effort at labeling clarification, and how we choose to classify things on BA and in writing
     
  6. Urk1127

    Urk1127 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,790) Jul 2, 2014 New Jersey
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Understandable. Knowing that saison is such a broad terms and not really style specific. I get it
     
  7. drtth

    drtth Initiate (0) Nov 25, 2007 Pennsylvania
    In Memoriam

    Couple of things. Creating a new style or official distinction has other ramifications,

    If someone brews a Belgian Pale Ale with Brett or an IPA with Brett or a Stout with Brett, do you then create three more new styles or distinctions? If not why not? Brett counted for the Saisons.

    If a base Saison without Brett is blended with 10% of a barrel aged version that has got some Brett in it from the barrel and the Brett can not be tasted until 6 mos to a year after the blend's best by date, does it start out as one style and become another? If not, why not? Similarly, what % is required for the different style or distinctions?

    If age counts for a Saison, then should there be a different style or distinction for each year a non Brett Imperial Stout rests in my cellar before I drink it? If not why not?
     
    #7 drtth, May 25, 2017
    Last edited: May 25, 2017
    SFACRKnight and utopiajane like this.
  8. JackRWatkins

    JackRWatkins Maven (1,472) Nov 3, 2014 Georgia
    Trader

    In regards to why not on a brett anything, I would say because the prevalence of brett and likewise organisms in saison far dwarfs its use in anything else save for wild ale and sour beer styles, it would be generally safe to say that few people have ever picked up a sour stout by accident assuming it was simply a stout, however, because of the interchangeable use of saison and the term farmhouse ale, one could easily make this mistake with countless saison/farmhouse ales on the market.

    In regards to the blending question, the same thing could be said for most anything that has turned or succumbed to age as the ingredients dictate, so what the style really says is what the brewer generally intends you get out of it, and since very few beers on the market are intended to not be opened when they hit the shelves

    (meaning that whether or not a beer can age is generally immaterial to the brewers general intent that you drink it when you buy it, if they intended you to wait, they would just hold onto it longer, no? there are very few beers that suggest you not drink them immediately after purchase, they may say you can age it, but few say you have to)

    As far as the finer minutia of where to draw the line, it's certainly a good question and one I don't have the ultimate answer for, but I'd love to hear suggestions, (it's kinda why I wrote this post in the first place)
     
  9. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I would suggest what I think is a simpler solution: no need for a new style definition per se but simply list the presence of Brett on the beer label.

    There are already enough beer styles defined (e.g., Brewers Association style guidelines).

    Cheers!
     
    bbtkd, hopsputin, utopiajane and 3 others like this.
  10. cavedave

    cavedave Grand Pooh-Bah (4,157) Mar 12, 2009 New York
    In Memoriam Pooh-Bah Trader

    I can't help but think every time I see a thread for a new style, and the responses to it, that it is really indicative of the need for far, far fewer styles. Predictably this will end with folks cross arguing points and claiming this is actually that style and that is actually this style. It is to the point where there are so many styles crossing over into so many other styles, the effort to catalog becomes less a consumer guide, more the province of curmudgeons arguing picayune points that the same things are in fact different.
     
    bbtkd, Ranbot and utopiajane like this.
  11. JackRWatkins

    JackRWatkins Maven (1,472) Nov 3, 2014 Georgia
    Trader

    I'm not against removing styles, I think that the idea is to clarify the information presented to consumers, which could be done by removing some styles, and adding others when necessary, for example, the session IPA could easily be removed, but I would argue there is often an intense difference between the more heavily bretted/wild strains of saison and the others, so much so that, someone who did not get what they expected would be inevitably either disappointed or confused as one tastes very little like the other on a basic level
     
    Harrison8 likes this.
  12. Harrison8

    Harrison8 Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,285) Dec 6, 2015 Missouri
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I agree with you 100%. That's not to say I want to create nice little style compartments that every single beer fits neatly into though. As a member of a site dedicated to reviewing and rating beer - having a set of criteria to compare with helps work out some bias and inconsistency between users.

    Same reason any parent or student should request a rubric from a teacher for any assignment that deviates from a solitary answer. Imagine if teachers just graded papers based on how they felt. So a particular sentence structure could turn off one teacher, but intrigue another. Repeated use of vague descriptors could result in a bad grade from one and not effect the grade for another. Misspellings could influence a grade in a negative or positive way. Even the teacher's bias or relationship with the student could impact the rating. By providing a rubric or beer style with descriptors, there is a set of criteria with which the teacher or reviewer can follow and provide some accountability for how they arrive at their numbers.
     
    THANAT0PSIS and JackRWatkins like this.
  13. Squire

    Squire Grand Pooh-Bah (4,385) Jul 16, 2015 Mississippi
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Just disclose on the label what's in it, malt type(s), hop(s), yeast, what you tried to make and I don't care what you call it.
     
    Gemini6, Cthulhusquid, jkblr and 2 others like this.
  14. utopiajane

    utopiajane Grand Pooh-Bah (3,982) Jun 11, 2013 New York
    Pooh-Bah


    I'll ask only one question then agree with you partly. If brett develops naturally as part of the original base style then why distinguish it's presence by naming another style? Brett does influence and impact beer. In the wrong style it is out of place. In the saison it can be wonderful but not necessary.
     
    VABA, Squire, drtth and 1 other person like this.
  15. MostlyNorwegian

    MostlyNorwegian Pooh-Bah (2,236) Feb 5, 2013 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah

    I attempted reading what op was getting to and got lost in a text maze while cross referencing the ideas with the murky attempt at clarifying which bjcp made on their last guideline update.
     
    Gemini6 and utopiajane like this.
  16. JackRWatkins

    JackRWatkins Maven (1,472) Nov 3, 2014 Georgia
    Trader

    So maybe I have (beyond the extent of bretts presence in saisons to begin with) placed a bit too much emphasis on ingredients, that is to say, I don't think this is a game of coming up with a bourbon specific (in regards to material composition) level of stylistic standard that mandates what percent of the yeast in a beer must be brett etc. that being said, though I don't know the measuring standard for this, I do know that there have been some attempts made (though I must confess I have no clue how effective they have been) to establish a way of measuring sourness in a beer. I feel as if, (assuming there is a way to establish the degree of sourness) there might be a quantifiable threshold a beer could cross in which it stops being something of a saison dupont, and starts being more of a crooked stave Surette.
     
    utopiajane likes this.
  17. JackRWatkins

    JackRWatkins Maven (1,472) Nov 3, 2014 Georgia
    Trader

    Interestingly enough, and more to the point, the last bjcp guideline states both that,
    "Bitterness is typically moderate to high, although sourness can be present in place of bitterness" and,
    "The balance is towards the fruity, spicy, hoppy character, with any bitterness or sourness not overwhelming these flavors."
    This would seem to suggest to me that, that from their view, within the confines of the style, the sourness (if present at all) should serve in an ancillary capacity, complementing the other flavors, without becoming the dominating feature.
    So to shortly clarify my initial suggestion, since it seems it was not succinct enough for you, I think it is certainly fair to say that the more sour branch of the saison family is still a part of the tree, but it is far too distinct from other saisons to be labeled the same way, and it would be good if we could establish a benchmark model of clarification/distinction to remedy this, as too often the terms farmhouse ale and saison are used interchangeably, and often, you don't really know for sure what you are going to get without considerable research into a particular beer.
     
  18. SFACRKnight

    SFACRKnight Grand Pooh-Bah (3,348) Jan 20, 2012 Colorado
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    BJCP would classify a beer with microorganisms other than sacc cervisea as a mixed culture fermentation, and would require the base beer to be included in the description. This is the same as svh or fruit beer, and as it already exists there is no need for additional styles.
     
    JackRWatkins and utopiajane like this.
  19. BeerPugz

    BeerPugz Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2016 Wisconsin

    Why not just substyles like subgenres?
     
    VABA likes this.
  20. bbtkd

    bbtkd Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,790) Sep 20, 2015 South Dakota
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    The problem with the current styles is an inconsistent classification system which variously considers color, flavor, brewing method, contents, country/region, ABV (imperials), target market (IPA), etc. Wow, no wonder it is confusing and inconsistent. We don't need more styles, we need some type of consistent classification system.
     
    JackRWatkins likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.