Bourbon County 2018

Discussion in 'Great Lakes' started by Beer_Economicus, Jul 2, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HawksBeerFan

    HawksBeerFan Maven (1,378) Dec 24, 2011 Illinois
    Trader

    The years kind of bleed together for me, but I remember the first two or so years it was brewed (this would have been after the initial KH release if I recall, when it was in the maroon/gold labels) it was very very well done. I've had it every year since then too and while the newer vintages are fine, compared to what it used to be, it's not close.
     
    eppie82 likes this.
  2. eppie82

    eppie82 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,377) Apr 19, 2015 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Good question. Regardless, because of the number of variants (and the kind of variants as well) I expect this year's shit show at LP Binny's to be even worse than last year.
     
    flat_lander and Boldbrew like this.
  3. Boldbrew

    Boldbrew Initiate (0) Jun 26, 2017 Minnesota

    FTFY
     
    Beer_Economicus, eppie82 and Jsimansk like this.
  4. Sabtos

    Sabtos Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,920) Dec 15, 2015 Ohio
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Yep, you are guessing.

    I actually like the newer versions better, 2016 and 2017. ikr
     
    Boldbrew likes this.
  5. HouseofWortship

    HouseofWortship Pooh-Bah (2,735) May 3, 2016 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I get that the former use BCBS barrels were at higher risk for infection to use a third time for the barleywine, but the former stout barrel is what separated BCB Barleywine from a crowd of other top barleywines. Why they can't barrel the barlewyine and then blend in a bit of the BCBS regular in to achieve a similar flavor to the original is beyond me.
     
  6. Sabtos

    Sabtos Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,920) Dec 15, 2015 Ohio
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    I think that's all in your head. I don't think the stout being in there previously added any flavor, I think all it did was actually tamp down the barrel influence that a second use barrel would impart. There I said it.
     
    croush and Boldbrew like this.
  7. HawksBeerFan

    HawksBeerFan Maven (1,378) Dec 24, 2011 Illinois
    Trader

    It really made all the difference.

    Unfortunately, I think with whatever happened to the Reserve BW last year, they are probably done using this approach.
     
  8. HawksBeerFan

    HawksBeerFan Maven (1,378) Dec 24, 2011 Illinois
    Trader

    meh, really dsiagree

    There was a huge difference between the first releases and the most recent ones.
     
  9. flat_lander

    flat_lander Pooh-Bah (2,490) May 11, 2016 Illinois
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    JFresh21 likes this.
  10. Jplachy

    Jplachy Pooh-Bah (1,848) Feb 12, 2012 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah Trader

  11. ktr5010

    ktr5010 Savant (1,028) Dec 12, 2014 Illinois
    Trader

    I know it went out to the vendors who did the collaborations (specifically the hot sauce). Possibly was kegged too?
     
  12. HouseofWortship

    HouseofWortship Pooh-Bah (2,735) May 3, 2016 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Or maybe it was totally indiscernible from the regular barleywine so they weren't going to be able to charge a premium for it selling it side by side without angering customers. If they wanted to release it later (Good for up to 5 years, right? Wink) they could. They would just need to somehow put some distance between it and the current barleywine series by doing something like taking the current barleywine out of the lineup for a year or if they made a ton and it is too late in the year they could add something like coffee to it to make it a much different flavor profile or then release something like a wheatwhine that tastes different enough from a barleywine that when a consumer compares the BCB Wheatwhine to a BCB Barleywine Reserve they exclaim "Wow, that Reserve has so much more flavor!" even though the Reserve tastes exactly like the normal barleywine.

    Or maybe it had flaws and they covered it up with coffee...
     
    Jsimansk, Sinzanasti and Sabtos like this.
  13. Sinzanasti

    Sinzanasti Pundit (794) Apr 3, 2014 Ohio
    Trader

    Yep between this and the fake beer labels it's like neck beards playing checkers while Goose/InBev playing chess.
     
    Jsimansk likes this.
  14. PhilBallins

    PhilBallins Savant (1,173) Nov 29, 2016 Illinois

    But checkers is an easier game, shouldn't we be winning?
     
  15. prior2two

    prior2two Maven (1,490) Oct 18, 2013 Illinois
    Trader

    I’m super pumped about Prop. It’s essentially BA Big John, which is one of the best beers Goose has made.
     
    ryno0384, jlsims04, jaysker95 and 4 others like this.
  16. Sabtos

    Sabtos Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,920) Dec 15, 2015 Ohio
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Never thought about it that way--actually forgot Big John had nibs.
     
    Boldbrew and HouseofWortship like this.
  17. prior2two

    prior2two Maven (1,490) Oct 18, 2013 Illinois
    Trader

    And the base is the same for both BCS and big John - Cook County Stout
     
    Beer_Economicus likes this.
  18. bmr29

    bmr29 Devotee (354) Apr 30, 2017 Illinois
    Trader

    Big John was fantastic. Good call. Never looked at it that way.
     
  19. Beer_Economicus

    Beer_Economicus Pooh-Bah (2,698) Apr 8, 2017 Ohio
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    You've just pumped everyone up and increased trade value. How dare you.
     
  20. mbockstruck30

    mbockstruck30 Pooh-Bah (1,800) Dec 31, 2010 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Big John only had cacao nibs, so it leaned to the bitter side (I loved it as well, btw). I'm expecting Prop to be a bit fudgier with the addition of actual chocolate. I'm actually hoping it ends up being more like Baudoinia, which was like a glass of fudge BCS. It was amazing.
     
    GuyFawkes, JFresh21, ktr5010 and 4 others like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.