Barrel Aged

Talk Discussion in 'BeerAdvocate Talk' started by barnzy78, Dec 31, 2020.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. barnzy78

    barnzy78 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,601) Jun 2, 2008 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah

    I know this one could potentially open up a can of worms regarding other beer styles that are barrel aged, but when you look at the top rated American Imperial Stouts and Russian Imperial Stouts, most are of the barrel aged variety. Just curious to hear thoughts on a separate barrel aged beer style. I’m not saying I would be 100% for it, especially when there are multiple styles that are barrel aged - it would be difficult to compare a barrel aged stout with a barrel aged quad, for example. I just want to hear others’ opinions on this one.
     
  2. cyclonece09

    cyclonece09 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,559) Aug 5, 2008 Wisconsin
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    Initial thoughts, no. Putting it in a barrel doesn't change the style. However, as always, open to being persuaded to change my mind.
     
  3. bluejacket74

    bluejacket74 Grand Pooh-Bah (5,305) Jul 4, 2005 Ohio
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    I agree with @cyclonece09 in that I don't think putting it in a barrel changes the style. When there's breweries who barrel age imperial stouts, porters, red ales and saisons (among other styles), I don't think it would be fair to put all barrel aged brews in just one category. I'd prefer if people would note that it's a barrel aged beer (and what kind of barrel/s were used to age it in) when adding it to BA, or putting it in the notes.
     
  4. barnzy78

    barnzy78 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,601) Jun 2, 2008 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah

    It was something that came to mind, but I agree in the fact that it would probably do more harm than good in the long run.
     
    ChicagoJ, beergoot and bluejacket74 like this.
  5. EmperorBevis

    EmperorBevis Grand High Pooh-Bah (9,338) Sep 25, 2011 England
    Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    You can literally barrel age anything, it may change the listing or the abv but not the style, I mean you could barrel age Malt Liquor but I don’t think we are going to see BA Colt 45 any time soon
     
    ChicagoJ, hopsputin and bluejacket74 like this.
  6. Snowcrash000

    Snowcrash000 Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,041) Oct 4, 2017 Germany
    Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Been done, actually: https://www.beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/1199/276242/

    Also, agreed that barrel-aging does not warrant additional style categories.
     
  7. EmperorBevis

    EmperorBevis Grand High Pooh-Bah (9,338) Sep 25, 2011 England
    Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah Trader

  8. Sabtos

    Sabtos Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,920) Dec 15, 2015 Ohio
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    And it was kind of terrible.

    ...well maybe not that bad.

    That said, I recently realized a vast majority of my highest rated beers consumed this year were all barrel aged beers, whether oak aged sours or whiskey barrel aged stouts. While I personally know them by recognizing their names, they aren't distinguishable or sortable in any other way to separate them from the non-ba beers.

    At this point I'm in no mental state to suggest one way or the other, but I do think it's worth noting. Some people, including a younger version of myself, hate BA variations of many or most beers.
     
    #8 Sabtos, Dec 31, 2020
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2020
    ChicagoJ and EmperorBevis like this.
  9. cyclonece09

    cyclonece09 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,559) Aug 5, 2008 Wisconsin
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    At this point in time, I believe a barrel variation of any given beer should be a different entry. That should allow for different ratings of a straight beer vs barrel aged variant (or different types of barrels). Wouldn't be opposed for a modification to Beer Stats to indicate if barrel aged or not, may help with your sorting issue. However, that probably is a much bigger update to the website that I have no idea how much work it would be.
     
    EmperorBevis likes this.
  10. RyanK252

    RyanK252 Grand Pooh-Bah (4,654) May 18, 2014 California
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    It's an interesting idea for sure, but I think it would cause more problems than solutions. I'll agree that there can be a very different drinking experience between a straight forward imperial stout and on that's seen the inside of a barrel. And it would be kinda fun to be able to quickly see what the best of each category would be. However, at the heart of the issue, the base beer style is the same. I'd treat the barrel as any other adjunct and move on. If we don't have a "Coffee Beer" category, which I am by no means advocating for, distinguishing between barrel aged and non-barrel aged shouldn't be necessary. Once you dive down that worm hole you begin to question if they need to be further broken down by type of barrel (bourbon, rum, wine, oak...).
     
    ChicagoJ, bluejacket74 and barnzy78 like this.
  11. damndirtyape

    damndirtyape Pooh-Bah (2,169) Apr 19, 2009 Ohio
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    I would like to see this as a different style. The quality of the underlying stout may be improved by the barrel aging, or get lost by the barrel aging. In some cases, I've had very different beers before and after the barrel aging process. Defining this style though could be quite tricky given the range of barrels out there.
     
    ChicagoJ and bluejacket74 like this.
  12. cyclonece09

    cyclonece09 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,559) Aug 5, 2008 Wisconsin
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    This can be handled by having two different beer listings, i.e. "X Beer" which is the normal imperial stout beer recipe and "Barrel Aged X Beer" which is the barrel aged imperial stout variant. This will allow you to rate/review the differences of the barrel, while respecting that throwing it in a barrel does not change the fact that both beers are Imperial Stouts.
     
    ChicagoJ and bluejacket74 like this.
  13. bluejacket74

    bluejacket74 Grand Pooh-Bah (5,305) Jul 4, 2005 Ohio
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    But it's just not stouts that are barrel aged. I realize that barrel aging changes a beer, but I'm not a fan of having a single barrel aged category because where do you draw the line at? Do you make separate categories for barrel aged stouts, porters, saisons, wee heavys, etc? With how many beers are barrel aged nowadays, you could have a case to add an extra barrel aged category for almost every style. And then you could have an extra category for bourbon, scotch, cognac, tequila, gin and whatever other barrels too. Where does it end? I'd just prefer if people would put the barrel in either the names of the beer (in cases where it's a variant) or in the notes of the beer (in cases where the beer is a separate brew but barrel aged) so people know it's different.
     
    ChicagoJ, Wasatch and sulldaddy like this.
  14. barnzy78

    barnzy78 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,601) Jun 2, 2008 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah

    This is exactly why I was hesitant to even suggest this in the first place, but I was so interested in hearing other opinions.
     
  15. damndirtyape

    damndirtyape Pooh-Bah (2,169) Apr 19, 2009 Ohio
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    All fair comments about where to draw the line, and, how it may be impossible to do so. I was thinking of solely barrel aged styles for American Imperial Stouts when I posted but yes, given how many beers can be barrel aged maybe it's a futile exercise. I suppose you could indeed fragment it down to barrel aging by barrel type (wine (and all types of wine), bourbon, scotch, gin, rum, brandy, etc.), but then defining said styles would be nearly impossible since it's all over the map. But I still feel that Barrel-Aged American Imperial Stouts ought to be their own category.
     
    EmperorBevis and bluejacket74 like this.
  16. SLeffler27

    SLeffler27 Grand Pooh-Bah (4,906) Feb 24, 2008 New York
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Think of Blithering Idiot vs. Insanity.

    Would it be possible to add a radio button, the the review, for styles that have barrel aged varieties? Then we can avoid the proliferation of styles, and still have the ability to distinguish and sort for barrel aged variants. The style description could include guidance for how to address the concern.

    And by the way, the same concept could be applied to other nuanced styles.
     
    ChicagoJ and bluejacket74 like this.
  17. bubseymour

    bubseymour Grand Pooh-Bah (4,800) Oct 30, 2010 Maryland
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Radio button to note barrel aged, or just edit the title of the beer so it says BA. It may take a lot of admin work by members and moderators but just another idea if we want to see a notation as to whether the beer has been put in a barrel or not without having to read each narrative description (if there is one included).
     
    ChicagoJ likes this.
  18. SLeffler27

    SLeffler27 Grand Pooh-Bah (4,906) Feb 24, 2008 New York
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Good point about the level of difficulty. I see the idea as perhaps just a check box that flags the beer, and allows a data point for searches. We should be considerate of level of difficulty, and still embrace challenges.

    Meanwhile, some instruction about including ( Barrel Aged ) or ( High ABV ) would mitigate the concern. Still, these beers can be expected to have different characteristics which may or may not be obvious to the reviewer. This can be accommodated with a sentence added to the style description.

    On another note, and I may be a contingent of one here, "Imperial" implies more than just high alcohol. I think it can be applied to any outrageous signature characteristic of a specific style. e.g. IBU, or Funk, or Sour, or density (think of the density and slickness of many fruited sours).
     
  19. sulldaddy

    sulldaddy Grand Pooh-Bah (5,716) Apr 6, 2003 Connecticut
    Mod Team BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Jumping in a little late, but I fall in the camp of barrel aging doesnt change the style but does change the beer.
    A barrel aged version of a beer should be in the BA system as a separate beer. The blithering idiot vs insanity is a perfect example.
    but both beers are still barleywines.
    Its a little easier to note as the name of the beer has changed in this example.

    Is there currently an issue with members reviewing a BA version of a beer as the base beer? I dont know the answer.
    I like the concept of a radio button or checkbox to help ensure proper categorization of BA versions.
    But I also wonder if this is a solution without a problem.
    Is there an easy way to check for inappropriately added/reviewed BA versions of a beer?
     
    ChicagoJ and bluejacket74 like this.
  20. Wasatch

    Wasatch Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,050) Jun 8, 2005 Colorado
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I don't mind at all the way they are listed now, under the appropriate style, but definitely should be listed as BBA if noted on the label.

    Cheers!
     
    ChicagoJ, bluejacket74 and Bitterbill like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.