Bad Trader: chardlogic

Discussion in 'Bad Traders' started by Pasearelli, Sep 9, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Pasearelli

    Pasearelli Crusader (476) Mar 1, 2015 California
    Trader

    I started a trade with Chard logic about 2 weeks ago. I was iso of Generational ft Westly in which he responded in still open. He responded fairly quickly and we responded to each other the same night of the post.

    After the first couple of responses he then sends me a message starting still interested..... This was after not responding for 12 hours. He seemed impatient so I informed him that there might be long gaps in communication as I am working alot these days but I was interested. Once again after we communicated that we would like to expand he then again asked are you still interest.... (Just trying to paint the picture) I then replied yes. We did 3 for 3.We sent each other tracking numbers which he lagged on sending the box and then the tracking number by a day each.

    So this is were the trade became a failed experience. Chardlogic sends a message stating that he read my ISO wrong and that he sent me the same bottle I put as a ft. He never apologized but rather says enjoy the bottles as I was really looking forward to trying Generational. Came off as entitled to give a sarcastic response like that to a mistake made on his part.

    I then asked since it was his mistake could he refund shipping.... Am I wrong for asking??? I think this would of been more passive than making him get me a Generational. I wouldn't of followed up with that trade unless my main iso was included in on that. We exchange words and thoughts..... He then leads to tell me that I had bad communication when the message I gave in the beginning was that I couldn't respond right away. Once I gave him more feedback his lack of execution he then leaves feedback on a bad trade when I have him exactly what we agreed on. Shipment was received within 2 days shipping to his hands.... On top of that, 1 bottle he sent wasnt wrapped. The long but thin box had a top and bottom had layer of bubble wrap and that's it. Plenty of room for the bottles to move around and crack each other.

    I didn't see the need for him to mark me as a bad trader so I felt this was fair on my part since this was his mistake.
     
    Rustytacos and rozzom like this.
  2. MattOC

    MattOC Pooh-Bah (2,100) Jan 13, 2013 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    You both sent each other a Westly, but only realized this after boxes were packed and shipped?
     
    FBarber, Pasearelli and carlso_aw like this.
  3. MattOC

    MattOC Pooh-Bah (2,100) Jan 13, 2013 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    While misreading a post can certainly happen, yours was quite straightforward and if I was involved in a trade like this my first message would have gone like, “have you closed this? If not, I have your Generational.”

    Then once agreed, each party lays out the bottles involved in messages so it’s clear and confirmed from both sides. If they don’t see the mix up then, it should have never gotten to packing and shipping.

    The call out on communication from their side seems wild. Your post portrays there were plenty of messages and communication. It seems like they were impatient, but that impatience should have lessened once you explained that you would/might be delayed in responding due to work, but interest in getting a deal done remained. That’s good on you for communicating that.

    Not sure that once the mistake was realized, that it could not have been rectified easily. If boxes were already shipped, just turnaround and send them back once they were received. Sort of a wash on cost from that end. Especially since the main bottle you got back from them was one you already had FT and it seems like no one got what they wanted, except maybe from the bottles you expanded with to make it 3:3. If they could not come up with a Generational or something agreed upon with you that satisfied the trade then everything should have been returned.

    As for the feedback, seems like that was done in haste on both sides. They should have apologized for misreading as well as not sending a bottle they thought they had. More communication and patience could have sorted this out amicably. If either feedback was left in retaliation, then it can be grounds for banning.

    [​IMG]
     
  4. rozzom

    rozzom Pooh-Bah (2,620) Jan 22, 2011 New York
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Maybe post screenshots (redacting any PII/addresses) of the DMs? But seems pretty clear cut based off the OP.
     
  5. Sabtos

    Sabtos Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,920) Dec 15, 2015 Ohio
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Giving bad feedback for a trader who satisfied their end of the deal is definitely bad trader behavior.

    Either returning both shipments at their expense or refunding the amount your original shipment cost would have been in order.

    Your trade should have been rated good, and if they had done the above, then you would have been justified in marking them either good or neutral.

    But at this point, considering their reaction, rating theirs as bad fits the bill, but the feedback they gave you needs to be adjusted. We usually need a mod to push for that.
     
  6. galos11

    galos11 Savant (1,092) Jan 21, 2015 Illinois
    BA4LYFE Society Trader

    This couldn’t be any clearer!
     
    Pasearelli likes this.
  7. MattOC

    MattOC Pooh-Bah (2,100) Jan 13, 2013 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I agree. Even with a misread, which I think is a stretch here, the bottles in the trade should be laid out in messages so everyone is on the same page before anything is packed/shipped.
     
  8. Pasearelli

    Pasearelli Crusader (476) Mar 1, 2015 California
    Trader

    That step was skipped. First time that we didn't lay it out before accepting trades. I assumed because of the urgency and the clear iso title it was enough. Couldn't get my time back and received a bottle that was out on the road for a longer period of time in 90 degree weather, I still didn't come up even.
     
  9. Pasearelli

    Pasearelli Crusader (476) Mar 1, 2015 California
    Trader

    Mines wasn't in retaliation at all. Being delt an headache based on his mistake I believe needs ownership. A simple apology and attempting to make it was all I looking for. Maybe it shouldn't be neutral but I felt not following the system this seemed fitting.
     
    SFACRKnight, TmKeisySC and MattOC like this.
  10. MattOC

    MattOC Pooh-Bah (2,100) Jan 13, 2013 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I wasn’t suggesting yours was. Just pointing out the possible punishment for doing so. You’d be inclined to provide bad or neutral. Them leaving bad on you and the communication being the reason is bs.

    I agree with you. An apology should have been there and a trader should do everything in their power to make it right.
     
    FBarber likes this.
  11. Sabtos

    Sabtos Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,920) Dec 15, 2015 Ohio
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Not sure who the appropriate mod is for this situation, but I think we're ready. @FBarber can we seek some mod input at this point?
     
    galos11 and FBarber like this.
  12. FBarber

    FBarber Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,325) Mar 5, 2016 Illinois
    Mod Team BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    First off, I am going to tag @chardlogic and give him a chance to offer his side of the story. I would like to hear a clear explanation as to why he left bad feedback for @Pasearelli, as it sounds like he fulfilled his side of the trade.

    Also, @Pasearelli, you said you expanded the trade to a 3:3 (from the original ISO:FT). Did either of you at any point list the beers each person was sending?
     
  13. Pasearelli

    Pasearelli Crusader (476) Mar 1, 2015 California
    Trader

    No we didn't. Completely own that one.
     
    FBarber likes this.
  14. FBarber

    FBarber Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,325) Mar 5, 2016 Illinois
    Mod Team BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Gotcha.
     
  15. Peterock27

    Peterock27 Zealot (708) Oct 4, 2016 New York
    Trader

    Wait so you posted ISO generational FT westly...he sent you a westly for your westly and then gave you bad feedback??

    Damn, I would be pissed too if I sent someone a beer only to get the same beer in return...but to then blame someone else for my mistake reading the post is crazy! If anything you should be posting the bad (or neutral) trade feedback.

    GL OP, hope you get things worked out.
     
  16. Pasearelli

    Pasearelli Crusader (476) Mar 1, 2015 California
    Trader

    He gave me the bad feedback first. I gave the bad feedback after because my feedback didn't match the situation and he didn't try to make it right. This whole situation trash..... Situation shouldn't be this messy.
     
  17. flat_lander

    flat_lander Pooh-Bah (2,490) May 11, 2016 Illinois
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    This.

    Also, we were closing in on a year without one of these. Boo.

    Last, red rover, red rover, let @chardlogic come over...

    EDIT: Regardless of what happens in the end here, @chardlogic you're profile pic is great. Is that like a 4 Loko in a lambic basket, in a HF glass?
     
    eppie82, F2brewers, Jinx989 and 4 others like this.
  18. Peterock27

    Peterock27 Zealot (708) Oct 4, 2016 New York
    Trader

    Homer Simpson voice: mmmm, blue hill farmstead!
     
    flat_lander and FBarber like this.
  19. John_M

    John_M Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,849) Oct 25, 2003 Washington
    Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    So would I, but my guess is we might need to wait a bit. He's not the most active BA member.

    There are a number of aspects of the original trade agreement/arrangement that I find somewhat puzzling, but the negative feedback seems unexplainable and completely unjustified. However, after reading thru numerous past BT threads, I've learned to reserve judgement until we hear the full story and/or explanation.
     
  20. monstershu

    monstershu Crusader (450) Jun 10, 2020 Illinois
    Trader

    So, not to toot my own horn or anything, but-

    At the height of the VSOJ craze, I misread a ISO/FT with @Topease. We would have sent each other the same thing. Luckily, I realized this before either of us shipped anything (<24 hrs), but it was enough time for him to mark his post as closed. I felt so bad for him missing prime trading time that I sent him a box of locals and semi-chase BAs valued around $50 and shipping of $18. I thought that was the bare minimum I could do for the inconvenience.

    I think anyone misreading a trade post should at least make right by refunding shipping, and at most send an apology box for messing with “time in market” aka trade opportunity lost.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.