What's the Difference? Share your side-by-side (2023)

Discussion in 'The Bar' started by cjgiant, Jan 21, 2023.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SLeffler27

    SLeffler27 Grand Pooh-Bah (4,906) Feb 24, 2008 New York
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Might the refrigeration have something to do with the lack of development?

    A sincere question, as I had a 2009 and a 2017 side-by-side (maybe 2019ish) and there was a noticeable, albeit modest, difference. Mostly in the heat and earthy dried fruit realms. Neither had been refrigerated.
     
    AlcahueteJ, ChicagoJ and PapaGoose03 like this.
  2. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Although I avidly follow this thread, I don’t keep a spreadsheet or anything where I track who has done what comparison. I think someone, perhaps @beergoot (?), has done this east vs west coast behemoth matchup. I will search later to see if there are notes to compare.
    [​IMG]

    Dates: Pliny the Elder, 12/08/23; Heady Topper, 12/11/23 (impressive on both, but especially the fresher beer from across the US)

    Appearance:
    Unsurprisingly, the Russian River beer is clearer, with maybe the lightest of chill haze on its golden body. The Alchemist brew is like a matte version of the shiny golden color from PtY. Heady’s head is a bit tighter after they both form their rings, making it appear a tad more dingy than Pliny’s white top.

    I feel like voting today, so this goes to the RR beer by a notch.

    Aroma:
    I got a waft of dank notes from Heady as I poured, amplified as I got nearer. Pliny’s aroma was more citrusy, with a muted weed-like note. Power and hemp go to Heady, nuance and citrus to PtY.

    I’m fine with some aggression today, Heady by a notch.

    Flavor:
    Deciding to start with nuance, Pliny gives me a grain cracker-like malt opening that has shed much of its sweet side. With some patience and a couple sips, the citrus and pine bitterness that made this a highly sought beer come forward and rake across my palate firmly but gently.

    Heady actually reverses course and lands softly, with a mix of dull tropical notes, citrus rinds, and a bit of marijuana threaded throughout. The flavor doesn’t evolve too much in each sip, just a bitter ride from start to finish.

    Hmmm… I gotta think on this one, but a tie-breaking nod might go to Pliny today.

    Feel:
    The Alchemist beer is a bit more full, with a softer carbonation - something I think most who have tried this beer have experienced. Russian River’s beer plays just a little lighter with a carbonation bite level that is a bit higher. I think Heady has a little bit drier finish, as well.

    Each sip I pick the one I just sipped, without fail, so this is going to have to be a tie, because they are differently, but equally, enjoyable.

    Overall:
    Pliny started a little weak, but the full team hopped up and came to life before the second quarter and improved throughout the game. Heady came out strong and maintained solid play for three quarters and brought a little tropical flare. This was necessary, as I was starting to lean towards Pliny, mainly because Heady’s game plan was too dry and bitter - a strong D without an offense to reward the other side of the ball.

    The GF deliberated quickly, per usual, and chose Pliny.

    Heady is my highest rated beer. But today, I think I have to agree with her. Maybe it’s the extra 4 days of aging (kidding) or that I didn’t drink Heady from the can, but The Alchemist coach will probably have to watch the film to find out what exactly went wrong today. Losing by a last second extra point on the road isn’t a horrible performance, however.
     
  3. ChicagoJ

    ChicagoJ Grand Pooh-Bah (5,247) Feb 2, 2015 Illinois
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Really loved your exploration and battle royale. Had my first chances at Heady and Focal Banger this year. PtE is one of my all time favorites in the style. I really enjoyed both Alchemist selections. I liked Heady with age more than fresh, liked fresh Focal Banger with the lighter touch fresh, though would chalk this up to my personal preference of a 5-7% PA/IPA over a 8-10% ABV version for most offerings.

    These are great beers, hoping to one day find either in Chicago, though very stoked RR will begin distribution in Vegas, where I visit at least a few weeks each year.

    Cheers!
     
  4. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I recall a few people weighing in on the comparison @DavetotheB did of the two Alchemist beers (including some unnecessary chiding by me), and you seem to be in the small majority of people who like Focal fresh better (relatively) than Heady. After our trip to VT a few years ago, returning with many of both, I found the opposite true for me.

    But each day is a new opportunity to test one’s preconceptions, and given recent events, I might have another day to retest my last post, and one day I’ll retest my thoughts on “aged” Focal vs Heady :wink:

    Cheers!
     
  5. ESHBG

    ESHBG Pooh-Bah (2,099) Jul 30, 2011 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Yuengling Flight vs Michelob Ultra

    Say what you will but I'm a fan of this category of beer and clearly many others are too, as both beers are fairly new in their respective portfolios but quickly rose to top seller/the top seller for the brand.

    Flight
    • Clear bottle, coded but may have been bottled on 06/27/23, as it looks like there's a Julian date in the mix.
    • 4.2%, 95 calories, 2.6g carbs.
    Ultra
    • Slender can, BB 02/05/24, may have been canned on 03/07/23.
    • 4.2%, 95 calories, 2.6g carbs.
    There's some age on these beers but I doubt that it will matter much. I've had both when they first came out, though, and a few times since. Both pour a clear yellow and the head quickly disappears but YF is a bit darker and has better carbonation. On the nose both smell like AALs but YF has more depth to it. Taste-wise, I'm surprised to report that it's not as much of a comparison as I thought that it would be and the YF has more going on and tastes like a decent AAL, just lighter. MU is good and has a nice slightly sweet grainy banana-y thing going on but it's more like beer water/seltzer than what YF is; not being as carbonated is probably what is driving some of this but in turn the experience is a little Ale-like which is kind of neat.

    But food for thought: bottle vs can (I don't mind cans at all but do find bottled beer to lean towards a better experience) and if my deciphering is correct YF is three+ months newer. But that is the one in the clear bottle so maybe not much of an advantage?

    I like them both. The YF is more of a regular Lager beer experience but in turn is getting a little "fuller" as I drink it, even with how light it is stats-wise. The MU stays lighter so if I wanted to drink 2+ I would probably lean more towards this one.
     
  6. Resistance88

    Resistance88 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,462) Apr 9, 2015 California
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Envy
     
    ChicagoJ, PapaGoose03 and Blogjackets like this.
  7. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Ok, time for a blind comparison, including a Blind Pig and an older cousin, Pliny the Elder (just realized I totally mis-abbreviated PtE a few times in my last post… oops!)

    These look pretty similar, though the right beer might have a dash of amber (much less than the photo indicates). Taking up the left beer, it has a citrus and pine focus with a little bit of honey undertone. The right beer is a little more muted and dank. I’d initially think this is Blind Pig, but the nose of Pliny was muted last post, so not so sure.
    [​IMG]

    In the taste, the right beer starts a bit grainy with a spike of grapefruit juice that throws me a bit and lands me on a wet forest floor. The left beer starts with a little sweeter citrus in lock step with the grain. A slow build of pine needle grows out of this. After the first sips, the left beer seems structured a bit better for my palate.

    The right beer gets itself together while I sip its competitor. It now has a pretty similar opening to the left beer, with a bit less sweetness (more earthy pine), and an herbal and piney finish. The left beer holds its course, a nice mix of citrus, grain, and finishing pine with a swath of pithy grapefruit.

    The left beer has a smoother, slightly fuller feel, and that’s what makes me think it’s Pliny. It’s going to be a very interesting couple of pairings if I am wrong.

    The GF said she preferred Pliny (a couple days fresher, FEIW), and when I told her my prediction…
    [​IMG]

    Whew! I was right. Though not sure what I was “worried” about - just a healthy (?) desire to be right.

    Anyhow, I’ll re-state that feel was the main thing that drive my guess and preference. Though the total composition gap closed, Pliny still seemed a more cohesive beer. I actually don’t think my previous tasting of Pliny gave me any direct hints in flavor, but I like to think I’d have noticed the relative disjunction of malt and hops I got in Blind Pig.

    But who knows? We actually have 2 more each of Pliny, Heady, and Blind Pig. Maybe I can convince the family to play my reindeer game of blind tasting and see what they think.
     
    TwentyDimes, AlcahueteJ, Rug and 9 others like this.
  8. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Reindeer games…

    I did a three beer blind with my oldest nephew, his dad, with the GF and I playing along, though I wasn’t doing it blind, and the GF peeked.

    So Heady, Pliny, Blind Pig (this Pliny was 2 days older than the previous). My brother-in-law picked Heady out easily, specifically mentioning how the two Russian River beers were similar; he ended up picking Heady, then Pliny, and finally Blind Pig. His eldest son preferred Blind Pig (I didn’t follow through on extracting a second choice).

    The funny part: GF went Heady, Blind Pig, Pliny - essentially reversing all her previous choices this week. I flipped Heady and Pliny from Tuesday to match my brother-in-law. My excuse? I just wanted the softer feel of Heady tonight - maybe as a switch up from my earlier comparison?
     
  9. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    That is the thing about hedonistic assessments. What we desire most on any given day will be a variable.

    Cheers!
     
  10. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Quiet little holiday at home for us. Figured I'd take the opportunity to do one of the bigger comparisons I've been meaning to do. There' a bit of an age difference here, so I'm sort of expecting fairly close profiles for two DFH World Wide Stouts - the older one aged in Utopias barrels (regular = this year purchase, code starts with 27; Utopias = two or so years ago, code starts with 24).
    [​IMG]

    The newer WWS beer produced a little more head, though neither covered the surface for long. The regular version also ends with a slightly thicker and slightly lighter colored ring.

    First surprise, is that the Utopias WWS actually has a stronger and more enticing nose on first sniff. There is a port-like aroma adding some dark fruit and giving a more acidic (not sour or spoiled) profile than the licorice and slightly charred note of regular WWS.

    The regular WWS has a slightly biting feel, but a fairly classic stout flavor profile. The extra ABV adds a little spice to the roasty malts, leaning into something like a rum and coke. I notice a thread of what I am calling "rum and coke" in the Utopias WWS, as well, but there's a dose of sweet dark fruit that plays a major role. Only the lightest bit of ageing oxidation is noted. Regular WWS is definitely more bitter, with Utopias WWS having a little more silky feel.

    After my first few sips, my mood was leaning towards the Utopias version. As I sipped through about half the glasses for this write up, my mind was starting to sway. I think the bite in the back of the regular WWS is the only things keeping it from overtaking my choice in this sitting, but some more warmth might fix that.

    Cheers, all!
     
  11. DavetotheB

    DavetotheB Grand Pooh-Bah (4,241) Sep 30, 2017 Pennsylvania
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    I really love this thread. I just wish I could participate more. It's a chore sometimes to do a side-by-side haha. Thanks to @cjgiant for the thread.

    [​IMG]

    Sierra Nevada Celebration Side-by-Side!!!

    On the left 2022 dated 10/4/22 vs on the right 2023 dated 9/21/23

    Saw someone do this in the New England forum and my dad had a couple cans from 2022 ( I "appropriated" one) so thought I’d give it a go.

    Appearance: 2022 was a gusher which I think lent to the bigger head. I’ve poured head like that on the 2023 before. Otherwise about the same, 2022 maybe just a touch darker. A bit more yeast particles in 2022.

    Aroma: Forgot to do a crack of the can smell, probably because I was dealing with the gusher haha. In the glass…not getting a ton of aroma from either but I think that’s more my nose than the beers.

    Taste: 2022 is smoother and sweeter, not a lot of hop character left. Malt is ruling the day. 2023 is very piney and resinous. Taste differences are much more noticeable going from 2023 to 2022 than the other way around. On warming, the taste divide really widens-sweet malt in 2022 against piney hops in the 2023.

    Feel: 2022 is smoother as mentioned before. It’s also less sticky with a sweeter aftertaste. 2023 taste like Celebration should taste like. Piney, bitter aftertaste and sticky mouthfeel.

    Overall: They’re different but not as different as I would have thought. I’d pick the 2023 every day of the week but I wouldn’t turn my nose up at the year old.

    May try to get one or two side-by-sides in before the end of the year but looking forward to the 2024 thread. Cheers!
     
    Rug, TwentyDimes, PapaGoose03 and 7 others like this.
  12. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Thanks for your input this year. I hope to get in one or two more, too. I have a couple imperial strength beers that I've been meaning to do for a couple months. End of the year seems an excuse to finally find the time / pull the trigger on them.

    Cheers!
     
    SLeffler27, ChicagoJ and DavetotheB like this.
  13. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Looks like I will not be getting in another comparison this year. I wanted to check in before thread lock to thank all who participated in the thread. Also, I hope everyone enjoyed reading the thoughts of BAs as they found similarities and differences, small and large, of two or more beers they felt like trying alongside each other.

    Have a good end of the year, fellow BAs!
     
  14. DavetotheB

    DavetotheB Grand Pooh-Bah (4,241) Sep 30, 2017 Pennsylvania
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    Thanks for hosting the thread and thanks to all who participated. I had said I would be doing another as well, but I don't think I'll get to it unless we want an AAL side-by-side to end the year. I'll spare yall...Cheers and Happy New Year!
     
  15. NickSMpls

    NickSMpls Grand Pooh-Bah (3,176) Nov 11, 2012 Washington
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Comparing two American Pale Ales. We have Moon Man from New Glarus out of the town of the same name in Wisconsin and Johnny Utah from Georgetown Brewing from Seattle. Being from MN, we are used to NG. After moving to WA in '17, we found a respectable APA from Georgetown.

    Moon Man has a BA rating of 92 with a 4.12 average and 5% ABV. Johnny Utah has a 89 rating, 3.96 avh with 5.6% ABV.

    Not surprisingly, given the BA ratings, you can guess the outcome.

    We found Moon Man had a definite edge in flavor and feel over the still very well done Johnny Utah. The malts used by MM come out ahead, while JU has a bit more hoppiness, which may appeal to some.

    The downside to New Glarus, as many might know, is that the beer is only distributed in Wisconsin.

    [​IMG]
     
    ChicagoJ, Rug, SLeffler27 and 6 others like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.