What’s The Difference? Share Your Side By Side (2025)

Discussion in 'The Bar' started by cjgiant, Jan 11, 2025.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    More Czech lager comparisons are needed in this thread, is apparently what I feel. This one is again a comparison of styles by the same brewery - Ocelot.

    Sort of. The Czech dark lager (Solstice) is made by them, where the Czech "half dark" (polotmavý or amber) lager (Ten Years Gone #1) is made in collaboration with Schilling and Human Robot for Ocelot's 10th anniversary. Separately, I have enjoyed the lower ABV Ten Years Gone #1 more than Solstice, and the latter was canned 3 months earlier than the collaboration.

    You can see the "half dark" lager is less dark; if it is halfway so or not, I will let you decide:
    [​IMG]
    The darker bodied beer also has a darker head, but both foam toppings last well and produce some lacing.

    You might be able to make out the malts on the can, and the details for the collaboration are:
    So both start with the floor-malted Bohemian pils, and the dark seems to go more on the roasted specialty malts where the amber has Barke Munich malt in the mix.

    Dark chocolate is the predominant aroma and opening flavor in Solstice. Digging deeper, there is a little char on the nose and something that comes to me as mint - in the way some rich rye whiskeys can have a mint or even menthol note. To be clear, it's not nearly as powerful as menthol, nor as striking as a rye whiskey, but it gives me that impression. If I were to guess, I think it's the interaction of hops and dark malt (perhaps with a little age) that is bringing this to my brain.

    Ten Years Gone #1 is has and ABV 1.5% lower, and definitely has a more toasted malt aroma, along with a little jammy not that can't help but evoke breakfast toast with a slather of fruit preserves. Taste is also a richer, crusty grain bread versus chocolate or coffee. The preserves didn't quite make it to the palate, and the bitterness is a bit more woody and earthy. The lower ABV does show up in the feel, with a slight bit of a watery vibe noted in the finish (a vibe not really noted up front).

    Comparing them more closely back-to-back, and int he nose there is definitely a "degree of toast" where you cold see Ocelot turning the toaster timer a good number of notches for Solstice before setting it back to a middle number for 10yr #1. There seems to be a more aggressive bittering involved in the older brew, as a mildly spicy hop note is detected in the finish. The fresher, but lower ABV, amber lager's bitterness seems to hit mid palate in a flash, with the malt regaining traction in the finish.

    Overall, I like Ten Years Gone #1 more as a session beer. It is flavorful, let light; not too complex, but not at all boring - especially if you enjoy malt flavors in your beer. Solstice is a little more brash, in comparison, with a bit more complexity. I think I might prefer it as a single beer to drink right now. I really like the malt profile of the amber lager, though, which I believe might be driven by the Munich malt.
     
  2. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Stay tuned for next weekend's NBW thread.

    Cheers!:beers:
     
    ChicagoJ, SLeffler27 and cjgiant like this.
  3. SLeffler27

    SLeffler27 Grand Pooh-Bah (4,906) Feb 24, 2008 New York
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Ooooo!
    I just might tune-in for this.
     
    ChicagoJ and JackHorzempa like this.
  4. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    [​IMG]
     
    ChicagoJ and SLeffler27 like this.
  5. DavetotheB

    DavetotheB Grand Pooh-Bah (4,241) Sep 30, 2017 Pennsylvania
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    Sometimes you just do stuff for science and to contribute to the side-by-side thread. And by "science", I mean, "for the hell of it." I didn’t see a side-by-side-by-side thread, so I’m posting this here.

    [​IMG]

    Natural Light/Natural Ice/Natty Daddy
    The whole Natty Family

    Never had any of these beers that I can remember. But then again when you get around to drinking these beers you’re usually past remembering…

    Stats:
    Natty Light-BB 18AUG25
    Natty Ice-25088 (late march canning?)
    Natty Daddy-25080 (just a bit before Ice?)
    25oz cans for all

    Look
    All poured into identical pint glasses. I’m struggling to find any difference between the Light and Ice. Both translucent pale golden yellow. Daddy is slightly darker. All had about a finger of quickly dissipating white head. Slightly better retention on the Light and Ice. Just a tiny bit of lacing in each.

    Smell
    Not a ton of difference. All have that grainy/corny AAL smell. Maybe some faint wet earth in Ice and alcohol definitely noticeable in Daddy.

    Taste
    Not a ton of difference again. Corny/grainy. I’d just say, the taste gets stronger as I move from left to right. Alcohol is prominent in Daddy. While I find each of these drinkable, they really go south in the taste department as they warm up.

    Feel
    All pretty highly carbonated. Body is thin but increases from left to right. Ice is probably the smoothest drinking of the three.

    Overall
    Daddy is just too boozy for me. I could see myself drinking either of the other two with a slight edge to Ice.
     
    FRANKHAZE, ChicagoJ, cjgiant and 2 others like this.
  6. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Na Zdravi – that’s how they say Cheers in the Czech Republic

    I purchased the Von Trapp Pilsner Pack (12-pack) that has three beers each of their Bohemian Pilsner, Czech Pale Lager, West Coast Pils, and Bavarian Pils. Two weeks ago, I discussed the West Coast Pils.

    [​IMG]

    For this week’s post I will discuss the Bohemian Pilsner (which I have had before) with the new brand: Czech Pale Lager.

    In the Let’s Give Lager Love on April 8th I discussed (prior to me purchasing this pack):

    “The BJCP style guidelines have two ‘versions’ of Bohemian (Czech) Pilsners: Czech Pale Lager and Czech Premium Pale Lager. In the Czech Republic they choose to distinguish via the Original Gravity of the beer as measured by degrees Plato. For example, a Czech Pale Lager would be labeled as 10% and the Czech Premium Pale Lager would be labeled as 12%.

    Below is from the Von Trapp website:

    “Bohemian Style Lager

    5.4% - Our award winning lager featuring Saaz hops and Pilsner malt. Spicy and zesty with notes of honey and hay.

    Czech Pale Lager

    4.5% - Unfiltered and double decocted, this traditional lager is made with 100%

    Czech ingredients including floor-malted barley and Budvar yeast.”

    https://www.vontrappbrewing.com/files/7012/pilsner_pack_sell_sheet_v4.pdf

    It would appear that a distinguishing feature of their Bohemian Style Lager (5.4% ABV) and their Czech Pale Lager (4.5% ABV) is the difference in alcohol level. Sort of like in the Czech Republic 10° vs. 12°.

    Von Trapp also provides ‘extra’ details about the brewing of the Czech Pale Lager (e.g., double decocted, Budvar yeast) which is absent from their description of the Bohemian Style Lager. It would be somewhat expected to notice the difference in alcohol between these two products. Would someone notice the difference (presuming there is one) in the mashing regime? And the difference (presuming there is one) in the yeast strain chosen?”

    In the past I have homebrewed with Weyermann floor malted Bohemian Pilsner Malt a couple of times when homebrewing my annual batch of Bohemian Pilsner. I stopped using that malt since it provided a flavor aspect that I would describe as “earthy” which was not particularly appealing for my palate. I wonder if I will pick this up in the Czech Pale Lager. To quote the wise owl: let’s find out!

    Served in my Polish Pilsner Glasses:

    Appearance:

    Von Trapp Czech Pale Lager: Straw/golden colored with a white head.

    Von Trapp Bohemian Pilsner: Straw/golden color with a white head.

    Aroma:

    Von Trapp Czech Pale Lager: A maltiness that gives an impression of being rich I n nature. There is a subtle hop aroma of spicy/herbal in the background.

    Von Trapp Bohemian Pilsner: The smell of cracker-like malt first hit my nose but then the hop aromas of spicy/herbal/floral are noticeable.


    Taste:

    Von Trapp Czech Pale Lager: The malt flavor follows the nose with an impression of richness but on mid-palate there is an earthiness (not a favorite for me). Subtle hop flavors of herbal/spicy. A medium bitterness.

    Von Trapp Bohemian Pilsner: The flavors follow the nose with a combination of cracker/bready malt flavors and substantial hop flavors of herbal/spicy/floral. In comparison to the Czech Pale Lager the hop flavors come off as being brighter in nature. A medium bitterness.


    Mouthfeel

    Von Trapp Czech Pale Lager: Light – medium body with a dry finish.

    Von Trapp Bohemian Pilsner: Medium body with a dry finish.

    Overall

    Von Trapp Czech Pale Lager: I enjoyed drinking this beer, it is very good. I appreciated the richness of the malt character but not so much the earthiness on mid-palate. The hop aroma/flavor was subtle.

    Von Trapp Bohemian Pilsner: I enjoyed drinking this beer too. The highlight for me with this beer is its brighter hop aroma/flavor. This beer is more balanced between malt & hop flavors for my palate.

    I am very thankful that I have two hands to enjoy both of these beers!

    Cheers!

    @rotsaruch @RobH @KOP_Beer_OUtlet @JacksAbbyBrewing @speakorspasm @ATL6245

    [​IMG]
     
  7. SLeffler27

    SLeffler27 Grand Pooh-Bah (4,906) Feb 24, 2008 New York
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    HA! So, did you conduct (condone or condemn) a direct blending experience?
     
    ChicagoJ likes this.
  8. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I did not blend. Frankly I didn’t even think of it.:grimacing:

    Na Zdravi
     
    ChicagoJ and SLeffler27 like this.
  9. zotzot

    zotzot Grand Pooh-Bah (5,352) Feb 22, 2015 Vermont
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    I did this comparison a few months ago and SOS was decidedly darker and less hazy. - weird
    I think I’ll repeat the comparison and refer to your comments.
     
    ChicagoJ and DavetotheB like this.
  10. zid

    zid Grand Pooh-Bah (3,132) Feb 15, 2010 New York
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    [​IMG]

    Sapporo from Vietnam canned Oct/Nov 2024
    Sapporo from US Stone brewery canned Nov 2024
    Sapporo from US Stone brewery canned Feb 2025

    Blind comparison over two days. I am surprised by how a company this big will allow this much discrepancy with a brand this big.

    The beers out of the former Stone facilities are bolder, hoppier, fruitier, bitterererer to me. This doesn't taste like a handling difference, but rather, a production difference.

    Is it telling that tasting these beers from a former Stone facility (never could have imagined this years ago) provided a more interesting drinking experience than anything I've recently had from a craft brewing company? Damn. :slight_frown:

    @jesskidden @Resistance88 @steveh
     
    #50 zid, May 20, 2025
    Last edited: May 20, 2025
    FRANKHAZE, ChicagoJ, cjgiant and 3 others like this.
  11. Resistance88

    Resistance88 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,462) Apr 9, 2015 California
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    SAPPORO is something i REGULARLY order at stone
    They have a dedicated draft line for it and sometimes for Sapporo Black( also awesome)

    Fucboi hype craft fandom/brand loyalty( consumerism) is so stupid:joy:
     
    ChicagoJ likes this.
  12. jesskidden

    jesskidden Grand Pooh-Bah (3,145) Aug 10, 2005 New Jersey
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Reminds me of this, after Miller started brewing a much different Löwenbräu (w/adjuncts, preservatives, force-carbonated, shortened largering period) for the US market, from a Löwenbräu brewery spokesman in Germany:
    Or this from Guinness promotional brewmaster, Fergal Murray, told the Wash. Post beer writer Greg Kitsock in March2007:
    So, it's not uncommon for a brewery to change the recipe of a beer for the local market. OTOH, one would expect that Sapporo in Vietnam could also brew a "US version", since obviously the cans are labeled for the US market.

    I guess it's nice that the "US market" would be seen by a multinational brewery as desiring a hoppier, more bitter beer. (Molson Coors' promotional people have kinda hinted that they may have tweaked Hamm's to appeal to craft drinkers by boosting hopping rate.)
    I don't know. An 8,000 mile ocean voyage on a container ship from Vietnam to California probably has more of a negative effect on a beer than trucking it from Virginia, or even California, to New York.
    :thinking_face: "Bitterererer", huh? Got an IBU estimate for that? :wink:

    I don't know if this originated in the popular culture somewhere or it was a private local joke, but some Latin American and Eastern European guys I worked with used to tell a story about someone learning English and trying to spell 'Banana':
    "Ba-na-na-na-na-na...."
    "No, no - stop, stop!"
     
    ChicagoJ, moodenba, cjgiant and 2 others like this.
  13. SLeffler27

    SLeffler27 Grand Pooh-Bah (4,906) Feb 24, 2008 New York
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Rode Vogel - Strangebird (NY) vs. Rodenbach Alexander (Belgium)

    [​IMG]

    Apperance:
    They are very similar, “Alex” being darker, with slight haze and red tint in the thin stem. “Rode” is more red in the body. Both have thin heads with fine to medium bubbles, and a surface vail of fog. Rode’s head is lighter in color and becomes a ring almost entirely composed of fine foam. Both leave a patch work of fine lace. (Even match)

    Aroma:
    Here they diverge, with Alex being MUCH more fruity and more sour. Sweet cherry pops. Light red wine, peeks out while warmth brings on mild oak. Rode, on the other hand, has strong cherry vinegar and tartness. It adds green apple and the red wine is mild yet obvious. Oak becomes very strong with warmth. (Alex is superior after the initial sniff)

    Flavor:
    Alex opens with a, “wow! those maraschino cherries pop.” Tartness occelation with sweetness, while faint bitterness is relegated to the background. Red currents and strawberries are noticeable. Oak is mild. Long tart finish of fruit punch. Rode is super tart, with strong acidity. Oak over cherry, green apple competes with the cherry as it warms. Strong acidic finish lingers. (Alex is far-n-away superior)

    Feel:
    Alex has the texture of fine silk, smooth and indulgent, with a medium body. abv as expected for 5.6%. Ample carbonation has a soft impact. Rode is initially soft, then turns sharp as the carbonation explodes on the tongue. abv as expected for 7.2%, slight warmth. Decent mouth pucker. (Alex nudges ahead)

    Overall Impression:
    Alexander is more refined, sophisticated, beer, with underlying subtleties as well as clearly defined qualities. Rode Vogel has a brashness. Either on their own are very enjoyable (for contrasting qualities).
    • I think the Alexander is probably best on its own, yet There are plans to pair it with a soft dulcé Gorgonzola later this week.
    • The Rode Vogel might pair better with a sharp cheddar. We shall see.
     
    #53 SLeffler27, May 24, 2025
    Last edited: May 24, 2025
    FRANKHAZE, ChicagoJ, Reef and 4 others like this.
  14. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Man, I missed the alert about new posts to this thread, and there were a few good ones.

    I had a few Firestone Walker beers burning a hole in our fridge, and if you know anything about refrigeration, burning and holes are generally not good things. I think I was waiting for a good day to find a comparison, and kept putting it off. Not knowing which made the most sense, I took the post of @DavetotheB to heart and did a triple comparison of Sucaba (2023), Whistle Monkee (2022), and their 28th Anniversary (2024). This is almost the same as his, so I'll be curious to compare results :wink:

    [​IMG]

    So the comparison is mainly a cleaning event, bu I am also curious which one I like the most, today. We will likely be visiting the brewery in the near future, and I might need to make a decision on what to purchase, after all :slight_smile:

    For the record, the XXVII is mostly Stickee Monkee and Bravo (imperial brown) with a handful of other barrel aged beers including my favorite, Double DBA.

    The anniversary ale has the thinnest collar - tight, and medium thin, whiles the other two beers have a fuzzy, medium thick collar. These two also have bubbles that are a little more sticky, though there isn't much lacing in any of the beers.

    The XXVIII easily wins the nose - it hits me with a the dark chocolate coconut of a mounds bar more than any beer I've had in a long time. I like coconut, and when it is barrel-derived, it is even more enticing.

    Sucaba has the least potency in smell, but digging in, I get a nice bitterness in it that counters the sweetness of 28th Anniversary and more toffee-like Stickee Monkee derivative.

    Sucaba does have a bitterness - but it is a mix of herbal, pine, and barrel tannin. There's a fizzy edge to it, though it is still a medium-plus thick beer. I feel the age-in-bottle in this one without really being able to pick out why I feel that.

    Whistle Monkee is sweet from the get go. I do get the mix of the quad and rye, with a light grass and spiciness behind the sweeter notes. It has a little rock candy note when all is combined, but the sweetness is pushing a level that I am not looking for this afternoon.

    The nose on XXVII has faded a little as I worked through the first sips of the other beers. First sip gives me the impression of cola, with a root beer / sasparilla sneaking in. This is the least heavy of the three beers, leading to a mouthfeel that is a tad more approachable. I think the PaRyebola (11% of the blend) is coming through, giving a little earthy spice and some grassy bitterness.

    So my initial run through, and I think I like the taste of Sucaba a little bit more than XXVIII, thought XXVIII holds the better nose, easily.

    As I analyze further, some brief notes:
    • I am definitely getting minty vibes I could associated with rye whiskey barrels from both the Whistle Monkee (makes sense) and XXVIII (maybe not so expected)
    • Sucaba continues to show a little age - with a slight cardboard note in the nose
    • I slowly get a more high cacao chocolate in the XXVIII taste, and the coconut eventually peeks out as the beer warms
    Ok, the GF weighed in with a "must make a decision" order of Whistle Monkee, Sucaba, and finally XXVIII. I'm probably going freshest to oldest here (directly opposite of the GF), though directly because of any perception of freshness (in fact, the middle 2023 beer is the only one that gave me and age-related notes).
     
    FRANKHAZE, bbtkd, ChicagoJ and 4 others like this.
  15. DavetotheB

    DavetotheB Grand Pooh-Bah (4,241) Sep 30, 2017 Pennsylvania
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    Whenever you have that "hole burning in your fridge" problem again, I'd be happy to trade your side-by-side-by-side for mine! Great comparison. Cheers!
     
    ChicagoJ, PapaGoose03 and cjgiant like this.
  16. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Ok, despite a post over on WBAYDN indicating I’d order a Blind Pig, I decided to compare Pliny with DDH Pliny whilst at the brewery…

    [​IMG]
    Regular Pliny is obviously more clear, and perhaps due to this, seems darker, as the haze of DDH might be diffusing light. Regular Pliny has a better head and wins looks.

    On the nose, DDH is more tropical and floral, with a peachy edge that I don’t get in the regular. The regular smells like it will be a bit more bitter, maybe a tad more dank. We’re going push, here, though if needed as a tie-breaker, DDH gets the nod.

    Sipping, the DDH is only a tad softer, filling out just a bit better. That softness may be partially influenced by the more tropical floral hop notes that aren’t bringing as much bitterness, to be fair. There is more high end citrus notes in DDH - more from the center of the fruit than the rind, which shows up more in regular Pliny.

    On initial sips, DDH seemed to be punching along with regular. There was a bit more nuance, maybe more complexity, but it came at a cost I can’t quite explain. I’d hypothesize more old school IPA fans would go along with me on classic Coke Pliny, and new IPA fans might gravitate towards the DDH version.

    Anyone else has these together or separately and have an opinion?
     
    FRANKHAZE, ChicagoJ, Reef and 4 others like this.
  17. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Ok, so I decided to do another Narwhal tasting, using a 2024 and a 2022 version. I have done a comparison of this beer across the years a few times now, as have others. As I recall, I think two years is still okay for this beer, and then its age starts to show in slight, but negative ways for my palate. Going to re-test that idea, with the potential "benefit" of reducing my older bottles by one.
    [​IMG]

    On looks, the older beer isn't quite as forthcoming with the fizz and isn't as clingy, but beyond the very minor differences in those aspects, they are the same. There is a little bit of a spiciness in the newer version that I don't get in the older when I swirl and stick my nose in. The 2024 produces a somewhat sarsparilla note where the 2022 keeps pretty roasty, more dark roast coffee with no frills.

    On my first sip of the 2022, though, I get a flavor that reminds me of the nose of the 2024. It's much more earthy than spicy, but the flavor parallels the aroma. Funny enough, in the 2024, I kinda don't get it. There is a relatively, yet significantly, more piney bitterness in the 2024 that may be hiding it.

    Palate rest and cleanse with some water, and doing the 2024 first, it is leaning a bit more towards the earthy note, but still with a dose of hop "brightness" (again meant as a relative descriptor within this tasting). Because of this, I like the 2024 a little bit more. But what I really like, having gone back and forth for this tasting, I like a sip of 2022, followed by a swig of 2024.

    Hope everyone is having a good weekend (holiday version for the U.S. crowd). Cheers!
     
  18. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Did you consider making a cuvée (e.g., 50/50 blend) of the two beers?

    Cheers!
     
    ChicagoJ and cjgiant like this.
  19. cjgiant

    cjgiant Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,584) Jul 13, 2013 District of Columbia
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I considered it, but didn't do it.

    Buuuhhht...

    I only poured half the bottles for the comparison (the bottle-capper from my home brew days comes in handy at times), so I decided to give it a go.

    Using my bar tools, I poured 2oz each into a glass, and...

    It's been an hour since I did the review, but it works decently well. I get a bit more of the 2024 in the mix, but it is a good cuvée.
     
  20. bbtkd

    bbtkd Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,790) Sep 20, 2015 South Dakota
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    I bought a Sam Adams Utopias in 2023 and recently received a Free Will Dystopias from @Ozzylizard in a generous LIF box. I've reviewed each individually, but thought it would be interesting to do a side-by-side. Utopias is a 28% ABV American Strong Ale and the Dystopias is a 20.1% ABV American Strong Ale. I previously rated the Utopias 4.57 and rated the Dystopias 4.42. These are both still (non-carbonated) BA beers that are generally served warm, and the bottles don't need to be refrigerated. I don't recommend finishing either in one sitting.

    Both pour black, as shown in the picture, but Dystopias was black through the entire pour, and the Utopias was dark brown while being poured. Both leave an oily sheen on the glass, which is thicker and more persistent with Utopias. For aroma, both have a strong alcohol smell, plus chocolate and dark fruit, as well as sweetness. Utopias also has a wine aroma. Utopias has the stronger smell overall, which makes sense.

    They differ quite a bit on flavor. Alcohol steals the show for Utopias, with chocolate, dark fruit, and wine hiding behind it, and it has a strong alcohol burn, slight sweetness and slight bitterness. Dystopias has much less alcohol burn, allowing the chocolate and dark fruit to be tasted, and is sweeter than Utopias. They both benefit from arduously complex brewing, using many different barrels. Both are worth obtaining or trying if you have a chance. Dystopias costs about 1/6 as much as Utopias.

    And then I did it, I combined them for a cuvée. The strong alcohol smell and burn of Utopias is tamed, allowing the other aromas and flavors to come out. Overall, I prefer the Utopias but I probably should have scored them closer than I did. One big plus for Utopias is the cool bottle. After I die and am cremated, I'm requesting my ashes be stored in the Utopias bottle.

    [​IMG]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.