Butt Crack Brown
Klamath Basin Brewing Co. - The Creamery Brew Pub And Grill
- From:
- Klamath Basin Brewing Co. - The Creamery Brew Pub And Grill
- Oregon, United States
- Style:
- American Brown Ale
- ABV:
- 5.5%
- Score:
- +5 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 3.4 | pDev: 14.41%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 4
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Jun 03, 2013
- Added:
- Oct 04, 2005
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
NO SCORE
-
-
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by Inflames from California
3.52/5 rDev +3.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4
3.52/5 rDev +3.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4
I can sit down and drink this beer and get a little satisfaction from it's mild aroma and average flavor. But I don't because I find the pale,IPA and stout to be more enjoyable.
What I would suggest is they add a bit more special grains to bring out the chocolate and caramel. A touch more hops. I'm not sure what they are using now but maybe go fuggle or just step up their bittering additions.
I like browns a little more full flavored but if someone preferred a bit thinner version then I would suggest this libation. Thus the reason I gave it above average ratings. Not a bad brew just not something to get excited about.
Apr 21, 2010What I would suggest is they add a bit more special grains to bring out the chocolate and caramel. A touch more hops. I'm not sure what they are using now but maybe go fuggle or just step up their bittering additions.
I like browns a little more full flavored but if someone preferred a bit thinner version then I would suggest this libation. Thus the reason I gave it above average ratings. Not a bad brew just not something to get excited about.
Reviewed by Magpie14 from Michigan
2.81/5 rDev -17.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
2.81/5 rDev -17.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
A: looks like a brand new saddle, deep brown and a touch of red. Foam hugs the rim of the glass
S: malts and toasty caramel, smells kinda clean
T: syrupy sweet/caramel, just a hit of malts and really not much else. Lacking in complexity and taste. Strange, you drink this one, the taste hits you, then it is gone. It is rather clean, for what looks like a malt heavy beer...
M: medium bodied, rather smooth, carbonation nips at the tongue.
D: hmm, a nice sipper but after a while I felt like I was drinking nothing. I say try it and support local brews, but I was hoping for a bit more.
Oct 30, 2008S: malts and toasty caramel, smells kinda clean
T: syrupy sweet/caramel, just a hit of malts and really not much else. Lacking in complexity and taste. Strange, you drink this one, the taste hits you, then it is gone. It is rather clean, for what looks like a malt heavy beer...
M: medium bodied, rather smooth, carbonation nips at the tongue.
D: hmm, a nice sipper but after a while I felt like I was drinking nothing. I say try it and support local brews, but I was hoping for a bit more.
Reviewed by MisterClean from California
3.8/5 rDev +11.8%
look: 2 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
3.8/5 rDev +11.8%
look: 2 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
12 oz from WCBF judging
A - Pours dark brown, no head, light carbonation, no legs (duh). Should have more carbonation and head.
S - Nutty, roasted malts, and coriander. Nice recovery!
T - Nutty with roasted malts.
M - Could be slightly more viscousy, but very smooth.
D - I'd lie if I didn't say I was disappointed in the appearance and mouthfeel, but overall, tastes like a decent session beer.
May 29, 2008A - Pours dark brown, no head, light carbonation, no legs (duh). Should have more carbonation and head.
S - Nutty, roasted malts, and coriander. Nice recovery!
T - Nutty with roasted malts.
M - Could be slightly more viscousy, but very smooth.
D - I'd lie if I didn't say I was disappointed in the appearance and mouthfeel, but overall, tastes like a decent session beer.
Reviewed by RedDiamond from Oregon
2.85/5 rDev -16.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
2.85/5 rDev -16.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
It tastes
brown. How else to say it? The smell is distant and the taste is somewhat nondescript, or shall we say minimal or lacking definition? Any way its said, there are no problems inherent in this beer aside from the unglamorous name. Its lack of defining assets casts the beer adrift in the ambiguous realm between inspiration and offense, making for a routine ale of casual dimensions.
Oct 04, 2005
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!