Milly's Napoleon's Waterloo
Stark Brewing Company

- From:
- Stark Brewing Company
- New Hampshire, United States
- Style:
- Belgian Lambic
- ABV:
- 5%
- Score:
- +8 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 3.51 | pDev: 3.99%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 2
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Dec 18, 2007
- Added:
- Nov 08, 2006
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by barleywinebrewer from New Hampshire
3.37/5 rDev -4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
3.37/5 rDev -4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
Managed to get a couple of these bottles. It's been out for a while and I'm not sure how many are left. I've wanted to try this for some time but just haven't found the right opportunity.
A - crystal clear golden color with an inner swirl of red. No head or hint of carbonation whatsoever.
S - a nice brett inspired cherry sourness with an undertone of sour funk
T - mostly a light funk / sour combination. Acidity is low which makes this approachable.
M - light to medium in body, still, lightly funky with a residual tartness after each sip
D - sipped as presented, it was good. Throw some carbonation in there and this would go up.
Dec 18, 2007A - crystal clear golden color with an inner swirl of red. No head or hint of carbonation whatsoever.
S - a nice brett inspired cherry sourness with an undertone of sour funk
T - mostly a light funk / sour combination. Acidity is low which makes this approachable.
M - light to medium in body, still, lightly funky with a residual tartness after each sip
D - sipped as presented, it was good. Throw some carbonation in there and this would go up.
Reviewed by dherling from New Jersey
3.65/5 rDev +4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
3.65/5 rDev +4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
Had at the Belgian Beer festival. Notes say this is a wild ale aged a yeard in oak with two different Belgiant yeast strains, Brettanomyces and additional sugars. Sounds like a lot of work. If not pleasent, the nose was at least interesting, some spice, some malt, some sourness to it, short of anything close to a lambic, but still slightly sour. Taste was a little better and more balanced than the nose. Mouthfeel was good, crisp, finished clean with slight lingering spice.
Nov 08, 2006
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!