Pale Ale
Triumph Brewing Company

Beer Geek Stats
From:
Triumph Brewing Company
 
New Jersey, United States
Style:
American Pale Ale
ABV:
Not listed
Score:
+1 rating needed
Avg:
3.6 | pDev: 17.5%
Ratings:
9 | reviews: 5
Status:
Retired
Rated:
Jun 16, 2019
Added:
Aug 25, 2003
Wants:
  0
Gots:
  1
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
 
Rated: 3.78 by Yeroc from Pennsylvania

Jun 16, 2019
 
Rated: 3.81 by JoshuaWilkins-38 from Tennessee

Jun 07, 2016
 
Rated: 3.52 by Tomhawk57

Sep 17, 2014
 
Rated: 3.5 by acurtis from New Jersey

Feb 10, 2013
Photo of orfeu
Reviewed by orfeu from New Mexico

4.28/5  rDev +18.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5
The more real ales I try, the more I grow to love that way of conditioning and serving beer. Triumph's cask pale ale in Princeton arrives a deep, clear copper with a perfect 1/2" ecru foam cap. The nose is slight, with grapefruit blossoms and bready malt notes. The taste is not overpowering either, but that is an asset: Biscuty malts support mellow citrus and pine-spice flavors. The mouth feel is nearly perfect, creamy and smooth with just a slight carbonated feel and a medium-light body. Paradigmatic of a sessionable ale. Nice.
Jun 24, 2006
Photo of NJpadreFan
Reviewed by NJpadreFan from New Jersey

2.12/5  rDev -41.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
Triumph- Pale Ale

-New Hope-

Appearance- light murky brown with no head.
Smell- dirty and earthy!? Slight toffee malt detected.
Taste- earthy mossy hops with a touch of sour malt. Metallic flavor and bitterness.
Mouthfeel- metallic bitterness and just quite bad.

Overall- what happened here?! I was expecting a floral/ citrus flavored Pale Ale. This was from the hand pump. Bad Pale Ale. Good thing their Hefe is a reliable beer.
May 21, 2006
Photo of PartyHatjo
Reviewed by PartyHatjo from Ohio

4.2/5  rDev +16.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
So far, this is my second favorite beer Triumph makes. They should replace the Bengal Gold on the permanent beer list. It's a good light gold in color, with a white head that laces alright (probably would have better lacing in a non-bar glass). The taste is slightly malty, with a good hop "grassiness" to it. Overall it's a very smooth beer and second only to Triumph's Golden Double Bock (it makes it's official debut on February 4th!) as far as beers I've had at Triumph.
Jan 27, 2004
Photo of NeroFiddled
Reviewed by NeroFiddled from Pennsylvania

4.1/5  rDev +13.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5
A clear, deep-amber body is capped by a frothy white head of foam that dwindles to a thin surface covering and leaves some thin but attractive streaks of lace about the glass. The nose offers some delicately floral and citrusy hops atop a caramel-streaked biscuity malt. The body is medium, and it's gently crisp in the mouth due to its very fine, median carbonation of about 2.4 volumes CO2/liter. The flavor mirrors the aroma with an exceptionally well-balanced character. The floral and citrusy hops enhance its malt component, but don't stray beyind that point; and it's lightly caramelish biscuit malt is backed by a firm but pliable bitterness that anchors everything while at the same time allowing each of the characteristics to shine on their own at one point or another. It finishes dry but with a subtle reminder of the citrusy and floral hop soaked malt. Exceptionally well-balanced. Far from over-done. Quite drinkable.
Sep 29, 2003
Photo of yen157
Reviewed by yen157 from New Jersey

3.11/5  rDev -13.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
It had a medium-frothy, cream colored head on top of the orange-amber body. Firm bitterness that lingered will into the finish. Medium body bolstered by pale malt. Metallic retro nasal aftertaste. Unspectacular, but better than their IPA. This was my second beer of the lunch and my last. I hope they find their groove and make some better stuff.
Aug 25, 2003